The Tennessee Medicaid medication therapy management program: early stage contextual factors and implementation outcomes.

BACKGROUND: First investigated in the 1990s, medication therapy management (MTM) is an evidence-based practice offered by pharmacists to ensure a patient's medication regimen is individualized to include the safest and most effective medications. MTM has been shown to a) improve quality of patient care, b) reduces health care costs, and c) lead to fewer medication-related adverse effects. However, there has been limited testing of evidence-based, a-priori implementation strategies that support MTM implementation on a large scale. METHODS: The study has two objectives assessed at the organizational and individual level: 1) to determine the adoption, feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of a multi-faceted implementation strategy to support the MTM pilot program in Tennessee; and 2) to report on the contextual factors associated with program implementation based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The overall design of the study was a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation study reporting outcomes of Tennessee state Medicaid's (TennCare) MTM Pilot program. This paper presents early stage implementation outcomes (e.g., adoption, feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness) and explores implementation barriers and facilitators using the CFIR. The study was assessed at the (a) organizational and (b) individual level. A mixed-methods approach was used including surveys, claims data, and semi-structured interviews. Interview data underwent initial, rapid qualitative analysis to provide real time feedback to TennCare leadership on project barriers and facilitators. RESULTS: The total reach of the program from July 2018 through June 2020 was 2033 MTM sessions provided by 17 Medicaid credentialed pharmacists. Preliminary findings suggest participants agreed that MTM was acceptable (µ = 16.22, SD = 0.28), appropriate (µ = 15.33, SD = 0.03), and feasible (µ = 14.72, SD = 0.46). Each of the scales had an excellent level of internal (> 0.70) consistency (feasibility, α = 0.91; acceptability, α = 0.96; appropriateness, α = 0.98;). Eight program participants were interviewed and were mapped to the following CFIR constructs: Process, Characteristics of Individuals, Intervention Characteristics, and Inner Setting. Rapid data analysis of the contextual inquiry allowed TennCare to alter initial implementation strategies during project rollout. CONCLUSION: The early stage implementation of a multi-faceted implementation strategy to support delivery of Tennessee Medicaid's MTM program was found to be well accepted and appropriate across multiple stakeholders including providers, administrators, and pharmacists. However, as the early stage of implementation progressed, barriers related to relative priority, characteristics of the intervention (e.g., complexity), and workflow impeded adoption. Programmatic changes to the MTM Pilot based on early stage contextual analysis and implementation outcomes had a positive impact on adoption.

A Comparison of Childbirth Costs for Adolescents and Adults From 2001 to 2010.

PURPOSE: Although teenage birth rates in America have fallen to a historic low of 26.2 births per 1,000 teenagers, the U.S. remains behind the rest of the industrialized world. Adolescent pregnancy is relatively well discussed in today's literature, with ever more detailed estimates constantly emerging to quantify the cost of children born to America's teenagers. This study, however, describes the financial cost of childbirth in the U.S. with a specific focus on understanding the impact of adolescent childbirth in comparison to that of adult women and of annual childbirth as a whole. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the 2001-2010 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS), a uniform, multistate database containing information regarding approximately 8 million hospital inpatient stays per year of data. Data were analyzed involving payment type, length of stay, and aggregate cost of all childbirths to adolescent girls (under 18 years of age) and to adult women. RESULTS: This study found that Medicaid pays for the majority (70%) of births to adolescent girls, whereas private insurance pays for the majority (53%) of births to adult women. This was in contrast to the Medicaid coverage of 41% of all childbirths within the study time frame. Furthermore, the aggregate cost of childbirths to adolescent girls paid for by Medicaid was $670 million. CONCLUSIONS: Beyond their social impact, births to adolescent mothers place a financial burden on the national economy. Stronger efforts must be made to decrease adolescent childbirth.