Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 36
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 94(2): E67-E77, 2019 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30811833

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Survival after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) has increased over the years. Short-term readmission rates in this high-risk population remain unknown. METHODS: We queried the United States (U.S.) Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) from January 2010 to November 2014 using the International Classification of Diseases-Ninth edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9 CM) codes to identify all patients ≥18 years readmitted within 30 days after surviving an index hospitalization for PCI in AMI-CS. Incidence, etiologies, and predictors of 30-day readmission were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 46,435 patients who survived to discharge after PCI in AMI-CS, 9,020 (19.4%) were readmitted within 30 days. Median time to 30-day readmission was 11 days. Cardiac conditions were the most common causes of readmission (57.8%). Heart failure was the leading readmission diagnosis (24.8%). Private insurance including HMO and self-pay were predictive of lower 30-day readmission. Among other covariates, female sex, comorbidities such as heart failure, atrial fibrillation, in-hospital complications such as major bleeding, sepsis, respiratory complications, AKI requiring dialysis, utilization of mechanical circulatory support (IABP and ECMO) were independently predictive of 30-day readmission. Trend analysis showed decline in 30-day readmission rates from 21.9% in 2010 to 17.9% in 2014 (ptrend < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this large real-world database, one in five patients receiving PCI in AMI-CS was readmitted within 30 days after discharge. Cardiac conditions were the most common causes of readmission. Insurance type had significant influence on 30-day readmission.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Readmissão do Paciente , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/economia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Incidência , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio/economia , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/economia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Fatores de Risco , Choque Cardiogênico/diagnóstico , Choque Cardiogênico/economia , Choque Cardiogênico/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 29(10): 1425-1435, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30016005

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The utilization of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) has increased significantly, since its initial approval for use in selected patients with heart failure. Limited data exist as for current trends in implant-related in-hospital complications and cost utilization. The aim of our study was to examine in-hospital complication rates associated with CRT-D and their trends over the last decade. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we estimated 378 248 CRT-D procedures from 2003 to 2012. We investigated common complications, including mechanical, cardiovascular, pericardial complications (hemopericardium, cardiac tamponade, or pericardiocentesis), pneumothorax, stroke, vascular complications (consisting of hemorrhage/hematoma, incidents requiring surgical repair, and accidental arterial puncture), and in-hospital deaths described with CRT-D, defining them by the validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code. Mechanical complications (5.9%) were the commonest, followed by cardiovascular (3.6%), respiratory failure (2.4%), and pneumothorax (1.5%). Age (≥65 years), female gender (OR, 95% CI; P value) (1.08, 1.03-1.13; 0.001), and the Charlson score ≥3 (1.52, 1.45-1.60; <0.001) were significantly associated with increased mortality/complications. CONCLUSIONS: The overall complication rate in patients undergoing CRT-D has been increasing in the last decade. Age (≥65), female sex, and the Charlson score ≥3 were associated with higher complications. In patients who underwent CRT-D implantation, postoperative complications were associated with significant increases in cost.


Assuntos
Dispositivos de Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/economia , Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/economia , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/economia , Cardioversão Elétrica/economia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/economia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Custos Hospitalares , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/mortalidade , Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/tendências , Dispositivos de Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/tendências , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/tendências , Cardioversão Elétrica/efeitos adversos , Cardioversão Elétrica/mortalidade , Cardioversão Elétrica/tendências , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
Expert Rev Med Devices ; 14(10): 789-804, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28862481

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Impella is a catheter-based micro-axial flow pump placed across the aortic valve, and it is currently the only percutaneous left ventricular assist device approved for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and cardiogenic shock. Areas Covered: Even though several studies have repeatedly demonstrated the excellent hemodynamic profile of Impella in high-risk settings, it remains underutilized. Here we aim to provide an up-to-date summary of the available literature on Impellas use in High risk settings as well as the practical aspects of its usage. Expert Commentary: Percutaneous coronary interventions in high rsk settings have always been challenging for a physician. Impella 2.5 and CP, have been proven safe, cost effective and feasible in High Risk Percutaneous coronary Interventions with an excellent hemodynamic profile.


Assuntos
Coração Auxiliar , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Contraindicações de Procedimentos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Ilustração Médica , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos
4.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 6(8)2017 Aug 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28862952

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sex-specific effectiveness of rivaroxaban (RIVA), dabigatran (DABI), and warfarin in reducing myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and all-cause mortality among patients with atrial fibrillation are not known. We assessed sex-specific associations of RIVA, DABI, or warfarin use with the risk of MI, HF, and all-cause mortality among patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Medicare beneficiaries (men: 65 734 [44.8%], women: 81 135 [55.2%]) with atrial fibrillation who initiated oral anticoagulants formed the study cohort. Inpatient admissions for MI, HF, and all-cause mortality were compared between the 3 drugs separately for men and women using 3-way propensity-matched samples. In men, RIVA use was associated with a reduced risk of MI admissions compared with warfarin use (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59 [0.38-0.91]), with a trend towards reduced risk compared with DABI use (0.67 [0.44-1.01]). In women, there were no significant differences in the risk of MI admissions across all 3 anticoagulants. In both sexes, RIVA use and DABI use were associated with reduced risk of HF admissions (men: RIVA; 0.75 [0.63-0.89], DABI; 0.81 [0.69-0.96]) (women: RIVA; 0.64 [0.56-0.74], DABI; 0.73 [0.63-0.83]) and all-cause mortality (men: RIVA; 0.66 [0.53-0.81], DABI; 0.75 [0.61-0.93]) (women: RIVA; 0.76 [0.63-0.91], DABI; 0.77 [0.64-0.93]) compared with warfarin use. CONCLUSIONS: RIVA use and DABI use when compared with warfarin use was associated with a reduced risk of HF admissions and all-cause mortality in both sexes. However, reduced risk of MI admissions noted with RIVA use appears to be limited to men.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Dabigatrana/administração & dosagem , Insuficiência Cardíaca/prevenção & controle , Infarto do Miocárdio/prevenção & controle , Rivaroxabana/administração & dosagem , Varfarina/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Demandas Administrativas em Assistência à Saúde , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/mortalidade , Causas de Morte , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Dabigatrana/efeitos adversos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Medicare , Análise Multivariada , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Admissão do Paciente , Pontuação de Propensão , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Rivaroxabana/efeitos adversos , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Varfarina/efeitos adversos
6.
Am J Cardiol ; 119(5): 760-769, 2017 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28109560

RESUMO

Heart failure (HF) is the most common discharge diagnosis across the United States, and these patients are particularly vulnerable to readmissions, increasing attention to potential ways to address the problem. The study cohort was derived from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Readmission Data 2013, sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HF was identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Readmission was defined as a subsequent hospital admission within 30 days after discharge day of index admission. Readmission causes were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes in primary diagnosis filed. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission. Hierarchical 2-level logistic models were used to evaluate study outcomes. From a total 301,892 principal admissions (73.4% age ≥65 years and 50.6% men), 55,857 (18.5%) patients were readmitted with a total of 64,264 readmissions during the study year. Among the etiologies of readmission, cardiac causes (49.8%) were most common (HF being most common followed by coronary artery disease and arrhythmias), whereas pulmonary causes were responsible for 13.1% and renal causes for 8.9% of the readmissions. Significant predictors of increased 30-day readmission included diabetes (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, p value: 1.06, 1.03 to 1.08, p <0.001), chronic lung disease (1.13, 1.11 to 1.16, p <0.001), renal failure/electrolyte imbalance (1.12, 1.10 to 1.15, p <0.001), discharge to facilities (1.07, 1.04 to 1.09, p <0.001), lengthier hospital stay, and transfusion during index admission. In conclusion, readmission after a hospitalization for HF is common. Although it may be necessary to readmit some patients, the striking rate of readmission demands efforts to further clarify the determinants of readmission and develop strategies in terms of quality of care and care transitions to prevent this adverse outcome.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Insuficiência Renal/epidemiologia , Desequilíbrio Hidroeletrolítico/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Arritmias Cardíacas , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Feminino , Número de Leitos em Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Nefropatias , Modelos Logísticos , Pneumopatias , Masculino , Medicaid , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Alta do Paciente , Readmissão do Paciente/tendências , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
7.
Am J Med ; 130(6): 688-698, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28063854

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The outcomes related to chest pain associated with cocaine use and its burden on the healthcare system are not well studied. METHODS: Data were collected from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2001-2012). Subjects were identified by using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Primary outcome was a composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiac arrest. RESULTS: We identified 363,143 admissions for cocaine-induced chest pain. Mean age was 44.9 (±21.1) years with male predominance. Left heart catheterizations were performed in 6.7%, whereas the frequency of acute myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary interventions were 0.69% and 0.22%, respectively. The in-hospital mortality was 0.09%, and the primary outcome occurred in 1.19% of patients. Statistically significant predictors of primary outcome included female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.35; P = .046), age >50 years (OR, 1.24, CI, 1.07-1.43; P = .004), history of heart failure (OR, 1.63, CI, 1.37-1.93; P <.001), supraventricular tachycardia (OR, 2.94, CI, 1.34-6.42; P = .007), endocarditis (OR, 3.5, CI, 1.50-8.18, P = .004), tobacco use (OR, 1.3, CI, 1.13-1.49; P <.001), dyslipidemia (OR, 1.5, CI, 1.29-1.77; P <.001), coronary artery disease (OR, 2.37, CI, 2.03-2.76; P <.001), and renal failure (OR, 1.27, CI, 1.08-1.50; P = .005). The total annual projected economic burden ranged from $155 to $226 million with a cumulative accruement of more than $2 billion over a decade. CONCLUSION: Hospital admissions due to chest pain and concomitant cocaine use are associated with low rates of adverse outcomes. For the low-risk cohort in whom acute coronary syndrome has been ruled out, hospitalization may not be beneficial and may result in unnecessary cardiac procedures.


Assuntos
Dor no Peito/etiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Cocaína/complicações , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Dor no Peito/terapia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Fatores de Risco , Tabagismo/complicações , Adulto Jovem
8.
Am J Cardiol ; 118(8): 1150-1157, 2016 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27642112

RESUMO

Since the introduction of new antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents in the last decade, large-scale data studying gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are lacking. Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified all hospitalizations from 2006 to 2012 that required PCI. Temporal trends in the incidence and multivariate predictors of GIB associated with PCI were analyzed. A total of 4,376,950 patients underwent PCI in the United States during the study period. The incidence of GIB was 1.1%. Mortality rate in the GIB group was significantly higher (9.71% vs 1.1%, p <0.0001). Although the incidence of GIB remained stable during the study period (0.97% in 2006 to 1.19% in 2012), in-hospital mortality rate increased significantly from 7.9% in 2006 to 10.78% in 2012, with a peak of 12% in 2010. The GIB group had a longer median length of stay (5.80 vs 1.57 days) and an increased median cost of hospitalization ($26,564 vs $16,879). The predictors of GIB included cardiovascular co-morbidities such as acute myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, valvular heart diseases, and a history of transient ischemic attack/stroke. Gastrointestinal co-morbidities including diverticulosis, esophageal cancer, stomach cancer, small intestine cancer, large intestine cancer, rectosigmoid cancer, gastrointestinal ulcer, and liver disease were predictors of GIB. Interestingly, a lower risk of GIB was associated with obese patients and patients with private insurance. A higher risk of GIB was noted in urgent versus elective admissions and weekend versus weekday admissions. In conclusion, the incidence of GIB in patients who underwent PCI remained stable from 2006 to 2012; however, the in-hospital mortality increased significantly. Identifying patients at higher risk for GIB is critically important to develop preventive strategies to reduce morbidity and mortality.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/induzido quimicamente , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/induzido quimicamente , Adolescente , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Emergências , Feminino , Gastroenteropatias/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/economia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/epidemiologia , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/economia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Choque Cardiogênico/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
9.
Am J Cardiol ; 118(7): 950-8, 2016 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27522303

RESUMO

The primary objective of our study was to evaluate the in-hospital outcomes in terms of mortality, procedural complications, hospitalization costs, and length of stay (LOS) after multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MVPCI) in hemodynamically stable patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The study cohort was derived from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, years 2006 to 2012. Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed during STEMI were identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, diagnostic and procedural codes. Patients in cardiogenic shock were excluded. Hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression models were used for categorical dependent variables such as in-hospital mortality and composite of in-hospital mortality and complications, and hierarchical mixed-effects linear regression models were used for continuous dependent variables such as cost of hospitalization and LOS. We identified 106,317 (weighted n = 525,161) single-vessel PCI and 15,282 (weighted n = 74,543) MVPCIs. MVPCI (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval [CI], p value) was not associated with significant increase in in-hospital mortality (0.99, 0.85 to 1.15, 0.863) but predicted a higher composite end point of in-hospital mortality and postprocedural complications (1.09, 1.02 to 1.17, 0.013) compared to single-vessel PCI. MVPCI was also predictive of longer LOS (LOS +0.19 days, 95% CI +0.14 to +0.23 days, p <0.001) and higher hospitalization costs (cost +$4,445, 95% CI +$4,128 to +$4,762, p <0.001). MVPCI performed during STEMI in hemodynamically stable patients is associated with no increase in in-hospital mortality but a higher rate of postprocedural complications and longer LOS and greater hospitalization costs compared to single-vessel PCI.


Assuntos
Custos Hospitalares , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transfusão de Sangue/economia , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Nefropatias/economia , Nefropatias/epidemiologia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/economia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/terapia , Embolia Pulmonar/economia , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/economia , Insuficiência Respiratória/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/economia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Trombose Venosa/economia , Trombose Venosa/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
10.
J Interv Cardiol ; 29(5): 505-512, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27545515

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Septal ablation (SA) is a key modality for left ventricular outflow tract gradient reduction in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) patients with refractory symptoms. The primary objective of our study was to evaluate post-procedural mortality, complications, length of stay (LOS), and cost of hospitalization following SA. METHODS: We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) between 2005 and 2011 using the ICD9 procedure code of 37.34 for ablation of heart tissue. Only adult patients with HOCM (ICD-9-CM: 425.1) were included. Patients with any arrhythmia diagnosis or open surgical ablation procedure code were excluded. Hierarchical mixed effects models were generated in order to identify the independent multivariate predictors of outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 358 SAs were available for analysis. There was no reported mortality during the study period; permanent pacemaker implantation rate was 8.7%. Highest hospital volume tertile (OR, 95%CI, P- value) predicted significantly lower post-procedural complications (0.51, 0.26-0.98, P = 0.04). Univariate analysis of highest versus lowest tertile of hospital volume showed significant decrease in LOS (2.6 days vs. 3.8 days, P<0.01) and non-significant decrease hospitalization costs (16,800$ vs. 19,500$, P = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: SA is a safe procedure and associated with low peri- procedural mortality rate. A higher burden of baseline comorbidities is associated with worse outcomes while higher annual hospital volume is associated with lower rate of post-procedural complications, length of stay, and cost of care following SA.


