Expectations of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Fellows; Do We Meet Them?

OBJECTIVE: There are 16 accredited hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) fellowships in North America. The purpose of this study is to portray the expectations of the incoming HPB fellows about their training and its implication on their career. DESIGN: A 29-questions survey was sent out to all HPB fellows starting in August 2017. The survey was divided in 3 sections depicting background, in-training and postfellowship expectations. Descriptive statistics were generated for aggregate survey responses. SETTING: This study was performed through an online questionnaire that was sent to the participants via e-mail. The answers were processed in our offices in Methodist Richardson Medical Center, in Richardson, Texas which is a private tertiary medical center part of the Methodist Health System. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were all incoming HPB Fellows (In HPB fellowship programs accredited by the Fellowship Council) starting their fellowship in August 2017. RESULTS: We had a 94% response rate. Forty-six percent of fellows anticipate doing about 150 to 250 HPB cases during the fellowship, and all 15 fellows anticipate having at least 1 publication during fellowship. Despite that >90% of fellows believe that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches will be more frequently utilized in HPB surgery, only 3/15 anticipate being able to apply MIS techniques and only 54% will be robotically trained. Interestingly the majority of fellows believe that the attending should be performing the case the first few months. CONCLUSION: The trainees believe that case volume is the most important factor for choosing a fellowship and for adequate training. Most of the fellows anticipate doing adequate number of cases but only the minority feels they will be adequately trained in MIS-robotic techniques.

Growth in robotic-assisted procedures is from conversion of laparoscopic procedures and not from open surgeons' conversion: a study of trends and costs.

BACKGROUND: Utilization of laparoscopy (LAP) has been increasing in general surgery for years, and there is currently a rapid increase in the utilization of robotic-assisted surgeries (RAS). This study evaluates trends in the surgical approach utilized in some commonly performed surgeries, the proportion of each approach within the procedures, and the cost of these surgeries based on the surgical approach. METHODS: This is a retrospective study using the Vizient database. The database was queried using ICD-9 codes for colectomy, cholecystectomy, inguinal and ventral hernia repairs, and bariatric surgeries, either open, LAP, or robotically performed. Utilization trends were evaluated between quarters, over a 7-year period, and direct cost was compared between approaches. IBM SPSS v.23.0.0 was used for data analysis, with α = 0.05. RESULTS: 857,468 patients underwent colectomy, cholecystectomy, inguinal and ventral hernia repairs, and bariatric procedures. A significant decrease in open-approach utilization was seen in colectomy (71.8-61.9%), cholecystectomy (35.7-27.1%), and bariatric surgeries (20.1-10.1%), whereas both LAP and RAS utilization increased (p < 0.001). Significant RAS increase was seen in all five procedures: colectomy (0.4-8.0%), cholecystectomy (0.2-1.8%), IHR (19.9-29.4%), VHR (0.2-2.9%), and bariatric (0.6-5.4%), compared to a decrease in LAP (p < 0.001). Surgery cost was significantly higher for open ($14,364), followed by RAS ($11,376) and LAP ($7945), p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic technology is commonly viewed as enabling open procedures to be converted to minimally invasive, a trend not observed in our study. Our trends analysis revealed significant RAS utilization increase from LAP procedures and not from open procedure conversion, although specific surgeon data were not available. RAS were costlier than LAP for all five procedures. The benefits of rapid robot adoption and the forces that are driving these must be examined against a backdrop of burdening an already expensive healthcare system.