Effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on total and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in primary prevention: A nationwide study based on French Health Insurance Data (SNDS).

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) both inhibit the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) but have different sites of action. Whether clinically meaningful differences exist is still debated. The authors set up a population-based nationwide retrospective cohort study with at least 5 years of follow-up based on the comprehensive French Health Insurance Database linked to the French hospital discharge database. Patients aged 50 or above, identified as ARB or ACE inhibitor new users in 2009 (at least one delivery during the year and no such delivery in 2008) were eligible. Exclusion criteria included history of cancer, cardiovascular disease, or chronic renal insufficiency. Main outcome measure was overall mortality. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular deaths, major cardiovascular events, and major or other cardiovascular events. Out of 407 815 eligible patients, 233 682 (57%) were ARB users; two-third had no previous exposure to antihypertensive drug. Based on propensity-score based Cox model, ARB new user group had a better overall (HR: .878, 95%CI, .854 to .902), and cardiovascular (HR: .841, 95%CI, .800 to .84) survival and had a lower risk for major cardiovascular events (HR: .886, 95%CI, .868 to .905). Statistically significant quantitative interactions were detected with diabetes. Considering subgroup analyses, ARBs had a better survival than ACE inhibitors in nondiabetic patients.

Geographical variations in the prevalence of hypertension in France: Cross-sectional analysis of the CONSTANCES cohort.

AIMS: While international variations in the prevalence of hypertension are well described, less is known about intra-national disparities and their determinants. We wanted to describe the variations in hypertension prevalence within France and to determine how much lifestyle and socioeconomic factors contributed to explain these regional variations. METHODS: Participants (62,247 French adults aged 18 to 69 years) were recruited in the 16 centres of the CONSTANCES study between 2012 and 2015. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure higher than 140/90 mmHg and/or taking antihypertensive medications. The contribution of lifestyle and socioeconomic factors to hypertension prevalence variations among centres was examined using sequential hierarchical logistic models. RESULTS: Hypertension prevalence was 37.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 36.6-38.0) in men and 23.2% (95% CI = 22.7-23.8) in women. Hypertension prevalence rates varied by almost two-fold among centres (1.9 in men, 1.6 in women) with the highest prevalence in the north and the east of France. Body mass index was strongly associated with hypertension in women (odds ratio (OR)1-unit increase = 1.11 (95% CI = 1.11-1.12)) and was the highest contributor to between-centre variations (27% in women), followed by socioeconomic characteristics (e.g. ORhigh versus low education = 0.85 (95% CI = 0.83-0.87), contributing to 14% of variations in women). Together, family history of hypertension, body mass index, education, occupation and residential area socioeconomic level explained about 30% and 40% of between-centre variations in men and women, respectively. CONCLUSION: Hypertension prevalence greatly varies among French regions and this is partly explained by known lifestyle and socioeconomic factors. Nevertheless, these variations and all the hypertension determinants have not been fully deciphered yet.