Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 27(3): 1330-44, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27524771

RESUMO

Few studies have examined neighborhood influences on physical activity (PA) among low-income African Americans living in public housing. This study measured the associations of PA resources and land use with PA among 216 African Americans living in 12 low-income housing developments in Houston, Texas. Neighborhood measures included both detailed information from in-person audits and geographic information systems (GIS) data. Hierarchical linear regression models tested the associations of neighborhood PA resource availability and quality and land use density and diversity with individual-level, self-reported PA. Land use diversity was positively associated with walking among men after controlling for other neighborhood characteristics. Policies that promote land use diversity or improve the pedestrian environment in areas with diverse destinations may encourage PA among public housing residents.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Exercício Físico , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Habitação Popular/estatística & dados numéricos , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Pressão Sanguínea , Índice de Massa Corporal , Crime , Meio Ambiente , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Texas , Caminhada
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 22(11): 3522-9, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25694246

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The rate of adverse events after pancreatectomy is widely reported as a measure of surgical quality. However, morbidity data are routinely acquired retrospectively and often are reported at 30 days. The authors hypothesized that morbidity after pancreatectomy is therefore underreported. They sought to compare rates of adverse events calculated at multiple time points after pancreatectomy. METHODS: The authors instituted an active surveillance system to detect, categorize, and grade the severity of all adverse events after pancreatectomy, using the modified Accordion system and International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definitions. All patients and clinical events were monitored directly for at least 90 days after surgery. RESULTS: Of 315 consecutively monitored patients, 239 (76 %) experienced 500 unique adverse events. The absolute number of unique adverse events increased by 32 % between index discharge and 90 days and by 10 % between 30 and 90 days. The number of severe adverse events increased by 96 % between discharge and 90 days and by 29 % between 30 and 90 days. In this study, 16 % of the patients experienced at least one severe adverse event within the index hospitalization, 24 % within 30 postoperative days, and 29 % within 90 days. Among the 80 readmissions that occurred within 90 days, 28 (35 %) occurred later than 30 days after pancreatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-third of severe adverse events and readmissions are reported more than 30 days after surgery. All adverse events that occur within 90 days of surgery must be identified and reported for accurate characterization of the morbidity associated with pancreatectomy.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Pancreatectomia/efeitos adversos , Fístula Pancreática/etiologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Vigilância da População , Gestão de Riscos/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA