Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 21(1): 77-86, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31978314

RESUMO

Introduction: Cost-of-illness studies are widely used for healthcare decision-making; however, no such study is available in pemphigus from the societal perspective. The purpose of this analysis was to estimate annual cost-of-illness per patient with pemphigus from a societal perspective. Areas covered: Between 2014 and 2017, a multicenter, cross-sectional study was carried out. Consecutive pemphigus patients aged ≥18 years were recruited at all four university dermatology departments in Hungary. Direct and indirect costs were calculated, including costs for treatments, outpatient visits, hospital admissions, informal care, travel costs and productivity loss. Generalized linear model was used to analyze predictors of costs. Atotal of 109 patients with pemphigus enrolled with amean age of 57.1 (SD 14.8) years. Total cost per pemphigus patient was €3,995 (SD €7,526) peryear, with productivity loss (58%) and informal care (19%) accounting for the majority. Annual means of 189 and 41 working hours were lost due to absence from work and reduced productivity, respectively. Younger age and pemphigus vulgaris were associated with higher costs (p < 0.05). Expert opinion: This is the first cost-of-illness study applying the societal perspective in pemphigus. Our results indicate a substantial economic burden on society, mainly driven by productivity loss and informal care.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Pênfigo/epidemiologia , Absenteísmo , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Eficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Hungria , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pênfigo/economia , Pênfigo/terapia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 76(1): 126-132, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27190098

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the value that rheumatologists across Europe attach to patients' preferences and economic aspects when choosing treatments for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: In a discrete choice experiment, European rheumatologists chose between two hypothetical drug treatments for a patient with moderate disease activity. Treatments differed in five attributes: efficacy (improvement and achieved state on disease activity), safety (probability of serious adverse events), patient's preference (level of agreement), medication costs and cost-effectiveness (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)). A Bayesian efficient design defined 14 choice sets, and a random parameter logit model was used to estimate relative preferences for rheumatologists across countries. Cluster analyses and latent class models were applied to understand preference patterns across countries and among individual rheumatologists. RESULTS: Responses of 559 rheumatologists from 12 European countries were included in the analysis (49% females, mean age 48 years). In all countries, efficacy dominated treatment decisions followed by economic considerations and patients' preferences. Across countries, rheumatologists avoided selecting a treatment that patients disliked. Latent class models revealed four respondent profiles: one traded off all attributes except safety, and the remaining three classes disregarded ICER. Among individual rheumatologists, 57% disregarded ICER and these were more likely from Italy, Romania, Portugal or France, whereas 43% disregarded uncommon/rare side effects and were more likely from Belgium, Germany, Hungary, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden or UK. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, European rheumatologists are willing to trade between treatment efficacy, patients' treatment preferences and economic considerations. However, the degree of trade-off differs between countries and among individuals.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/economia , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Comportamento de Escolha , Preferência do Paciente , Reumatologistas/psicologia , Adulto , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Br J Dermatol ; 175(3): 593-9, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27062497

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in pemphigus has been widely investigated; nevertheless, utility values for economic evaluations are still lacking. OBJECTIVES: To estimate health utilities for hypothetical pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and pemphigus foliaceus (PF) health states in a general population sample. METHODS: Three health states (uncontrolled PV, uncontrolled PF and controlled pemphigus) were developed based on a systematic literature review of HRQoL studies in pemphigus. Utilities were obtained from a convenience sample of 108 adults using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and 10-year time trade-off (TTO). Lead-time TTO was applied for health states regarded as worse than dead with a lead time to disease time ratio of 1 : 1. RESULTS: The mean VAS utility scores for PV, PF and controlled pemphigus were 0·25 ± 0·15, 0·37 ± 0·17 and 0·63 ± 0·16, respectively. Corresponding TTO utilities were as follows: 0·34 ± 0·38, 0·51 ± 0·32 and 0·75 ± 0·31. Overall, 14% and 6% judged PV and PF as being worse than dead. For both VAS and TTO values, significant differences were observed between all health states (P < 0·001). VAS utilities were rated significantly lower compared with TTO in each health state (P < 0·001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that reports health utility values for PV and PF. Successful treatment of pemphigus might result in significant utility gain (0·24-0·41). These empirical findings with respect to three health states in pemphigus may serve as anchor points for further utility studies and cost-effectiveness analyses.


Assuntos
Pênfigo/prevenção & controle , Qualidade de Vida , Atividades Cotidianas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Preferência do Paciente , Pênfigo/psicologia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Adulto Jovem
4.
Eur J Health Econ ; 17 Suppl 1: 79-87, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27086322

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the economic burden from a societal perspective and the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in Europe. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with JIA from Germany, Italy, Spain, France, the United Kingdom, Bulgaria, and Sweden. Data on demographic characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, informal care, labor productivity losses, and HRQOL were collected from the questionnaires completed by patients or their caregivers. HRQOL was measured with the EuroQol 5-domain (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients (67 Germany, 34 Sweden, 33 Italy, 23 United Kingdom, 4 France, and 1 Bulgaria) completed the questionnaire. Excluding Bulgarian results, due to small sample size, country-specific annual health care costs ranged from €18,913 to €36,396 (reference year: 2012). Estimated direct healthcare costs ranged from €11,068 to €22,138; direct non-healthcare costs ranged from €7837 to €14,155 and labor productivity losses ranged from €0 to €8715. Costs are also shown to differ between children and adults. The mean EQ-5D index score for JIA patients was estimated at between 0.44 and 0.88, and the mean EQ-5D visual analogue scale score was estimated at between 62 and 79. CONCLUSIONS: JIA patients incur considerable societal costs and experience substantial deterioration in HRQOL in some countries. Compared with previous studies, our results show a remarkable increase in annual healthcare costs for JIA patients. Reasons for the increase are the inclusion of non-professional caregiver costs, a wider use of biologics, and longer hospital stays.


Assuntos
Artrite Juvenil/economia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Qualidade de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Artrite Juvenil/psicologia , Cuidadores , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Licença Médica/economia , Perfil de Impacto da Doença , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reino Unido , Adulto Jovem
5.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 29(11): 2222-30, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26370506

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of biological agents for the treatment of psoriasis and to explore country-specific differences within six Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries, namely Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Romania. METHODS: A literature overview on the epidemiology and disease burden of psoriasis in CEE was conducted. The number of patients treated with biologics was obtained from patient registries, ministries of health, national professional societies and health insurance funds. Biological treatment rates were estimated by two different methods: (i) as a proportion of all psoriasis patients of a country (assuming a common prevalence of psoriasis 2%) and (ii) per 100,000 population. Moreover, we provide a detailed comparison of drug coverage policies and guidelines regulating the treatment with biologics in psoriasis. RESULTS: On average 0.25% of all psoriasis patients, or five psoriasis patients out of 100,000 inhabitants are treated with biologics embedding a 14.6-fold difference between the six countries. Bulgaria, Croatia and Poland lag behind the other three countries in the use of biologics. The significant differences among CEE countries cannot be explained by variations in prices of biologics, cost-effectiveness or budget impact of biologics. It seems that the time since coverage decision, the fewer number of covered biologics, the more restrictive criteria to be eligible for covered treatment in terms of baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores, and the maximum duration of treatment allowed are responsible for the majority of the differences. CONCLUSIONS: There exists a disconnect between the European psoriasis treatment guidelines and the various CEE country-specific biologic coverage eligibilities. The cost of biologic therapy for psoriasis is not solely and directly responsible for the different use rates amongst the CEE countries. Psoriasis may not be perceived by all payers as a serious disease that can be successfully treated in a cost-effective manner.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Produtos Biológicos/economia , Bulgária/epidemiologia , Croácia/epidemiologia , República Tcheca/epidemiologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Hungria/epidemiologia , Polônia/epidemiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Prevalência , Romênia/epidemiologia
10.
J Nutr Health Aging ; 14(8): 633-9, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20922339

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this paper is to give an overview on the quality of life, health care utilisation and costs of dementia in Hungary. METHOD: A cross-sectional non-population based study of 88 consecutive dementia patients and their caregivers was conducted in three GP practices and one outpatient setting in 2008. Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and quality of life (EQ-5D) were surveyed and cost calculations were performed. Costs of patients living at home were estimated by the current bottom-up cost-of-illness calculations, while costs of nursing home patients were considered by official reimbursement to determine the disease burden from a societal viewpoint. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 77.4 years (SD=9.2), 59% of them were female. The mean MMSE score was 16.70 (SD=7.24), and the mean EQ-5D score was 0.40 (SD=0.34). The average annual cost of dementia was 6,432 Euros per patient living at home and 6,086 Euros per patient living in nursing homes. For the whole demented population (based on EuroCoDe data) we estimated total annual costs of 846.8 million Euros; of which 55% are direct costs, 9% indirect costs and 36% informal care cost. Compared to acute myocardial infarction the total disease burden of dementia is 26.3 times greater. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study investigating resource utilisation, costs, and quality of life of dementia patients in the Central and Eastern European region. Compared to the general population of Hungary EQ-5D values of the demented patients are lower in all age groups. Dementia related costs are much lower in Hungary compared to Western European countries. There is no remarkable difference between the costs of demented patients living at home and in nursing homes, from the societal point of view.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Demência/economia , Demência/terapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cuidadores , Estudos Transversais , Demência/tratamento farmacológico , Demência/fisiopatologia , Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Domiciliar/economia , Humanos , Hungria , Masculino , Casas de Saúde/economia , Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
11.
Osteoporos Int ; 19(2): 243-9, 2008 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17701364

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: The Hungarian national health insurance database was screened for fractures of patients aged 50-100, 1999-2003. On average, there were 343 hip, 1,579 forearm, 342 proximal humerus, 48 inpatient vertebral and 2,459 other fractures/100,000 inhabitants/year. INTRODUCTION: The incidence of fractures differs among populations. Our aim was to study the incidence of fractures in Hungary, focusing on classical osteoporotic sites and to compare the results with those of other European countries. METHODS: The Hungarian National Health Insurance Fund database, covering 100% of the population, was screened for fractures of patients aged 50-100, 1999-2003. The search of vertebral fractures was restricted to those admitted to hospital. A gender and age-matched comparison was performed with available data from Europe. RESULTS: There were mean 343 hip, 1,579 forearm, 342 proximal humerus, 48 inpatient vertebral and 2,459 other fractures/100,000 inhabitants/year; the female/male ratio was between 1.2-2.4. Multiple fractures occurred in 23.1% of the cases. Hip fracture incidence in Hungary lies between the rates of northern and southern countries of Europe. CONCLUSIONS: Our study offers nationwide epidemiological data on fractures in Hungary. The incidence of fractures increased by age, regardless of the type of fracture. Incidence of hip fractures in Hungary fits in the previously established geographic trends in Europe. Our results fulfil a need for fracture data from Central Europe.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Acidentes de Trânsito/estatística & dados numéricos , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/etiologia , Humanos , Hungria/epidemiologia , Incidência , Seguro Saúde , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Osteoporose/complicações , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/complicações , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA