RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Due to the rarity of pediatric diseases, collaborative research is the key to maximizing the impact of research studies. A research needs assessment survey was created to support initiatives to foster pediatric interventional radiology research. OBJECTIVE: To assess the status of pediatric interventional radiology research, identify perceived barriers, obtain community input on areas of research/education/support, and create metrics for evaluating changes/responses to programmatic initiatives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey link was sent to approximately 275 members of the Society for Pediatric Interventional Radiology (SPIR) between May and October 2020. Data was collected using a web-based interface. Data collected included practice setting, clinical role, research experience, research barriers, and suggestions for future initiatives. RESULTS: Fifty-nine surveys were analyzed with a staff physician survey response rate of 28% (56/198). A wide range of practice sizes from 15 countries were represented. Respondents were predominantly staff physicians (95%; 56/59) with an average of 11 years (range: 1-25 years) of clinical experience working at academic or freestanding children's hospitals. A total of 100% (59/59) had research experience, and 70% (41/58) had published research with a mean of 30 peer-reviewed publications (range: 1-200). For job security, 56% (33/59) of respondents were expected or required to publish, but only 19% (11/58) had research support staff, and 42% (25/59) had protected research time, but of those, 36% (9/25) got the time "sometimes or never." Lack of support staff, established collaborative processes, and education were identified as top barriers to performing research. CONCLUSIONS: The needs assessment survey demonstrated active research output despite several identified barriers. There is a widespread interest within the pediatric interventional radiology community for collaborative research.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gastrojejunal tubes are important feeding devices for children with gastro-esophageal reflux, allowing medication and feeding into the small bowel, and allowing gastric venting to prevent reflux. As with many medical devices, there are multiple manufacturers and designs, including balloon-retained tubes and disc-retained tubes. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the cost difference between these two types of gastrojejunal tube. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a 3.5-year retrospective cost evaluation for all pediatric patients undergoing an insertion or change of gastrojejunal tube using a bottom-up micro-costing analysis. We calculated days between encounters and a subsequent cost per day for each patient. RESULTS: A total of 187 children and adolescents were included, with an average age of 9.2 years. They underwent a total of 1,240 encounters, an average of 6.6 encounters per patient during the study period. A total of 82% of these encounters were related to balloon-retained tubes and 18% to disc-retained tubes. The most common reason for an encounter was a routine change (57%), with mechanical complications accounting for 31%. Disc-retained tubes had a longer period between encounters (117.5 days) than balloon-retained tubes (95 days; P=0.038). However, disc-retained tubes cost 6.9 British pound sterling (GBP) per day, which was significantly higher than balloon-retained tubes at 5.2 GBP per day (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Despite being more expensive to purchase, balloon-retained tubes were noted to be the least costly device in a cost-per-day analysis.
