RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Trauma is a leading cause of global death, with 200 000 deaths and over 3 million non-fatal injuries/year in the United States. We aim to assess trauma care value for patients who underwent urgent laparotomies (LAP) and thoracotomies (THO) in our Health Network System. METHODS: Clinical variables (v = 84) from trauma patients (>18 yo) were retrieved retrospectively (Jan-2010 to July-2016) and prospectively (Aug-2016 to Sept-2021) from a Health System warehouse under IRB-approved protocols. Patients were divided according to their Injury Severity Score (ISS) into mild/moderate cases (ISS <15) and severe cases (ISS >15). Value was assessed using quality and cost domains. Quality surrogates included graded postoperative complications (PCs), length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission (RA), patient satisfaction (PS), and textbook (TB) cases. Total charges (TCs) and reimbursement index (RI) were included as surrogates for cost. Value domains were displayed in scorecards comparing Observed (O) with Expected (E) (using the ACS risk calculator) outcomes. Uni-/multivariate analyses were performed using SPSS. RESULTS: 41,927 trauma evaluations were performed, leading to 16 044 admissions, with 528 (3.2%) patients requiring urgent surgical procedures (LAP = 413 and THO = 115). Although the M:F ratio (7:3) was similar in LAP vs THO groups, age and BMI were significantly different (41.8 ± 19.1 vs 51.8 ± 19.9 years, 28.6 ± 9.9 vs 27.4 ± 7 Kg/m2, respectively, P < .05). Blunt trauma was involved in 68.8/77.3% of the LAP/THO procedures, respectively (P < .05). Multivariate analyses showed ISS, age, ASA class, and medical center as factors significantly predicting PC (P < .05). Postoperative complication grades from the LAP/THO groups showed above-average outcomes; nonetheless, LOS was higher than the national averages. CONCLUSIONS: The Trauma Program holds high value in our Health Network System. Protocols for decreasing LOS are being implemented.
RESUMO
AIM: To reduce the number of paediatric respiratory viral swabs (locally referred to as a FLOQ) performed across the authors clinical centre from a baseline of over 800 ($38 000) per year by 25% over 4 months from 6 February 2017 to 31 May 2017. METHODS: A quality improvement project 'What the FLOQ?' (WTF) was instigated from 6 February 2017 to complement the Emergency Department (ED) 'Sensible Test Ordering Process' project from 1 April 2017. Stakeholder engagement across ED and general paediatric staff was sought. Alterations in practice included education of staff, targeted feedback to groups frequently ordering a FLOQ and rationalising patients appropriate for testing. Monthly requests were tallied on a run chart for FLOQs ordered in ED and the paediatric ward. A monthly audit of FLOQs performed on ED-discharged patients was conducted with feedback. RESULTS: Total FLOQ swabs decreased by 55% from 336 (February to May 2016) to 151 (February to May 2017). ED performed 66% less FLOQs from 237 (February to May 2016) to 82 (February to May 2017). There was no increase in the number of FLOQs performed on the paediatric ward February to May 2017. Monthly auditing of ED discharged patients under 2 years with a FLOQ went from 40 to 3%. CONCLUSION: Rationalising patient groups appropriate for testing with targeted feedback and broad stakeholder engagement successfully reduced FLOQs performed by 55%. This has projected savings of over $21 000 by 12 months. WTF has reduced the number of invasive patient procedures performed, benefitting staff and patients. Sustaining this change will be achieved through ongoing staff education on rationalisation criteria and consultant only requests outside of these parameters.