Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Open ; 12(2): e055267, 2022 Feb 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35228288

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Assess feasibility of a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) to measure clinical and cost-effectiveness of an enhanced recovery pathway for people with hip fracture and cognitive impairment (CI). DESIGN: Feasibility trial undertaken between 2016 and 2018. SETTING: Eleven acute hospitals from three UK regions. PARTICIPANTS: 284 participants (208 female:69 male). INCLUSION CRITERIA: aged >60 years, confirmed proximal hip fracture requiring surgical fixation and CI; preoperative AMTS ≤8 in England or a 4AT score ≥1 in Scotland; minimum of 5 days on study ward; a 'suitable informant' able to provide proxy measures, recruited within 7 days of hip fracture surgery. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: no hip surgery; not expected to survive beyond 4 weeks; already enrolled in a clinical trial. INTERVENTION: PERFECT-ER, an enhanced recovery pathway with 15 quality targets supported by a checklist and manual, a service improvement lead a process lead and implemented using a plan-do-study-act model. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility outcomes: recruitment and attrition, intervention acceptability, completion of participant reported outcome measures, preliminary estimates of potential effectiveness using mortality, EQ-5D-5L, economic and clinical outcome scores. RESULTS: 282 participants were consented and recruited (132, intervention) from a target of 400. Mean recruitment rates were the same in intervention and control sites, (range: 1.2 and 2.7 participants/month). Retention was 230 (86%) at 1 month and 54%(144) at 6 months. At 3 months a relatively small effect (one quarter of an SD) was observed on health-related quality of life of the patient measured with EQ-5D-5L proxy in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: This trial design was feasible with modifications to recruitment. Mechanisms for delivering consistency in the PERFECT-ER intervention and participant retention need to be addressed. However, an RCT may be a suboptimal research design to evaluate this intervention due to the complexity of caring for people with CI after hip fracture. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN99336264.


Assuntos
Disfunção Cognitiva , Fraturas do Quadril , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Hospitais , Humanos , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida
3.
J Med Ethics ; 43(1): 60-62, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27974422

RESUMO

The concluding statement of the Burns Commission, established to evaluate whether changes are needed to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), ruled no major legislative changes were required. As such Freedom of Information (FOI) legislation still enables anyone to obtain information from public authorities. In this brief report article we explore arguments regarding FOI as an instrument for healthcare research using an international research programme as a case study.


Assuntos
Acesso à Informação/legislação & jurisprudência , Pesquisa Biomédica/legislação & jurisprudência , Confidencialidade , Análise Ética , Ética Médica , Disseminação de Informação/legislação & jurisprudência , Privacidade , Pesquisa Biomédica/ética , Coerção , Confidencialidade/ética , Confidencialidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Análise Custo-Benefício , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/ética , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Privacidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicina Estatal , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA