Post-trial access in implanted neural device research: Device maintenance, abandonment, and cost.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trial participants who benefit from experimental neural devices for the treatment of debilitating and otherwise treatment-resistant conditions are generally not ensured continued access to effective therapy or maintenance of devices at the conclusion of trials. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Post-trial obligations have been extensively examined in the context of drug trials, but there has been little empirical examination of stakeholder perspectives regarding these obligations in the rapidly growing field of neural device research. METHODS: This study examined the perspectives of 44 stakeholders (i.e., 23 researchers and 21 patient-participants) involved in implantable neural device trials. RESULTS: Researchers were concerned about current post-trial management, identified barriers like cost, and suggested ways to improve the system. Many patient-participants were unaware of whether they would have post-trial access, but most thought they should keep devices if beneficial, and agreed with researchers that more should be done to help them keep and maintain these neural devices. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first in-depth examination of researcher perspectives regarding continued access to experimental neural devices and only the second such examination of patient-participant perspectives. These data can help inform future ethical and policy decisions about post-trial access to implantable neurotechnology.

Geospatial Analysis of Persons with Movement Disorders Living in Underserved Regions.

Background: Movement disorders persons from underserved areas have increased barriers to access tertiary care. There is currently limited data on the geographic and demographic profile of movement disorders persons from underserved areas. Methods: A retrospective chart review of the geographic and demographic profile of consecutive cases seen between 2002-2017 at the University of Florida Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases (UF-NFIND) was performed. Information collected included age, sex, diagnosis, zip code, treatment received, and insurance information. The distances between each person's home residence and the nearest movement disorders center of excellence (MDC) as well as the distance to the UF-NFIND were calculated using ArcGIS 10.3. Results: A total of 5.2% (355/6867) of the sample population were identified as a Medicaid/self-pay population and classified as underserved. The most common diagnoses were tic disorder (19.2%), dystonia (18.3%), and Parkinson's disease (14.3%). In underserved persons, the median distances from their homes to the UF-NFIND (82.19 [45.79-176.93] km) vs. their nearest MDC (63.34 [26.91-121.43] km) were significantly different (p < 0.001). Discussion: Underserved persons in our study travelled further to receive subspecialty care at UF-NFIND than closer MDCs. Potential reasons for underutilization of closer care could possibly include research opportunities, availability of specific treatments or procedures, insurance restrictions, and limited specialist availability. Despite this observation, underserved persons were underrepresented at our institution compared to the proportion of Medicaid/uninsured patients in Florida. Our results highlight the need for increased awareness of care options for underserved movement disorders populations.

Home Health Management of Parkinson Disease Deep Brain Stimulation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The travel required to receive deep brain stimulation (DBS) programming causes substantial burden on patients and limits who can access DBS therapy. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of home health DBS postoperative management in an effort to reduce travel burden and improve access. Design, Settings, and Participants: This open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted at University of Florida Health from November 2017 to April 2020. Eligible participants had a diagnosis of Parkinson disease (PD) and were scheduled to receive DBS independently of the study. Consenting participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either standard of care or home health postoperative DBS management for 6 months after surgery. Primary caregivers, usually spouses, were also enrolled to assess caregiver strain. Interventions: The home health postoperative management was conducted by a home health nurse who chose DBS settings with the aid of the iPad-based Mobile Application for PD DBS system. Prior to the study, the home health nurse had no experience providing DBS care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the number of times each patient traveled to the movement disorders clinic during the study period. Secondary outcomes included changes from baseline on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III. Results: Approximately 75 patients per year were scheduled for DBS. Of the patients who met inclusion criteria over the entire study duration, 45 either declined or were excluded for various reasons. Of the 44 patients enrolled, 19 of 21 randomized patients receiving the standard of care (mean [SD] age, 64.1 [10.0] years; 11 men) and 23 of 23 randomized patients receiving home health who underwent a minimum of 1 postoperative management visit (mean [SD] age, 65.0 [10.9] years; 13 men) were included in analysis. The primary outcome revealed that patients randomized to home health had significantly fewer clinic visits than the patients in the standard of care arm (mean [SD], 0.4 [0.8] visits vs 4.8 [0.4] visits; P < .001). We found no significant differences between the groups in the secondary outcomes measuring the efficacy of DBS. No adverse events occurred in association with the study procedure or devices. Conclusions and Relevance: This study provides evidence supporting the safety and feasibility of postoperative home health DBS management. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02474459.

Comparative pharmacovigilance assessment of mortality with pimavanserin in Parkinson disease-related psychosis.

BACKGROUND: Pimavanserin is approved for treatment of Parkinson disease (PD)-related psychosis, but its use has been associated with an increased risk of death during clinical trials, as well as during postmarketing surveillance. Previous reports on the association between pimavanserin and mortality have not taken into account limitations of data sources nor included comparable populations or comparisons to relevant treatment alternatives. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a comparative pharmacovigilance assessment of pimavanserin vs treatment alternatives and by restricting surveillance data to more representative populations. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of adverse event case reports submitted to the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2016 through 2019 quarter 3 (Q3). FAERS data are collected from the full population, were further restricted to only those with PD, and were based on PD medication use. Reports were assessed for exposure to pimavanserin, clozapine, quetiapine, haloperidol, and other atypical antipsychotics. The outcome of interest was all-cause death. A proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and 95% confidence limits were calculated for each 2 by 2 contingency of outcome (death) and exposure (pimavanserin and others). For each outcome/exposure pair, the baseline population was altered to include the full FAERS sample, only reports with PD, reports with PD treated with levodopa, and reports with PD treated with multiple PD medications. The sample was also stratified by time period before April 2018 and after September 2018 to capture periods of public knowledge and federal response. A lower 95% CI (Lower95CI) ≥ 2 for the PRR was considered as the accepted threshold for a drug safety signal. RESULTS: As of 2019 Q3, there were 2,287 reports of death associated with pimavanserin. Compared within the full FAERS base population, pimavanserin yielded a PRR Lower95CI = 2.08 but was smaller when restricted to comparison among only a base population with PD (Lower95CI = 1.09), PD treated with levodopa (Lower95CI = 1.15), or PD treated with multiple PD medications (Lower95CI = 1.63). Metrics for quetiapine, clozapine, and other atypical antipsychotics were similar in magnitude. Stratification by time showed a possible reporting bias associated with pimavanserin, since no safety signal was detected before April 2018; however, a signal was present thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: Compared in context with treatment alternatives for patients with PD, pimavanserin was not associated with excess reports of death in the FAERS data. This information should be used in shared decision making between physicians and PD patients to balance the risks and benefits of pimavanserin and other treatments for PD psychosis. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. The authors report no disclosures or conflicts of interest relevant to this study. Armstrong receives research support from the NIA (P30AG047266, R01AG068128) and the Florida Department of Health (grant 20A08). She is the local principal investigator of a Lewy Body Dementia Association Research Center of Excellence. She also receives compensation from the American Academy of Neurology for work as an evidence-based medicine methodology consultant. She is on the level of evidence editorial board for Neurology and related publications (uncompensated), receives publishing royalties for Parkinson's Disease: Improving Patient Care (Oxford University Press, 2014), and has received an honorarium for presenting for Medscape CME in 2018. Okun serves as a consultant for the Parkinson's Foundation and has received research grants from NIH, Parkinson's Foundation, the Michael J. Fox Foundation, the Parkinson Alliance, Smallwood Foundation, the Bachmann-Strauss Foundation, the Tourette Syndrome Association, and the UF Foundation. Okun has participated as a site principal investigator and/or co-investigator for several NIH-, foundation-, and industry-sponsored trials over the years but has not received honoraria. Malaty has participated in research funded by the Parkinson Foundation, Tourette Association, Dystonia Coalition, Abbvie, Boston Scientific, Eli Lilly, Neuroderm, Pfizer, Revance, and Teva. She has received travel compensation and/or honoraria from the Tourette Association of America, NeuroChallenge Foundation and NIH/Neurobiology of Disease in Children, Parkinson Foundation, Medscape, International Association of Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, and Cleveland Clinic, and royalties from Robert Rose publishers. The other authors have no disclosures.

Coexistent Osteoarthritis and Parkinson's Disease: Data from the Parkinson's Foundation Outcomes Project.

