Assessment of lung edema during ex-vivo lung perfusion by single transpulmonary thermodilution: A preliminary study in humans.

BACKGROUND: Single transpulmonary thermodilution (SD) with extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) could become a new tool to better assess lung graft edema during ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP). In this study we compare EVLWI with conventional methods to better select lungs during EVLP and to predict post-transplant primary graft dysfunction (PGD). METHODS: We measured EVLWI, arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (P/F) ratio, and static lung compliance (SLC) during EVLP in an observational study. At the end of EVLP, grafts were accepted or rejected according to a standardized protocol blinded to EVLWI results. We compared the respective ability of EVLWI, P/F, and SLC to predict PGD. Mann-Whitney U-test, Fisher's exact test, and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve data were used for analysis. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Thirty-five lungs were evaluated by SD during EVLP. Three lungs were rejected for pulmonary edema. Thirty-two patients were transplanted, 8 patients developed Grade 2 or 3 PGD, and 24 patients developed Grade 0 or 1 PGD. In contrast to P/F ratio, SLC, and pulmonary artery pressure, EVLWI differed between these 2 populations (p < 0.001). The area under the ROC for EVLWI assessing Grade 2 or 3 PGD at the end of EVLP was 0.93. Donor lungs with EVLWI >7.5 ml/kg were more likely associated with a higher incidence of Grade 2 or 3 PGD at Day 3. CONCLUSIONS: Increased EVLWI during EVLP was associated with PGD in recipients.

Post-approval studies in France, challenges facing medical devices.

Medical devices are characterized notably by a wide heterogeneity (from tongue depressors to hip prostheses, and from non-implantable to invasive devices), a short life cycle with recurrent incremental innovations (from 18 months to 5 years), and an operator-dependent nature. The objective of the current round table was to develop proposals and recommendations concerning the prerequisites needed in order to meet the French health authorities expectations concerning requests for post-approval studies for medical devices, required in cases where short and long-term consequences are unknown. These studies, which are the responsibility of the manufacturer or the distributor of the medical device, are designed to confirm the role of the medical device in the therapeutic management strategy in a real-life setting. There are currently approximately 150 post-approval studies underway, mainly concerning class III devices, and the majority face difficulties implementing the study or meeting the study objectives. In light of this, the round table endeavored to clearly identify the conditions for implementation of post-approval studies specific to the characteristics of medical devices. Various areas of progress have been envisaged to improve the performance of these studies, and by consequence, the efficiency of reimbursement of medical devices by the national health insurance. These include providing manufacturers with the opportunity to better anticipate post-approval requirements, defining a study-specific primary objective, integrating a phase allowing dialogue between the manufacturer, the health authorities and the scientific committee, and increasing awareness and training of health professionals on the impact of post-approval clinical studies in terms of the reimbursement of medical devices by the national insurance.

Scientific evaluation and pricing of medical devices and associated procedures in France.

Medical devices are many and various, ranging from tongue spatulas to implantable or invasive devices and imaging machines; their lifetimes are short, between 18 months and 5 years, due to incessant incremental innovation; and they are operator-dependent: in general, the clinical user performs a fitting procedure (hip implant or pacemaker), a therapeutic procedure using a non-implantable invasive device (arrhythmic site ablation probe, angioplasty balloon, extension spondyloplasty system, etc.) or follow-up of an active implanted device (long-term follow-up of an implanted cardiac defibrillator or of a deep brain stimulator in Parkinson's patients). A round-table held during the XXVIII(th) Giens Workshops meeting focused on the methodology of scientific evaluation of medical devices and the associated procedures with a view to their pricing and financing by the French National Health Insurance system. The working hypothesis was that the available data-set was sufficient for and compatible with scientific evaluation with clinical benefit. Post-registration studies, although contributing to the continuity of assessment, were not dealt with. Moreover, the focus was restricted to devices used in health establishments, where the association between devices and technical medical procedures is optimally representative. An update of the multiple regulatory protocols governing medical devices and procedures is provided. Issues more specifically related to procedures as such, to non-implantable devices and to innovative devices are then dealt with, and the proposals and discussion points raised at the round-table for each of these three areas are presented.