Immigrant status and disparities in health care delivery in patients with myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the differences in socioeconomic status and quality health care between Singapore-born citizens and immigrants presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: In a prospective study, patients admitted with STEMI were recruited for a questionnaire survey. The recruited patients were categorized based on their immigration status into Singapore-born citizens (SBC), foreign-born citizens (FBC), permanent residents (PR) and non-residents (NR). RESULTS: Among the 374 recruited patients, 286 (76.5%) patients were categorized as SBC, and the remaining 88 (23.5%) as immigrants. Further breakdown of the immigrants revealed that 33 were FBC (median duration of living in Singapore, 53 years), 22 were PR (18 years), and 33 were NR (11 years). Significant differences in socioeconomic status among SBC, FBC, PR and NR were detected. NR were in the lowest, while PR in the highest, socioeconomic class based on occupation (p=0.003), education level (p<0.001), and average monthly household income (p=0.020). There were no disparities in the proportion of patients treated with primary PCI (SBC 88%, FBC 82%, PR 91%, NR 79%, p=0.555). Median door-to-balloon times were similar among the four groups (56, 52, 60, 56min, p=0.614). Compared with SBC, PR was associated with longer symptom-to-balloon times (median difference 54.1 min; 95% CI 9.0 to 99.2). CONCLUSION: There were major differences in the socioeconomic status among SBC, FBC, PR and NR who presented with STEMI. Although there were no major disparities in access to high quality health care to these patients with different immigration status, symptom-to-balloon time differed substantially among the different migrant classes.

Burden of care and childhood cancer: experiences of parents in an Asian context.

This article discusses a two-phase qualitative study on parents' experiences of psychosocial needs arising from having a child with cancer over four to eight months in multicultural Singapore. Given the value of children to Asian families and the practical support available in a collectivist context, the author expected the subjective burden of care to be more pronounced than the objective burden at the initial stage of treatment and the objective burden to be greater after discharge from the hospital. Findings showed subjective burden consistently higher at both phases. Implications for psychosocial support for parents are discussed.