Population pharmacokinetics and Monte Carlo simulation for dosage optimization of fosfomycin in the treatment of osteoarticular infections in patients without renal dysfunction.

Background: Fosfomycin is gaining interest in the treatment of complex osteoarticular infections (OI) due to MDR pathogens.Objective: The aims were to conduct population pharmacokinetics of fosfomycin in a cohort of OI patients receiving 16g/daily by intermittent (II) or continuous infusion (CI), and to carry out Monte Carlo simulations for dosage optimization in the treatment of these infections.Methods: Patients underwent blood sampling on day 5 of therapy (2-3 serial samples). Population pharmacokinetics and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to define the probability of target attainment (PTA) of 70% T>MIC, and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) against common OI pathogens with dosages of 8, 12, 16, and 20g/day administered by II, extended-infusion (EI) or CI.Results: Forty-eight patients were recruited. A two-compartment open model with infusion input and first-order elimination was developed. Estimated creatinine clearance (CLCR) was included as covariate in the final model. Monte Carlo simulations showed that optimal PTAs and CFRs (≥90%) may be achieved in three different classes of renal function by administering a daily dosage of: 2g q6h by II against S. aureus, E. coli, ESBL-producing E. Coli and MRSA; 8g by CI against CoNS, K. pneumoniae and ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae; 12g by CI against P. aeruginosa, and 16g by CI against KPC-producing K. pneumoniae Conclusion: Our study provides a strong rationale for considering fosfomycin dosages of 8-16 g daily by CI in several clinical scenarios for OI patients. Feasibility of administration by CI in an elastomeric pump makes fosfomycin a candidate for OPAT programs.

Assessment of a PK/PD Target of Continuous Infusion Beta-Lactams Useful for Preventing Microbiological Failure and/or Resistance Development in Critically Ill Patients Affected by Documented Gram-Negative Infections.

BACKGROUND: Emerging data suggest that more aggressive beta-lactam PK/PD targets could minimize the occurrence of microbiological failure and/or resistance development. This study aims to assess whether a PK/PD target threshold of continuous infusion (CI) beta-lactams may be useful in preventing microbiological failure and/or resistance development in critically ill patients affected by documented Gram-negative infections. METHODS: Patients admitted to intensive care units from December 2020 to July 2021 receiving continuous infusion beta-lactams for documented Gram-negative infections and having at least one therapeutic drug monitoring in the first 72 h of treatment were included. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed using the ratio between steady-state concentration and minimum inhibitory concentration (Css/MIC) ratio as the test variable and occurrence of microbiological failure as the state variable. Area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Independent risk factors for the occurrence of microbiological failure were investigated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 116 patients were included. Microbiological failure occurred in 26 cases (22.4%). A Css/MIC ratio ≤ 5 was identified as PK/PD target cut-off with sensitivity of 80.8% (CI 60.6-93.4%) and specificity of 90.5% (CI 74.2-94.4%), and with an AUC of 0.868 (95%CI 0.793-0.924; p < 0.001). At multivariate regression, independent predictors of microbiological failure were Css/MIC ratio ≤ 5 (odds ratio [OR] 34.54; 95%CI 7.45-160.11; p < 0.001) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection (OR 4.79; 95%CI 1.11-20.79; p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Early targeting of CI beta-lactams at Css/MIC ratio > 5 during the treatment of documented Gram-negative infections may be helpful in preventing microbiological failure and/or resistance development in critically ill patients.

Population pharmacokinetics of continuous infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam in very elderly hospitalized patients and considerations for target attainment against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Continuous infusion (CI) piperacillin/tazobactam is frequently used to treat infections in very elderly patients. This study aimed to conduct a population pharmacokinetic analysis of CI piperacillin/tazobactam, and to identify optimal dosages for safe and effective probability of target attainment (PTA) against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Non-linear mixed-effects modelling was performed with Pmetrics. Monte Carlo simulations assessed the steady-state concentration (Css) of increasing piperacillin/tazobactam regimens (from 2.25 to 18 g daily by continuous infusion). Permissible doses were defined as those associated with <10% probability of Css >157.2 mg/L. PTA at the pharmacodynamic targets of free plasma steady-state concentration (fCss)/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥1 and ≥4 and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) against EUCAST MIC distribution were also calculated. A total of 141 patients (median age 85 years) provided 217 plasma piperacillin Css. Most patients (55.2%) had hospital-acquired pneumonia and intra-abdominal infections. A one-compartment pharmacokinetic model with parallel linear and Michaelis-Menten elimination best described piperacillin data. Creatinine clearance (CLCR) was the covariate retained by the model. Pharmacokinetic estimates were 6.05 L/h for clearance and 3.39 mg/L for the Michaelis-Menten constant. Permissible doses were up to 4.5, 9, 11.25 and 13.5 g daily by continuous infusion for patients with CLCR of 0-19, 20-39, 40-59 and 60-79 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. At the clinical breakpoint of 8 mg/L, the permissible doses only achieved optimal PTA for fCss/MIC ≥1 in patients with CLCR 20-79 mL/min/1.73 m2. Optimal CFRs with the permissible doses were only attained against Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis. Permissible dosages and CLCR should be considered for prescribing CI piperacillin/tazobactam in very elderly patients.

Comparative Population Pharmacokinetics of Darunavir in SARS-CoV-2 Patients vs. HIV Patients: The Role of Interleukin-6.

BACKGROUND: Darunavir is an anti-HIV protease inhibitor repurposed for SARS-CoV-2 treatment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the population pharmacokinetics of darunavir in SARS-CoV-2 patients compared with HIV patients. METHODS: Two separate models were created by means of a nonlinear mixed-effect approach. The influence of clinical covariates on each basic model was tested and the association of significant covariates with darunavir parameters was assessed at multivariate regression and classification and regression tree (CART) analyses. Monte Carlo simulation assessed the influence of covariates on the darunavir concentration versus time profile. RESULTS: A one-compartment model well-described darunavir concentrations in both groups. In SARS-CoV-2 patients (n = 30), interleukin (IL)-6 and body surface area were covariates associated with darunavir oral clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (Vd), respectively; no covariates were identified in HIV patients (n = 25). Darunavir CL/F was significantly lower in SARS-CoV-2 patients compared with HIV patients (4.1 vs. 10.3 L/h; p < 0.001). CART analysis found that an IL-6 level of 18 pg/mL may split the SARS-CoV-2 population in patients with low versus high darunavir CL/F (mean ± standard deviation 3.47 ± 1.90 vs. 8.03 ± 3.24 L/h; proportion of reduction in error = 0.46). Median (interquartile range) darunavir CL/F was significantly lower in SARS-CoV-2 patients with IL-6 levels ≥ 18 pg/mL than in SARS-CoV-2 patients with IL-6 levels < 18 pg/mL or HIV patients (2.78 [2.16-4.47] vs. 7.24 [5.88-10.38] vs. 9.75 [8.45-13.79] L/h, respectively; p < 0.0001). Increasing IL-6 levels affected darunavir concentration versus time simulated profiles. We hypothesized that increases in IL-6 levels associated with severe SARS-CoV-2 disease may downregulate the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4-mediated metabolism of darunavir. CONCLUSIONS: This is a proof-of-concept of SARS-CoV-2 disease-drug interactions, and may support the need for optimal dose selection of sensitive CYP3A4 substrates in severe SARS-CoV-2 patients.

Reappraisal of Linezolid Dosing in Renal Impairment To Improve Safety.

Linezolid is administered as a fixed dose to all patients despite evidence of increased exposure and myelosuppression in renal impairment. The objectives of these studies were to assess the risk of thrombocytopenia with standard-dose linezolid in renal impairment and to identify an alternate dosing strategy. In study 1, data from adult patients receiving linezolid for ≥10 days were retrospectively reviewed to determine the frequency of thrombocytopenia in patients with and without renal impairment. Time-to-event analyses were performed using Cox proportional-hazards models. In study 2, population pharmacokinetic modeling was employed to build covariate-structured models using an independent data set of linezolid concentrations obtained during routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Monte Carlo simulations were performed to identify linezolid dosing regimens that maximized attainment of therapeutic trough concentrations (2 to 8 mg/liter) across various renal-function groups. Toxicity analysis (study 1) included 341 patients, 133 (39.0%) with renal impairment. Thrombocytopenia occurred more frequently among patients with renal impairment (42.9% versus 16.8%; P < 0.001), and renal impairment was independently associated with this toxicity in multivariable analysis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52 to 3.68). Pharmacokinetic analyses (study 2) included 1,309 linezolid concentrations from 603 adult patients. Age, body surface area, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were identified as covariates of linezolid clearance. Linezolid dose reductions improved the probability of achieving optimal exposures in simulated patients with eGFR values of <60 ml/min. Thrombocytopenia occurs more frequently in patients with renal impairment receiving standard linezolid doses. Linezolid dose reduction and trough-based TDM are predicted to mitigate this treatment-limiting toxicity.

Population pharmacokinetics of continuous-infusion ceftazidime in febrile neutropenic children undergoing HSCT: implications for target attainment for empirical treatment against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a population pharmacokinetic analysis of continuous-infusion ceftazidime in a retrospective cohort of paediatric HSCT patients who were empirically treated for febrile neutropenia (FN) and who underwent therapeutic drug monitoring of ceftazidime steady-state plasma concentrations (Css) for optimization of drug exposure. METHODS: A non-parametric approach with Pmetrics was used for pharmacokinetic analysis and covariate evaluation. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to calculate the PTA of the pharmacodynamic determinant of efficacy (Css/MIC ≥4) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with continuous-infusion ceftazidime dosages of 1-6 g daily. The Css safety threshold was arbitrarily placed at 100 mg/L and advisable dosages were used. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients with 70 ceftazidime Css values were included. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and body surface area were the covariates associated with drug clearance. At the EUCAST clinical breakpoint of 8 mg/L, simulations showed that continuous-infusion ceftazidime dosages of 4-6 g daily attained optimal PTAs (>90%) across most of 16 different clinical scenarios based on four classes of eGFR (50-145, 145.1-200, 200.1-286 and 286.1-422 mL/min/1.73 m2) and body surface area (0.30-0.64, 0.65-0.88, 0.89-1.34 and 1.35-1.84 m2). In patients with body surface area 0.30-0.64 m2 and eGFR ≤200 mL/min/1.73 m2 the advisable dose of 3 g daily allowed only suboptimal PTAs (<75%). The cumulative fraction of response against MIC distribution of P. aeruginosa was >87%. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous-infusion ceftazidime dosages ranging from 3 to 6 g daily according to different classes of eGFR and body surface area may allow optimized empirical treatment of P. aeruginosa infections in paediatric HSCT patients with FN.

Population pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in liver transplantation: implications for target attainment for infections with Candida albicans and non-albicans spp.

OBJECTIVES: The study aims to assess the population pharmacokinetics of fluconazole and the adequacy of current dosages and breakpoints against Candida albicans and non-albicans spp. in liver transplant (LT) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients initiated i.v. fluconazole within 1 month from liver transplantation (LTx) for prevention or treatment of Candida spp. infections. Multiple assessments of trough and peak plasma concentrations of fluconazole were undertaken in each patient by means of therapeutic drug monitoring. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to define the probability of target attainment (PTA) with a loading dose (LD) of 400, 600, and 800 mg at day 1, 7, 14, and 28 from LTx, followed by a maintenance dose (MD) of 100, 200, and 300 mg daily of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target of AUC24h/MIC ratio ≥ 55.2. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were recruited. A two-compartment model with first-order intravenous input and first-order elimination was developed. Patient's age and time elapsed from LTx were the covariates included in the final model. At an MIC of 2 mg/L, a LD of 600 mg was required for optimal PTAs between days 1 and 20 from LTx, while 400 mg was sufficient from days 21 on. A MD of 200 mg was required for patients aged 40-49 years old, while a dose of 100 mg was sufficient for patients aged ≥ 50 years. CONCLUSIONS: Fluconazole dosages of 100-200 mg daily may ensure optimal PTA against C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis. Higher dosages are required against C. glabrata. Estimated creatinine clearance is not a reliable predictor of fluconazole clearance in LT patients.

Valganciclovir Pharmacokinetics in Patients Receiving Oral Prophylaxis Following Kidney Transplantation and Model-Based Predictions of Optimal Dosing Regimens.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Valganciclovir is used as oral prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in kidney transplant recipients. However, limited pharmacokinetic data exist to guide dosing in this patient group. This study aimed to describe the population pharmacokinetics of valganciclovir in a large sample of kidney transplant recipients and predict optimal dosing based on Monte Carlo simulations. METHODS: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data from adult kidney transplant recipients who received valganciclovir prophylaxis during a 10-year study period were collected retrospectively. A non-parametric pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations to determine the probabilities of reaching an area under the drug concentration-time curve (AUC) target of 40-50 mg·h/L with various dosing regimens at different levels of renal function were conducted using the Pmetrics™ package for R. RESULTS: This study included 792 ganciclovir concentration measurements derived from 97 patients. A one-compartment oral absorption model best described the data. The final covariate model was as follows: CL(ganciclovir) = TVCL × (CLCR/51)0.75, where CL is the clearance, TVCL is the typical value of ganciclovir clearance, creatinine clearance (CLCR) according to the Cockcroft-Gaultt equation and 51 is the mean CLCR determined in the study. In the simulations, the probability of reaching the targeted AUC was insufficient when using the recommended dosing regimens for prophylaxis, especially in patients with impaired renal function at CLCR < 50 mL/min. CONCLUSIONS: Higher doses of valganciclovir corrected to renal function are suggested for use as oral prophylaxis for CMV infection in kidney transplant recipients. Further study is required to establish TDM targets to ensure adequate drug concentrations while avoiding potentially toxic drug exposures.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Considerations for the Use of Linezolid in Overweight and Obese Adult Patients.

BACKGROUND: Linezolid is an anti-Gram-positive antimicrobial agent used at a fixed dose of 600 mg every 12 h. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of linezolid in a retrospective cohort of overweight and obese hospitalized patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Population pharmacokinetic and Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to assess the probability of target attainment (PTA) of an area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 h (AUC24)/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio > 100, defined as the pharmacodynamic target of efficacy, with incremental candidate dosages. Maximum permissible doses were defined as those causing a ≤ 25% of probability of a linezolid trough of > 8.06 mg/L, associated with thrombocytopenia. The cumulative fraction of response was calculated for the permissible linezolid doses by testing the PTA against the MIC distributions of a large collection of Staphylococci and Enterococci. RESULTS: A total of 352 trough (minimum) and 293 peak (maximum) linezolid concentrations from 112 patients were included. The final mixed-saturative model accounted for 88% of drug concentrations variability over time, and estimated creatinine clearance [by means of the Chronic Kidney Diseases Epidemiology formula (CrCLCKD-EPI)] was the only covariate that improved the model fit. Dose reduction to 450 mg every 12 h may be optimal for patients with coagulase-negative staphylococcal infections and a CrCLCKD-EPI < 130 mL/min/1.73 m2. Dose escalation to 450 mg every 8 h may be optimal for patients with a CrCLCKD-EPI ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Escalation to 600 mg every 8 h should not be recommended due to an unacceptable high risk of thrombocytopenia. Patients with CrCLCKD-EPI ≥ 130 mL/min/1.73 m2 and/or co-medication with P-glycoprotein modulators require therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize linezolid doses. CONCLUSIONS: Dosage adjustments of linezolid in this population should be based on CrCLCKD-EPI estimates, rather than on body size descriptors.

Population Pharmacokinetics of High-Dose Continuous-Infusion Meropenem and Considerations for Use in the Treatment of Infections Due to KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.

We assessed the population pharmacokinetics of high-dose continuous-infusion (HDCI) meropenem in a cohort of patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) infections. Monte Carlo simulations were used to define the permissible HDCI meropenem regimens that could be safely considered for the treatment of KPC-Kp infections due to meropenem-resistant strains. Permissible doses were arbitrarily defined as those associated with a ≤10% to 15% likelihood of meropenem steady-state concentrations (Css) of >100 mg/liter. Probabilities of target attainment (PTA) of four incremental pharmacodynamic determinants for meropenem efficacy (100% T>1×MIC, 100% T>2×MIC, 100% T>3×MIC, and 100% T>4×MIC, where "T>MIC" represents the time during which the plasma concentration of this time-dependent antibacterial agent is maintained above the MIC for the pathogen) in relation to different classes of renal function were calculated. The cumulative fractions of response (CFR) for the permissible HDCI meropenem regimens were calculated against the MIC distribution of the KPC-Kp clinical isolates that were collected routinely at our University Hospital between 2013 and 2016 (n = 169). Ninety-seven meropenem Css were included in the analysis. The final model included creatinine clearance (CrCL) as a covariate and explained 94% of the population variability. Monte Carlo simulations based on licensed dosages of up to 6 g/day predicted an acceptable PTA (>80%) of 100% T>1×MIC against KPC-Kp with a meropenem MIC of ≤32 mg/liter in patients with a CrCL level of <130 ml/min. Dosages of 8 g/day were needed for achieving the same target in patients with CrCL at levels of 130 to 200 ml/min. In dealing with pathogens with a meropenem MIC of 64 mg/liter, HDCI regimens using meropenem at higher than licensed levels should be considered. In these cases, real-time therapeutic drug monitoring could be a useful adjunct for optimized care. The predicted CFR were >75% in all of the classes of renal function.

Population pharmacokinetics and dosing considerations for the use of daptomycin in adult patients with haematological malignancies.

Objectives: To assess the population pharmacokinetics (popPK) of daptomycin at the conventional dose of 6 mg/kg/day in a cohort of oncohaematological patients. Methods: Patients underwent serial blood sampling on day 3 of therapy (before dosing and at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 12 h after dosing) to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of daptomycin. PopPK and Monte Carlo simulation were performed to define the probability of target attainment (PTA) with 6, 8, 10 and 12 mg/kg/day of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target of AUC 24 /MIC >1081. Results: Thirty patients were recruited. A two-compartment open model with first-order intravenous input and first-order elimination was developed. Estimated creatinine clearance (CL CR ), serum albumin concentration (Alb) and presence of AML were covariates included in the final model. Monte Carlo simulation showed that the conventional 6 mg/kg/day dose resulted in optimal PTAs (≥80%) in the presence of pathogens with an MIC up to 0.5 mg/L only in patients with CL CR 50-100 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , Alb 26-45 g/L and a haematological diagnosis other than AML. Conversely, higher dosages, up to 12 mg/kg/day, were needed to achieve this goal in the presence of pathogens with an MIC of 0.25-0.5 mg/L in all of the other tested scenarios. In patients with CL CR 101-150 mL/min/1.73 m 2 and Alb 15-25 g/L, suboptimal PTAs (<60%) were predicted even with 12 mg/kg/day dosing . Conclusions: Our study provides a strong rationale for considering daptomycin dosages of ≥ 8 mg/kg/day in several clinical scenarios for oncohaematological patients. In some of these scenarios therapeutic drug monitoring could be a useful adjunct for optimized care.

Pharmacokinetics and Dosing of Ceftobiprole Medocaril for the Treatment of Hospital- and Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Different Patient Populations.

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are among the most common infections treated in the hospital setting, and together they place a significant burden on healthcare systems. Successful management of HAP and CAP depends on rapid initiation of empirical antibiotic therapy with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Ceftobiprole is a new-generation, broad-spectrum cephalosporin antibiotic for the treatment of HAP (excluding ventilator-associated pneumonia) and CAP. It displays potent in vitro activity against a broad range of pathogens important in pneumonia. This review summarizes the pharmacokinetic profile of ceftobiprole, and considers the pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamics underlying the choice of dosing regimen. Ceftobiprole shows linear pharmacokinetics after single and multiple doses and is eliminated predominantly through the kidneys. Ceftobiprole is administered as a 500 mg intravenous infusion over 2 h every 8 h, and steady-state concentrations are reached on the first day of dosing. Dose adjustment is recommended for patients with moderate or severe renal impairment and for those with end-stage renal disease. Extending the infusion time of ceftobiprole to 4 h is recommended to optimize drug exposure in critically ill patients with augmented renal clearance. However, there is no need for dose adjustments based on age, sex or ethnicity, or for patients with severe obesity. Population pharmacokinetic modelling and Monte Carlo simulations were used to determine the optimal dosing regimen for ceftobiprole in special patient populations, including paediatric patients. Future studies of ceftobiprole in patients with HAP and CAP would be of interest.

A 1 year retrospective audit of quality indicators of clinical pharmacological advice for personalized linezolid dosing: one stone for two birds?

AIM: This study explored the clinical and economic impact of clinical pharmacological advice (CPA) (based on therapeutic drug monitoring [TDM] results, and on patients' characteristics and co-medications) on personalized linezolid therapy in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: A 1 year retrospective analysis of quality indicators of CPA (clinicians' adherence rate to CPA, pre-post rate of linezolid trough concentrations within the desired range and cost balance analysis) was conducted. RESULTS: Five hundred and forty-four CPAs were provided to clinicians during 2014 for personalizing linezolid therapy in 168 patients. Clinicians' adherence to CPAs was very high (94.7%). The pre-post rate of linezolid Cmin distribution showed a favourable impact of CPA on patient care (pre-post ratio of Cmin within the desired range + 23.4%, pre, 51.2% vs. post, 74.6%). Overall, linezolid dosage was mainly reduced (56.9% of cases), whereas dose augmentation was needed only in a minority of cases (7.7%). Cost balance analysis showed that overall 1258 standard doses of linezolid (unitary dose 600 mg) were spared for treating 168 patients with a personalized dosage for a median duration of 11 days (range 3-128 days) with a cost saving of 60038.05 €. CONCLUSION: Active computerized advice elaborated by the clinical pharmacologist on the basis of TDM results and of patient's pathophysiological data and co-medications may be cost-effective for personalizing linezolid treatment.

Does Critical Illness Change Levofloxacin Pharmacokinetics?

Levofloxacin is commonly used in critically ill patients for which existing data suggest nonstandard dosing regimens should be used. The objective of this study was to compare the population pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin in critically ill and in non-critically ill patients. Adult patients with a clinical indication for levofloxacin were eligible for participation in this prospective pharmacokinetic study. Patients were given 500 mg or 750 mg daily by intravenous administration with up to 11 blood samples taken on day 1 or 2 of therapy. Plasma samples were analyzed and population pharmacokinetic analysis was undertaken using Pmetrics. Thirty-five patients (18 critically ill) were included. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age, weight, and Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance for the critically ill and for the non-critically ill patients were 60.3 (16.4) and 72.0 (11.6) years, 78.5 (14.8) and 70.9 (15.8) kg, and 71.9 (65.8) and 68.2 (30.1) ml/min, respectively. A two-compartment linear model best described the data. Increasing creatinine clearance was the only covariate associated with increasing drug clearance. The presence of critical illness did not significantly affect any pharmacokinetic parameter. The mean (SD) parameter estimates were as follows: clearance, 8.66 (3.85) liters/h; volume of the central compartment (Vc), 41.5 (24.5) liters; intercompartmental clearance constants from central to peripheral, 2.58 (3.51) liters/h; and peripheral to central compartments, 0.90 (0.58) liters/h. Monte Carlo dosing simulations demonstrated that achievement of therapeutic exposures was dependent on renal function, pathogen, and MIC. Critical illness appears to have no independent effect on levofloxacin pharmacokinetics that cannot be explained by altered renal function.

