HIV-positive patients presenting with peripheral blood cytopenias: is bone marrow assessment a priority?

ABSTRACT Introduction: Hematologic abnormalities are frequent among persons living with HIV (PLWH). The bone marrow aspirate (BMA) and biopsy (BMB) are commonly performed in the diagnostic approach of patients with unexplained cytopenias. Changes in antiretrovirals, supportive therapy and increased life expectancy have modified the distribution and etiology of cytopenias, questioning their use. Our aim was to analyze the diagnostic yield of BMA, BMB and marrow cultures for the evaluation of cytopenias in PLWH. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of ≥ 18-year-old PLWH undergoing bone marrow assessment (MA) for the evaluation of cytopenias between January 2002 and December 2015. Results: A total of 236 cytopenic events were analyzed, 47.9% being PLWH who had a longstanding diagnosis (≥ 1 year). Adherence to antiretrovirals was 63.5%. Anemia was seen in 91.9% and pancytopenia in 39%. Common presentations included fever (52.1%), weight loss (42.8%) and adenopathies (28.8%). Median days from detection to MA was 5 (0 - 63 days). Most common etiologies were non-HIV infectious diseases (31.4%) and benign/malignant hematologic diseases (26.3%). The diagnostic yield was 16.1% for BMA, 20.3% for BMB, 30.5% for both and 35.6% when cultures were added. Patients most likely to have conclusive MA were those with moderate/severe thrombocytopenia (p = 0.007). Fever, splenomegaly, and low CD4+ counts were associated with infectious etiologies, while hematologic diagnoses were related to the presence of adenopathies. Conclusion: As a minimally invasive intervention, the MA has a high yield for identifying the etiology of cytopenic events in PLWH, being conclusive in one in three patients. Early performance could lead to prompt diagnosis and timely therapy initiation.

HIV-positive patients presenting with peripheral blood cytopenias: is bone marrow assessment a priority?

INTRODUCTION: Hematologic abnormalities are frequent among persons living with HIV (PLWH). The bone marrow aspirate (BMA) and biopsy (BMB) are commonly performed in the diagnostic approach of patients with unexplained cytopenias. Changes in antiretrovirals, supportive therapy and increased life expectancy have modified the distribution and etiology of cytopenias, questioning their use. Our aim was to analyze the diagnostic yield of BMA, BMB and marrow cultures for the evaluation of cytopenias in PLWH. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort of ≥ 18-year-old PLWH undergoing bone marrow assessment (MA) for the evaluation of cytopenias between January 2002 and December 2015. RESULTS: A total of 236 cytopenic events were analyzed, 47.9% being PLWH who had a longstanding diagnosis (≥ 1 year). Adherence to antiretrovirals was 63.5%. Anemia was seen in 91.9% and pancytopenia in 39%. Common presentations included fever (52.1%), weight loss (42.8%) and adenopathies (28.8%). Median days from detection to MA was 5 (0 - 63 days). Most common etiologies were non-HIV infectious diseases (31.4%) and benign/malignant hematologic diseases (26.3%). The diagnostic yield was 16.1% for BMA, 20.3% for BMB, 30.5% for both and 35.6% when cultures were added. Patients most likely to have conclusive MA were those with moderate/severe thrombocytopenia (p = 0.007). Fever, splenomegaly, and low CD4+ counts were associated with infectious etiologies, while hematologic diagnoses were related to the presence of adenopathies. CONCLUSION: As a minimally invasive intervention, the MA has a high yield for identifying the etiology of cytopenic events in PLWH, being conclusive in one in three patients. Early performance could lead to prompt diagnosis and timely therapy initiation.

Transplant trends in Mexico during the COVID-19 pandemic: Disparities within healthcare sectors.

Healthcare systems worldwide were challenged during the COVID-19 pandemic. In Mexico, the public hospitals that perform most transplants were adapted to provide care for COVID-19 patients. Using a nationwide database, we describe the first report of the impact of COVID-19 and related transplantation healthcare policies in a middle-income country by comparing statistics before and during the pandemic (pre-COVID: March 2019-February 2020 vs. COVID era: March 2020-February 2021) and by type of institution (public vs. private). The global reduction in transplantation was higher in public institutions compared with private institutions, 89% versus 62%, respectively, p < .001. When analyzing by organ, kidney transplantation decreased by 89% at public versus 57% at private, p < .001; cornea by 88% at public versus 64% at private, p < .001; liver by 88% at public versus 35% at private, p < .001; and heart by 88% in public versus 67% at private institutions, p = .4. The COVID-19 pandemic along with the implemented health policies were associated with a decrease in donations, waiting list additions, and a decrease in transplantation, particularly at public institutions, which care for the most vulnerable.

New 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association High Blood Pressure Guideline.

The new American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2017 Hypertension Guidelines lower the threshold to define hypertension, thus increasing its prevalence. The impact on populations and health systems is poorly understood. We included data from 990 subjects aged 20 to 64 years from the SALMEX cohort (Salt in Mexico; Mexico City) and determined the prevalence of hypertension and requirement for pharmacological treatment according to both Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure 7 and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2017 guidelines. The data obtained were extrapolated to sex- and age-adjusted Mexico City population, and annual costs of medical follow-up were calculated. The new definition increased the prevalence of hypertension among SALMEX cohort from 16.2% to 37.4% (18%-39.3% after adjusting to Mexico City population). The proportion of subjects that require pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment increased from 17.7% to 19.0% and from 17.7% to 37.4%, respectively (19.4%-21.8% for pharmacological and 19.4%-39.3% for nonpharmacological treatment, after adjusting to Mexico City population). Annual costs of medical follow-up for subjects with hypertension in Mexico City would increase an estimated $59 278 928. The requirement to initiate pharmacological treatment was similar when assessed by Framingham risk score with lipids or with body mass index compared with the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease score, with correlation κ indexes of 0.981 and 0.972, respectively. On the basis of these results, Framingham body mass index represents an attractive and potentially cost-effective alternative to assess cardiovascular risk. In conclusion, the adoption of the new guidelines in Mexican population has implications not only on its prevalence but also on medical follow-up costs. A pharmacoeconomic model is required to assess the actual financial impact.