Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 763, 2024 Jun 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38915005

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The organisational care needs involved in accessing kidney transplant have not been described in the literature and therefore a detailed analysis thereof could help to establish a framework (including appropriate timing, investment, and costs) for the management of this population. The main objective of this study is to analyse the profile and care needs of kidney transplant candidates in a tertiary hospital and the direct costs of studying them. METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted using data on a range of variables (sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, study duration, and investment in visits and supplementary tests) from 489 kidney transplant candidates evaluated in 2020. RESULTS: The comorbidity index was high (> 4 in 64.3%), with a mean of 5.6 ± 2.4. Part of the study population had certain characteristics that could hinder their access a kidney transplant: physical dependence (9.4%), emotional distress (33.5%), non-adherent behaviours (25.2%), or language barriers (9.4%). The median study duration was 6.6[3.4;14] months. The ratio of required visits to patients was 5.97:1, meaning an investment of €237.10 per patient, and the ratio of supplementary tests to patients was 3.5:1, meaning an investment of €402.96 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: The study population can be characterised as complex due to their profile and their investment in terms of time, visits, supplementary tests, and direct costs. Management based on our results involves designing work-adaptation strategies to the needs of the study population, which can lead to increased patient satisfaction, shorter waiting times, and reduced costs.


Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/economia , Estudos Transversais , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Custos e Análise de Custo , Idoso , Centros de Atenção Terciária
2.
Nutrients ; 15(5)2023 Feb 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36904084

RESUMO

Malnutrition has a negative impact on patients with chronic diseases and its early identification is a priority. The primary objective of this diagnostic accuracy study was to assess the performance of the phase angle (PhA), a bioimpedance analysis (BIA)-derived parameter, for malnutrition screening using the Global Leadership Initiative for Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria as the reference standard in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) waiting for kidney transplantation (KT); criteria associated with low PhA in this population were also analyzed. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative likelihood ratios, predictive values, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for PhA (index test) and compared with GLIM criteria (reference standard). Of 63 patients (62.9 years old; 76.2% men), 22 (34.9%) had malnutrition. The PhA threshold with the highest accuracy was ≤4.85° (sensitivity 72.7%, specificity 65.9%, and positive and negative likelihood ratios 2.13 and 0.41, respectively). A PhA ≤ 4.85° was associated with a 3.5-fold higher malnutrition risk (OR = 3.53 (CI95% 1.0-12.1)). Considering the GLIM criteria as the reference standard, a PhA ≤ 4.85° showed only fair validity for detecting malnutrition, and thus cannot be recommended as a stand-alone screening tool in this population.


Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Desnutrição , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Liderança , Curva ROC , Padrões de Referência , Avaliação Nutricional , Estado Nutricional
3.
Hum Immunol ; 81(6): 293-299, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32279925

RESUMO

MAIN PROBLEM: Luminex panel and single antigen beads (SAB) are used for screening and DSA specificity determination respectively. The cost of SAB may limit its general use, so some labs perform SAB tests only after positive screening. METHODS: We compared both strategies: 1) SAB only if positive screening with kits from manufacturer A, and 2) direct SAB from manufacturer B, and correlate their sensitivity with histological findings. RESULTS: We selected 118 kidney transplant recipients with a normal biopsy (n = 19), histological antibody-mediated damage (ABMR, n = 52) or interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA, n = 47) following Banff 2015 and 2017 classification. Direct SAB detected DSA in 13 patients missed by screening. Strategy 1 detected DSA in 0% normal, 61.5% ABMR and 8.5% IFTA patients; percentages with strategy 2 were 5.2%, 78.8% and 14.8% (p=0.004). Strategy 2 identified DSA allowing full ABMR diagnosis in 17% cases missed by strategy 1. Thereafter, direct SAB from manufacturer A confirmed DSA in 46% DSA-positive cases with strategy 2 (55.5% ABMR cases). CONCLUSIONS: Luminex screening failed to identify clinically relevant HLA antibodies, hampering DSA detection in patients with possible ABMR. Direct SAB testing should be the chosen strategy for post-transplantation monitoring, albeit direct SAB from the two existing manufacturers may diverge in as much as 50% of cases.


Assuntos
Isoanticorpos/sangue , Transplante de Rim , Rim/patologia , Sorologia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Fibrose , Antígenos HLA/imunologia , Teste de Histocompatibilidade , Humanos , Separação Imunomagnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sorologia/economia
4.
Nefrologia (Engl Ed) ; 38(1): 27-33, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29137893

RESUMO

Bone disease related to chronic kidney disease and, particularly, to kidney transplant patients is a common cause or morbidity and mortality, especially due to a higher risk of osteoporotic fractures. Despite the fact that this has been known for decades, to date, an appropriate diagnostic strategy has yet to be established. Apart from bone biopsy, which is invasive and scarcely used, no other technique is available to accurately establish the risk of fracture in kidney patients. Techniques applied to the general population, such as bone densitometry, have not been subjected to sufficient external validation and their use is not systematic. This means that the identification of patients at risk of fracture and therefore those who are candidates for preventive strategies is an unmet need. Bone strength, defined as the ability of the bone to resist fracture, is determined by bone mineral density (measured by bone densitometry), trabecular architecture and bone tissue quality. The trabecular bone score estimates bone microarchitecture, and low values have been described as an independent predictor of increased fracture risk. Bone microindentation is a minimally invasive technique that measures resistance of the bone to micro-cracks (microscopic separation of mineralised collagen fibres), and therefore bone tissue biomechanical properties. The superiority over bone densitometry of the correlation between the parameters measured by trabecular bone score and microindentation with the risk of fracture in diverse populations led us to test its feasibility in chronic kidney disease and kidney transplant patients.


Assuntos
Distúrbio Mineral e Ósseo na Doença Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Transplante de Rim , Absorciometria de Fóton , Densidade Óssea , Distúrbio Mineral e Ósseo na Doença Renal Crônica/etiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Fraturas Espontâneas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Espontâneas/etiologia , Fraturas Espontâneas/prevenção & controle , Fraturas de Estresse/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas de Estresse/etiologia , Fraturas de Estresse/prevenção & controle , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Risco , Transplantados
5.
Transplantation ; 101(4): 727-745, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28072755

RESUMO

The old-for-old allocation policy used for kidney transplantation (KT) has confirmed the survival benefit compared to remaining listed on dialysis. Shortage of standard donors has stimulated the development of strategies aimed to expand acceptance criteria, particularly of kidneys from elderly donors. We have systematically reviewed the literature on those different strategies. In addition to the review of outcomes of expanded criteria donor or advanced age kidneys, we assessed the value of the Kidney Donor Profile Index policy, preimplantation biopsy, dual KT, machine perfusion and special immunosuppressive protocols. Survival and functional outcomes achieved with expanded criteria donor, high Kidney Donor Profile Index or advanced age kidneys are poorer than those with standard ones. Outcomes using advanced age brain-dead or cardiac-dead donor kidneys are similar. Preimplantation biopsies and related scores have been useful to predict function, but their applicability to transplant or refuse a kidney graft has probably been overestimated. Machine perfusion techniques have decreased delayed graft function and could improve graft survival. Investing 2 kidneys in 1 recipient does not make sense when a single KT would be enough, particularly in elderly recipients. Tailored immunosuppression when transplanting an old kidney may be useful, but no formal trials are available.Old donors constitute an enormous source of useful kidneys, but their retrieval in many countries is infrequent. The assumption of limited but precious functional expectancy for an old kidney and substantial reduction of discard rates should be generalized to mitigate these limitations.


Assuntos
Seleção do Doador , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Doadores de Tecidos/provisão & distribuição , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Causas de Morte , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Função Retardada do Enxerto/etiologia , Função Retardada do Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Rejeição de Enxerto/imunologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Perfusão , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA