A multicenter survey of Hispanic caregiver preferences for patient decision control in the United States and Latin America.

BACKGROUND: Understanding family caregivers' decisional role preferences is important for communication, quality of care, and patient and family satisfaction. The family caregiver has an important role in a patient's decisional role preferences. There are limited studies on family caregivers' preferences of the patient's decision control at the end of life among Hispanics. AIMS: To identify Hispanic caregivers' preferences of the decision control of patients with advanced cancer and to compare the preferences of caregivers in Hispanic Latin American and Hispanic American caregivers. DESIGN: We surveyed patients and their family caregivers referred to outpatient palliative care clinics in the United States, Chile, Argentina, and Guatemala. Caregiver preferences of patient's decision control were evaluated using the Control Preference Scale. Caregivers' and patients' sociodemographic variables, patient performance status, and Hispanic American patient acculturation level were also collected. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 387 caregivers were surveyed: 100 (26%) in Chile, 99 (26%) in Argentina, 97 (25%) in Guatemala, and 91 (24%) in the United States. The median age was 56 years, and 59% were female. RESULTS: Caregiver preference of patient's decision control was passive, shared, and active for 10 (11%), 45 (52%), and 32 (37%) Hispanic American caregivers and 54 (19%), 178 (62%), and 55 (19%) Hispanic Latin American caregivers (p = 0.0023), respectively. Caregiver acculturation level did not affect the preferences of the Hispanic American sample (p = 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: Most Hispanic family caregivers preferred the patient to make shared decisions. Hispanic Latin American caregivers more frequently preferred patients to assume a passive decisional role. Acculturation did not influence the preferences of Hispanic American caregivers.

Assessment of palliative care cancer patients' most important concerns.

AIMS: Patients in the palliative care setting have a number of concerns not necessarily connected to their medical problems, such as spiritual and relationship issues. When these problems are not properly assessed and addressed, they may become a significant source of distress for patients and families. The aims of the present study were to assess the concerns of patients attending a palliative care clinic, to examine physicians' ratings of patient concerns, to access the concordance between patients' and physicians' ratings, and to assess the association between patients' concerns and their level of distress. METHODS: We evaluated 137 patients attending a symptom control and palliative care clinic. Patients completed the Concerns Checklist, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Cancer Behavior Inventory at the beginning of their visit. The Concerns Checklist was completed by the patient's clinic physician immediately after the visit and was used to estimate how accurate the physician was in identifying patients' concerns. We examined the correlation between the total number of patient concerns and their levels of anxiety, mood disturbance, and self-efficacy. RESULTS: Patients were most concerned about loss of function, the future, and caring for themselves. Concordance between physician and patient rating of concerns was poor (all kappas, 0.26 or lower). Higher levels of patient concerns were associated with greater anxiety (r = 0.52) and depressive symptoms (r = 0.40) and lower self-efficacy (r = -0.37). CONCLUSIONS: There was generally poor concordance between patients reporting of their concerns and physicians reporting of the patients' concerns. In addition, patients' with more concerns also had higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms. Thus, it is important to find strategies to more accurately identify patients' concerns, so that they can be adequately addressed.

Associations among hypogonadism, C-reactive protein, symptom burden, and survival in male cancer patients with cachexia: a preliminary report.

CONTEXT: Cachexia is characterized by muscle wasting, anorexia, and elevated inflammatory markers. In patients without cancer, hypogonadism is associated with lower lean body mass, increased symptom burden, and decreased survival. Hypogonadism in cancer cachexia could exacerbate symptoms, facilitate a proinflammatory state, and decrease survival. OBJECTIVES: To explore the relationships among these factors, a retrospective study of male cancer patients was conducted. METHODS: The charts of 98 consecutive male patients referred to a cachexia clinic at a comprehensive cancer center were reviewed. All patients reported weight loss of >5% within the preceding six months; the median age was 60 years. Fifty-seven (58%) had serum C-reactive protein (CRP), and 68 (69%) had total testosterone evaluated. Symptoms were evaluated by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. RESULTS: Median CRP was 20mg/L, and median testosterone level was 185 ng/dL (6.42 nmol/L) (normal > or = 240 ng/dL or 8.36 nmol/L). There was an inverse correlation between testosterone and CRP levels (P<0.01). Lower testosterone was associated with increased dyspnea and insomnia (P<0.05). Poor appetite and insomnia (P<0.05) correlated with elevated CRP. Survival of patients with testosterone levels < or = 185 ng/dL (6.42 nmol/L) was decreased compared with that of those with levels >185 ng/dL (13 vs. 62 weeks, P=0.004). Patients with CRP levels >10mg/L had decreased survival compared with those with levels < or = 10mg/L (15 vs. 46 weeks, P=0.01). The combination of hypogonadism and elevated CRP was associated with poorer prognosis. Elevated CRP levels were associated with increased symptom burden and decreased survival. Low testosterone was associated with decreased survival and correlated inversely with CRP levels, dyspnea, and insomnia. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results suggest that testosterone and CRP may be additive or synergistic as markers for survival in male patients and could be useful in future prognostic models.

Single- vs. multiple-item instruments in the assessment of quality of life in patients with advanced cancer.

Although multidimensional instruments are usually used to measure quality of life in advanced cancer patients, recent research suggests that single-item assessments can provide a reliable measure. Using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) instrument as a gold standard, we assessed the performance of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System "feeling of well-being" (ESAS WB) item. We reviewed the data from 213 patients enrolled in six clinical trials. We determined the association between baseline ESAS WB and FACT-G total and subscale domain scores (Physical Well-being [PWB], Social/Family Well-being [SWB], Emotional Well-being [EWB], and Functional Well-being [FWB]. We also calculated the association between baseline (T1) and second (T2) observations of ESAS WB and of FACT-G total score. In addition, we predicted the change in FACT-G predicted by the ESAS WB score using regression analysis. Mean age was 60 (SD 12) years and 48% were female. The Spearman correlation coefficient of ESAS WB and FACT-G was -0.48 (P<0.0001). Correlations with FACT-G subscale domains were also highly significant, except for the SWB domain (P=0.08). The Pearson correlation coefficient for T1-T2 in ESAS WB and FACT-G for 146 patients was -0.36 (P<0.0001). The change in ESAS WB corresponding to FACT-G published minimally important difference was -0.24 for 3, -1.55 for 5, and -2.87 for 7, respectively. These results suggest that the single-item measure ESAS WB best reflects the total score on the FACT-G and PWB, EWB, and FWB domains but not on the SWB domain.

The association between autonomic dysfunction and survival in male patients with advanced cancer: a preliminary report.

CONTEXT: Autonomic nervous system dysfunction (AD) is a common syndrome in patients with advanced cancer. It is associated with decreased survival in several patient populations, including diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and neurological diseases. Based on this evidence, we hypothesized that autonomic dysfunction is associated with decreased survival in patients with advanced cancer. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this preliminary study was to test the association between AD, as measured by the standardized Ewing test and heart rate variability (HRV) measures, and survival in this patient population. METHODS: We examined the relationship between survival and parameters of AD in subjects who participated in a prospective study of autonomic dysfunction and hypogonadism in male patients with advanced cancer. Eligibility criteria were defined based on the prospective study protocol. We collected demographic information, date of death (obtained from the online Social Security Death Index database), date of study entry, and Ewing and HRV scores. We defined survival as the interval between study entry and date of death. A survival analysis was used to test the association between survival (in days) and Ewing test (0-5) and measures of HRV, including time domain (standard deviation of normal to normal beat interval [SDNN]) and frequency domain (ultra low, very low, low, and high). Four patients were still alive at the time of this study and included in the survival analysis as being censored. RESULTS: Forty-seven male patients were included in this study. Median age was 59 years (range: 20-79), and 30 out of 47 (63%) were Caucasians. AD, defined as Ewing score greater than 2, was present in 38 out of 47 (80%) of the patients. Median Ewing score was 3 (1-5), indicating moderate to severe AD. Spearman correlation for Ewing score and SDNN was 0.44 (P = 0.002). There was a significant association between abnormal Ewing score and survival (P < 0.0001) and abnormal SDNN HRV and survival (P = 0.056). CONCLUSION: AD is associated with shorter survival in male patients with advanced cancer. Further longitudinal research in a large cohort is justified based on.

Evaluating minimal important differences for the FACT-Melanoma quality of life questionnaire.

OBJECTIVES: Minimal Important Differences (MIDs) establish benchmarks for interpreting mean differences in clinical trials involving quality of life outcomes and inform discussions of clinically meaningful change in patient status. The purpose of this study was to assess MIDs for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Melanoma (FACT-M). METHODS: A prospective validation study of the FACT-M was performed with 273 patients with stages I through IV melanoma. FACT-M, Karnofsky Performance Scales, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status scores were obtained at baseline and 3 months following enrollment. Anchor- and distribution-based methods for assessing MIDs were compared, and pattern-mixture modeling was employed to derive multivariate adjusted estimates. RESULTS: This study indicates that an approximate range for MIDs of the FACT-M subscales is between 5 to 9 points for the Trial Outcome Index, 4 to 6 points for the Melanoma Combined Subscale, 2 to 4 points for the Melanoma Subscale, and 1 to 2 points for the Melanoma Surgery Subscale. Each method produced similar but not identical ranges of MIDs. CONCLUSIONS: The properties of the anchor instrument employed to derive MIDs directly affect resulting MID ranges and point values. When MIDs are offered as supportive evidence of a clinically meaningful change, the anchor instrument used to derive clinically meaningful thresholds of change should be clearly stated along with information supporting the choice of anchor instrument as the most appropriate for the domain of interest.

The impact of palliative care consultation on symptom assessment, communication needs, and palliative interventions in pediatric patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: There are few data describing symptom prevalence in children with cancer. The available literature suggests that similar to adults, symptom prevalence and distress are high and that communication regarding end-of-life care needs is limited. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated symptom prevalence, treatment recommendations, and communication about end-of-life care issues for children seen in pediatric palliative care consultation (PCC) at one National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. The goal of our study was to obtain baseline data to target areas in need of intervention. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of consecutive patients referred to a newly initiated PCC service. Analysis was descriptive. RESULTS: Over the 9-month study period, 15 children were referred. Median age was 13 years (2-24), with 10 males. Eleven children were receiving chemotherapy and/or radiation. Median number of documented symptoms at PCC was 5 per child (2-10). PCC universally resulted in the detection of symptoms not identified by the primary team, for a median of 3 new symptoms per patient (0-9). Documented communication about most end-of-life care issues with parents was uncommon, and rarely involved children. Initial PPCC resulted in recommendations for medication changes in 14 of 15 children, allied health consultation in 8, counseling in 11, patient care conference in 3, and family conference in 6. For the 12 patients who died, median time from PPCC to death was 8 days (1-96). CONCLUSIONS: PCC, although late in the course, resulted in the detection of multiple symptom control and communication needs, and corresponding treatment recommendations.

Alcoholism screening in patients with advanced cancer: impact on symptom burden and opioid use.

PURPOSE: Alcoholism is a devastating disease that can cause patient and family suffering and is frequently underdiagnosed. Preliminary studies suggest that it is associated with increased symptom expression and opioid dose escalation. The CAGE questionnaire is a widely used tool for alcoholism screening. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and characteristics of patients who screen positive for alcoholism in a palliative care outpatient clinic (PCOC). METHODS: We reviewed 665 consecutive charts of patients referred to the PCOC and collected data regarding age, gender, and type of cancer. For the first 100 consecutive CAGE positive (CAGE+) and 100 consecutive CAGE negative (CAGE-) patients, time from advanced cancer diagnosis (AC) to PCOC was calculated, and symptoms (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, ESAS) and Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (MEDD) were collected. RESULTS: CAGE was available for 598 of 665 (90%) patients. Of 598 patients, 100 (17%) were CAGE+. CAGE+ patients were younger (58 versus 60 years, p < 0.05), predominantly male (68% versus 47%, p < 0.0001), and with head/neck malignancies (24% versus 9%, p < 0.05). CAGE+ patients were referred earlier (5 +/- 27 months after AC, p < 0.0001). At baseline, pain, sleep, dyspnea, well-being, and total symptom distress were significantly worse among CAGE+ patients. Both groups showed similar improvement in symptoms. CAGE+ patients were more frequently on opioids upon referral (47/100 versus 29/100, p < 0.05) and follow-up (27/65 versus 16/68, p < 0.05). At follow-up, opioid doses did not show significant changes. CONCLUSION: Seventeen percent of the patients were CAGE+. These patients were referred earlier to palliative care, had more symptom expression, and were more frequently on opioids. The palliative care team successfully improved symptom control in both groups without opioid dose escalation.

Prospective assessment of the reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Melanoma questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: The authors previously developed a melanoma-specific module for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-Melanoma), a tool for the assessment of quality of life (QOL) in patients with melanoma. The reliability and validity of the FACT-Melanoma was examined in this study. METHODS: Patients with melanoma (N = 273; stages I-IV) completed a battery of questionnaires at the time of enrollment. The validity of the instrument was examined by comparing FACT-Melanoma scores with performance status, disease stage, treatment status, and other scales, including the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Melanoma Module, the Profile of Mood States, and the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Patients were assessed after 1 week to assess test-retest reliability and at 3 months to determine the sensitivity of the instrument to change in performance status. RESULTS: The internal consistency and test-retest reliability (r) of the melanoma subscale (Cronbach alpha = .85; r = .81) and the total FACT-Melanoma (alpha = .95; r = .90) were excellent. Overall, the scales were correlated with other measures, as anticipated. Total FACT-Melanoma scores, along with scores for physical well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being, and melanoma-specific scales, were lower for patients with advanced (stage III/IV) melanoma, poor performance status, and patients who were receiving active treatment. The FACT-Melanoma total score and the score for physical well-being were sensitive to changes in performance status (P = .0012 and P = .004, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study indicated that the FACT-Melanoma questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument for patients with melanoma that can be used for the assessment of QOL in clinical trials.

Predictors of access to palliative care services among patients who died at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

PURPOSE: Palliative care services can decrease physical and psychosocial distress in patients with advanced cancer. However, most patients with cancer die without access to palliative care services (APCS), and patterns of referral are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to determine predictors of patients' access to palliative care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed patient records from the computerized database at UT M. D. Anderson Cancer Center over 2 (2003 and 2004) to determine differences in characteristics and outcomes between patients with and without APCS. APCS was defined as a palliative care consultation and follow-up or transfer to the palliative care unit. RESULTS: A total of 499 of 1453 (34%) inpatients who died at our cancer center had APCS. There were no significant differences in race, age, or insurance status between the APCS groups. The two major predictors of a low rate of APCS were hematologic malignancies (20% rate of APCS versus 44% for solid tumors, p < 0.0001) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission (15% versus 52% for non-ICU admission, p < 0.0001). Patients with hematologic malignancies who were admitted to the ICU had the lowest APCS rate (10%, p < 0.0001). The median relative cost of care per patient for decedents with APCS was 0.62 compared to non-referred patients (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: APCS was lower among patients with hematologic malignancies and those admitted to the ICU. APCS resulted in a lower cost of care. Mortality in comprehensive cancer centers is quite variable among different primary malignancies. More research is needed to better define patterns of referral.

Psychosocial assessment of patients who have undergone inpatient cancer rehabilitation.

This study summarized the social work services provided in an acute inpatient cancer rehabilitation program. Reviewed were 49 consecutive social worker assessments from February 2003 to March 2003. The social worker was consulted mostly for discharge planning (40/49, 82%) and helping patients cope (23/49, 47%). Sixty-seven percent of the patients (33/49) were coping well. Sixty-five percent of patients (32/49) had an identified caregiver. Most patients planned to go home (33/49, 67%) after their discharge. Interventions provided by the social worker included counseling (100% of patients/ families), referral to financial resources (24/49, 49%) and transportation services (21/49, 43%), and other resources (37/49, 76%). Age, gender, and identified caregiver did not show significant association with the coping status or referrals. The social worker is important in assessing cancer patients' coping and providing support.

Evaluation of the memorial delirium assessment scale (MDAS) for the screening of delirium by means of simulated cases by palliative care health professionals.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is among the most common neuropsychiatric complications of advanced cancer. The Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) is a widely used and validated screening tool for delirium in cancer patients. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the use of the MDAS by different palliative care health professionals after receiving formal training and a guiding manual for administration and scoring. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one palliative care health professionals received a training session on the MDAS, including description of the tool, validation, and scoring. Participants also received copies of a proposed standardized manual for completion of the MDAS. Two of the investigators presented three simulated cases to the participants, who independently completed a scoring sheet for each case. The data were then analyzed according to the cases and the profession of the operators. RESULTS: Thirty-one scoring sheets were analyzed (11 physicians, 12 nurses, and 8 others). A correct diagnosis was achieved by 30 (96.8%) of the 31 participants in case 1 (nondelirious, true score = 5, median = 5, range = 2-15), 28 of 31 (90.3%) in case 2 (severe mixed delirium, true score = 20, median = 18, range = 10-26), and 31 of 31 in case 3 (mild hypoactive delirium, true score = 14, median = 19, range = 13-25). Overall percentage of error was 31% for items 2, 3, and 4 (cognitive) and 45% for all other items (observational) (p < 0.001). The percentage of error did not differ between physicians and nurses and other palliative care professionals (p > 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results suggest that adequate training and a guiding manual can enhance the application of MDAS by palliative care health professionals in the teaching settings. Clinical studies to assess the utility of the MDAS as a screening tool are justified to further confirm these findings.