Clinical pharmacological approach for balancing the use of daptomycin and linezolid in comparison with that of vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA-related infections.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the most challenging bacterial pathogens responsible for severe infections among hospitalized patients. In recent years there is increasing evidence that the clinical efficacy of vancomycin is progressively decreasing. Although daptomycin and linezolid are valuable alternatives to vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA-related bloodstream infections and pneumonia, respectively, a great deal of debate exists about their role in daily clinical practice due to cost-effectiveness issues. In this article we put into perspective the importance of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) considerations based on recent experimental and clinical data to argue whether they could be helpful in identifying clinical conditions in which these agents could be advantageous as compared to vancomycin.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of linezolid in hospitalized paediatric patients: a step toward dose optimization by means of therapeutic drug monitoring and Monte Carlo simulation.

OBJECTIVES: To report on linezolid exposure in a paediatric population who routinely underwent therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for dosage optimization and to assess the factors affecting interpatient variability. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients whose plasma C(min) and Cmax levels were measured during linezolid treatment. Adequate exposure was defined as a C(min) of 2-7 mg/L and/or an estimated AUC24 of 160-300 mg · h/L. Patients were divided into two subgroups (Group 1, 2-11 years; Group 2, 12-18 years). Monte Carlo simulation was performed to investigate whether or not the currently recommended dosages might enable a high probability of target attainment (PTA) of two thresholds for linezolid efficacy (AUC24/MIC ≥ 80 or ≥ 100). Data on demographic characteristics, disease, microbiology and haematochemical parameters and outcomes were collected. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients were included. Standard dosages were suboptimal in 50.0% and 44.4% of patients in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. Among those who underwent multiple instances of TDM, the dosages were increased in 33.3% of cases in both groups, and decreased in 6.6% and 9.5% of cases in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. Co-treatment with phenobarbital, proton pump inhibitors and amiodarone accounted for most of the variability in C(min) (adjusted R(2) of 0.692). Simulations showed a PTA of ≥ 90% with the current dosing regimens in both groups only for pathogens with an MIC ≤ 1 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Higher dosages of linezolid may be needed, especially in Group 1 when in the presence of pathogens with an MIC >1 mg/L. The role of TDM should be encouraged for optimization of linezolid exposure in the paediatric setting in the presence of infections caused by pathogens with borderline susceptibility and/or for patients co-treated with drugs that may alter linezolid exposure.

Levofloxacin dosing regimen in severely morbidly obese patients (BMI ≥40 kg/m(2)) should be guided by creatinine clearance estimates based on ideal body weight and optimized by therapeutic drug monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Levofloxacin is a commonly prescribed antimicrobial where recommendations exist to reduce doses for renal impairment but not to increase doses for augmented renal function. Morbidly obese patients are increasing in prevalence, and represent a population that can have augmented renal function requiring higher-than-standard doses. OBJECTIVE: The current investigation was performed to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and evaluate the influence of alternate body size descriptors and renal function as predictors of levofloxacin clearance (CL) and the area under the curve over 24 h (AUC24). METHODS: A database of patients undergoing levofloxacin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) were queried to identify patients ≥18 years of age with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m(2). A maximum a posteriori probability Bayesian approach using a two-compartment linear PK model was used to estimate individual PK parameters and AUC24. RESULTS: A total of 394 concentration-time data points (peaks and trough) from 68 patients between 98 and 250 kg were evaluated. The median (5th, 95th percentile) daily dose and AUC24 was 1,000 (250, 1,500) mg and 90.7 (44.4, 228) mg·h/L, respectively. Levofloxacin CL was significantly (p < 0.05) related to height but not weight. As a result, levofloxacin CL was best related (R (2) = 0.57) to creatinine CL (CLcr) estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation and ideal body weight (IBW) because IBW is a height transformation. An empiric four-category daily-dose regimen (500, 750, 1,000, 1,250 mg) stratified by CLcr (CG-IBW) is expected to have >90 % probability of achieving an AUC24 of 50-150 mg·h/L in morbidly obese patients. Subsequent application of TDM and integration with pathogen-specific information could then be applied to tailor the levofloxacin regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed approach serves as a relevant alternative to the current fixed-dosing paradigm of levofloxacin in the morbidly obese.