Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 22
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Endourol ; 38(6): 559-563, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38429913

RESUMO

Introduction: Retzius-sparing prostatectomy was promoted with the early continence result. The long-term oncologic outcome is still unknown. In this study, we aimed to compare the intermediate-term oncologic outcomes of these two approaches in patients' cohort who were treated as part of a randomized controlled trial. Methods: A total of 120 patients were previously randomized equally to receive Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) vs standard robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (S-RARP) between January 2015 and April 2016. Baseline, surgical, and pathologic characteristics as well as oncologic outcomes were assessed. The analysis was done based on the treatment received. Result: Sixty-three patients underwent S-RARP, whereas 57 patients underwent RS-RARP. There was no statistically significant difference in the baseline nor surgical characteristics. The median follow-up was 71.24 (interquartile range: 59.75-75.75) months. There were more pathologic T3 diseases in RS-RARP. There was no significant difference in the positive margin status nor in the biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate among both groups. After S-RARP and RS-RARP, 6 and 10 patients had BCR, and the 5 years BCR-free survival was 91% and 85%, respectively (p = 0.21). Conclusion: In this cohort, there was no difference in BCR in the patients who received either technique. Further multi-institutional studies with a larger sample size and longer follow-up are required.


Assuntos
Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Masculino , Prostatectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Idoso , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Laparoscopia/métodos
2.
Urology ; 184: 94-100, 2024 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38160761

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence, cumulative healthcare burden, and financial impact of inpatient admissions for radiation cystitis (RC), while exploring practice differences in RC management between teaching and nonteaching hospitals. METHODS: We focused on 19,613 patients with a diagnosis of RC within the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2008 to 2014. ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes were used. Complex-survey procedures were used to study the descriptive characteristics of RC patients and the procedures received during admission, stratified by hospital teaching status. Inflation-adjusted cost and cumulative annual cost were calculated for the study period. Multivariable logistic regression was used to study the impact of teaching status on the high total cost of admission. RESULTS: Median age was 76 (interquartile range 67-82) years. Most of the patients were males (73%; P < .001). 59,571 (61%) patients received at least one procedure, of which, 24,816 (25.5%) received more than one procedure. Median length of stay was 5days (interquartile range 2-9). Female patients and patients with a higher comorbidity score were more frequently treated at teaching hospitals. A higher proportion of patients received a procedure at a teaching hospital (64% vs 59%; P < .001). The inflation-adjusted cost was 9207 USD and was higher in teaching hospitals. The cumulative cost of inpatient treatment of RC was 63.5 million USD per year and 952.2 million USD over the study period. CONCLUSION: The incidence of RC-associated admissions is rising in the US. This disease is a major burden to US healthcare. The awareness of the inpatient economic burden and healthcare utilization associated with RC may have funding implications.


Assuntos
Cistite , Pacientes Internados , Masculino , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Feminino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Hospitais de Ensino , Custos Hospitalares , Cistite/epidemiologia , Cistite/terapia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde
4.
Cancer Med ; 8(8): 3659-3665, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31111654

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging is playing an ever-bigger role in the management of prostate cancer. This study investigated barriers to obtaining multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) in African-American men on active surveillance for prostate cancer in comparison to white men affected by the same type of cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of prostate mpMRI orders from August 2015 to October 2017 at a single health organization treating a diverse population was performed. Data was extracted from the electronic medical records and cancellations were examined based on the documented reason for mpMRI cancellation, race, median zip code household income, and distance from healthcare facility. RESULTS: Out of 793 prostate mpMRI orders, 201 (25%) went unscanned. Access to care issues accounted for 46% of unscanned orders. Patient cancellations were the most common, followed by difficulty contacting patients, and insurance denials. African-American patients disproportionately went unscanned because institution staff were unable to contact patients (29% vs 10% in white men, P = 0.0015). Median zip code household income was significantly different between racial groups but did not vary between indication for cancellation. CONCLUSIONS: African-American prostate cancer patients' access to mpMRI is hindered more by barriers to care than White patients. Urology providers must consider these issues before using prostate mpMRI within their active surveillance pathways.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Conduta Expectante , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Etnicidade , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Surg Endosc ; 32(11): 4458-4464, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29654528

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop a structured scoring tool: cystectomy assessment and surgical evaluation (CASE) that objectively measures and quantifies performance during robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) for men. METHODS: A multinational 10-surgeon expert panel collaborated towards development and validation of CASE. The critical steps of RARC in men were deconstructed into nine key domains, each assessed by five anchors. Content validation was done utilizing the Delphi methodology. Each anchor was assessed in terms of context, score concordance, and clarity. The content validity index (CVI) was calculated for each aspect. A CVI ≥ 0.75 represented consensus, and this statement was removed from the next round. This process was repeated until consensus was achieved for all statements. CASE was used to assess de-identified videos of RARC to determine reliability and construct validity. Linearly weighted percent agreement was used to assess inter-rater reliability (IRR). A logit model for odds ratio (OR) was used to assess construct validation. RESULTS: The expert panel reached consensus on CASE after four rounds. The final eight domains of the CASE included: pelvic lymph node dissection, development of the peri-ureteral space, lateral pelvic space, anterior rectal space, control of the vascular pedicle, anterior vesical space, control of the dorsal venous complex, and apical dissection. IRR > 0.6 was achieved for all eight domains. Experts outperformed trainees across all domains. CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a reliable structured, procedure-specific tool for objective evaluation of surgical performance during RARC. CASE may help differentiate novice from expert performances.


Assuntos
Consenso , Cistectomia/educação , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/educação , Cirurgiões/educação , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
6.
J Urol ; 197(5): 1237-1244, 2017 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27913152

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Comprehensive training and skill acquisition by urological surgeons are vital to optimize surgical outcomes and patient safety. We sought to develop and validate PACE (Prostatectomy Assessment and Competence Evaluation), an objective and procedure specific tool to assess the quality of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Development and content validation of PACE was performed by deconstructing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy into 7 key domains utilizing the Delphi methodology. Reliability and construct validation were then assessed using de-identified videos performed by practicing surgeons and fellows. Consensus for each domain was defined as achieving a content validity index of 0.75 or greater. Reliability was assessed by the intraclass correlation and construct validation using a mixed linear model accounting for multiple ratings on the same video. RESULTS: After 3 rounds consensus was reached on wording, relevance of the skills assessed and concordance between the score assigned and the skill assessed. An intraclass correlation of 0.4 or greater was achieved for all domains. The expert group outperformed trainees in all domains but reached statistical significance in bladder drop (4.5 vs 3.4, p = 0.002), preparation of the prostate (4.4 vs 3.2, p <0.0001), seminal vesicle and posterior plane dissection (8.3 vs 6.8, p = 0.03), and neurovascular bundle preservation (4.1 vs 2.4, p <0.0001). Limitations included the lack of assessment of other key skills such as communication and decision making. CONCLUSIONS: PACE is a structured, procedure specific and reliable tool that objectively measures surgical performance during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. It can differentiate different levels of expertise and provide structured feedback to customize training and surgical quality improvement.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Prostatectomia/normas , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/normas , Adulto , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Próstata/cirurgia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos
7.
J Surg Educ ; 74(3): 486-494, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27932307

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Effective training is paramount for patient safety. Modular training entails advancing through surgical steps of increasing difficulty. This study aimed to construct a modular training pathway for use in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). It aims to identify the sequence of procedural steps that are learnt before surgeons are able to perform a full procedure without an intervention from mentor. DESIGN: This is a multi-institutional, prospective, observational, longitudinal study. We used a validated training tool (RARP Score). Data regarding surgeons' stage of training and progress were collected for analysis. A modular training pathway was constructed with consensus on the level of difficulty and evaluation of individual steps. We identified and recorded the sequence of steps performed by fellows during their learning curves. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We included 15 urology fellows from UK, Europe, and Australia. RESULTS: A total of 15 surgeons were assessed by mentors in 425 RARP cases over 8 months (range: 7-79) across 15 international centers. There were substantial differences in the sequence of RARP steps according to the chronology of the procedure, difficulty level, and the order in which surgeons actually learned steps. Steps were not attempted in chronological order. The greater the difficulty, the later the cohort first undertook the step (p = 0.021). The cohort undertook steps of difficulty level I at median case number 1. Steps of difficulty levels II, III, and IV showed more variation in median case number of the first attempt. We recommend that, in the operating theater, steps be learned in order of increasing difficulty. A new modular training route has been designed. This incorporates the steps of RARP with the following order of priority: difficulty level > median case number of first attempt > most frequently undertaken in surgical training. CONCLUSIONS: An evidence-based modular training pathway has been developed that facilitates a safe introduction to RARP for novice surgeons.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Bolsas de Estudo , Prostatectomia/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/educação , Treinamento por Simulação/métodos , Austrália , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Reino Unido , Urologia/educação
8.
Urology ; 94: 117-22, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27210569

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of robotic anatrophic nephrolithotomy (RANL) using near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) image-guidance for treating staghorn stones, in an in vivo stone surgery model. METHODS: We developed a novel technique of RANL in a preclinical setting following guidelines on safe surgical innovation from the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term monitoring (IDEAL) collaborative. We performed 2 RANL procedures on 2 live Yorkshire porcine females (IDEAL stage 0 study). The robot was docked in the flank position and a mini-GelPOINT was placed periumbilically as an assistant port. A model staghorn "stone" was created in vivo by injecting low-viscosity DenMat precision material into the renal pelvis. NIRF image-guidance, following clamping of the posterior renal artery, was used to determine if an anatrophic plane could be identified. One procedure was assessed under cold ischemia, with ice-slush injected onto the renal surface via the mini-GelPOINT. RESULTS: Both porcine subjects underwent RANL successfully. Replica staghorn models could be created reliably (mean size 5.1 cm; solidification time 2-3 minutes). NIRF image-guidance afforded clear vascular demarcation for precise scoring of an anatrophic plane in both kidneys. The staghorn models were removed in toto through the anatrophic incision in both subjects. Mean blood loss was 160 cc. Mean console and ischemia times were 114 minutes and 34.5 minutes, respectively; ice-slush hypothermia led to a renal surface temperature of 15.4°C. CONCLUSION: In this IDEAL stage 0 preclinical study, we demonstrated that NIRF image-guidance is able to accurately identify the renal avascular plane, thus permitting an anatrophic approach for robotic excision of staghorn stones.


Assuntos
Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador , Animais , Pesquisa Biomédica , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Fluorescência , Raios Infravermelhos , Exame Físico , Suínos , Fatores de Tempo
9.
Eur Urol ; 69(3): 526-35, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26585582

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Use of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer is increasing. Structured surgical training and objective assessment are critical for outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a modular training and assessment pathway via Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (HFMEA) for trainees undertaking RARP and evaluate learning curves (LCs) for procedural steps. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multi-institutional (Europe, Australia, and United States) observational prospective study used HFMEA to identify the high-risk steps of RARP. A specialist focus group enabled validation. Fifteen trainees who underwent European Association of Urology robotic surgery curriculum training performed RARP and were assessed by mentors using the tool developed. Results produced LCs for each step. A plateau above score 4 indicated competence. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We used a modular training and assessment tool (RARP Assessment Score) to evaluate technical skills. LCs were constructed. Multivariable Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and κ coefficient analyses were used. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Five surgeons were observed for 42 console hours to map steps of RARP. HFMEA identified 84 failure modes and 46 potential causes with a hazard score ≥8. Content validation created the RARP Assessment Score: 17 stages and 41 steps. The RARP Assessment Score was acceptable (56.67%), feasible (96.67%), and had educational impact (100%). Fifteen robotic surgery trainees were assessed for 8 mo. In 426 RARP cases (range: 4-79), all procedural steps were attempted by trainees. Trainees were assessed with the RARP Assessment Score by their expert mentors, and LCs for individual steps were plotted. LCs demonstrated plateaus for anterior bladder neck transection (16 cases), posterior bladder neck transection (18 cases), posterior dissection (9 cases), dissection of prostatic pedicle and seminal vesicles (15 cases), and anastomosis (17 cases). Other steps did not plateau during data collection. CONCLUSIONS: The RARP Assessment Score based on HFMEA methodology identified critical steps for focused RARP training and assessed surgeons. LCs demonstrate the experience necessary to reach a level of competence in technical skills to protect patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: We developed a safety and assessment tool to gauge the technical skills of surgeons performing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Improvement was monitored, and measures of progress can be used in future to guide mentors when training surgeons to operate safely.


Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Curva de Aprendizado , Prostatectomia/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/educação , Análise e Desempenho de Tarefas , Ensino/métodos , Austrália , Competência Clínica , Currículo , Escolaridade , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Mentores , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Prospectivos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos
10.
Ann Surg ; 262(6): 955-64, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26501490

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between race/ethnicity and perioperative outcomes in individuals undergoing major oncologic and nononcologic surgical procedures in the United States. BACKGROUND: Prior work has shown that there are significant racial/ethnic disparities in perioperative outcomes after several types of major cardiac, general, vascular, orthopedic, and cancer surgical procedures. However, recent evidence suggests attenuation of these racial/ethnic differences, particularly at academic institutions. METHODS: We utilized the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify 142,344 patients undergoing one of the 16 major cancer and noncancer surgical procedures between 2005 and 2011. RESULTS: Eighty-five percent of the cohort was white, with black and Hispanic individuals comprising 8% and 4%, respectively. In multivariable analyses, black patients had greater odds of experiencing prolonged length of stay after 10 of the 16 procedures studied (all P < 0.05), though there was no disparity in odds of 30-day mortality after any surgery. Hispanics were more likely to experience prolonged length of stay after 5 surgical procedures (all P < 0.04), and were at greater odds of dying within 30 days after colectomy, heart valve repair/replacement, or abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (all P < 0.03). Fewer disparities were observed for Hispanics, than for black patients, and also for cancer, than for noncancer surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Important racial/ethnic disparities in perioperative outcomes were observed among patients undergoing major cancer and noncancer surgical procedures at American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program institutions. There were fewer disparities among individuals undergoing cancer surgery, though black patients, in particular, were more likely to experience prolonged length of stay.


Assuntos
Etnicidade , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , População Branca , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
11.
Urology ; 85(2): 343-9, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25623683

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the rates of hospitalization in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mCaP), as well as the effect of hospice utilization on the cost patterns of mCaP. Over the past decade, dramatic changes in the management of advanced prostate cancer have proceeded alongside changes in end-of-life care. But, the impact of these contemporary advances in management of mCaP and its implications on US health care expenditure remains unknown. METHODS: Patients hospitalized with mCaP from 1998 to 2010 were extracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (n = 100,220). Temporal trends in incidence and charges were assessed by linear regression. Complex samples logistic regression models were used to identify the predictors of in-hospital mortality, elevated hospital charges beyond the 75th percentile and hospice utilization. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2010, admissions for mCaP decreased at a rate of -5.95% per year (P <.001), whereas per-incident charges increased at the rate of 6.1% (P <.001) annually; the national economic burden of care was stable. Over the study period, hospice use increased 488.0% per year (P <.001) but was significantly lower among black (odds ratio [OR], 0.73; P = .01) and Hispanic (OR, 0.65; P = .03) patients. In multivariable analyses, hospice utilization was associated with decreased odds of elevated hospital charges beyond the 75th percentile (OR, 0.84; P = .02). CONCLUSION: Despite a decline in hospitalizations for mCaP, the economic burden of care has remained stable. Increasing use of hospice services has moderated the effect of rising per-incident hospital charges, highlighting the importance of promoting access to hospice in the right clinical setting. These findings have important policy implications, particularly as advances in treatment are expected to further increase expenditures related to the inpatient management of mCaP.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida/economia , Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida/estatística & dados numéricos , Admissão do Paciente/economia , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/economia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/secundário
12.
BJU Int ; 115(1): 166-74, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24467726

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the utility of cognitive assessment during robot-assisted surgery (RAS) to define skills in terms of cognitive engagement, mental workload, and mental state; while objectively differentiating between novice and expert surgeons. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In all, 10 surgeons with varying operative experience were assigned to beginner (BG), combined competent and proficient (CPG), and expert (EG) groups based on the Dreyfus model. The participants performed tasks for basic, intermediate and advanced skills on the da Vinci Surgical System. Participant performance was assessed using both tool-based and cognitive metrics. RESULTS: Tool-based metrics showed significant differences between the BG vs CPG and the BG vs EG, in basic skills. While performing intermediate skills, there were significant differences only on the instrument-to-instrument collisions between the BG vs CPG (2.0 vs 0.2, P = 0.028), and the BG vs EG (2.0 vs 0.1, P = 0.018). There were no significant differences between the CPG and EG for both basic and intermediate skills. However, using cognitive metrics, there were significant differences between all groups for the basic and intermediate skills. In advanced skills, there were no significant differences between the CPG and the EG except time (1116 vs 599.6 s), using tool-based metrics. However, cognitive metrics revealed significant differences between both groups. CONCLUSION: Cognitive assessment of surgeons may aid in defining levels of expertise performing complex surgical tasks once competence is achieved. Cognitive assessment may be used as an adjunct to the traditional methods for skill assessment during RAS.


Assuntos
Cognição/fisiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/educação , Cirurgiões/educação , Cirurgiões/normas , Adulto , Competência Clínica , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Eletroencefalografia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Análise e Desempenho de Tarefas
13.
J Urol ; 191(1): 90-6, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23933053

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) we examined trends in visits, hospitalization and charges for patients with upper urinary tract stones who presented to the emergency department in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All visits with a primary diagnosis of kidney calculus (ICD-9-CM code 592.0), ureter calculus (592.1) or urinary calculus unspecified (592.9) were extracted from NEDS between 2006 and 2009. A weighted sample was used to calculate incidence rates. Temporal trends were quantified by the estimated annual percent change. Patient and hospital characteristics associated with hospitalization were evaluated using logistic regression models adjusted for clustering. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2009 there were 3,635,054 emergency department visits for upper urinary tract stones. The incidence increased from 289 to 306/100,000 individuals. More men visited than women but women showed significant increases in visits (estimated annual percent change 2.85%, p = 0.018). Total monthly emergency department visits ranged from 5.8% in February to 8.4% in August. Overall 12.0% of patients were hospitalized and the hospitalization rate remained stable (estimated annual percent change -1.02%, p = 0.634). Patients were more likely to be hospitalized if they were female, more ill, seen at an urban teaching or low volume hospital, or had Medicaid or Medicare (each p <0.001). Sepsis was associated with the highest likelihood of hospital admission (OR 69.64, p <0.001). In 2009 charges for emergency department visits increased to $5 billion (estimated annual percent change 10.06%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Women showed significant annual increases in emergency department visits for upper urinary tract stones. While emergency department charges increased substantially, hospitalization rates remained stable. Greater use of computerized tomography and medical expulsive therapy could be the reasons for this observation, which warrants further study.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/tendências , Urolitíase/economia , Urolitíase/epidemiologia , Adulto , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Honorários e Preços/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Cálculos Renais/economia , Cálculos Renais/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Ureterolitíase/economia , Ureterolitíase/epidemiologia
14.
Can J Urol ; 20(6): 7008-14, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24331341

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Though the prevalence of metastatic prostate cancer is decreasing, the rate of admission from the emergency department (ED) is increasing. Little is known about the implications of metastatic site on a patient's ED course and admission. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A weighted estimate of 15,367 patients with metastatic prostate cancer who presented to the ED between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2009 was abstracted from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). Descriptive statistics were used to elaborate patient and hospital characteristics of the metastatic prostate cancer population and logistic regression models were fitted to identify predictors of admission. RESULTS: The most common site of metastasis in patients with metastatic prostate cancer presenting to the ED was bone (80.6%), followed by liver (13.2%), lung (9.3) and other genitourinary sites (8.1%). Over the study period, there was an increase in prevalence of the four commonest metastatic sites, and admission rates varied between metastatic sites (83.2% for bone to 95.2% for nodal metastasis). Substantial variability in the rate of inpatient mortality was noted. Increasing age, Northeast region, increased comorbidity burden, and the presence of nodal metastases and other urinary metastases were shown to be independent predictors of hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: The commonest metastatic site in patients presenting to United States EDs with metastatic prostate cancer between 2006 and 2009 was bone. Patients presenting with nodal metastases were most likely to be admitted. Independent predictors of hospitalization included age, Northeast region, increased comorbidities, nodal metastases and other urinary metastases.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundário , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias Urogenitais/secundário , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Mid-Atlantic Region , New England , Estados Unidos
15.
J Surg Res ; 185(2): 561-9, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23910887

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A standardized scoring system does not exist in virtual reality-based assessment metrics to describe safe and crucial surgical skills in robot-assisted surgery. This study aims to develop an assessment score along with its construct validation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All subjects performed key tasks on previously validated Fundamental Skills of Robotic Surgery curriculum, which were recorded, and metrics were stored. After an expert consensus for the purpose of content validation (Delphi), critical safety determining procedural steps were identified from the Fundamental Skills of Robotic Surgery curriculum and a hierarchical task decomposition of multiple parameters using a variety of metrics was used to develop Robotic Skills Assessment Score (RSA-Score). Robotic Skills Assessment mainly focuses on safety in operative field, critical error, economy, bimanual dexterity, and time. Following, the RSA-Score was further evaluated for construct validation and feasibility. Spearman correlation tests performed between tasks using the RSA-Scores indicate no cross correlation. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed between the two groups. RESULTS: The proposed RSA-Score was evaluated on non-robotic surgeons (n = 15) and on expert-robotic surgeons (n = 12). The expert group demonstrated significantly better performance on all four tasks in comparison to the novice group. Validation of the RSA-Score in this study was carried out on the Robotic Surgical Simulator. CONCLUSION: The RSA-Score is a valid scoring system that could be incorporated in any virtual reality-based surgical simulator to achieve standardized assessment of fundamental surgical tents during robot-assisted surgery.


Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/normas , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Avaliação Educacional/normas , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Robótica/educação , Adulto , Educação Baseada em Competências/métodos , Educação Baseada em Competências/normas , Simulação por Computador/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Internato e Residência/métodos , Internato e Residência/normas , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Interface Usuário-Computador
16.
J Surg Educ ; 70(2): 224-31, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23427968

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Reliance upon fluoroscopy within urology is increasing, with urologists key in determining radiation exposure to patients, themselves, and other healthcare personnel. However, education in occupational radiation safety is nonstandardized, often lacking. Consequently, residents and practicing urologists risk overexposure. We assessed occupational radiation safety attitudes and practices of training urologists. METHODS: A confidential, anonymous, internet-based survey on workplace radiation safety practices was distributed to residents and fellows via program directors identified from the American College of Graduate Medical Education and the American Osteopathic Association. Items explored included sources of education on occupational radiation exposure, knowledge of occupational dose limits, exposure frequency, and protective item utilization. Investigators were blinded to responses. RESULTS: Overall, 165 trainees responded, almost all of whom reported at least weekly workplace radiation exposure. Compliance with body and thyroid shields was high at 99% and 73%, respectively. Almost no one used lead-lined glasses and gloves; three-quarters cited lack of availability. The principle of keeping radiation doses As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) was widely practiced (88%). However, 70% of respondents never used dosimeters, while 56% never had one issued. Only 53% felt adequately trained in radiation safety; this number was 30% among those pregnant during training. Fewer than half (46%) correctly identified the maximum acceptable annual physician exposure. Departmental education in radiation safety improved knowledge, protective practices, monitoring, and satisfaction with education in radiation exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that protective equipment usage and occupational radiation monitoring for the training urologist are insufficient. Despite frequent exposure, resident education in radiation safety was found lacking. Efforts should be made to address these deficiencies on a local and national level.


Assuntos
Bolsas de Estudo , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Internato e Residência , Saúde Ocupacional/educação , Proteção Radiológica , Urologia/educação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
17.
Urol Oncol ; 31(8): 1470-6, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22534086

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The implications of positive surgical margin (PSM) extent and location during radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) have not been assessed in a contemporary series. We aimed to examine the incidence, location, and extent of PSM as well as their impact on biochemical recurrence (BCR) following RPP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 794 patients underwent RPP by a single surgeon between June 1993 and August 2010. Covariates included age, pathologic T stage, pathologic Gleason sum, preoperative PSA, prostate volume, PSM extent, and location. Life table, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analyses assessed predictors of BCR following RPP. RESULTS: PSM were recorded in 162 patients (20.4%); of these, 83 (51.2%) were focal (≤ 1 mm) whereas 79 (48.8%) were broad (>1 mm). Location of PSM was anterior 10.5%, posterior or lateral 14.8%, bladder neck 23.5%, apical 32.1%, and multifocal 19.1%. At a median follow-up of 54 months, the 5-year BCR-free probability was 90.8% in patients with negative margins, 77.5% in patients with focal PSM, and 47.5% in patients with broad PSM. On multivariable analyses adjusted for age, pathologic T stage, pathologic Gleason sum, preoperative PSA, and prostate volume, broad PSM, (HR = 3.49, P < 0.001) as well as anterior (HR = 3.77, P = 0.003), bladder neck (HR = 2.25, P = 0.01) and multifocal (HR = 3.55, P < 0.001) PSM were independent predictors of BCR. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we present oncologic outcomes following RPP in a large contemporary cohort of patients undergoing RPP. In adjusted analyses, broad and anterior PSM carried the highest risk of recurrence after RPP.


Assuntos
Próstata/cirurgia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Próstata/patologia , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Fatores de Risco
18.
Cancer ; 118(18): 4421-6, 2012 Sep 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22298310

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic status represents an established barrier to health care access. Age, sex, and race may also play a role. The authors examined whether these affect the access to high-volume hospitals for uro-oncologic procedures in the United States. METHODS: Within the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), the authors focused on radical prostatectomy (RP), radical cystectomy, and nephrectomy (Nx) performed within the 5 most contemporary years (2003-2007). Logistic regression models were used to estimate the impact of the primary predictors on the likelihood of receiving care at a high-volume hospital. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2007, 62,165 RP, 6557 radical cystectomy, and 28,062 Nx cases were recorded within the NIS. Patient age (P = .001), year of surgery (P = .001), Charlson Comorbidity Index (P ≤ .025), median Zip Code income (highest vs lowest quartile, P = .001), and insurance status (private vs Medicare, P = .008) were independent predictors of being treated at high-volume institutions. Moreover, black race was an independent predictor of decreased utilization of high-volume institutions for radical cystectomy (P = .012), and female sex was an independent predictor of decreased utilization of high-volume institutions for Nx (P = .016). CONCLUSIONS: On average, old, sick, poor, and Medicare patients were less likely to be treated at high-volume hospitals for uro-oncologic surgery. Similarly, black patients were less likely to have a radical cystectomy at a high-volume hospital, and female patients were less likely to have an Nx at a high-volume hospital. Selective referral of individuals who are less likely to receive care at such institutions may represent a health care priority intended to optimize outcomes across all population strata.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos , Neoplasias Urológicas/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos , Cistectomia , Feminino , Hospitais , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Masculino , Medicare , Nefrectomia , Prostatectomia , Grupos Raciais , Estados Unidos
19.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 44(2): 343-51, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21894468

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Privately insured patients may have favorable health outcomes when compared to those covered by federally funded initiatives. This study explored the effect of insurance status on five short-term outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN). METHODS: Within the Health Care Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), we focused on PNs performed between 1998 and 2007. We tested the rates of in-hospital mortality, blood transfusions, prolonged length of stay, as well as intraoperative and postoperative complications, stratified according to insurance status. Multivariable logistic regression analyses fitted with general estimation equations for clustering among hospitals further adjusted for confounding factors. RESULTS: Overall, 8,513 PNs were identified. Of those, most patients were privately insured (53.5%), followed by Medicare (37.5%), uninsured (4.6%) and Medicaid (4.4%). Medicare and Medicaid patients had higher rates of transfusions (P < 0.001) and overall postoperative complications (P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, when compared to privately insured patients, Medicaid patients had higher rates of transfusions (OR = 1.91, P < 0.001) and prolonged length of stay (OR = 1.49, P < 0.001). Medicare patients had higher rates of overall postoperative complications (OR = 1.24, P = 0.015) and length of stay beyond the median (OR = 1.4, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with private insurance undergoing PN have better short-term outcomes, when compared to their publicly insured counterparts.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde/economia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Nefrectomia/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Humanos , Incidência , Neoplasias Renais/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
20.
Cancer ; 118(7): 1894-900, 2012 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21898379

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Race represents an established barrier to health care access in the United States and elsewhere. We examined whether race affects the utilization rate of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP) in a population-based sample of individuals from the United States. METHODS: Within the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), we focused on patients in whom MIRP and open radical prostatectomy (ORP) were performed between 2001 and 2007. We assessed the proportions and temporal trends in race distributions between MIRP and ORP. Multivariable logistic regression analyses further adjusted for age, year of surgery, baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index, annual hospital caseload tertiles, hospital region, insurance status, and median zip code income. RESULTS: Of 65,148 radical prostatectomies, 3581 (5.5%) were MIRPs. African Americans accounted for 11.4% of patients versus 78.8% for Caucasians versus 9.9% for others. Between 2001 and 2007, the annual proportions of Caucasian patients treated with MIRP were 2.2%, 0.9%, 2.6%, 7.2%, 4.7%, 9.3%, and 11.6%, respectively (chi-square trend p<0.001). For the same years in African American patients, the proportions were 0.8, 0.3, 1.4, 4.4, 3.5, 9.0 and 8.4% (chi-square trend P < .001). In multivariable analyses relative to Caucasian patients, African American patients were 14% less likely to undergo MIRP (P = .01). After period stratification between years 2001-2005 versus 2006-2007, African Americans were 22% less likely to undergo a MIRP in the early period (P = .007) versus 11% less likely to have a MIRP in the contemporary period (P = .1). CONCLUSIONS: The racial discrepancies in MIRP utilization rates are gradually improving.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Prostatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/etnologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Grupos Raciais , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , População Branca
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA