Financial Toxicity in Radiation Oncology.

Financial toxicity details the financial burden patients face due to a variety of medical costs. Cancer patients, especially those receiving radiation therapy, are at a much higher risk of experiencing economic hardships than healthy people or people with other conditions. There are a variety of risk factors associated with financial toxicity as well as numerous tools to assess the toxicity experienced by patients. In this review article, we present a concise overview of contributors, risk factors, case studies, tools, impacts, and potential interventions of financial toxicity.

The cost-effectiveness of surgical resection and cesium-131 intraoperative brachytherapy versus surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of metastatic brain tumors.

This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of surgical resection (S) and Cesium-131 (Cs-131) [S + Cs-131] intraoperative brachytherapy versus S and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) [S + SRS] for the treatment of brain metastases. Treatment records as well as hospital and outpatient charts of 49 patients with brain metastases between 2008 and 2012 who underwent S + Cs-131 (n = 24) and S + SRS (n = 25) were retrospectively reviewed. Hospital charges were compared for the single treatment in question. Means and curves of survival time were defined by the Kaplan-Meier estimator, with the cost analysis focusing on the time period of the relevant treatment. Quality adjusted life years (QALY) and Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated for each treatment option as a measure of cost-effectiveness. The direct hospital costs of treatments per patient were: S + Cs131 = $19,271 and S + SRS = $44,219. The median survival times of S + Cs-131 and S + SRS were 15.5 and 11.3 months, and the 12 month survival rates were 61 % and 49 % (P = 0.137). The QALY for S + SRS when compared to S + Cs-131 yielded a p < 0.0001, making it significantly more cost-effective. The ICER also revealed that when compared to S + Cs-131, S + SRS was significantly inferior (p < 0.0001). S + Cs-131 is more cost-effective compared with S + SRS based on hospital charges as well as QALYs and ICER. Cost effectiveness, in addition to efficacy and risk, should factor into the comparison between these two treatment modalities for patients with surgically resectable brain metastases.

Assessment of pain as a sequela in patients treated with intracavitary brachytherapy accelerated partial breast irradiation (IBAPBI): preliminary results of a prospective study.

To assess pain rates and relationship to radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) in patients treated with intracavitary brachytherapy accelerated partial breast irradiation (IBAPBI). Thirty-nine patients treated with IBAPBI were assessed prospectively for development of pain pretreatment, 1 month post-IBAPBI, and every 6 months thereafter. A qualitative subjective Late Effects of Normal Tissue-Subjective Objective Management Analytical (LENT-SOMA) questionnaire assessed pain. Use of pain medications was assessed as "no", "sometimes", or "regularly". A quantitative objective validated pressure threshold (PTH) measured pain in the site of IBAPBI breast (index) and its mirror-image in the nonirradiated breast (control). A validated tissue compliance meter (TCM) quantitatively assessed RIF in the index and control breasts at all time points. Mean ΔPTH(kg) and ΔTCM(mm) values reflected mean difference between the index and control breasts. Median follow-up is 44 months (range 5-59 months). According to LENT-SOMA, pain occurred in 89% at 1 and 24 months, 67% at 30 months, 30% at 36 months, 29% at 40 months, and 20% at 48 months. No patient used pain medication "regularly" but the use "sometimes" decreased over time: 61% at 1 month, 42% at 18 and 24 months, 13% at 36 months, and 10% at 40 months. Mean ΔPTH values, compared to Δ0 kg at baseline, peaked in absolute value by 1 month to -1.36 kg (p < 0.0001), persisted after 18 months at -0.99 kg (p < 0.0001) and 24 months at -0.73 kg (p < 0.0001), and returned to nearly baseline by 40 months at -0.11 kg (p < 0.57). Mean ΔPTH and ΔTCM correlated significantly with subjective patient reports of pain at each time point (p < 0.0001). To date, this is the first report to prospectively assess pain employing quantitative and qualitative inventories in patients treated with IBAPBI. Pain is experienced in the majority of patients experienced pain within the first 2 years, sometimes requiring a medication, and though subsides, it may persist 4 years after IBAPBI.

Early assessment of radiation response using a novel functional imaging modality -- [18F]fluorocholine PET (FCH-PET): a pilot study.

AIM: [¹8F]Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (FDG-PET) is commonly used to assess response to patients treated with radiation (RT) or combination of chemotherapy and RT (CRT). The intent of this pilot study is to explore whether [¹8F]fluorocholine PET (FCH-PET) can serve as an early predictive biomarker for early detection of RT/CRT response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients have been accrued and analyzed. The lesions were base of tongue, tonsil, nodes, hypopharynx, maxilla, palate, lung, pancreas, brain, uterine, and rectal. There were 16 lesions that were considered target lesion and were followed for correlation between change in FCH-PET SUVmax readings and clinical outcome. Median tumor size was 4.4 cm. Median RT dose was 66 Gy. The change in SUVmax (Δ SUVmax) of FCH-PET scans performed before and during RT was correlated with clinical outcome at the last follow-up. RESULTS: The median FCH-PET SUVmax for the 1st and 2nd scans was 6.15 and 4.65, respectively. Fourteen (87.5%) lesions showed a reduction in SUVmax in either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR), and 2 lesions showed an increase in SUVmax both of which were determined to be non-response (NR). The median percentage change between the 1st and 2nd scan was -19.5%. Forty-four percent of lesions (7/16) had CR, 44% (7/16) had PR, and 12% (2/16) had NR (no response). Median follow-up was 12 months. The results showed a difference between NR and PR, between NR and CR, and a trend towards significance (p=0.06). CONCLUSION: FCH-PET scan demonstrated changes in SUVmax during RT that were predictive of final outcome.

Quantitative assessment of radiation-induced fibrosis of the breast with tissue compliance meter, palpation, and radiological imaging: preliminary results.

Quantification of radiation (RT)-induced fibrosis (RIF) continues to present a challenge in breast cancer survivors. We compare assessment of RIF by palpation and tissue compliance meter (TCM) to the radiological findings in women treated with RT. Of 300 patients treated with adjuvant RT, 17 women had > or =2-year follow-up sufficient to document RIF. Palpation and TCM were employed by three radiation oncologists in a blinded fashion. Palpation grades 1, 2, and 3 denoted mild, moderate, and severe RIF. TCM measured degree of compliance (DC) of RIF in irradiated (RTB) and nonirradiated breasts (NRTB). Architectural distortions (AD) on mammograms, ultrasound (US), and MRI were assessed. Median time of follow up was 3.9 years (range 2.1-6.5 years). Palpation revealed RIF grades 1, 2, and 3 in four, 10, and three patients, respectively. Mean percent changes (PC) in DC between RTB and NRTB by TCM were 19.5%, 37.1%, and 57.5% for grades 1, 2, and 3 RIF, respectively (p < 0.0001). There was a strong linear correlation between palpation grade and PC of DC by TCM (spearman-rank correlation=0.88, p < 0.0001). Interobserver variability (reliability) was computed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for TCM and kappa statistic for clinical palpation (ICC=0.99 [p < 0.0001] and kappa=0.70 [p < 0.0001], respectively). There was no correlation between average size of the AD as measured by the imaging modalities and RIF as assessed by palpation or TCM. Our preliminary data suggest that quantification of RIF is best with TCM. TCM results correlate better with palpation than with radiological imaging. The study with larger number of patients required to confirm our findings is underway.