Assuntos
Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica , Ablação por Cateter , Septos Cardíacos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Obstrução do Fluxo Ventricular Externo , Adulto , Idoso , Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica/diagnóstico , Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica/mortalidade , Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica/fisiopatologia , Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Feminino , Septos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagem , Septos Cardíacos/cirurgia , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Obstrução do Fluxo Ventricular Externo/etiologia , Obstrução do Fluxo Ventricular Externo/cirurgia
11.
J Card Surg ; 31(10): 608-616, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27572827

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Since elective transcatheter aortic valve replacements (TAVRs) can be performed on the day of admission, i.e., Day 0, or on the next day of admission, i.e., Day 1, we sought to investigate if there is an advantage to either approach. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study, using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample database of 2012 and identified subjects undergoing endovascular (Transfemoral/Transaortic) TAVRs using the ICD-9-CM procedure code of 35.05. The cohort was divided based on the day of the TAVR performed, i.e., Day 0 or 1. The cost of the hospitalization and length of stay were the primary outcomes, with in-hospital mortality and procedural complications as the secondary outcomes. We identified a total of 843 TAVRs. Propensity matched models were created. The mean age of the study cohort was 82 years. RESULTS: In a propensity-matched dataset, TAVRs performed on Day 0 were associated with a lower cost ($51,126 ± 1184 vs $57,703 ± 1508, p < 0.0001) and length of stay (mean days, standard error: 5.87 ± 0.25 vs 7.20 ± 0.29, p < 0.001) compared to Day 1. In-hospital mortality plus complication rates were relatively similar with no difference between Days 0 and 1 (31.5% vs 34.1%, p = 0.47, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular TAVRs performed on the same day of admission are associated with lower hospitalization costs and length of stay, and similar mortality and complication rates compared to those performed on the next day of admission.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Admissão do Paciente , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/economia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/mortalidade , Cateterismo Cardíaco/economia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
12.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 88(4): 605-616, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26914274

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to study the impact of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) on in-hospital outcomes. BACKGROUND: There is paucity of data regarding the impact of GPI on the outcomes following peripheral endovascular interventions. METHODS: The study cohort was derived from Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database between the years 2006 and 2011. Peripheral endovascular interventions and GPI utilization were identified using appropriate ICD-9 Diagnostic and procedural codes. Two-level hierarchical multivariate mixed models were created. The study outcomes were: primary (in-hospital mortality and amputation studied separately) and secondary (composite of in-hospital mortality and postprocedural complications). Hospitalization costs were also assessed. RESULTS: GPI utilization (OR, 95% CI, P-value) was independently predictive of lower amputation rates (0.36, 0.27-0.49, <0.001). There was no significant difference in terms of in-hospital mortality (0.59, 0.31-1.14, P 0.117), although GPI use predicted worse secondary outcomes (1.23, 1.03-1.47, 0.023). Following propensity matching, the amputation rate was lower (3.2% vs. 8%, P < 0.001), while hospitalization costs were higher in the cohort that received GPI ($21,091 ± 404 vs. 19,407 ± 133, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Multivariate analysis revealed GPI use in peripheral endovascular interventions to be suggestive of an increase in composite end-point of in-hospital mortality and postprocedural complications, no impact on in-hospital mortality alone, significantly lower rate of amputation, and increase in hospitalization costs. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Complexo Glicoproteico GPIIb-IIIa de Plaquetas/antagonistas & inibidores , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Amputação Cirúrgica , Estudos Transversais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Custos de Medicamentos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/economia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Salvamento de Membro , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Doença Arterial Periférica/economia , Doença Arterial Periférica/mortalidade , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/economia , Pontuação de Propensão , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
13.
Am J Cardiol ; 117(7): 1117-26, 2016 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26899494

RESUMO

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has emerged as a popular procedure. The purpose of this study was to examine whether there exist differences or disparities in ablation utilization across gender, socioeconomic class, insurance, or race. Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2000 to 2012), we identified adults hospitalized with a principal diagnosis of AF by ICD 9 code 427.31 who had catheter ablation (ICD 9 code-37.34). We stratified patients by race, insurance status, age, gender, and hospital characteristics. A hierarchical multivariate mixed-effect model was created to identify the independent predictors of AF ablation. Among an estimated total of 3,508,122 patients (extrapolated from 20% Nationwide Inpatient Sample) hospitalized with a diagnosis of AF in the United States from the year 2000 to 2012, 102,469 patients (2.9%) underwent catheter ablations. The number of ablations was increased by 940%, from 1,439 in 2000 to 15,090 in 2012. There were significant differences according to gender, race, and health insurance status, which persisted even after adjustment for other risk factors. Female gender (0.83 [95% CI 0.79 to 0.87; p <0.001]), black (0.49 [95% CI 0.44 to 0.55; p <0.001]), and Hispanic race (0.64 [95% CI 0.56 to 0.72; p <0.001]) were associated with lower likelihoods of undergoing an AF ablation. Medicare (0.93, 0.88 to 0.98, <0.001) or Medicaid (0.67, 0.59 to 0.76, <0.001) coverage and uninsured patients (0.55, 0.49 to 0.62, <0.001) also had lower rates of AF ablation compared to patients with private insurance. In conclusion we found differences in utilization of catheter ablation for AF based on gender, race, and insurance status that persisted over time.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter/estatística & dados numéricos , Etnicidade , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro , População Branca , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
14.
Clin Cardiol ; 39(1): 9-18, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26785349

RESUMO

Fibrinolytic therapy is still used in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) when the primary percutaneous coronary intervention cannot be provided in a timely fashion. Management strategies and outcomes in transferred fibrinolytic-treated STEMI patients have not been well assessed in real-world settings. Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2008 to 2012, we identified 18 814 patients with STEMI who received fibrinolytic therapy and were transferred to a different facility within 24 hours. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included gastrointestinal bleeding, bleeding requiring transfusion, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), length of stay, and cost. The patients were divided into 3 groups: those who received medical therapy alone (n = 853; 4.5%), those who underwent coronary artery angiography without revascularization (n = 2573; 13.7%), and those who underwent coronary artery angiography with revascularization (n = 15 388; 81.8%). Rates of in-hospital mortality among the groups were 20% vs 6.6% vs 2.1%, respectively (P < 0.001); ICH was 8.5% vs 1.1% vs 0.6%, respectively (P < 0.001); and gastrointestinal bleeding was 1.1% vs 0.4% vs 0.4%, respectively (P = 0.011). Multivariate analysis identified increasing age, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and ICH as the independent predictors of not performing coronary artery angiography and/or revascularization in patients with STEMI initially treated with fibrinolytic therapy. The majority of STEMI patients transferred after receiving fibrinolytic therapy undergo coronary angiography. However, notable numbers of patients do not receive revascularization, especially patients with cardiogenic shock and following a cardiac arrest.


Assuntos
Fibrinolíticos/administração & dosagem , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Transferência de Pacientes , Terapia Trombolítica , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transfusão de Sangue , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Angiografia Coronária , Análise Custo-Benefício , Bases de Dados Factuais , Custos de Medicamentos , Feminino , Fibrinolíticos/efeitos adversos , Fibrinolíticos/economia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Parada Cardíaca/terapia , Custos Hospitalares , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Hemorragias Intracranianas/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragias Intracranianas/terapia , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Infarto do Miocárdio/economia , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Revascularização Miocárdica , Fatores de Risco , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Terapia Trombolítica/efeitos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/economia , Terapia Trombolítica/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Tempo para o Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
15.
Am J Cardiol ; 117(4): 555-562, 2016 Feb 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26732421

RESUMO

Contemporary real-world data on clinical outcomes after utilization of coronary atherectomy are sparse. The study cohort was derived from Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from year 2012. Percutaneous coronary interventions including atherectomy were identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision diagnostic and procedural codes. Two-level hierarchical multivariate mixed models were created. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality and periprocedural complications; the secondary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Hospitalization costs were also assessed. A total of 107,131 procedures were identified in 2012. Multivariate analysis revealed that atherectomy utilization was independently predictive of greater primary composite outcome of in-hospital mortality and complications (odds ratio 1.34, 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 1.47, p <0.001) but was not associated with any significant difference in terms of in-hospital mortality alone (odds ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.99 to 1.52, p 0.063). In the propensity-matched cohort, atherectomy utilization was again associated with a higher rate of complications (12.88% vs 10.99%, p = 0.001), in-hospital mortality +a ny complication (13.69% vs 11.91%, p = 0.003) with a nonsignificant difference in terms of in-hospital mortality alone (3.45% vs 2.88%, p = 0.063) and higher hospitalization costs ($25,341 ± 353 vs $21,984 ± 87, p <0.001). Atherectomy utilization during percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with a higher rate of postprocedural complications without any significant impact on in-hospital mortality.


Assuntos
Aterectomia Coronária/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aterectomia Coronária/economia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/economia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26732517

RESUMO

The incidence and prevalence of peripheral vascular disease has been increasing. When coexistent with coronary artery disease (CAD), it has shown to predict higher mortality along with poorer quality-of-life consequently leading to a marked increase in healthcare costs. Broadly, there has been an increase in utilization of endovascular techniques in the management of peripheral vascular diseases. An inverse relation between volume and outcomes has been noted in these procedures. Additionally, improved resource utilization has also been noted with higher hospital and operator volumes. This has led to proposals to regionalize these procedures to high volume hospitals. There have also been calls to introduce the idea of having a set threshold of procedures for providers. This review presents an overview of published literature on the volume-outcome relationship affecting the outcomes of peripheral endovascular procedures.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/cirurgia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/complicações , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Procedimentos Endovasculares/economia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/mortalidade , Qualidade de Vida
17.
Clin Cardiol ; 39(2): 63-71, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26799597

RESUMO

Prior studies have highlighted disparities in cardiac lifesaving procedure utilization, particularly among women and in minorities. Although there has been a significant increase in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) insertion, socioeconomic disparities still exist in the trend of ICD utilization. With the use of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2003 through 2011, we identified subjects with ICD insertion (procedure code 37.94) and cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (procedure code 00.50, 00.51) as codified by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification. Overall, 1 020 076 ICDs were implanted in the United States from 2003 to 2011. We observed an initial increase in ICD utilization by 51%, from 95 062 in 2003 to 143 262 in 2006, followed by a more recent decline. The majority of ICDs were implanted in men age ≥65 years. Implantation of ICDs was 2.5× more common in men than in women (402 per million vs 163 per million). Approximately 95% of the ICDs were implanted in insured patients, and 5% were used in the uninsured population. There has been a significant increase in ICD implantation in blacks, from 162 per million in 2003 to 291 per million in 2011. We found a significant difference in the volume of ICD implants between the insured and the uninsured patient populations. Racial disparities have narrowed significantly in comparison with those noted in earlier studies and are now more reflective of the population demographics at large. On the other hand, significant gender disparities continue to exist.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis/tendências , Cardioversão Elétrica/tendências , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Seguro Saúde/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Cardioversão Elétrica/instrumentação , Cardioversão Elétrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etnologia , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/etnologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos , População Branca
18.
J Endovasc Ther ; 23(1): 65-75, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26637836

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To examine the impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) utilization during lower limb endovascular interventions as regards postprocedural complications and amputation. METHODS: The study cohort was derived from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample database between the years 2006 and 2011. Peripheral endovascular interventions were identified using appropriate ICD-9 procedure codes. Two-level hierarchical multivariate mixed models were created. The co-primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and amputation; the secondary outcome was postprocedural complications. Model results are given as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Hospitalization costs were also assessed. RESULTS: Overall, among the 92,714 patients extracted from the database during the observation period, IVUS was used in 1299 (1.4%) patients. IVUS utilization during lower extremity peripheral vascular procedures was independently predictive of a lower rate of postprocedural complications (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.99, p=0.037) as well as lower amputation rates (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.77, p<0.001) without any significant impact on in-hospital mortality. Multivariate analysis also revealed IVUS utilization to be predictive of a nonsignificant increase in hospitalization costs ($1333, 95% CI -$167 to +$2833, p=0.082). CONCLUSION: IVUS use during lower limb endovascular interventions is predictive of lower postprocedural complication and amputation rates with a nonsignificant increase in hospitalization costs.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares/estatística & dados numéricos , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/terapia , Padrões de Prática Médica , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Amputação Cirúrgica , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Análise Custo-Benefício , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/economia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Salvamento de Membro , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/mortalidade , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/cirurgia , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/economia , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
19.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 87(5): 955-62, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26699085

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare the in-hospital outcomes in cirrhosis patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus those undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). BACKGROUND: Over the last 10 years, TAVR has emerged as a therapeutic option for treating severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients. Cirrhosis patients have a high risk of operative morbidity and mortality while undergoing cardiac surgery. This study's hypothesis was that TAVR is a safer alternative compared to SAVR in cirrhosis patients. METHODS: The study population was derived from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for the years 2011-2012 using ICD-9-CM procedure codes 35.21 and 35.22 for SAVR, and 35.05 and 35.06 for TAVR. Patients <50 years of age and those who concomitantly underwent other valvular procedures were excluded. ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes were used to identify patients with liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and esophageal varices. Using propensity score matching, two matched cohorts were derived in which the outcomes were compared using appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: There were 30 patients in the SAVR and TAVR group each. Compared to the TAVR group, the patients in SAVR group had significantly higher rate of transfusion of whole blood or blood products (p = 0.037), longer mean postprocedural length of stay (p = 0.006), and nonsignificantly higher mean cost of hospitalization (p = 0.2), any complications rate (p = 0.09), and liver complications rate (p = 0.4). In-hospital mortality rate was same in the both the groups. No patients in the TAVR group required open-heart surgery or cardiopulmonary bypass. CONCLUSION: TAVR could be a viable option for aortic valve replacement in cirrhosis patients.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/terapia , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/complicações , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Transfusão de Sangue , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/economia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentação , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Estudos Transversais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/economia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/instrumentação , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Cirrose Hepática/diagnóstico , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Pontuação de Propensão , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
20.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 101(4): 1477-84, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26588867

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have shown survival benefit in end-stage heart failure patients. LVAD technology has evolved considerably with the development of continuous-flow devices. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from 2005 to 2011 using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition procedure code 37.66, Insertion of Implantable Heart System, in any procedure field. Patients with primary diagnosis of orthotopic heart transplant or use of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices were excluded. Procedural complications were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition codes and patient safety indicators. Cochran-Armitage and Cuzick tests for trend were used to identify time trends for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS: There were 2,038 LVAD implantations from 2005 to 2011. LVAD use increased from 127 procedures in 2005 to 506 procedures in 2011, and in-hospital mortality declined from 47.2% to 12.7% (p < 0.001), with sharp inflection points in the year 2008. Average length of stay decreased from 44 days in the pulsatile-flow era (2005 to 2007) to 36 days in the continuous-flow era (2008 to 2011). Cost of hospitalization increased from $194,380 in 2005 to $234,808 in 2011 but remained constant from 2008 to 2011. There was a trend of increased incidence of major bleeding and thromboembolism and decreased incidence of infectious and iatrogenic cardiac complications in the continuous-flow era. CONCLUSIONS: LVAD use has increased and in-hospital mortality and LOS after LVAD implantation have declined. These changes coincide with United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of continuous-flow devices in 2008.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Coração Auxiliar/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Coração Auxiliar/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Fluxo Pulsátil/fisiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA