Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed ; 35(5): 332-338, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31063610

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Narrowband UVB phototherapy is a common treatment modality in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, but evidence of its actual effect in clinical setting is sparse. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness and costs of narrowband UVB phototherapy in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis in clinical setting. METHODS: We observed 207 psoriasis patients and 144 atopic dermatitis patients in eight centers. SAPASI, PO-SCORAD, and VAS measures were used at baseline, at the end, and 3 months after the narrowband UVB phototherapy course. Quality of life was measured using Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and costs were assessed using a questionnaire. RESULTS: In both psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, the DLQI and Self-Administrated PASI (SAPASI)/Patient-Oriented SCORAD (PO-SCORAD) improved significantly and the results remained improved for at least 3 months in both groups. Alleviation of pruritus correlated with better quality of life in both patient groups. We reported slight redness and burning side effects which were due to lack of MED testing. Self-administered tools proved to be useful in evaluating pruritus and severity of the disease in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. Mean patient costs were 310 € and 21 hours of time, and mean costs for the healthcare provider were 810 €. CONCLUSION: In psoriasis, narrowband UVB is a very efficient treatment in clinical setting, whereas in atopic dermatitis, more studies are needed to determine the best dosage.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Psoríase , Inquéritos e Questionários , Terapia Ultravioleta/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Custos e Análise de Custo , Dermatite Atópica/economia , Dermatite Atópica/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prurido/economia , Prurido/prevenção & controle , Psoríase/economia , Psoríase/terapia , Qualidade de Vida
2.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 300(5): 253-61, 2008 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18386028

RESUMO

Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is the primary cause of skin cancers. However, it is difficult to evaluate the amount of UVR absorbed into the skin retrospectively. Therefore, objective and non-invasive quantitative method would be valuable for epidemiological UVR exposure assessment. Photodamage reduces the amount of bound water in the skin, and thus, measuring the skin's dielectric constant can provide an opportunity for assessing the cumulative UVR exposure. The purpose of the study was to assess the reliability and validity of the bioimpedance device, Moisture Meter-D. The measurements were performed on 100 subjects at three separate measurement times. A questionnaire was used to obtain information on the host factors and on the past UVR exposure. The biological samples, to determine the elastin proportion of the dermis, were collected. Some long-term as well as seasonal variations in the dielectric constants were detected. Also, a weak relationship between the dielectric constant and the UVR exposure indicators and host factors was observed. The MoistureMeter-D appears not to measure structural alterations in the skin caused by photodamage, and thus it is not a valid instrument for the assessment of photodamage, i.e., past UVR exposure.


Assuntos
Lesões por Radiação/patologia , Pele/efeitos da radiação , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Composição Corporal/efeitos da radiação , Líquidos Corporais/efeitos da radiação , Impedância Elétrica , Desenho de Equipamento/instrumentação , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/etiologia , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/patologia , Lesões por Radiação/complicações , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Pele/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Testes Cutâneos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA