How we do it: the absorbable gelatin sponge cube, an effective and economical approach to packing in ear surgery.

INTRODUCTION: There is currently a lack of robust evidence on the best form of packing for otological surgery. We describe the use of the absorbable gelatin sponge, a packing material that does not require removal and has the benefit of being considerably cheaper compared to other common forms of ear packing. METHODS: A comparison was made of the financial cost of several forms of packing for common otological procedures. In addition, a retrospective audit of complications was undertaken of all patients in whom the absorbable gelatin sponge was used over the past three years. RESULTS: The absorbable gelatin sponge was shown to be cheaper to purchase per unit and also more economical to use. It has been the exclusive form of packing used in 519 procedures over the past three years at the William Harvey Hospital in Ashford (UK), with very few complications noted at the follow-up review. CONCLUSION: We strongly advocate using the absorbable gelatin sponge, a packing material that is kinder to the patient, has similar efficacy to other forms of packing and is also much cheaper to use compared to other common forms of packing.

Errors in the assessment of tympanic membrane perforations.

It is commonly stated that operative closure of large perforations of the tympanic membrane is less successful than closure of small perforations. Few authors mention the exact size of the perforations studied, and fewer still give their method of measuring perforations. We describe a photographic method of assessing the size of perforations relative to the total drumhead, measuring them with a computerized digitizing pad. Thirteen temporal bones were selected at random. Perforations of different sizes, shapes and at different sites were fashioned in the tympanic membranes. These were assessed by clinicians of all grades, who were asked to draw the perforations and give estimates of the perforation size as a percentage of the total drumhead. Visual estimates and drawings were compared with a photographic objective method. Gross errors (some in excess of 100%) were apparent in both estimates and drawings. There was a highly significant statistical difference between the objective method and visual estimates and drawings (P < 0.001). Greater clinical experience was not correlated with better performance in estimating the size of perforations.