BACKGROUND: The impact of concurrent osteoarthritis on mobility and mortality in individuals with Parkinson's disease is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand to what extent osteoarthritis severity influenced mobility across time and how osteoarthritis severity could affect mortality in individuals with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: In a retrospective observational longitudinal study, data from the Parkinson's Foundation Quality Improvement Initiative was analyzed. We included 2,274 persons with Parkinson's disease. The main outcomes were the effects of osteoarthritis severity on functional mobility and mortality. The Timed Up and Go test measured functional mobility performance. Mortality was measured as the osteoarthritis group effect on survival time in years. RESULTS: More individuals with symptomatic osteoarthritis reported at least monthly falls compared to the other groups (14.5% vs. 7.2% without reported osteoarthritis and 8.4% asymptomatic/minimal osteoarthritis, p = 0.0004). The symptomatic group contained significantly more individuals with low functional mobility (TUG≥12 seconds) at baseline (51.5% vs. 29.0% and 36.1%, p < 0.0001). The odds of having low functional mobility for individuals with symptomatic osteoarthritis was 1.63 times compared to those without reported osteoarthritis (p < 0.0004); and was 1.57 times compared to those with asymptomatic/minimal osteoarthritis (p = 0.0026) after controlling pre-specified covariates. Similar results hold at the time of follow-up while changes in functional mobility were not significant across groups, suggesting that osteoarthritis likely does not accelerate the changes in functional mobility across time. Coexisting symptomatic osteoarthritis and Parkinson's disease seem to additively increase the risk of mortality (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the impact and potential additive effects of symptomatic osteoarthritis in persons with Parkinson's disease.

Recommendations for the Organization of Multidisciplinary Clinical Care Teams in Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Optimal management in expert centers for Parkinson's disease (PD) usually involves pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, delivered by a multidisciplinary approach. However, there is no guideline specifying how this model should be organized. Consequently, the nature of multidisciplinary care varies widely. OBJECTIVE: To optimize care delivery, we aimed to provide recommendations for the organization of multidisciplinary care in PD. METHODS: Twenty expert centers in the field of multidisciplinary PD care participated. Their leading neurologists completed a survey covering eight themes: elements for optimal multidisciplinary care; team members; role of patients and care partners; team coordination; team meetings; inpatient versus outpatient care; telehealth; and challenges towards multidisciplinary care. During a consensus meeting, outcomes were incorporated into concept recommendations that were reviewed by each center's multidisciplinary team. Three patient organizations rated the recommendations according to patient priorities. Based on this feedback, a final set of recommendations (essential elements for delivery of multidisciplinary care) and considerations (desirable elements) was developed. RESULTS: We developed 30 recommendations and 10 considerations. The patient organizations rated the following recommendations as most important: care is organized in a patient-centered way; every newly diagnosed patient has access to a core multidisciplinary team; and each team has a coordinator. A checklist was created to further facilitate its implementation. CONCLUSION: We provide a practical tool to improve multidisciplinary care for persons with PD at the organizational level. Future studies should focus on implementing these recommendations in clinical practice, evaluating their potential applicability and effectiveness, and comparing alternative models of PD care.

Multimodal neuroimaging and behavioral assessment of α-synuclein polymorphism rs356219 in older adults.

The single-nucleotide polymorphism rs356219 in the α-synuclein (SNCA) gene has been shown to significantly contribute to an earlier age at onset of Parkinson's disease (PD), and regulates SNCA expression in PD brain regions, blood, and plasma. Here, we used multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to study healthy adults with and without the rs356219 risk genotype. Motor and cognitive tests were administered, and all participants underwent functional and structural MRI. Imaging analyses included (1) task-based functional MRI; (2) task-based functional connectivity; (3) free-water diffusion MRI of the substantia nigra; (4) voxel-based morphometry; and (5) surface-based morphometry. There were no differences between the 2 groups in motor and cognitive performance, or brain structure. However, carrying a PD risk variant was associated with reduced functional activity in the posterior putamen and primary motor cortex. Moreover, the posterior putamen had reduced functional connectivity with the motor cortex during motor control in those with a risk genotype compared to those without. These findings point to functional abnormalities in the striatocortical circuit of rs356219 risk genotype carriers.

