Evaluation of High-Pitch Ungated Pediatric Cardiovascular Computed Tomography for the Assessment of Cardiac Structures in Neonates.

PURPOSE: We evaluated a high-pitch, non-electrocardiogram-gated cardiac computed tomographic protocol, designed to image both cardiac and extracardiac structures, including coronary arteries, in a neonatal population (less than 1 year old) that was referred for congenital heart disease assessment and compared it with an optimized standard-pitch protocol in an equivalent cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine high-pitch scans were compared with 31 age-matched, sex-matched, and weight-matched standard-pitch, dosimetrically equivalent scans. The visualization and subjective quality of both cardiac and extracardiac structures were scored by consensus between 2 trained blinded observers. Image noise, signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios, and radiation doses were also compared. RESULTS: The high-pitch protocol better demonstrated the pulmonary veins (P=0.03) and all coronary segments (all P<0.05), except the distal right coronary artery (P=0.10), with no significant difference in the visualization of the remaining cardiac or extracardiac structures. Both contrast-to-noise and signal-to-noise ratios improved due to greater vessel opacity, with significantly fewer streak (P<0.01) and motion (P<0.01) artifacts. Image noise and computed tomographic dose index were comparable across the 2 techniques; however, the high-pitch acquisition resulted in a small, but statistically significant, increase in dose-length product [13.0 mGy.cm (9.0 to 17.3) vs. 11.0 mGy.cm (9.0 to 13.0), P=0.05] due to greater z-overscanning. CONCLUSIONS: In neonates, a high-pitch protocol improves coronary artery and pulmonary vein delineation compared with the standard-pitch protocol, allowing a more comprehensive assessment of cardiovascular anatomy while obviating the need for either patient sedation or heart rate control.

Magnetic resonance imaging and radiographic assessment of carpal depressions in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: normal variants or erosions?

OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is playing an increasingly important role in the diagnosis and followup of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Carpal depressions are commonly observed in healthy children and in patients with JIA. The aim of our study was to further characterize these depressions in patients with JIA. METHODS: A total of 29 MRI wrist examinations were analyzed. Depressions were classified according to morphology as either tubular or focal. Features including the presence of a vessel related to the depression, evidence of synovitis, bone marrow edema, or loss of joint space on a radiograph taken on the same day were recorded for each depression. RESULTS: A total of 173 depressions were identified in 145 carpal bones. Forty percent were capitate depressions. A third were focal depressions and two-thirds were tubular. About 10% of tubular depressions and 30% of focal depressions were associated with features suggesting true erosions, with the remainder likely to represent vascular channels and normal variants. CONCLUSION: Radiologists and clinicians should undertake caution when assessing carpal depressions on MRI because the vast majority are likely to represent normal variants.

Assessment of active inflammation in juvenile dermatomyositis: a novel magnetic resonance imaging-based scoring system.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reproducibility of a novel scoring system that we have developed for the objective assessment of acute inflammatory change in JDM. This system defines markers of inflammatory change in four muscle groups and the surrounding soft tissues. METHODS: Forty-eight children (33 girls) underwent retrospective assessment of their MRI studies by two musculoskeletal paediatric radiologists for the presence of disease activity. Each observer performed the readings on two separate occasions. The degree of concordance between the two observers and between the two readings was assessed using kappa analysis. The reproducibility of the total score was determined using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: There was fair to moderate agreement between the two observers for all the examined disease activity markers in all muscle groups. There was good intra-observer agreement between the two readings. There was no difference according to the side evaluated. The mean total score (out of 20) for Observer 1 was 7.9 and for Observer 2 was 7.5 (mean difference -0.4, 95% limits of agreement -6.8 to 6.0), while the mean total scores for Observer 1 were 9.0 for the first reading and 7.9 for the second reading (mean difference 1.0, 95% limits of agreement -2.6 to 4.6). CONCLUSION: Markers of inflammatory change in JDM can be observed on MRI in a reliable fashion and have been used to make a reliable and objective scoring system. The accuracy of the proposed scoring system is acceptable for the single reader, although there is more variability between two different individuals.

Comparison of urokinase and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for treatment of childhood empyema.

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing incidence and morbidity, little evidence exists to inform the best management approach in childhood empyema. AIM: To compare chest drain with intrapleural urokinase and primary video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of childhood empyema. METHODS: Children were prospectively randomized to receive either percutaneous chest drain with intrapleural urokinase or primary VATS. The primary outcome was the number of hospital days after intervention. Secondary end points were number of chest drain days, total hospital stay, failure rate, radiologic outcome at 6 mo, and total treatment costs. RESULTS: Sixty children were recruited. The two groups were well matched for demographics; baseline characteristics; and hematologic, biochemical, and bacteriologic parameters. No significant difference was found in length of hospital stay after intervention between the two groups: VATS (median [range], 6 [3-16] d) versus urokinase (6 [4-25] d) (p = 0.311; 95% confidence interval, -2 to 1). No difference was demonstrated in total hospital stay: VATS versus urokinase (8 [4-17] d and 7 [4-25] d) (p = 0.645); failure rate: 5 (16.6%); and radiologic outcome at 6 mo after intervention in both groups. The mean (median) treatment costs of patients in the urokinase arm US dollars 9,127 (US dollars 6,914) were significantly lower than those for the VATS arm US dollars 11,379 (US dollars 10,146) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in clinical outcome between intrapleural urokinase and VATS for the treatment of childhood empyema. Urokinase is a more economic treatment option compared with VATS and should be the primary treatment of choice. This study provides an evidence base to guide the management of childhood empyema.