Resource use and cost associated with computerized decision support system and usual care in managing patients with atrial fibrillation: analysis of IMPACT-AF randomized trial data.

BACKGROUND: IMPACT-AF is a prospective, randomized, cluster design trial comparing atrial fibrillation (AF) management with a computerized decision support system (CDS) to usual care (control) in the primary care setting of Nova Scotia, Canada. The objective of this analysis was to compare the resource use and costs between CDS and usual care groups. METHODS: Case costing data, 12-month self-administered questionnaires, and monthly diaries from IMPACT-AF were used in this analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to compare costs and resource use between groups. All costs are presented in 2021 Canadian dollars and cover the 12-month period of participation in the study. RESULTS: A total of 1,145 patients enrolled in the trial. Case costing data were available for 466 participants (41.1%), 12-month self-administered questionnaire data for 635 participants (56.0%) and monthly diary data for 223 participants (19.7%). Emergency department visits and hospitalizations comprised the most expensive component of AF care. Across all three datasets, there were no statistically significant differences in costs or resource use between CDS and usual care groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no significant differences in resource use or costs among CDS and usual care groups in the IMPACT-AF trial, this study provides insight into the methodology and practical challenges of collecting economic data alongside a trial. REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT01927367, date of registration: 2013-08-20).

Prevalence and management of electrical lead abnormalities in cardiac implantable electronic device leads.

Background: Electrical lead abnormalities (ELAs) can result in device malfunction, leading to significant morbidity in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Objective: We sought to determine the prevalence and management of ELAs in patients with CIEDs. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients implanted with a CIED between 2012 and 2019 at a tertiary care center. The primary outcome was ELA defined as increased capture threshold (≥2× implantation value), decreased sensing (≤0.5 implantation value), change in impedance (>50% over 3 months), or nonphysiologic potentials. A secondary outcome of device clinic utilization was also collected. Results: There were 2996 unique patients (35% female) included with 4600 leads (57% Abbott, 43% Medtronic). ELAs were observed in 135 (3%) leads, including 124 (92%) Abbott and 10 (7%) Medtronic leads (hazard ratio 9.25, P < .001). Mean follow-up was 4.5 ± 2.2 years. ELAs were associated smaller lead French size, atrial location, and Abbott leads. Lead revision was required in 28% of cases. Patients with lead abnormalities had 38% more in-clinic visits per patient year of follow-up compared with those without (P < .001). Conclusion: ELAs were more frequent in certain models, which increased rates of revision and follow-up. Identification of factors that mitigate these abnormalities to improve lead performance are required to improve care for these devices and provide efficient healthcare.

Sex and racial disparities in catheter ablation.

Sex and racial disparities in the presentation, diagnosis, and management of cardiac arrhythmias are recognized. Sex-specific differences in electrophysiological parameters are well known and are predominantly related to differences in ion channel expression and the influence of sex hormones. However, the relationship between hormonal or racial influence and arrhythmia mechanisms, presentation, and management needs to be better defined. Women and racial and ethnic groups are less likely to undergo catheter ablation procedures for treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Underrepresentation of women and racial/ethnic groups in clinical trials has resulted in significant knowledge gaps. Whether sex and racial disparities in arrhythmia management reflect barriers in access to care, physician bias, patient values, and preferences or other factors requires further study.

Research Priorities in the Secondary Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation: A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Virtual Workshop Report.

There has been sustained focus on the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease and heart failure; yet, apart from stroke prevention, the evidence base for the secondary prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence, AF progression, and AF-related complications is modest. Although there are multiple observational studies, there are few large, robust, randomized trials providing definitive effective approaches for the secondary prevention of AF. Given the increasing incidence and prevalence of AF nationally and internationally, the AF field needs transformative research and a commitment to evidenced-based secondary prevention strategies. We report on a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute virtual workshop directed at identifying knowledge gaps and research opportunities in the secondary prevention of AF. Once AF has been detected, lifestyle changes and novel models of care delivery may contribute to the prevention of AF recurrence, AF progression, and AF-related complications. Although benefits seen in small subgroups, cohort studies, and selected randomized trials are impressive, the widespread effectiveness of AF secondary prevention strategies remains unknown, calling for development of scalable interventions suitable for diverse populations and for identification of subpopulations who may particularly benefit from intensive management. We identified critical research questions for 6 topics relevant to the secondary prevention of AF: (1) weight loss; (2) alcohol intake, smoking cessation, and diet; (3) cardiac rehabilitation; (4) approaches to sleep disorders; (5) integrated, team-based care; and (6) nonanticoagulant pharmacotherapy. Our goal is to stimulate innovative research that will accelerate the generation of the evidence to effectively pursue the secondary prevention of AF.

Remote Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Canada: Survey of Patients and Device Health Care Professionals.

BACKGROUND: Remote monitoring is used to supplement in-clinic follow-up for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) every 6-12 months. There is a need to optimize remote management for CIEDs because of the consistent increases in CIED implants over the past decade. The objective of this study was to investigate real and perceived barriers to the use of remote patient management strategies in Canada and to better understand how remote models of care can be optimized. METHODS: We surveyed 512 CIED patients and practitioners in 22 device clinics in Canada. RESULTS: Device clinic surveys highlighted significant variation and inconsistency in follow-up care for in-clinic and remote visits across and within clinics. This survey showed that funding policies and management of additional workflow are barriers to optimal use and uptake. Despite this, device clinics perceive remote follow-up as a valuable resource and an efficient way to manage patient follow-up. Patients were broadly satisfied with their CIED follow-up care but identified barriers related to coordination of care, visit logistics, and information needs. Views varied as a function of clinical or sociodemographic characteristics. Most patients (n = 228; 91%) expressed a desire to receive a phone call from their device clinic after a remote transmission has been received. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of a unified, guideline-supported approach to follow-up after CIED implant, and discrepant funding policies across jurisdictions, are significant barriers to the use of remote patient management strategies in Canada. Efforts to increase or expand use of remote follow-up must recognize these barriers and the needs of specific subgroups of patients.

INTRODUCTION: La télésurveillance sert de complément à la consultation en clinique des patients porteurs d'un dispositif cardiaque électronique implantable (DCEI) tous les 6 à 12 mois. Il est nécessaire d'optimiser la prise en charge à distance des patients porteurs de DCEI en raison de la constante augmentation des implantations de DCEI au cours de la dernière décennie. L'objectif de la présente étude était d'examiner les obstacles réels et perçus à l'utilisation des stratégies de prise en charge à distance des patients du Canada et de mieux comprendre la façon d'optimiser les modèles de soins à distance. MÉTHODES: Nous avons interrogé 512 patients porteurs de DCEI et praticiens de 22 cliniques spécialisées en DCEI du Canada. RÉSULTATS: Les enquêtes des cliniques spécialisées en DCEI ont fait ressortir la variation importante et le manque d'uniformité dans les soins de suivi lors des consultations en clinique et à distance au sein de toutes les cliniques et entre elles. Cette enquête a montré que les politiques de financement et la gestion du flux de travail supplémentaire sont les obstacles qui empêchent l'utilisation optimale et l'adoption. Malgré cela, les cliniques spécialisées en DCEI perçoivent le suivi à distance comme une ressource très utile et un moyen efficace de prendre en charge le suivi du patient. Les patients étaient dans l'ensemble satisfaits de leurs soins de suivi relatifs à leur DCEI, mais relevaient des obstacles liés à la coordination des soins, à la logistique des consultations et à leurs besoins d'information. Les points de vue variaient en fonction des caractéristiques cliniques et sociodémographiques. La plupart des patients (n = 228 ; 91 %) ont fait part de leur souhait de recevoir un appel téléphonique de leur clinique spécialisée en DCEI après la réception de la transmission à distance. CONCLUSIONS: L'absence d'une approche unifiée et fondée sur les lignes directrices qui porte sur le suivi après l'implantation de DCEI, et la divergence des politiques de financement des provinces et territoires sont des obstacles importants à l'utilisation de stratégies de prise en charge à distance des patients au Canada. Les efforts visant à accroître ou à étendre l'utilisation du suivi à distance doivent tenir compte de ces obstacles et des besoins des sous-groupes particuliers de patients.

Remote-only monitoring for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a before-and-after pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices are better when follow-up incorporates remote monitoring technology in addition to in-clinic visits. For patients with implantable devices, we sought to determine the feasibility, safety and associated health care utilization of remote-only follow-up, along with its effects on patients' quality of life and costs. METHODS: This multicentre before-and-after pilot study involved patients with new or existing pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators. The "before" phase of the study spanned the period October 2015 to February 2017; the "after" phase spanned the period October 2016 to February 2018. The exposure was remote-only follow-up in combination with Remote View, a service that facilitates access to device data, allowing device settings to be viewed remotely to facilitate remote programming. Outcomes at 12 months were feasibility (adherence to remote monitoring), safety (rate of adverse events) and health care utilization (remote and in-clinic appointments). We also assessed quality of life, using 3 validated scales, and costs, taking into account both health care system and patient costs. RESULTS: A total of 176 patients were enrolled. Adherence (defined as at least 1 successful remote transmission during follow-up) was 87% over a mean follow-up of 11.7 (standard deviation 2.2) months. There was a reduction in in-clinic visits at specialized sites among patients with both implantable defibrillators (26 v. 5, p < 0.001, n = 48) and pacemakers (42 v. 10, p < 0.001, n = 51). There was no significant change in visits to community sites for patients with defibrillators (13 v. 17, p = 0.3, n = 48). The composite rate of death, stroke, cardiovascular hospitalization and device-related hospitalization was 7% (n = 164). No adverse events were linked to the intervention. There was no change in quality-of-life scales between baseline and 12 months. Health care costs were reduced by 31% for patients with defibrillators and by 44% for those with pacemakers. INTERPRETATION: This pilot study showed the feasibility of remote-only follow-up, with no increase in adverse clinical outcomes and no effect on quality of life, but with reductions in costs and health care utilization. These results support progression to a larger-scale study of whether superior effectiveness and reduced cost can be achieved, with preservation of safety, through use of remote-only follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT02585817.

Prospective Assessment of an Automated Intraprocedural 12-Lead ECG-Based System for Localization of Early Left Ventricular Activation.

BACKGROUND: To facilitate ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT), an automated localization system to identify the site of origin of left ventricular activation in real time using the 12-lead ECG was developed. The objective of this study was to prospectively assess its accuracy. METHODS: The automated site of origin localization system consists of 3 steps: (1) localization of ventricular segment based on population templates, (2) population-based localization within a segment, and (3) patient-specific site localization. Localization error was assessed by the distance between the known reference site and the estimated site. RESULTS: In 19 patients undergoing 21 catheter ablation procedures of scar-related VT, site of origin localization accuracy was estimated using 552 left ventricular endocardial pacing sites pooled together and 25 VT-exit sites identified by contact mapping. For the 25 VT-exit sites, localization error of the population-based localization steps was within 10 mm. Patient-specific site localization achieved accuracy of within 3.5 mm after including up to 11 pacing (training) sites. Using 3 remotes (67.8±17.0 mm from the reference VT-exit site), and then 5 close pacing sites, resulted in localization error of 7.2±4.1 mm for the 25 identified VT-exit sites. In 2 emulated clinical procedure with 2 induced VTs, the site of origin localization system achieved accuracy within 4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective validation study, the automated localization system achieved estimated accuracy within 10 mm and could thus provide clinical utility.

Integrated Management Approach to Atrial Fibrillation Care: A Cost Utility Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a substantial burden on health care. Combined specialist and nurse-based AF clinics are associated with improved outcomes. However, Canadian data on the cost-effectiveness of this integrated management approach to AF care are lacking. METHODS: We evaluated health care costs and outcomes of 413 patients with newly-diagnosed AF in 3 emergency departments in Nova Scotia between January 1, 2011 and January 31, 2014. Using a before-after study design, patients were divided into usual care (228 patients) and intervention (185 patients) groups. The intervention was a nurse-run, physician-supervised AF clinic. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were compared between usual care and intervention. Costs were those incurred because of the clinical outcome, bleeding events, medications, and cardiovascular-related procedures. Probabilistic analysis was conducted to assess uncertainty. RESULTS: The AF clinic was associated with an average cost reduction of CAD$210.83 and an average improvement in QALY of 0.0007 per patient. The AF clinic was dominant over usual care despite higher operational and medication costs over 1 year. It provided greater cost-saving in approximately 66% of probabilistic analysis simulations and generated more QALYs in approximately 92% of simulations. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio < $50,000 was found in 68% of simulations. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides guidance regarding the cost-effectiveness of an integrated management approach compared with usual specialty care of AF in a Canadian setting. We recommend further study be undertaken that prospectively plans for economic evaluation before definitive assessments of cost-effectiveness can be made.

Cost Effectiveness of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Versus Escalation of Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy: The VANISH Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This analysis uses the data from the randomized controlled trial to assess the cost effectiveness of catheter ablation (n = 132) versus escalated antiarrhythmic therapy (n = 127). BACKGROUND: For survivors of myocardial infarction with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks despite antiarrhythmic drugs, the VANISH (Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Versus Escalated Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Ischemic Heart Disease) trial demonstrated improved clinical outcomes with catheter ablation compared with more aggressive antiarrhythmic pharmacotherapy. METHODS: Health care resource use and quality-of-life data were used to determine the cost effectiveness of catheter ablation. Published references were used to estimate costs (in 2015 Canadian dollars). The analysis was over 3 years, with a 5% discount rate. Adjustment was made for censoring and baseline utilities. RESULTS: Ablation resulted in greater quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) than escalated drug therapy did (1.63 vs. 1.49; difference: 0.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.20 to 0.46) and higher cost ($65,126 vs. $60,269; difference: $4,857; 95% CI: -$19,757 to $27,106); with an incremental cost per QALY gained for ablation versus escalated drug therapy of $34,057 primarily due to the initial costs of ablation, which were partially offset by the costs of subsequent ablations and adverse outcomes in the escalated drug therapy arm. For patients with amiodarone-refractory ventricular tachycardia, ablation dominated escalated drug therapy, with greater QALYs (1.48 vs. 1.26; difference: 0.22; 95% CI: -0.19 to 0.59) and lower costs ($67,614 vs. $68,383; difference: -$769; 95% CI: -$35,330 to $27,092). For those with sotalol-refractory ventricular tachycardia, ablation resulted in similar QALYs (1.90 vs. 1.90; difference: -0.00; 95% CI: -0.59 to 0.62) and higher costs ($60,455 vs. $45,033; difference: $15,422; 95% CI: -$10,968 to $48,555). CONCLUSIONS: For the total trial population, results are suggestive that ablation is cost effective compared with escalation of drug therapy. This result was only manifest for the subgroup of patients whose qualifying arrhythmia occurred despite amiodarone.

Predicting early mortality after implantable defibrillator implantation: a clinical risk score for optimal patient selection.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced heart disease are at risk from sudden death; however, benefit from implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) may be limited as a result of early mortality from other causes. The objective of this study was to develop a model to predict mortality within the first year after ICD implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 469 consecutive patients who underwent ICD implantation at a single tertiary-care center from 1999 to 2002. Vital status was determined from the Social Security Death Index. Patients were randomized into prediction and validation cohorts. A risk score was derived from the prediction cohort by multivariate logistic regression and applied to the validation cohort. One point was assigned for each variable in the risk score (age > 80 years, history of atrial fibrillation, creatinine > 1.8 mg/dL, New York Heart Association class III or IV). One-year mortality significantly increased with increasing risk score in both the prediction and validation cohorts. Validation cohort mortality was 3.4% for 0 points, 4.3% for 1 point, 17% for 2 points, and 33% for > or = 3 points (P for trend < .0001). A risk score > or = 2 predicted a 1-year mortality rate of 21%, whereas a risk score < 2 predicted a mortality rate of 4% at 1 year (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: A risk score using simple clinical criteria may identify patients at high risk of early mortality after ICD implantation. This may be helpful in consideration of ICD risk/benefit for individual patients. Further studies conducted in a prospective manner using these clinical criteria are warranted.

Atrial fibrillation in heart failure: high mortality risk even if ventricular function is preserved.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine if patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) have a better prognosis when systolic function is preserved as compared with those with depressed systolic function. METHODS: Data from consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department at Brigham and Women's Hospital from January 1997 to December 2002 who had a diagnosis of AF and HF and a measure of ejection fraction (EF) were reviewed. Vital status was determined from the Social Security Death Index. RESULTS: Of 478 patients (mean age 74 +/- 13 years; 47% women), EF was preserved (> 50%) in 46%. Those with preserved left ventricular (LV) function were older (76 vs 72 years, P < .0020), included more women (62 vs 35%, P < .0001), more likely to have a history of hypertension and pulmonary disease and less likely to have had a prior myocardial infarction. At 5 years, mortality was similar between the preserved and depressed EF groups (50% vs 48%, P = .74). In multivariable analysis, age > 75 years, history of cancer, cerebrovascular disease, aortic valve disease, serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL, and serum sodium < 130 mmol/L were associated with increased mortality. Therapy with beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blocker were associated with lower mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients who present to the emergency department with AF, HF, and preserved LVEF have a similarly high mortality as compared with those with depressed LVEF. Further study is needed to assess the impact of therapies and clarify the reasons for the poor prognosis.