Hospitalization and rehospitalization in Parkinson disease patients: Data from the National Parkinson Foundation Centers of Excellence.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Parkinson disease (PD) are at high risk of hospital encounters with increasing morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to determine the rate of hospital encounters in a cohort followed over 5 years and to identify associated factors. METHODS: We queried the data from the International Multicenter National Parkinson Foundation Quality Improvement study. Multivariate logistic regression with backward selection was performed to identify factors associated with hospital encounter prior to baseline visit. Kaplan-Meier estimates were obtained and Cox regression performed on time to hospital encounter after the baseline visit. RESULTS: Of the 7,507 PD patients (mean age 66.5±9.9 years and disease duration 8.9±6.4 years at baseline visit), 1919 (25.6%) had a history of a hospital encounter prior to their baseline visit. Significant factors associated with a history of a hospital encounter prior to baseline included race (white race: OR 0.49), utilization of physical therapy (OR 1.47), history of deep brain stimulation (OR 1.87), number of comorbidities (OR 1.30), caregiver strain (OR 1.17 per standard deviation), and the standardized Timed Up and Go Test (OR 1.21). Patients with a history of hospitalization prior to the baseline were more likely to have a re-hospitalization (HR1.67, P<0.0001) compared to those without a prior hospitalization. In addition, the time to hospital encounter from baseline was significantly associated with age and number of medications. In patients with a history of hospitalization prior to the baseline visit, time to a second hospital encounter was significantly associated with caregiver strain and number of comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Hospitalization and re-hospitalization were common in this cohort of people with PD. Our results suggest addressing caregiver burden, simplifying medications, and emphasizing primary and multidisciplinary care for comorbidities are potential avenues to explore for reducing hospitalization rates.

Evolving Applications, Technological Challenges and Future Opportunities in Neuromodulation: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank.

The annual Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Think Tank provides a focal opportunity for a multidisciplinary ensemble of experts in the field of neuromodulation to discuss advancements and forthcoming opportunities and challenges in the field. The proceedings of the fifth Think Tank summarize progress in neuromodulation neurotechnology and techniques for the treatment of a range of neuropsychiatric conditions including Parkinson's disease, dystonia, essential tremor, Tourette syndrome, obsessive compulsive disorder, epilepsy and cognitive, and motor disorders. Each section of this overview of the meeting provides insight to the critical elements of discussion, current challenges, and identified future directions of scientific and technological development and application. The report addresses key issues in developing, and emphasizes major innovations that have occurred during the past year. Specifically, this year's meeting focused on technical developments in DBS, design considerations for DBS electrodes, improved sensors, neuronal signal processing, advancements in development and uses of responsive DBS (closed-loop systems), updates on National Institutes of Health and DARPA DBS programs of the BRAIN initiative, and neuroethical and policy issues arising in and from DBS research and applications in practice.

Barriers to investigator-initiated deep brain stimulation and device research.

The success of device-based research in the clinical neurosciences has overshadowed a critical and emerging problem in the biomedical research environment in the United States. Neuroprosthetic devices, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), have been shown in humans to be promising technologies for scientific exploration of neural pathways and as powerful treatments. Large device companies have, over the past several decades, funded and developed major research programs. However, both the structure of clinical trial funding and the current regulation of device research threaten investigator-initiated efforts in neurologic disorders. The current atmosphere dissuades clinical investigators from pursuing formal and prospective research with novel devices or novel indications. We review our experience in conducting a federally funded, investigator-initiated, device-based clinical trial that utilized DBS for thalamic pain syndrome. We also explore barriers that clinical investigators face in conducting device-based clinical trials, particularly in early-stage studies or small disease populations. We discuss 5 specific areas for potential reform and integration: (1) alternative pathways for device approval; (2) eliminating right of reference requirements; (3) combining federal grant awards with regulatory approval; (4) consolidation of oversight for human subjects research; and (5) private insurance coverage for clinical trials. Careful reformulation of regulatory policy and funding mechanisms is critical for expanding investigator-initiated device research, which has great potential to benefit science, industry, and, most importantly, patients.

Deep brain stimulation may improve quality of life in people with Parkinson's disease without affecting caregiver burden.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the influence of deep brain stimulation (DBS) on caregiver burden and quality of life in Parkinson's disease. METHODS: A cross-sectional retrospective study utilizing the National Parkinson Foundation Quality Improvement Initiative clinical study was conducted. A group of 275 patients who had undergone DBS for Parkinson's disease were extracted from 2916 subjects who were included in this data base. The data were compared to an age, sex, and disease severity matched control group. A secondary analysis was then performed on two more control groups that were matched to account for presence or absence of motor fluctuations. The multidimensional caregiver strain index and Parkinson's disease quality-of-life questionnaire 39 summary index were compared. RESULTS: The multidimensional caregiver strain index did not differ between the DBS group (16.9 ± 11.8) and a matched non-DBS group (16.1 ± 17.6, p = 0.618). The quality-of-life index was, however, significantly better in the DBS group (28.9 ± 15.6) than in the non-DBS group (32.3 ± 17.6, p = 0.034). A secondary analysis revealed that the total caregiver strain score was lower in the no motor fluctuation control group than the other two groups (p < 0.05). Regression analysis revealed significant relationships between the quality-of-life index and caregiver strain index total scores (p < 0.001), between caregiver strain index total score and age at surgery (p = 0.027), and also between the interval since surgery (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were several limitations to this study, DBS seems to improve quality of life without significantly increasing caregiver burden.

High rates and the risk factors for emergency room visits and hospitalization in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) patients are hospitalized more frequently than their peers as a result of falls, psychosis, infections and other medical complications. However, patient-specific risk factors for hospitalization are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To identify rates and risk factors for hospital encounters (Emergency Room [ER] visits or hospitalization) among people with PD. METHODS: 3415 PD participants (mean age 67 ± 10 years, disease duration 9 ± 6 years, H&Y 2 47%, H&Y 3 26%) enrolled in the prospective international multicenter NPF-QII Study. One-year follow-up data was available for 1030 patients. Rates and risk factors for hospital encounters were determined at baseline and after one year follow-up. RESULTS: Of 3415 PD participants at study entry, 1120 (33%) reported at least one hospital encounter. Associations were: longer timed up-and-go test (OR: 1.33), increased comorbidities (OR: 1.25), motor fluctuations (OR: 1.32), and deep brain stimulation (DBS) (OR: 2.49). Of these 1120 persons, 311 had follow-up data and 158 (51%) had a repeat encounter one year later, associated with higher H&Y stage, fluctuations, and lower health-related quality-of-life. Of 2295 participants without a hospital encounter at baseline, 719 had follow-up data and 178 (25%) had a first hospital encounter one year later. Risk factors were female gender, comorbidities, lower cognition, fluctuations, and DBS. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of people with PD had a hospital encounter each year, and one-half of those had a repeat encounter. These high rates correlated with disease severity, comorbidities and DBS. There is an urgent need to develop programs to reduce PD hospital encounters.

What are the issues facing Parkinson's disease patients at ten years of disease and beyond? Data from the NPF-QII study.

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative syndrome, classically characterized by levodopa-responsive motor features accompanied by non-motor mood, cognitive, sensory and autonomic issues. Over time, disease burden slowly accumulates resulting in diminished health status. Many clinicians consider the 10 year disease duration mark as significant, however the clinical status and health-related quality of life of patients reaching this milestone have not been well documented. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed on PD patients with ≥ 10 years disease duration (PD-10) (n = 1835) included in the multicenter National Parkinson's Foundation Quality Improvement Initiative (NPF-QII). Demographic, clinical and health-related quality of life data was analyzed. RESULTS: PD-10 patients (62.2% male) had a mean age of 67.8 years (± 9.5) with a mean age of PD onset of 52.7 years (± 10.6), and median disease duration 14.3 years (interquartile range 11.5-18.1). Many were minimally disabled with Hoehn and Yahr stage 1 or 2 (44.0%) or experiencing postural instability (HY stage 3, 40.3%). Most (88.2%) were able to stand unaided, but falls were common (54.8%). Almost all were living at home (93.1%) with a family member as a regular caregiver (83.8%). PD-10 patients had an average of 1.9 (± 1.4) co-morbidities, with arthritis (48.9%) and heart problems (31.7%) most commonly encountered. The majority (86.7%) took at least 2 medications: levodopa (95.7%), dopamine agonists (45.6%) and antidepressants (37.3%) were most commonly recorded. Most PD-10 patients were not currently utilizing physical, occupational or speech therapy, although two-thirds reported engaging in physical activity. Deep brain stimulation was documented in 22.4%. Overall the mean health-related quality of life and caregiver burden was impaired in all domains. CONCLUSIONS: Our data on PD patients with at least 10 years disease duration confirmed the younger age of onset of PD, but not the higher proportion of females or rest tremor, or the lower proportion of Caucasians seen in other aged PD cohorts. PD-10 patients had increased disease burden, increased caregiver burden, and impaired health-related quality of life. Although subjects mostly remained independently mobile, balance could be impaired with frequent falls identified. The prevalence of PD-10 patients living at home (93%) was very high in our sample which was drawn from specialty clinics, compared to prior studies reporting up to 27% PD patients institutionalized at 10 years duration. Thus policies to improve in-home support and caregiver support will be crucial in efforts aimed at maintaining patients in a home setting.

The Frequency of Nonmotor Symptoms among Advanced Parkinson Patients May Depend on Instrument Used for Assessment.

Background. Nonmotor symptoms (NMS) of Parkinson's disease (PD) may be more debilitating than motor symptoms. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and corecognition of NMS among our advanced PD cohort (patients considered for deep brain stimulation (DBS)) and caregivers. Methods. NMS-Questionnaire (NMS-Q), a self-administered screening questionnaire, and NMS Assessment-Scale (NMS-S), a clinician-administered scale, were administered to PD patients and caregivers. Results. We enrolled 33 PD patients (23 males, 10 females) and caregivers. The most frequent NMS among patients using NMS-Q were gastrointestinal (87.9%), sleep (84.9%), and urinary (72.7%), while the most frequent symptoms using NMS-S were sleep (90.9%), gastrointestinal (75.8%), and mood (75.8%). Patient/caregiver scoring correlations for NMS-Q and NMS-S were 0.670 (P < 0.0001) and 0.527 (P = 0.0016), respectively. Conclusion The frequency of NMS among advanced PD patients and correlation between patients and caregivers varied with the instrument used. The overall correlation between patient and caregiver was greater with NMS-Q than NMS-S.

Hospitalization in Parkinson disease: a survey of National Parkinson Foundation Centers.

OBJECTIVES: To explore current practices and opinions regarding hospital management of Parkinson disease (PD) patients in specialized PD Centers. METHODS: Fifty-one out of 54 National Parkinson Foundation (NPF) Centers worldwide completed an online survey regarding hospitalization of PD patients. RESULTS: Many Centers were concerned about the quality of PD-specific care provided to their patients when hospitalized. Primary concerns were adherence to the outpatient medication schedule and poor understanding by hospital staff of medications that worsen PD. Few Centers had a policy with their primary hospital that notified them when their patients were admitted. Rather, notification of hospitalization came often from the patient or a family member. Several Centers (29%) reported not finding out about a hospitalization until a routine clinic visit after discharge. Quick access to outpatient PD care following discharge was a problem in many Centers. Elective surgery, fall/fracture, infection, and mental status changes, were identified as common reasons for hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: There is a perceived need for PD specialists to be involved during hospitalization of their patients. Improvement in communication between hospitals and PD Centers is necessary so that hospital clinicians can take advantage of PD specialists' expertise. Education of hospital staff and clinicians regarding management of PD, complications of PD, and medications to avoid in PD is critical. Most importantly, outpatient access to PD specialists needs to be improved, which may prevent unnecessary hospitalizations in these patients.

Clock drawing in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment: recommendations for dementia assessment.

BACKGROUND: Clock drawing is part of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test but may have administration and scoring limitations. We assessed (1) the reliability of the MoCA clock criteria relative to a published error scoring approach, (2) whether command-only administration could distinguish dementia from cognitively intact individuals and (3) the value of adding a clock copy condition to the MoCA. METHODS: Three novice raters and clocks from dementia and control participants were used to assess the 3 aims. RESULTS: MoCA interrater and intrarater reliability were low (i.e. intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.12-0.31) and required repeat training. Clocks drawn to command classified dementia at chance. Inclusion of a copy condition demonstrated expected dementia subgroup patterns. CONCLUSION: Reliable clock scoring with MoCA criteria requires practice. Supplementing a clock copy to the standard MoCA test (takes <1 min) will improve dementia assessment.

Generic versus branded pharmacotherapy in Parkinson's disease: does it matter? A review.

There is an ongoing debate about generic drug use for a multitude of conditions including epilepsy, psychosis, hypertension, post-organ transplantation, and several infectious diseases. Most of the concerns involve drugs with narrow therapeutic indices. There is a heightened attention to health care costs and macroeconomic policy as well as microeconomic business decisions that may impact the use of generic drugs. The issues surrounding generic substitution for chronic degenerative conditions such as in Parkinson's disease (PD) continue to be controversial subjects for physicians, pharmacists, patients, Medicare/governmental insurance programs, and for private insurance companies. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires that generic drugs meet a standard for bioequivalence prior to market approval, but this may not translate to therapeutic efficacy or to overall patient tolerance. In this review we will address issues related to the use of generics versus branded drugs in PD, and the potential impact substitution of generics may have on patients and on clinicians. Having proper documentation may help in deciding the appropriate usage of these drugs in PD. Medicare, governmental run health care systems, and third party insurance companies should in a complex disease such as PD, allow physicians and patients the chance to properly document the superiority of brand versus generic approaches. Currently, in the U.S, and in many countries around the world, there is no obligation for payers to respect these types of patient specific bedside trials, and there has been no standardization of the process.

Nanoplatforms for constructing new approaches to cancer treatment, imaging, and drug delivery: what should be the policy?

Nanotechnology is the design and assembly of submicroscopic devices called nanoparticles, which are 1-100 nm in diameter. Nanomedicine is the application of nanotechnology for the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Disease-specific receptors on the surface of cells provide useful targets for nanoparticles. Because nanoparticles can be engineered from components that (1) recognize disease at the cellular level, (2) are visible on imaging studies, and (3) deliver therapeutic compounds, nanotechnology is well suited for the diagnosis and treatment of a variety of diseases. Nanotechnology will enable earlier detection and treatment of diseases that are best treated in their initial stages, such as cancer. Advances in nanotechnology will also spur the discovery of new methods for delivery of therapeutic compounds, including genes and proteins, to diseased tissue. A myriad of nanostructured drugs with effective site-targeting can be developed by combining a diverse selection of targeting, diagnostic, and therapeutic components. Incorporating immune target specificity with nanostructures introduces a new type of treatment modality, nano-immunochemotherapy, for patients with cancer. In this review, we will discuss the development and potential applications of nanoscale platforms in medical diagnosis and treatment. To impact the care of patients with neurological diseases, advances in nanotechnology will require accelerated translation to the fields of brain mapping, CNS imaging, and nanoneurosurgery. Advances in nanoplatform, nano-imaging, and nano-drug delivery will drive the future development of nanomedicine, personalized medicine, and targeted therapy. We believe that the formation of a science, technology, medicine law-healthcare policy (STML) hub/center, which encourages collaboration among universities, medical centers, US government, industry, patient advocacy groups, charitable foundations, and philanthropists, could significantly facilitate such advancements and contribute to the translation of nanotechnology across medical disciplines.

Management of the hospitalized patient with Parkinson's disease: current state of the field and need for guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature and to identify practice gaps in the management of the hospitalized Parkinson's disease (PD) patient. BACKGROUND: Patients with PD are admitted to hospitals at higher rates, and frequently have longer hospital stays than the general population. Little is known about outpatient interventions that might reduce the need for hospitalization and also reduce hospital-related complications. METHODS: A literature review was performed on PubMed about hospitalization and PD between 1970 and 2010. In addition, in press peer-reviewed papers or published abstracts known to the authors were included. Information was reviewed by a National Parkinson Foundation workgroup and a narrative review article was generated. RESULTS: Motor disturbances in PD are believed to be a causal factor in the higher rates of admissions and complications. However, other conditions are commonly recorded as the primary reason for hospitalization including motor complications, reduced mobility, lack of compliance, inappropriate use of neuroleptics, falls, fractures, pneumonia, and other important medical problems. There are many relevant issues related to hospitalization in PD. Medications, dosages and specific dosage schedules are critical. Staff training regarding medications and medication management may help to avoid complications, particularly those related to reduced mobility, and aspiration pneumonia. Treatment of infections and a return to early mobility is also critical to management. CONCLUSIONS: Educational programs, recommendations, and guidelines are needed to better train interdisciplinary teams in the management of the PD patient. These initiatives have the potential for both cost savings and improved outcomes from a preventative and a hospital management standpoint.