Quantitative ultrasound, elastography, and machine learning for assessment of steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis in chronic liver disease.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a quantitative ultrasound (QUS)- and elastography-based model to improve classification of steatosis grade, inflammation grade, and fibrosis stage in patients with chronic liver disease in comparison with shear wave elastography alone, using histopathology as the reference standard. METHODS: This ancillary study to a prospective institutional review-board approved study included 82 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, chronic hepatitis B or C virus, or autoimmune hepatitis. Elastography measurements, homodyned K-distribution parametric maps, and total attenuation coefficient slope were recorded. Random forests classification and bootstrapping were used to identify combinations of parameters that provided the highest diagnostic accuracy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were computed. RESULTS: For classification of steatosis grade S0 vs. S1-3, S0-1 vs. S2-3, S0-2 vs. S3, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were respectively 0.60, 0.63, and 0.62 with elasticity alone, and 0.90, 0.81, and 0.78 with the best tested model combining QUS and elastography features. For classification of inflammation grade A0 vs. A1-3, A0-1 vs. A2-3, A0-2 vs. A3, AUCs were respectively 0.56, 0.62, and 0.64 with elasticity alone, and 0.75, 0.68, and 0.69 with the best model. For classification of liver fibrosis stage F0 vs. F1-4, F0-1 vs. F2-4, F0-2 vs. F3-4, F0-3 vs. F4, AUCs were respectively 0.66, 0.77, 0.72, and 0.74 with elasticity alone, and 0.72, 0.77, 0.77, and 0.75 with the best model. CONCLUSION: Random forest models incorporating QUS and shear wave elastography increased the classification accuracy of liver steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis when compared to shear wave elastography alone.

Assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma treatment response with LI-RADS: a pictorial review.

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) play critical roles for assessing treatment response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after locoregional therapy. Interpretation is challenging because posttreatment imaging findings depend on the type of treatment, magnitude of treatment response, time interval after treatment, and other factors. To help radiologists interpret and report treatment response in a clear, simple, and standardized manner, the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) has developed a Treatment Response (LR-TR) algorithm. Introduced in 2017, the system provides criteria to categorize response of HCC to locoregional treatment (e.g., chemical ablation, energy-based ablation, transcatheter therapy, and radiation therapy). LR-TR categories include Nonevaluable, Nonviable, Equivocal, and Viable. LR-TR does not apply to patients on systemic therapies. This article reviews the LR-TR algorithm; discusses locoregional therapies for HCC, treatment concepts, and expected posttreatment findings; and illustrates LI-RADS treatment response assessment with CT and MRI.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Imaging for Surveillance and Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare imaging-based surveillance and diagnostic strategies in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) while taking into account technically inadequate examinations and patient compliance. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A Markov model simulated seven strategies for HCC surveillance and diagnosis in patients with cirrhosis: strategy A, ultrasound (US) for surveillance and CT for diagnosis; strategy B, US for surveillance and complete MRI for diagnosis; strategy C, US for surveillance and CT for inadequate or positive surveillance; strategy D, US for surveillance and complete MRI for inadequate or positive surveillance; strategy E, surveillance and diagnosis with CT followed by complete MRI for inadequate surveillance; strategy F, surveillance and diagnosis with complete MRI followed by CT for inadequate surveillance; and strategy G, surveillance with abbreviated MRI followed by CT for inadequate surveillance or complete MRI for positive surveillance. Two compliance scenarios were evaluated: optimal and conservative. For each scenario, the most cost-effective strategy was based on a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 (Canadian) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS. Base-case analysis revealed that strategy E was the most cost-effective when compliance was optimal ($13,631/QALY), and strategy G was the most cost-effective when compliance was conservative ($39,681/QALY). Sensitivity analyses supported the base-case analysis in the optimal compliance scenario, but several parameters altered the most cost-effective strategy in the conservative compliance scenario. CONCLUSION. In an optimal compliance scenario, CT for HCC surveillance and diagnosis and complete MRI for inadequate CT was most cost-effective. In a conservative compliance scenario, abbreviated MRI may be an alternative to US-based surveillance.

Diagnostic performance of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for assessment of anal fistula activity.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences for quantitative characterization of anal fistula activity. METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. One hundred and two patients underwent MRI for clinical suspicion of anal fistula. Forty-three patients with demonstrable anal fistulas met the inclusion criteria. Quantitative analysis included measurement of DCE and IVIM parameters. The reference standard was clinical activity based on medical records. Statistical analyses included Bayesian analysis with Markov Chain Monte Carlo, multivariable logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic analyses. RESULTS: Brevity of enhancement, defined as the time difference between the wash-in and wash-out, was longer in active than inactive fistulas (p = 0.02). Regression coefficients of multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that brevity of enhancement increased and normalized perfusion area under curve decreased with presence of active fistulas (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively). By cross-validation, a logistic regression model that included quantitative perfusion parameters (DCE and IVIM) performed significantly better than IVIM only (p < 0.001). Area under the curves for distinguishing patients with active from those with inactive fistulas were 0.669 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.500, 0.838) for a model with IVIM only, 0.860 (95% CI: 0.742, 0.977) for a model with IVIM and brevity of enhancement, and 0.921 (95% CI: 0.846, 0.997) for a model with IVIM and all DCE parameters. CONCLUSION: The inclusion of brevity of enhancement measured by DCE-MRI improved assessment of anal fistula activity over IVIM-DWI only.