Errors in symptom intensity self-assessment by patients receiving outpatient palliative care.

BACKGROUND: Patient-based symptom scores are the standard method for assessment in palliative care. There has been limited research on the frequency of errors upon using this approach. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) is a reliable and valid assessment tool routinely used for symptom intensity assessment in our cancer center. OBJECTIVE: To determine if patients were scoring the symptoms on the ESAS in the way it was supposed to be scored. SETTINGS: The study was carried out at the outpatient palliative care center. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: Retrospective review of 60 consecutive patient charts was done where the patient had initially scored the ESAS. The physician looked at this scoring on the ESAS and went back to the patient to do the scoring again to see if the patient had scored it in the way it was intended to be scored. The same physician did the assessment on all of the patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Level of agreement (weighted kappa) before versus after the physician visit; Screening performance of patient completed ESAS for mild and moderate symptom intensity. RESULTS: Complete agreement ranged from 58% (sleep) to 82% (well-being); the weighted kappa ranged from 0.49 (drowsiness) to 0.78 (well-being). There was more agreement for symptoms such as dyspnea, nausea, anxiety, and depression and less agreement for symptoms such as lack of sleep and lack of appetite. The screening performance of the initial patient self assessment showed less sensitivity for nausea, drowsiness if the intensity was mild and less sensitivity for pain, nausea, anxiety, and drowsiness if the intensity was moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Vigilance needs to be maintained about the ESAS scores done by the patients particularly for symptoms of sleep, appetite, and pain. There is a likelihood of error if doctors or nurses do not routinely check the way patients have completed the assessment form. More research is needed to determine the best way to teach patients how to minimize errors in self-reporting of symptoms.

The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System as a screening tool for depression and anxiety.

PURPOSE: Mood disorders are among the most important psychiatric problems in patients with cancer. However, they are frequently underdiagnosed and therefore undertreated. This may lead to difficulties with symptom control, social withdrawal, and poor quality of life. This study was conducted to evaluate the screening performance of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) for depression and anxiety, compared to Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed ESAS and HADS data collected from three previous clinical trials conducted by our group. The diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety, and moderate/severe depression and/or anxiety made when patients scored 8 or more, and 11 or more in HADS questionnaire, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values for ESAS were calculated. RESULTS: Of 216 patients analyzed, the median (range) score for depression was 2 (0-10) and anxiety 3 (0-10) using ESAS, and 6 (0-16) and 7 (0-19) using HADS, respectively. A cut off of 2 out of 10 or more in the ESAS gave a sensitivity of 77% and 83% with a specificity of 55% and 47% for depression and moderate/severe depression, respectively. A cutoff of 2 out of 10 or more in the ESAS gave a sensitivity of 86% and 97%, and a specificity of 56% and 43% for anxiety and moderate/severe anxiety, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the ideal cutoff point of ESAS for the screening of depression and anxiety in palliative care is 2 out of 10 or more. More research is needed to define the ideal cutoff point for screening of severe depression and anxiety.

Pain intensity assessment by bedside nurses and palliative care consultants: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of pain intensity assessments (0-10) conducted by registered nurses (RN) and clinical nurse assistants (CAN) as compared to those conducted by the palliative care consultant (PCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of charts of patients who had received palliative care consult between April 2002 and August 2002. Data on patient demographic, date of palliative care consult, and date and intensity of pain assessment were collected. A numerical rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) was used to assess pain intensity. The data were included for analysis if the pain intensity assessment was performed during the same shift by all three care providers (RN, CNA, and PCC). RESULTS: Forty-one charts were found to include a complete pain assessment performed by the RN, CNA, and PCC. The agreement of pain intensity between the PCC and both the RN and CNA was poor. For a diagnosis of moderate-to-severe pain, the RN's intensity assessment had a specificity of 90% but a sensitivity of 45%, and the CNA's intensity assessment had a specificity of 100% but a sensitivity of only 30%. The Spearman correlation coefficient between the intensity assessments performed by the PCC and the RN was 0.56 (p=0.00) and between those by the PCC and the CNA 0.22 (p=0.15). CONCLUSION: Lack of agreement between pain intensity assessments performed by the PCC and bedside nurse suggests possible inconsistencies in the way the assessments were performed. Better education on how to perform standard pain intensity assessment is needed.

Potent analgesics are more expensive for patients in developing countries: a comparative study.

Opioids are some of the most important analgesic medications for the management of both moderate to severe pain and several are included on the World Health organization (WHO) list of essential drugs. Opioid costs in developing countries have been reported to be higher than those in developed nations. This study documents retail prices and availability of several potent opioids in a number of developing and developed countries. Pain and Palliative Care specialists currently working in their countries were asked to collect data on the retail cost of a 30 day supply of 15 different opioid preparations in 5 developing and 7 developed countries. Data were analyzed to compare costs and costs as a percentage of gross national product (GNP) per capita per month. Opioid costs and availability varied widely in both developing and developed countries. Forty five of 75 opioid preparations were available in developing countries (40% of medications studied were not available) and 76 of 105 preparations were available in the developed countries (28% not available). In US dollars, the median cost of opioids differed between developed and developing countries ($53 and $112 respectively) The median costs of all opioid preparations as a percentage of GNP per capita per month were 36% for developing and 3% for developed nations; the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). In developing countries 23 of 45 (51%) of opioid dosage forms cost more than 30% of the monthly GNP per capita, versus only three of 76 (4%) in developed countries. The relative cost of opioids to income is higher in developing countries. Our data suggest that in developing countries opioid access for the majority of patients is likely to be limited by cost, and development of palliative care programs will require heavy or total subsidization of opioid costs.

Palliative care inpatient service in a comprehensive cancer center: clinical and financial outcomes.

PURPOSE: Inpatient palliative care units are unavailable in most cancer centers and tertiary hospitals. The purpose of this article is to review the outcomes of the first 344 admissions to the Palliative Care Inpatient Service (PCIS) at our comprehensive cancer center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our computerized database for clinical and demographic information, length of stay, and hospital billing during the first year of the service's operation. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty patients were admitted during the study period. Their median age was 57 years. The main cancer diagnoses were thoracic or head and neck (44%), gastrointestinal (25%), and hematologic malignancy (8%). The main referral symptoms were pain (44%), nausea (41%), fatigue (39%), and dyspnea (38%). The median length of stay in the PCIS was 7 days (range, 1 to 58 days). Fifty-nine patients died while in the PCIS. However, the overall hospital mortality rate was not increased compared with that in the year before the establishment of the PCIS (3.58% v 3.59%). The mean reimbursement rate for all palliative care charges was approximately 57%, and the mean daily charges in the PCIS were 38% lower than the mean daily charges for the rest of the hospital. Symptom intensity data showed severe distress on admission and significant improvement in the main target symptoms. Most patients were discharged to a hospice. CONCLUSION: The PCIS has been accepted in our tertiary cancer center on the basis of its clinical utility and financial viability.

An assessment of the utilization of complementary and alternative medication in women with gynecologic or breast malignancies.

PURPOSE: To describe and assess the current utilization of complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) in women with a diagnosis of either gynecologic or breast cancer and evaluate their reasons for use. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 250 female patients from the Multidisciplinary Breast Center and 250 patients from the Gynecologic Oncology Center of The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX). Patients were selected by having an odd-numbered medical record number, and they were contacted before their clinic visit. The goals of the study were explained, and verbal consent was obtained. Patients who agreed to participate were asked to bring a written list and the medication bottles of all over-the-counter prescriptions and CAMs with them to clinic. In clinic, the investigator obtained a written informed consent and administered the survey. All patients and surveys were assessable. RESULTS: The most frequently used herbal products and megavitamins/minerals were identified from the patient medication histories. Overall, we found the proportion of patients using CAM to be 48% (95% CI, 44% to 53%; 241 of 500 patients). CAM use was related to patients' educational status: 62% had postgraduate degrees, 50% had college degrees, 56% had some college, and 33% had a high school education or less. Also, among patients using CAMs, only 53.5% had spoken to a healthcare provider regarding CAM therapy. CONCLUSION: The use of CAM is common among women with cancer. Studies need to be conducted to establish if there are any potential drug interactions and/or therapeutic benefit of CAM products. Moreover, there is a need to educate patients and healthcare providers on appropriate and safe use of CAM products.