[Support Needs for Health Promotion of Community-Dwelling People with Disabilities: Perspectives of Operators Managing Disability Supportive Housing].

PURPOSE: Recent studies have focused on policies aimed at supporting the independence of individuals with disabilities in communities. As part of this initiative, supportive housing, integrated care, and residential spaces offer tailored services based on individual needs and autonomy. The attitudes and knowledge of the administrators supporting supportive housing residents regarding health management can influence the well-being of individuals with disabilities. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the challenges faced by supporting housing workers in enhancing the self-management skills of individuals with disabilities. METHODS: In this qualitative study, focus group interviews were conducted in August 2023 with nine administrators working to support housing in Seoul. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the interview data. RESULTS: The needs and challenges in enhancing the self-management skills of individuals with disabilities were as follows: (1) the complexity of health management challenges, (2) bidirectional strategies for strengthening health management capabilities, and (3) support for systematic health management. Additionally, eight subthemes were derived. CONCLUSION: By investigating the difficulties experienced and identifying the necessary support requirements for supportive housing workers, this study seeks to uncover insights and identifies areas for improvement and strategies for health management. This study acknowledges the educational and institutional support necessary to improve the health and quality of life of individuals with disabilities residing in supportive housing.

A mixed-method systematic literature review of health literacy interventions for people with disabilities.

AIMS: To identify the components and characteristics of health literacy interventions for people with disabilities and to explore the outcomes in terms of health literacy competencies. DESIGN: A mixed-method systematic literature review. REVIEW METHODS: The search results were reported based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. The quality appraisal was guided by the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The contents of each intervention were mapped to the health literacy intervention model and the outcomes were annotated using the integrated model of health literacy. DATA SOURCES: The literature search was conducted using several electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane library and PsycINFO in December 2022. RESULTS: Ten studies were selected for this systematic literature review. Seven studies were quantitative, two were qualitative and one was a mixed-methods study. The four components of the health literacy interventions included empowering individuals with low-health literacy (n = 10), strengthening individuals' social support system (n = 3), improving communication with health professionals (n = 1) and reducing barriers to access health systems (n = 3). No intervention addressed improving health professionals' health literacy competencies. Health literacy competencies identified as outcomes in the studies included access (n = 1), understand (n = 7), appraise (n = 1) and apply (n = 9) the health information. CONCLUSIONS: The significant findings of this systematic literature review provide baseline data and evidence for developing health literacy interventions for people with disabilities. However, this review demonstrates that only a handful of intervention studies have addressed the low-health literacy of people with disabilities. Further and more rigorous interventions addressing health literacy for people with diverse disabilities are warranted. IMPACT: This review provides insights into how health literacy interventions can be tailored to the type of disability. Further, efforts should be expanded to comprehensively promote all the four core competencies of health literacy to reduce health disparities for individuals living with disabilities. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Systematic literature review.