Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 13(1): 3, 2024 01 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38191470

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The laboratory-based surveillance of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a priority component of the multisectoral national action plan to combat AMR in Burkina Faso. This study aimed to assess the QMS of microbiology laboratories involved in the Sentinel laboratory-based antimicrobial resistance surveillance network in Burkina Faso. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from September 1st to November 30th, 2022. The external quality assessment (EQA) method used was on-site evaluation using a checklist that was developed and validated by a technical committee of experts. Teams of two, including an antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) specialist and a QMS specialist, were trained on this checklist to conduct the assessment. Satisfactory performance was defined as any on-site evaluation score 80% and above with the aim of developing action plans to address gaps. RESULTS: All 18 laboratories were evaluated. The overall average performance score of the participating laboratories was 40%. The highest overall performance score was 58%, and the lowest overall performance score was 26%. The average overall scores were not significantly different between private and public laboratories (p value = 0.78). The only section of the checklist with the satisfactory performance concerned the "Analytical step of AST", with 76.5% (13/17) of the sentinel laboratories having a score ≥ 80%. CONCLUSION: The performance of the QMS of the sentinel laboratories in Burkina Faso for AMR surveillance was unsatisfactory, and a corrective action plan was proposed to support these laboratories in improving their QMS over the next 3 years.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Humanos , Burkina Faso , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Estudos Transversais , Laboratórios
2.
Int J Infect Dis ; 118: 224-229, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35227869

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to assess the statistical relationship between the use of chloroquine phosphate or hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin (CQ/HCQ + AZ) and virological recovery, disease worsening, and death among out- and inpatients with COVID-19 in Burkina Faso. METHODS AND DESIGNS: This was a retrospective observational study that compared outcomes in terms of time to recovery, worsening, and death in patients who received CQ/HCQ + AZ and those who did not using a multivariable Cox or Poisson model before and after propensity matching. RESULTS: Of the 863 patients included in the study, about 50% (432/863) were home-based follow-up patients and 50% were inpatients. Of these, 83.3% (746/863) received at least 1 dose of CQ/HCQ + AZ and 13.7% (118/863) did not. There were no significant differences in associated time to recovery for patients receiving any CQ/HCQ + AZ (adjusted HR 1.44; 95% CI 0.76-2.71). Similarly, there was no significant association between CQ/HCQ + AZ use and worsening (adjusted IRR 0.80; 95% CI 0.50-1.50). However, compared with the untreated group, the treated group had a lower risk of death (adjusted HR 0.20; 95% CI 0.10-0.44). CONCLUSIONS: The study provided valuable additional information on the use of CQ/HCQ in patients with COVID-19 and did not show any harmful outcomes of CQ/HCQ + AZ treatment.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Hidroxicloroquina , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Azitromicina/efeitos adversos , Burkina Faso/epidemiologia , Cloroquina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapêutico , Pacientes Internados , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , SARS-CoV-2
3.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 539, 2021 Jun 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34098893

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa, acute respiratory infections (ARI), acute gastrointestinal infections (GI) and acute febrile disease of unknown cause (AFDUC) have a large disease burden, especially among children, while respective aetiologies often remain unresolved. The need for robust infectious disease surveillance to detect emerging pathogens along with common human pathogens has been highlighted by the ongoing novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The African Network for Improved Diagnostics, Epidemiology and Management of Common Infectious Agents (ANDEMIA) is a sentinel surveillance study on the aetiology and clinical characteristics of ARI, GI and AFDUC in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: ANDEMIA includes 12 urban and rural health care facilities in four African countries (Côte d'Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Democratic Republic of the Congo and Republic of South Africa). It was piloted in 2018 in Côte d'Ivoire and the initial phase will run from 2019 to 2021. Case definitions for ARI, GI and AFDUC were established, as well as syndrome-specific sampling algorithms including the collection of blood, naso- and oropharyngeal swabs and stool. Samples are tested using comprehensive diagnostic protocols, ranging from classic bacteriology and antimicrobial resistance screening to multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) systems and High Throughput Sequencing. In March 2020, PCR testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and analysis of full genomic information was included in the study. Standardised questionnaires collect relevant clinical, demographic, socio-economic and behavioural data for epidemiologic analyses. Controls are enrolled over a 12-month period for a nested case-control study. Data will be assessed descriptively and aetiologies will be evaluated using a latent class analysis among cases. Among cases and controls, an integrated analytic approach using logistic regression and Bayesian estimation will be employed to improve the assessment of aetiology and associated risk factors. DISCUSSION: ANDEMIA aims to expand our understanding of ARI, GI and AFDUC aetiologies in sub-Saharan Africa using a comprehensive laboratory diagnostics strategy. It will foster early detection of emerging threats and continued monitoring of important common pathogens. The network collaboration will be strengthened and site diagnostic capacities will be reinforced to improve quality management and patient care.


Assuntos
Doenças Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Doenças Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Programas de Rastreamento , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Teorema de Bayes , Burkina Faso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Côte d'Ivoire , República Democrática do Congo , Febre/epidemiologia , Febre/microbiologia , Gastroenteropatias/epidemiologia , Gastroenteropatias/microbiologia , Humanos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , África do Sul
4.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 78(1): 54-60, 2020 02 01.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32108579

RESUMO

The realization of the antibiotic susceptibility test in agar is the routine bacteriological examination for the determination and monitoring of bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics. In this study, we report the comparative results between pencil leads for criterium, as an alternative to platinum rods in the realization of the antibiotic susceptibility test. METHODOLOGY: Experimental study evaluating the comparability of the results between Criterium and Inoclic mines (by counting bacterial cells on agar after 5 successive dilutions of reason 10 from a bacterial suspension obtained after piercing through a colony; by measuring the inhibition diameters of 4 ATCC reference bacterial strains on an antibiogram in an agar medium) and evaluating the sterility of the criterium mines by culturing them on enriched broth (heart - brain type). RESULTS: 42 bacterial strains were used for bacterial cell counting. The results were of the same order of magnitude (107 CFU/mL) between Inoclic and criterium mines, for all strains and at all dilutions. The antibiotic susceptibility tests performed for the 4 reference strains by the Inoclics and criterium mines all complied (100%) with the expected limits for determining their sensitivity profile to the antibiotics tested. Compared to the bacterial growth inhibition diameters on antibiotic susceptibility tests, no intra-operator variability was observed, while significant inter-operator variability (both with Inoclic and 0.5 mm criterium mines) was observed with some strains and for inhibition diameters greater than 10 mm. The enriched broth cultures (BCC) and their subculture carried out on 10 criterium mines from 5 different batches were negative. CONCLUSION: Criterium mines seem to be a serious and less expensive alternative to Inoclic for the realization of antibiotic susceptibility testing in our resource-limited countries.


Assuntos
Ágar/química , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/economia , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Meios de Cultura/química , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Meios de Cultura/economia , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Escherichia coli/fisiologia , Grafite/química , Grafite/economia , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/fisiologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/economia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Platina/química , Platina/economia , Áreas de Pobreza , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/fisiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA