Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 14(9): e0220234, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31483796

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2014, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) began covering a multitarget stool DNA (mtSDNA) test for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening of Medicare beneficiaries. In this study, we evaluated whether mtSDNA testing is a cost-effective alternative to other CRC screening strategies reimbursed by CMS, and if not, under what conditions it could be. METHODS: We use three independently-developed microsimulation models to simulate a cohort of previously unscreened US 65-year-olds who are screened with triennial mtSDNA testing, or one of six other reimbursed screening strategies. Main outcome measures are discounted life-years gained (LYG) and lifetime costs (CMS perspective), threshold reimbursement rates, and threshold adherence rates. Outcomes are expressed as the median and range across models. RESULTS: Compared to no screening, triennial mtSDNA screening resulted in 82 (range: 79-88) LYG per 1,000 simulated individuals. This was more than for five-yearly sigmoidoscopy (80 (range: 71-89) LYG), but fewer than for every other simulated strategy. At its 2017 reimbursement rate of $512, mtSDNA was the most costly strategy, and even if adherence were 30% higher than with other strategies, it would not be a cost-effective alternative. At a substantially reduced reimbursement rate ($6-18), two models found that triennial mtSDNA testing was an efficient and potentially cost-effective screening option. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to no screening, triennial mtSDNA screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality at acceptable costs. However, compared to nearly all other CRC screening strategies reimbursed by CMS it is less effective and considerably more costly, making it an inefficient screening option.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais , DNA Tumoral Circulante , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , DNA de Neoplasias , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Fezes , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Fezes/química , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Medicare , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Health Serv Res ; 47(4): 1561-79, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22375796

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact of deductibles on the initiation and continuation of psychotherapy for depression. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Data from health care encounters and claims from Group Health Cooperative, a large integrated health care system in Washington State, was merged with information from a centralized behavioral health triage call center to conduct study analyses. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective observational design using a hierarchical logistic regression model was used to estimate initiation and continuation probabilities for use of psychotherapy, adjusting for key sociodemographic/economic factors and prior use of behavioral health services relevant to individual decisions to seek mental health care. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Analyses were based on merged datasets on patient enrollment, insurance benefits, use of mental health and general medical services and information collected by a triage specialist at a centralized behavioral health call center. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among individuals with unmet deductibles between $100 and $500, we found a statistically significant lower likelihood of making an initial visit, but there was no statistically significant effect on making an initial or subsequent visit among individuals that had met their deductible. CONCLUSIONS: Unmet deductibles appear to influence the likelihood of initiating psychotherapy for treating depression.


Assuntos
Dedutíveis e Cosseguros , Depressão/terapia , Psicoterapia/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Washington
3.
J Gen Intern Med ; 26(7): 698-704, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21384219

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Quality of antidepressant treatment remains disturbingly poor. Rates of medication adherence and follow-up contact are especially low in primary care, where most depression treatment begins. Telephone care management programs can address these gaps, but reliance on live contact makes such programs less available, less timely, and more expensive. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a depression care management program delivered by online messaging through an electronic medical record. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial comparing usual primary care treatment to primary care supported by online care management SETTING: Nine primary care clinics of an integrated health system in Washington state PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and eight patients starting antidepressant treatment for depression. INTERVENTION: Three online care management contacts with a trained psychiatric nurse. Each contact included a structured assessment (severity of depression, medication adherence, side effects), algorithm-based feedback to the patient and treating physician, and as-needed facilitation of follow-up care. All communication occurred through secure, asynchronous messages within an electronic medical record. MAIN MEASURES: An online survey approximately five months after randomization assessed the primary outcome (depression severity according to the Symptom Checklist scale) and satisfaction with care, a secondary outcome. Additional secondary outcomes (antidepressant adherence and use of health services) were assessed using computerized medical records. KEY RESULTS: Patients offered the program had higher rates of antidepressant adherence (81% continued treatment more than 3 months vs. 61%, p = 0.001), lower Symptom Checklist depression scores after 5 months (0.95 vs. 1.17, p = 0.043), and greater satisfaction with depression treatment (53% "very satisfied" vs. 33%, p = 0.004). LIMITATIONS: The trial was conducted in one integrated health care system with a single care management nurse. Results apply only to patients using online messaging. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that organized follow-up care for depression can be delivered effectively and efficiently through online messaging.


Assuntos
Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Transtorno Depressivo/terapia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Correio Eletrônico/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/estatística & dados numéricos , Adesão à Medicação/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Profissionais de Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas On-Line , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 11(4): 394-403, 2009 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19299409

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Providing smokers with biologically based evidence of smoking-related disease risk or physical impairment may be an effective way to motivate cessation. METHODS: Smokers were recruited for a free health risk assessment and randomized to receive personally tailored feedback based on their lung functioning, carbon monoxide (CO) exposure, and smoking-related health conditions or generic information about the risks of smoking and personalized counseling based on their diet, body mass index, and physical activity. All (n = 536) were advised to quit smoking and offered access to a free telephone cessation program. Participants were surveyed immediately after intervention and 1 month later to assess the impact on various indices of motivation to quit. RESULTS: Immediately posttreatment, experimental participants rated themselves as more likely to try to quit (p = .02) and reported a greater mean increase in their motivation to quit than controls (p = .04). At 1-month follow-up, however, we found no significant group differences on any motivational indices. In post-hoc analyses comparing smokers in the experimental group with and without lung impairment, persons with impaired lung functioning had a greater change from baseline in posttreatment motivation to quit (adjusted p = .05) and perceived risk of developing a smoking-related disease (p = .03) compared with persons with no lung impairment, but we found no significant treatment effect on any motivational indices at 1 month. DISCUSSION: The results suggest that the intervention had a small, temporary effect, but we found no clear evidence that the intervention increased motivation to quit smoking during the first month postintervention.


Assuntos
Motivação , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Monóxido de Carbono , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Testes de Função Respiratória , Medição de Risco/métodos , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/psicologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA