Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 119(4): 990-1006, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38569789

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) has been linked to several adverse health outcomes, thus many countries introduced taxation to reduce it. OBJECTIVES: To summarize national SSB taxation laws and to assess their association with obesity, overweight and diabetes. METHODS: We conducted a systematic scoping review up to January 2022 on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Search to identify taxes on SSBs. An interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) was conducted on 17 countries with taxation implemented in 2013 or before to evaluate the level and slope modifications in the rate of change of standardized prevalence rates of overweight, obesity, and diabetes. Random-effects meta-regression was used to assess whether year of entry into force of the law, national income, and tax design affected observed results. RESULTS: We included 76 tax laws issued between 1940 and 2020 by 43 countries, which were heterogeneous in terms of tax design, amount, and taxed products. Among children and adolescents, ITSA showed level or slope reduction for prevalence of overweight and obesity in 5 (Brazil, Samoa, Palau, Panama, Tonga) and 6 (El Salvador, Uruguay, Nauru, Norway, Palau, Tonga) countries out of 17, respectively. No clear pattern of modification of results according to investigated factors emerged from the meta-regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Taxation is highly heterogeneous across countries in terms of products and design, which might influence its effectiveness. Our findings provide some evidence regarding a deceleration of the increasing prevalence rates of overweight and obesity among children occurring in some countries following introduction of taxation. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021233309.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Bebidas Adoçadas com Açúcar , Adolescente , Criança , Humanos , Sobrepeso/epidemiologia , Bebidas Adoçadas com Açúcar/efeitos adversos , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Obesidade/etiologia , Impostos , Bebidas/efeitos adversos
2.
PLoS One ; 15(7): e0235038, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32609729

RESUMO

Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant condition caused by pathogenic variants in mismatch repair (MMR) genes that predispose individuals to different malignancies, such as colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer. Current guidelines recommended testing for LS in individuals with newly diagnosed CRC to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality in relatives. Economic evaluations in support of such approach, however, are not available in Italy. We developed a decision-analytic model to analyze the cost-effectiveness of LS screening from the perspective of the Italian National Health System. Three testing strategies: the sequencing of all MMR genes without prior tumor analysis (Strategy 1), a sequential IHC and MS-MLPA analysis (Strategy 2), and an age-targeted strategy with a revised Bethesda criteria assessment before IHC and methylation-specific MLPA for patients ≥ than 70 years old (Strategy 3) were analyzed and compared to the "no testing" strategy. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) in relatives after colonoscopy, aspirin prophylaxis and an intensive gynecological surveillance were estimated through a Markov model. Assuming a CRC incidence rate of 0.09% and a share of patients affected by LS equal to 2.81%, the number of detected pathogenic variants among CRC cases ranges, in a given year, between 910 and 1167 depending on the testing strategy employed. The testing strategies investigated, provided one-time to the entire eligible population (CRC patients), were associated with an overall cost ranging between €1,753,059.93-€10,388,000.00. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of the Markov model ranged from €941.24 /QALY to €1,681.93 /QALY, thus supporting that "universal testing" versus "no testing" is cost-effective, but not necessarily in comparison with age-targeted strategies. This is the first economic evaluation on different testing strategies for LS in Italy. The results might support the introduction of cost-effective recommendations for LS screening in Italy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Testes Genéticos/economia , Neoplasias Colorretais/economia , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/economia , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/genética , Análise Custo-Benefício , Reparo de Erro de Pareamento de DNA , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Proteína 1 Homóloga a MutL/genética , Linhagem , Probabilidade , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida
3.
Public Health Genomics ; 22(5-6): 189-207, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31805557

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most frequent form of hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC; up to 3-5% of the total CRC burden) and predisposes to the development of other cancers. Multidisciplinary diagnostic strategies are relevant both to the index cases and to their at-risk relatives, but their implementation is still limited. Our study aimed to explore LS testing practices in Italy. METHODS: In order to ascertain the current practice of LS diagnosis and management, we conducted a qualitative assessment by sending a questionnaire to health care professionals at 4 Italian hospitals selected as "models" representing different hospital settings. Based on the surveys, we reconstructed the management pathways for CRC patients in terms of diagnostic strategies and health professionals involved. RESULTS: Seven of the 8 invited professionals filled in the questionnaire. Noncompliance with the latest guidelines was reported, as no tumor "screening" was performed on CRC cases. The lack of a structured multidisciplinary team who manages CRC patients from risk assessment to diagnosis and follow-up was reported. The availability of professionals and laboratory technologies differ widely between hospitals. As for cascade testing of at-risk relatives, a systematic and active approach was absent in all the considered hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that no structured and standardized pathways for the diagnosis and management of LS patients are currently in place in Italy. We envisage that by extending our research to further experiences and countries, an increasing awareness of the topic can be translated into a health gain for hereditary CRC patients and their at-risk relatives.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/diagnóstico , Aconselhamento Genético/organização & administração , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Adulto , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/genética , Procedimentos Clínicos/organização & administração , Gerenciamento Clínico , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Public Health Genomics ; 22(5-6): 208-214, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31805565

RESUMO

Medical practitioners are increasingly adopting a personalized medicine (PM) approach involving individually tailored patient care. The Personalized Prevention of Chronic Diseases (PRECeDI) consortium project, funded within the Marie Sklodowska Curie Action (MSCA) Research and Innovation Staff Exchange (RISE) scheme, had fostered collaboration on PM research and training with special emphasis on the prevention of chronic diseases. From 2014 to 2018, the PRECeDI consortium trained 50 staff members on personalized prevention of chronic diseases through training and research. The acquisition of skills from researchers came from dedicated secondments from academic and nonacademic institutions aimed at training on several research topics related to personalized prevention of cancer and cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases. In detail, 5 research domains were addressed: (1) identification and validation of biomarkers for the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases, secondary prevention of Alzheimer disease, and tertiary prevention of head and neck cancer; (2) economic evaluation of genomic applications; (3) ethical-legal and policy issues surrounding PM; (4) sociotechnical analysis of the pros and cons of informing healthy individuals on their genome; and (5) identification of organizational models for the provision of predictive genetic testing. Based on the results of the research carried out by the PRECeDI consortium, in November 2018, a set of recommendations for policy makers, scientists, and industry has been issued, with the main goal to foster the integration of PM approaches in the field of chronic disease prevention.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/terapia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Genômica/organização & administração , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Medicina Preventiva/organização & administração , Humanos
5.
Eur J Public Health ; 29(Supplement_3): 23-27, 2019 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31738444

RESUMO

Healthcare systems around the world are facing incredible challenges due to the ageing population and the related disability, and the increasing use of technologies and citizen's expectations. Improving health outcomes while containing costs acts as a stumbling block. In this context, Big Data can help healthcare providers meet these goals in unprecedented ways. The potential of Big Data in healthcare relies on the ability to detect patterns and to turn high volumes of data into actionable knowledge for precision medicine and decision makers. In several contexts, the use of Big Data in healthcare is already offering solutions for the improvement of patient care and the generation of value in healthcare organizations. This approach requires, however, that all the relevant stakeholders collaborate and adapt the design and performance of their systems. They must build the technological infrastructure to house and converge the massive volume of healthcare data, and to invest in the human capital to guide citizens into this new frontier of human health and well-being. The present work reports an overview of best practice initiatives in Europe related to Big Data analytics in public health and oncology sectors, aimed to generate new knowledge, improve clinical care and streamline public health surveillance.


Assuntos
Big Data , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/tendências , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/tendências , Assistência ao Paciente/tendências , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Controle de Custos , Tomada de Decisões , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Humanos
6.
Genet Med ; 20(10): 1131-1144, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29300371

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Lynch syndrome (LS) screening can significantly reduce cancer morbidity and mortality in mutation carriers. Our aim was to identify cost-effective LS screening programs that can be implemented in the "real world." METHODS: We performed a systematic review of full economic evaluations of genetic screening for LS in different target populations; health outcomes were estimated in life-years gained or quality-adjusted life-years. RESULTS: Overall, 20 studies were included in the systematic review. Based on the study populations, we identified six categories of LS screening program: colorectal cancer (CRC)-based, endometrial cancer-based, general population-based, LS family registry-based, cascade testing-based, and genetics clinic-based screening programs. We performed an in-depth analysis of CRC-based LS programs, classifying them into three additional subcategories: universal, age-targeted, and selective. In five studies, universal programs based on immunohistochemistry, either alone or in combination with the BRAF test, were cost-effective compared with no screening, while in two studies age-targeted programs with a cutoff of 70 years were cost-effective when compared with age-targeted programs with lower age thresholds. CONCLUSION: Universal or <70 years-age-targeted CRC-based LS screening programs are cost-effective and should be implemented in the "real world."


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Testes Genéticos/economia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Neoplasias Colorretais/economia , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/economia , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/genética , Análise Custo-Benefício/economia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf/genética
7.
Clin Drug Investig ; 37(11): 1093-1102, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28895089

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There is no available evidence to recommend gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue-based ovarian suppression versus bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) in the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer, since the two approaches are considered equivalent in terms of oncologic outcome. The role of surgical ovarian ablation has been revitalized based on the advances of minimally invasive surgery, and a better understanding of clinical and molecular basis of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer syndromes. The aim of this study is to analyze the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic BSO and GnRH analogue administration in patients aged 40-49 years with hormone-sensitive breast cancer. METHODS: A probabilistic decision tree model was developed to evaluate costs and outcomes of ovarian ablation through laparoscopic BSO, or ovarian suppression through monthly injections of GnRH analogue. Results were expressed as incremental costs per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. RESULTS: Laparoscopic BSO strategy was associated with a lower mean total cost per patient than GnRH treatment, and considering the difference in terms of QALYs, the incremental effectiveness did not demonstrate a notable difference between the two approaches. From the National Health Service perspective, and for a time horizon of 5 years, laparoscopic BSO was the dominant option compared to GnRH treatment; laparoscopic BSO was less expensive than GnRH, €2385 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 2044, 2753] vs €7093 (95% CI = 3409, 12,105), respectively, and more effective. CONCLUSION: Surgical ovarian ablation is more cost-effective than GnRH administration in the adjuvant treatment of hormone-sensitive breast cancer patients aged 40-49 years, and the advantage of preventing ovarian cancer through laparoscopic BSO should be considered.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Ovarianas/prevenção & controle , Salpingo-Ooforectomia/métodos , Adulto , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida
8.
PLoS One ; 11(5): e0154217, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27167982

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Along with the proliferation of Open Access (OA) publishing, the interest for comparing the scientific quality of studies published in OA journals versus subscription journals has also increased. With our study we aimed to compare the methodological quality and the quality of reporting of primary epidemiological studies and systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in OA and non-OA journals. METHODS: In order to identify the studies to appraise, we listed all OA and non-OA journals which published in 2013 at least one primary epidemiologic study (case-control or cohort study design), and at least one systematic review or meta-analysis in the field of oncology. For the appraisal, we picked up the first studies published in 2013 with case-control or cohort study design from OA journals (Group A; n = 12), and in the same time period from non-OA journals (Group B; n = 26); the first systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in 2013 from OA journals (Group C; n = 15), and in the same time period from non-OA journals (Group D; n = 32). We evaluated the methodological quality of studies by assessing the compliance of case-control and cohort studies to Newcastle and Ottawa Scale (NOS) scale, and the compliance of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) scale. The quality of reporting was assessed considering the adherence of case-control and cohort studies to STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist, and the adherence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist. RESULTS: Among case-control and cohort studies published in OA and non-OA journals, we did not observe significant differences in the median value of NOS score (Group A: 7 (IQR 7-8) versus Group B: 8 (7-9); p = 0.5) and in the adherence to STROBE checklist (Group A, 75% versus Group B, 80%; p = 0.1). The results did not change after adjustment for impact factor. The compliance with AMSTAR and adherence to PRISMA checklist were comparable between systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in OA and non-OA journals (Group C, 46.0% versus Group D, 55.0%; p = 0.06), (Group C, 72.0% versus Group D, 76.0%; p = 0.1), respectively). CONCLUSION: The epidemiological studies published in OA journals in the field of oncology approach the same methodological quality and quality of reporting as studies published in non-OA journals.


Assuntos
Bibliometria , Publicação de Acesso Aberto/normas , Revisão da Pesquisa por Pares/normas , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/normas , Estudos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Fator de Impacto de Revistas , Metanálise como Assunto , Publicação de Acesso Aberto/ética , Revisão da Pesquisa por Pares/ética , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/ética , Controle de Qualidade , Projetos de Pesquisa
9.
Genet Epidemiol ; 36(6): 652-62, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22829130

RESUMO

In genetic association studies, a single marker is often associated with multiple, correlated phenotypes (e.g., obesity and cardiovascular disease, or nicotine dependence and lung cancer). A pervasive question is then whether that marker exerts independent effects on all phenotypes. In this paper, we address this question by assessing whether there is a genetic effect on one phenotype that is not mediated through the other ones, so called direct genetic effect. Answering such question may represent an important step in the elucidation of the underlying biological mechanism. Under rather restrictive conditions, such direct genetic effects are known to be estimable by standard regression methods. Under more lenient conditions, in a prospective or unmatched case-control study, these effects can be estimated by using a previously proposed G-estimation method (Vansteelandt [2009] Epidemiology 20, 851-860). The present paper extends this method to matched case-control studies, and investigates the conditions under which this extension is valid. We illustrate the method on data from a matched case-control study, which we use to elucidate the pathway implications of a detected association between myocardial infarction and a genetic locus in the chromosomal region of the FTO gene.


Assuntos
Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos de Associação Genética/métodos , Modelos Genéticos , Dioxigenase FTO Dependente de alfa-Cetoglutarato , Índice de Massa Corporal , Simulação por Computador , Testes Genéticos , Humanos , Método de Monte Carlo , Infarto do Miocárdio/genética , Fenótipo , Proteínas/genética , Análise de Regressão
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA