Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36128256

RESUMO

Advanced posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) of the knee is a cause of substantial disability, particularly in younger individuals, and the treatment of choice is total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Racial and socioeconomic disparities exist in the use of TKA, but, to our knowledge, there have been no studies examining these disparities among patients with PTOA. Methods: We performed chi-square and logistic regression analyses on data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). The outcome of interest was the rate of TKA utilization, and the primary predictors were racial/ethnic group and insurance status. The regression models were adjusted for age, sex, household income, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Results: The odds of receiving TKA for Black patients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48 to 0.62) and Hispanic patients (OR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.62) were lower compared with White patients. Patients with Medicare (OR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.57), those with Medicaid (OR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.55), and those who self-paid (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.25) had significantly lower odds of TKA compared with those with private insurance. Conclusions: Black and Hispanic patients are less likely than White patients to utilize TKA, and patients with private insurance are more likely to utilize TKA. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

2.
Neuromodulation ; 24(3): 434-440, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33723896

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is used in the treatment of many chronic pain conditions. This study investigates racial and socioeconomic disparities in SCS among Medicare patients with chronic pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients over the age of 18 with a primary diagnosis of postlaminectomy syndrome (ICD-10 M96.1) or chronic pain syndrome (ICD-10 G89.4) were identified in the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare Claims Limited Data Set. We defined our outcome as SCS therapy by race and socioeconomic status. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the variables associated with SCS. RESULTS: We identified 1,244,927 patients treated between 2016 and 2019 with a primary diagnosis of postlaminectomy syndrome (PLS) or chronic pain syndrome (CPS). Of these patients, 59,182 (4.8%) received SCS. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that, compared with White patients, Black (OR [95%CI], 0.62 [0.6-0.65], p < 0.001), Asian (0.66 [0.56-0.76], p < 0.001), Hispanic (0.86 [0.8-0.93], p < 0.001), and North American Native (0.62 [0.56-0.69], p < 0.001) patients were significantly less likely to receive SCS. In addition, patients who were dual-eligible for Medicare and Medicaid were significantly less likely to receive SCS than those eligible for Medicare only (OR = 0.38 [95% CI: 0.37-0.39], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that racial and socioeconomic disparities exist in SCS among Medicare and Medicaid patients with PLS and CPS. Further work is required to elucidate the complex etiology underlying these findings.


Assuntos
Estimulação da Medula Espinal , Adulto , Idoso , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Classe Social , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca
3.
Pain Med ; 22(4): 819-828, 2021 04 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33502490

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Diversity and equity in medicine remain pivotal to care delivery. Data analysis on sex and racial diversity of pain medicine fellowship trainees and faculty in the United States are scant. We sought to characterize demographic and retention patterns among pain medicine fellows and faculty, who represent the emerging chronic pain management workforce. DESIGN: cross-sectional retrospective analysis. METHOD: We conducted an analysis of data from the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) and the United States Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-approved residency and fellowship training-programs for each year from 2009 through 2019, inclusively. We compared changes in sex, racial/ethnicity composition and retention rates of fellows and faculty in the United States by practice setting. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2019, there was a 14% increase in the number of ACGME pain fellowship programs. From 2009 to 2019, the ratio of men to women pain fellows ranged from 5:1 to 3.7:1. Compared with their self-identified White peers, Asian (OR 0.44; 95% CI: 0.34-0.58), Black (OR 0.46; 95% CI: 0.30-0.72), and Native American/Alaskan Native (OR 0.26; 95% CI: 0.08-0.80) identifying individuals had significantly lower odds of being a pain fellow, P < 0.05. There was no significant difference in female (OR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.148-1.09) and Black (OR 0.36; 95% CI: 0.11-1.12) program-directors. Pain-fellow in-state retention was 53%. CONCLUSIONS: The demographics of pain medicine training programs reflect a persistent male vs. female gap with underrepresentation of racial minorities. Further research is needed to elucidate reasons underlying these disparities.


Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Bolsas de Estudo , Estudos Transversais , Docentes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Dor , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
4.
Pain Pract ; 21(1): 75-82, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32654360

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapies are used in the management of patients with complex regional pain syndrome I (CRPS I) and failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). The purpose of this study was to investigate the racial and health insurance inequalities with SCS therapy in patients with chronic pain who had CRPS I and FBSS. METHODS: Patients with chronic pain who had a discharge diagnosis of FBSS and CRPS I were identified using the National Inpatient Sample database. Our primary outcome was defined as the history of SCS utilization by race/ethnicity, income quartile, and insurance status. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the variables associated with utilization of SCS therapy. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2015, 40,858 patients who were hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of FBSS and/or CRPS I were identified. Of these patients, 1,082 (2.7%) had a history of SCS therapy. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that compared to White patients, Black and Hispanic patients had higher odds of having SCS therapy (Black patients: odds ratio [OR] = 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12 to 1.77; P = 0.003; Hispanic patients: OR = 1.41; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.81; P = 0.007). Patients with private insurance had significantly higher odds of having SCS therapy compared with those with Medicare (OR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.43; P = 0.003). Compared to patients with Medicare, Medicaid patients had lower odds of having SCS therapy (OR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.70; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that socioeconomic disparities may exist in the utilization of SCS among hospitalized patients with CRPS I and FBSS the United States. However, confirming these data from other administrative databases, in the outpatient setting, may shed more insight.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/terapia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Manejo da Dor/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Dor Crônica/etiologia , Síndrome Pós-Laminectomia/complicações , Síndrome Pós-Laminectomia/terapia , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Manejo da Dor/economia , Distrofia Simpática Reflexa/complicações , Distrofia Simpática Reflexa/terapia , Estados Unidos
5.
Adv Ther ; 37(8): 3571-3583, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32632850

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: To date, no study has reported the prevalence of cannabis use in chronic pain patients. The aim of this study is to investigate the trends in cannabis use among chronic pain in-patients from 2011 to 2015 in the USA. METHODS: Patients were identified from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision, diagnosis codes for chronic pain and cannabis use. Annual estimates and trends were determined for cannabis use, patient characteristics, cannabis use among subgroups of chronic pain conditions, cost, length of stay, and associated discharge diagnosis. RESULTS: Between 2011 to 2015, a total of 247,949 chronic pain patients were cannabis users, increasing from 33,189 to 72,115 (P < 0.001). There were upward trends of cannabis use in females (38.7-40.7%; P = 0.03), Medicare insured patients (32.7-40.4%; P < 0.01), patients with lowest annual household income (36.1-40.9%; P = 0.02), patients aged 45-64 years (45.9-49.2%; P < 0.001), and patients with tobacco use disorder (63.8-72.4%; P < 0.0001). Concurrently, cannabis use decreased among patients with opioid use disorder (23.8-19.9%; P < 0.001). Cannabis use increased from 2011 to 2015 in patients with chronic regional pain syndrome, trauma, spondylosis, and failed back surgery syndrome. Adjusted total hospitalization cost increased from $31,271 ($1333) in 2011 to $38,684 ($946) in 2015 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Cannabis use increased substantially from 2011 to 2015, while the rates of cannabis use in opioid users down-trended simultaneously. Disparities in cannabis use among subgroups should be explored further.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Maconha Medicinal/uso terapêutico , Fitoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Fitoterapia/tendências , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Dor Crônica/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
Spine J ; 20(4): 547-555, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31740396

RESUMO

BACKGROUND CONTENT: Vertebral augmentation procedures are used for treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures. Prior studies have reported disparities in the treatment of patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures, particularly with regards to the use of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to report updates in racial and health insurance inequalities of spine augmentation procedures in patients with osteoporotic fractures. METHODS: With the use of the National Inpatient Sample, we identified hospitalized patients with osteoporotic fractures between the period of 2011 and 2015. Patients with spine augmentation, defined by the utilization of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, were also identified. Our primary outcome was defined as the utilization of spine augmentation procedures across ethnic (white, hispanic, black, and asian/pacific islander) and insurance (self-pay, private insurance, Medicare, and Medicaid) groups. Variables were identified from the NIS database using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth diagnosis codes. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was used for statistical analysis with p value <.05 considered significant. A subgroup analysis was performed across the utilization of kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, and Medicare coverage. RESULTS: We identified a total of 110,028 patients with a primary diagnosis of vertebral fracture between 2011 and 2015 (mean age: 74.4±13.6 years, 68% women). About 16,237 patients (14.8%) underwent any type of spine augmentation with over 75% of the patients receiving kyphoplasty. Multivariate analysis showed that black patients (odds ratio [OR]=0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-0.70, p<.001), Hispanic patients (OR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.73-0.86, p<.001), and Asian/Pacific Islander (OR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.70-0.89, p<.001) had significantly lower odds for receiving any spine augmentation compared with white patients. Patients with Medicaid (OR=0.59, 95% CI: 0.53-0.66, p<.001), private insurance (OR=0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.96, p=.001), and those who self-pay (OR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.47-0.69, p<.001) had significantly lower odds of spine augmentation compared with those with Medicare. Comparative use of kyphoplasty was not significantly different between white and black patients (OR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.70-1.04, p=.12). However, Hispanic patients (OR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.71-0.99, p=.04) and Asian/Pacific Islander patients (OR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.58-0.92, p=.007) had significantly lower use of kyphoplasty compared with white patients. The comparative use of kyphoplasty among patients receiving spine augmentation was not significantly different across each insurances status when compared with patients with Medicare. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that racial and socioeconomic disparities continue to exist with the utilization of spine augmentation procedures in hospitalized patients with osteoporotic fractures.


Assuntos
Fraturas por Compressão , Cifoplastia , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral , Vertebroplastia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Fraturas por Compressão/cirurgia , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Masculino , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fraturas por Osteoporose/cirurgia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
7.
Pain Physician ; 22(5): E487-E494, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31561661

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain remains a major public health issue that affects the lives of many worldwide, including patients with chronic pain. Comorbidities like depression have been associated with decreased quality of sleep, decreased enjoyment of life activities, increased anxiety, and decreased efficacy in treatments among patients with chronic pain. Despite these associations, the trends and demographic characteristics of patients with chronic pain with depression is yet to be investigated. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the trends and demographic characteristics of hospitalized patients with chronic pain with comorbid depression from years 2011 to 2015 in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: This was an observational study. SETTING: Patients were identified from a Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project database called National Inpatient Sample (NIS) documentation. METHODS: Patients were identified from the NIS database using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision (ICD-9 and ICD-10) diagnosis codes for chronic pain and comorbid depression from years 2011 to 2015. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2015, an estimated 9.3 million patients with chronic pain were identified. Of this cohort, 2.2 million patients (22.9%) were diagnosed with comorbid depression. The estimated number of patients with depression varied from 399,865 (22.6%) in 2011 to 421,490 (23.1%) in 2015 (P = 0.13). From 2011 to 2015, there was a significant upward trend of depression among blacks (8.1 ± 0.42% to 9.7 ± 0.27%), patients aged 65 to 84 years (29.0 ± 0.39% to 32.4 ± 0.23%), Medicare insured patients (56.1 ± 0.54% to 58.5 ± 0.29%), Medicaid insured patients (14.7 0.4% to 17.1 ± 0.24%), and patients from zip code areas with lowest annual household income (29.2 ± 1.3% to 32.0 ± 0.59%). Among patients with depression, the adjusted total hospitalization cost increased from $43,584 in 2011 to $49,923 in 2015 (P < 0.001), with average length of hospital stay stable around 5.05 ± 0.02 days. Most patients were discharged home or with self-care compared with short-term facility (57.9 ± 0.14% vs. 2.0 ± 0.03%). LIMITATIONS: Large database research comes with several limitations. The NIS database does not contain variables that can evaluate disease severity such as depression. In addition, the NIS database is highly dependent on the selection and report accuracy of the appropriate diagnostic ICD codes. These estimates could be imprecise from over or underestimation of the number of patients with chronic pain with comorbid depression. CONCLUSIONS: These findings from the present investigation suggest that depression in patients with chronic pain remained stable from 2011 to 2015, with the majority of patients identified as women, white, and ages 45 to 65 years. KEY WORDS: Chronic pain, depression, National Inpatient Sample.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/psicologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos
8.
Pain Med ; 20(12): 2479-2494, 2019 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31498396

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review is to critically appraise the literature for evidence supporting the health care resource utilization and cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) compared with conventional therapies (CTs) for chronic low back and leg pain. METHODS: The PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine databases were searched for studies published from January 2008 through October 2018, using the following MeSH terms: "spinal cord stimulation," "chronic pain," "back pain," "patient readmission," "economics," and "costs and cost analysis." Additional sources were added based on bibliographies and consultation with experts. The following data were extracted and analyzed: demographic information, study design, objectives, sample sizes, outcome measures, SCS indications, complications, costs, readmissions, and resource utilization data. RESULTS: Of 204 studies screened, 11 studies met inclusion criteria, representing 31,439 SCS patients and 299,182 CT patients. The mean age was 53.5 years for SCS and 55.6 years for CT. In eight of 11 studies, SCS was associated with favorable outcomes and found to be more cost-effective than CT for chronic low back pain. Compared with CT, SCS resulted in shorter hospital stays and lower complication rates and health care costs at 90 days. SCS was associated with significant improvement in health-related quality of life, health status, and quality-adjusted life-years. CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of chronic low back and leg pain, the majority of studies are of fair quality, with level 3 or 4 evidence in support of SCS as potentially more cost-effective than CT, with less resource expenditure but higher complication rates. SCS therapy may yet play a role in mitigating the financial burden associated with chronic low back and leg pain.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/terapia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Dor Lombar/terapia , Estimulação da Medula Espinal , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Dor Crônica/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Humanos , Neuroestimuladores Implantáveis , Perna (Membro) , Dor Lombar/economia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/economia , Implantação de Prótese , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida
9.
Pain Pract ; 19(6): 656-663, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31077526

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic pain treated with opioids are at an increased risk for opioid misuse or opioid use disorder (OUD). Recent years have seen a stark increase in abuse, misuse, and diversion of prescription opioid medications. The aim of this study was to investigate trends in changing rates of opioid use disorder among patients with chronic pain. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database identified chronic pain admissions with OUD from 2011 to 2015. Patients were identified from the NIS database using International Classification of Diseases (9th and 10th revisions) diagnosis codes for chronic pain and OUD. Annual estimates and trends were determined for OUD, patient characteristics, OUD among subgroups of chronic pain conditions, and discharge diagnosis. RESULTS: We identified 10.3 million patients with chronic pain. Of these, 680,631 patients were diagnosed with OUD. The number of patients with OUD increased from 109,222 in 2011 to 172,680 in 2015 (P < 0.001). Similarly, there were upward trends of OUD among females (53.2% to 54.5%; P = 0.09), patients 65 to 84 years of age (11.8% to 17%; P < 0.001), Medicare-insured patients (39.5% to 46.0%; P < 0.01), patients with low annual household incomes (27.8% to 33.3%; P < 0.001), and patients with cannabinoid use disorder (7.2% to 8.3%; P = 0.01). The prevalence of OUD increased from 2011 to 2015 in patients with chronic regional pain syndrome (5.53% to 7.46%; P = 0.01) and spondylosis (1.32% to 1.81%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the prevalence of OUD increased substantially from 2011 to 2015. Disparities of OUD with increasing opioid use among vulnerable populations including women, those with Medicare insurance, tobacco use disorder, and low annual income should be explored further.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA