Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 34
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
PLoS One ; 18(11): e0295024, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38033169

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and predictors of testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) under an accountable care model of health care delivery. Data sources were claims and encounter records from the Massachusetts Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program (MassHealth) for enrollees aged 13 to 64 years in 2019. This cross-sectional study examines the one-year prevalence of STI testing and evaluates social determinants of health and other patient characteristics as predictors of such testing in both primary care and other settings. We identified visits with STI testing using procedure codes and primary care settings from provider code types. Among 740,417 members, 55% were female, 11% were homeless or unstably housed, and 15% had some level of disability. While the prevalence of testing in any setting was 20% (N = 151,428), only 57,215 members had testing performed in a primary care setting, resulting in an 8% prevalence of testing by primary care clinicians (PCCs). Members enrolled in a managed care organization (MCO) were significantly less likely to be tested by a primary care provider than those enrolled in accountable care organization (ACO) plans that have specific incentives for primary care practices to coordinate care. Enrollees in a Primary Care ACO had the highest rates of STI testing, both overall and by primary care providers. Massachusetts' ACO delivery systems may be able to help practices increase STI screening with explicit incentives for STI testing in primary care settings.


Assuntos
Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Criança , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Medicaid , Estudos Transversais , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Atenção Primária à Saúde
4.
South Med J ; 116(6): 455-463, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37263607

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to measure sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing among Medicaid enrollees initiating preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent human immunodeficiency virus. Secondary data are in the form of Medicaid enrollment and claims data in six states in the US South. METHODS: Research partnerships in six states in the US South developed a distributed research network to accomplish study aims. Each state identified all first-time PrEP users in fiscal year 2017-2018 (combined N = 990) and measured the presence of STI testing for chlamydia, syphilis, and gonorrhea through 2019. Each state calculated the percentage of individuals with at least one STI test during 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up periods. RESULTS: The proportion of first-time PrEP users that received an STI test varied by state: 37% to 67% of all of the individuals in each state who initiated PrEP received a test within the first 6 months of PrEP treatment and 50% to 77% received a test within the first 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Although the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends STI testing at least every 6 months for PrEP users, our analysis of Medicaid data suggests that STI testing occurs less frequently than recommended in populations at elevated risk of syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia.


Assuntos
Gonorreia , Infecções por HIV , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Sífilis , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Humanos , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Medicaid , Homossexualidade Masculina , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle
5.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 5(6): 100937, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36933802

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Congenital syphilis can cause severe morbidity, including miscarriage and stillbirth, and rates are increasing rapidly within the United States. However, congenital syphilis can be prevented with early detection and treatment of syphilis during pregnancy. Current screening recommendations propose that all women should be screened early in pregnancy, whereas women with elevated risks for congenital syphilis should be screened again later in pregnancy. The rapid increase in congenital syphilis rates suggests that there are still gaps in prenatal syphilis screening. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine associations between the odds of prenatal syphilis screening and sexually transmitted infection history or other patient characteristics across 3 states with elevated rates of congenital syphilis. STUDY DESIGN: We used the Medicaid claims data from Kentucky, Louisiana, and South Carolina for women with deliveries between 2017 and 2021. Within each state, we examined the log-odds of prenatal syphilis screening as a function of the mother's health history, demographic factors, and Medicaid enrollment history. Patient history was established using a 4-year lookback period of the Medicaid claims data; in state A, sexually transmitted infection surveillance data were used to improve the sexually transmitted infection history. RESULTS: The prenatal syphilis screening rates varied by state, ranging from 62.8% to 85.1% of deliveries to women without a recent history of sexually transmitted infections and from 78.1% to 91.1% of deliveries to women with a previous sexually transmitted infection. For the main outcome of syphilis screening at any time during pregnancy, deliveries associated with previous sexually transmitted infections had 1.09 to 1.37 times higher adjusted odds ratios of undergoing screening. Deliveries to women with continuous Medicaid coverage throughout the first trimester also had higher odds of syphilis screening at any time (adjusted odds ratio, 2.45-3.15). Among deliveries to women with a previous sexually transmitted infection, only 53.6% to 63.6% underwent first-trimester screening and this rate was still just 55.0% to 69.5% when considering only deliveries to women with a previous sexually transmitted infection and full first-trimester Medicaid coverage. Fewer delivering women underwent third-trimester screening (20.3%-55.8% of women with previous sexually transmitted infection). Compared with deliveries to White women, deliveries to Black women had lower odds of first-trimester screening (adjusted odds ratio, 0.85 in all states) but higher odds of third-trimester screening (adjusted odds ratio, 1.23-2.03), potentially impacting maternal and birth outcomes. For state A, linkage to surveillance data doubled the rate of detection of a previous sexually transmitted infection because 53.0% of deliveries by women with a previous sexually transmitted infection would not have had sexually transmitted infection history detected using Medicaid claims alone. CONCLUSION: A previous sexually transmitted infection and continuous preconception Medicaid enrollment were associated with higher rates of syphilis screening, but Medicaid claims alone do not fully capture the sexually transmitted infection history of patients. The overall screening rates were lower than would be expected given that all women should undergo prenatal screening, but the rates in the third trimester were particularly low. Of note, there are gaps in early screening for non-Hispanic Black women who had lower odds of first-trimester screening when compared with non-Hispanic White women despite being at elevated risk for syphilis.


Assuntos
Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Sífilis Congênita , Sífilis , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Sífilis/epidemiologia , Sífilis/complicações , Sífilis Congênita/diagnóstico , Sífilis Congênita/epidemiologia , Sífilis Congênita/prevenção & controle , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Etnicidade , Medicaid , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal
6.
Womens Health Issues ; 33(4): 349-358, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36725411

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Rates of congenital syphilis cases are increasing, particularly among lower socioeconomic populations within the southern United States. Medicaid covers a significant portion of these births, which provides an opportunity to improve birth outcomes. This project sought to collect information from key stakeholders to assess facilitators of and barriers to Medicaid funding of prenatal syphilis screening and to provide insight into improving screening and lowering incidence through the Medicaid program. METHODS: Seven southern states (Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee) were identified for this assessment. Researchers conducted a legal and policy analysis for each state to gather information on factors affecting congenital syphilis prevention, identify knowledge gaps, and inform the development of interview guides. Seventeen structured interviews with 29 participants were conducted to gather information on facilitators and barriers to receiving timely prenatal syphilis screening through the Medicaid program. Interview transcripts were analyzed and compared to identify key themes. RESULTS: Barriers to timely prenatal syphilis screening include varied laws among the states on the timing of screening, Medicaid reimbursement policies that may not adequately incentivize testing, Medicaid enrollment issues that affect both enrollment and continuity of care, and lack of clear understanding among providers on recommended testing. CONCLUSION: This work provides insight into systemic issues that may be affecting rates of prenatal syphilis screening and incidence among Medicaid enrollees and others in the U.S. South. To address rising congenital syphilis cases, policymakers should consider requiring third trimester syphilis screening, adopting policies to enhance access to prenatal care, adapting Medicaid payment and incentive models, and promoting collaboration between Medicaid and public health agencies.


Assuntos
Sífilis Congênita , Sífilis , Gravidez , Feminino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Humanos , Sífilis Congênita/diagnóstico , Sífilis Congênita/prevenção & controle , Medicaid , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Sífilis/epidemiologia , Sífilis/prevenção & controle , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal
7.
Am J Prev Med ; 62(5): 770-776, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34998629

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The rates of syphilis among pregnant women and infants have increased in recent years, particularly in the U.S. South. Although state policies require prenatal syphilis testing, recent screening rates comparable across Southern states are not known. The purpose of this study is to measure syphilis screening among Medicaid enrollees with delivery in states in the U.S. South. METHODS: A total of 6 state-university research partnerships in the U.S. South developed a distributed research network to analyze Medicaid claims data using a common analytic approach for enrollees with delivery in fiscal years 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 (combined N=504,943). In 2020-2021, each state calculated the percentage of enrollees with delivery with a syphilis screen test during the first trimester, third trimester, and at any point during pregnancy. Percentages for those with first-trimester enrollment were compared with the percentages of those who enrolled in Medicaid later in pregnancy. RESULTS: Prenatal syphilis screening during pregnancy ranged from 56% to 91%. Screening was higher among those enrolled in Medicaid during the first trimester than in those enrolled later in pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Despite state laws requiring syphilis screening during pregnancy, screening was much lower than 100%, and states varied in syphilis screening rates among Medicaid enrollees. Findings indicate that access to Medicaid in the first trimester is associated with higher rates of syphilis screening and that efforts to improve access to screening in practice settings are needed.


Assuntos
Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez , Sífilis , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Medicaid , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Sífilis/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos
9.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 28(4): 358-365, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34939604

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) continue to increase in the United States. Publicly funded sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics provide important safety net services for communities at greater risk for STIs. However, creating financially sustainable models of STI care remains a challenge. OBJECTIVE: Characterization of clinic insurance billing practices and patient willingness to use insurance. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey assessment of clinic administrators and patients. SETTING: Twenty-six STD clinics and 4138 patients attending these clinics in high STD morbidity metropolitan statistical areas in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Clinic administrators and patients of these clinics. INTERVENTION: Survey assessment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Insurance billing practices of STD clinics and patient insurance status and willingness to use their insurance. RESULTS: Fifteen percent of clinics (4/26) indicated that they billed only Medicaid, 58% (15/26) billed both Medicaid and private insurance, 27% (7/26) did not bill for any health insurance, and none (0%) billed only private health insurance companies. Of 4138 patients surveyed, just more than one-half of patients (52.6%) were covered by some form of health insurance. More than one-half (57.2%) of all patients covered by health insurance indicated that they would be willing to use their health insurance for that visit. After adjusting for patient demographics and clinic characteristics, the patients covered by government insurance were 3 times as likely (odds ratio: 3.16; 95% confidence interval, 2.44-4.10) than patients covered by private insurance to be willing to use their insurance for their visit. CONCLUSION: Opportunities exist for sustainable STI services through the enhancement of billing practices in STD clinics. The STD clinics provide care to large numbers of individuals who are both insured and who are willing to use their insurance for their care. As Medicaid expansion continues across the country, efforts focused on improving reimbursement rates for Medicaid may improve financial sustainability of STD clinics.


Assuntos
Seguro Saúde , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Estudos Transversais , Honorários e Preços , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Estados Unidos
10.
J Infect Dis ; 224(12 Suppl 2): S103-S112, 2021 08 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34396411

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is an infection of the upper genital tract that has important reproductive consequences to women. We describe the burden of and trends in PID among reproductive-aged women in the United States during 2006-2016. METHODS: We used data from 2 nationally representative probability surveys collecting self-reported PID history (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, National Survey of Family Growth); 5 datasets containing International Classification of Diseases, Ninth/Tenth Revision codes indicating diagnosed PID (Healthcare Utilization Project; National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, emergency department component; National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey; National Disease Therapeutic Index; MarketScan); and data from a network of sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics (Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance Network). Trends during 2006-2016 were estimated overall, by age group and, if available, race/ethnicity, region, and prior STIs. RESULTS: An estimated 2 million reproductive-aged women self-reported a history of PID. Three of 4 nationally representative data sources showed overall declines in a self-reported PID history, and PID emergency department and physician office visits, with small increases observed in nearly all data sources starting around 2015. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of PID in the United States is high. Despite declines in burden over time, there is evidence of an increase in recent years.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Doença Inflamatória Pélvica/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Comportamento Sexual , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
11.
Sex Transm Dis ; 48(8): 572-577, 2021 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33433174

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis are common, treatable sexually transmitted infections (STIs) that are highly prevalent in the general US population. Costs associated with diagnosing and treating these conditions for individual states' Medicaid participants are unknown. The purpose of this study was to estimate the cost of screening and treatment for 3 common STIs for state Medicaid program budgets in Maryland and South Carolina. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted using Medicaid administrative claims data over a 2-year period. Claims were included based on the presence of one of the 3 study conditions in either diagnosis or procedure codes. Descriptive analyses were used to characterize the participant population and expenditures for services provided. RESULTS: Total Medicaid expenditures for STI care in state fiscal years 2016 and 2017 averaged $43.5 million and $22.3 million for each year in Maryland and South Carolina, respectively. Maryland had a greater proportion of costs associated with outpatient hospital and laboratory settings. Costs for care provided in the emergency department were highest in South Carolina. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis and treatment of commonly reported STIs may have a considerable financial impact on individual state Medicaid programs. Public health activities directed at STI prevention are important tools for reducing these costs to states.


Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia , Gonorreia , Infecções por HIV , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Infecções por Chlamydia/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Chlamydia/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Gonorreia/tratamento farmacológico , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Maryland/epidemiologia , Medicaid , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
12.
Sex Transm Dis ; 47(1): 62-66, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31688727

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Access to health care services such as screening, testing, and treatment of sexually transmitted diseases is vital for those who engage in high-risk behaviors. Studies examining the relationship between high-risk behaviors and health care access and utilization are crucial for determining whether persons at risk are receiving appropriate health services. METHODS: We examined 2016 data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Our study population included persons aged 18 to 65 years. χ and logistic regression analyses were used to examine relationships between high-risk behaviors including drug use and high-risk sexual behaviors, and access to and utilization of health care services. RESULTS: Among our study population, 6.2% engaged in a high-risk behavior in the past year. Those engaging in high-risk behaviors were more likely to have no health insurance coverage (odds ratio [OR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-1.34), have no personal health care provider (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.06-1.21), have foregone care because of cost (OR 1.54; 95% CI, 1.42-1.65), or have had no routine check-up in the past 2 years (OR 1.16; 95% CI, 1.09-1.25). CONCLUSIONS: Those who engaged in high-risk behaviors had poorer health care access and utilization outcomes. Future studies should incorporate the relationships between changes in behaviors, health care access and utilization, and resulting sexually transmitted disease morbidity.


Assuntos
Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Assunção de Riscos , Comportamento Sexual/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
13.
Am J Prev Med ; 57(1): 51-56, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31128954

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Chlamydia and gonorrhea are the most commonly reported notifiable infections in the U.S., with direct medical costs for the treatment of these infections exceeding $700 million annually. Medicaid currently covers approximately 80 million low-income Americans, including a high percentage of racial and ethnic minorities. Studies have shown that racial and ethnic minority populations, particularly those with low SES, are at an increased risk of acquiring a sexually transmitted disease. Therefore, as Medicaid expands, there will likely be a greater demand for sexually transmitted disease services in community-based physician offices. To determine demand for these services among Medicaid enrollees, this study examined how often Medicaid was used to pay for sexually transmitted disease services received in this setting. METHODS: This study combined 2014 and 2015 data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and tested for differences in the proportion of visits with an expected payment source of Medicaid when sexually transmitted disease services were and were not provided. All analyses were conducted in October 2018. RESULTS: During 2014-2015, an estimated 25 million visits received a sexually transmitted disease service. Medicaid paid for a greater percentage of sexually transmitted disease visits (35.5%, 95% CI=22.5%, 51.1%) compared with non-sexually transmitted disease visits (12.1%, 95% CI=10.8%, 13.6%). Logistic regression modeling, controlling for age, sex, and race of the patient, showed that visits covered by Medicaid had increased odds of paying for a sexually transmitted disease service visit (OR=1.97, 95% CI=1.12, 3.46), compared with other expected payment sources. CONCLUSIONS: Focusing sexually transmitted disease prevention in Medicaid populations could reduce sexually transmitted disease incidence and resulting morbidity and costs.


Assuntos
Medicaid , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/economia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Minoritários/estatística & dados numéricos , Pobreza , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/etnologia , Estados Unidos
14.
Sex Transm Infect ; 94(8): 611-615, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30150251

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Chlamydia, gonorrhoea and syphilis (primary and secondary) are at high levels in the USA. Disparities by race, gender and sexual orientation have been characterised, but while there are indications that rural poor populations may also be at distinct risk this has been subjected to little study by comparison. The federally designated Delta Regional Authority, similar in structure to the Appalachian Regional Commission, oversees 252 counties within eight Mississippi Delta states experiencing chronic economic and health disparities. Our objective was to identify differences in infection risk between Delta Region (DR)/non-DR counties and examine how they might vary by rurality, population density, primary care access and education attainment. METHODS: Reported chlamydia/gonorrhoea/syphilis data were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention AtlasPlus, county demographic data from the Area Health Resource File and rurality classifications from the Department of Agriculture. Data were subjected to analysis by t-test, χ2 and linear regression to assess geographical disparities in incidence and their association with measures of rurality, population and primary care density, and education. RESULTS: Overall rates for each infection were significantly higher in DR versus non-DR counties (577.8 vs 330.1/100 000 for chlamydia; 142.8 vs 61.8 for gonorrhoea; 3.6 vs 1.7 for syphilis; all P<0.001) and for nearly every infection for every individual state. DR rates for each infection were near-universally significantly increased for every level of rurality (nine levels) and population density (quintiles). Regression found that primary care and population density and HS graduation rates were significantly associated with each, though model predictive abilities were poor. CONCLUSIONS: The nearly 10 million people living in the DR face significant disparities in the incidence of chlamydia, gonorrhoea and syphilis-in many instances a near-doubling of risk. Our findings suggest that resource-constrained areas, as measured by rurality, should be considered a priority for future intervention efforts.


Assuntos
Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Infecções por Chlamydia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , População Rural , Comportamento Sexual , Sífilis/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
16.
Am J Public Health ; 106(8): 1511-3, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27310349

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To survey patients of publicly funded sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics across the United States about their willingness to use health insurance for their visit. METHODS: In 2013, we identified STD clinics in 21 US metropolitan statistical areas with the highest rates of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveillance reports. Patients attending the identified STD clinics completed a total of 4364 surveys (response rate = 86.6%). RESULTS: Nearly half of the insured patients were willing to use their health insurance. Patients covered by government insurance were more likely to be willing to use their health insurance compared with those covered by private insurance (odds ratio [OR] = 3.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.79, 4.65), and patients covered by their parents' insurance were less likely to be willing to use their insurance compared with those covered by private insurance (OR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.52, 1.00). Reasons for unwillingness to use insurance were privacy and out-of-pocket cost. CONCLUSIONS: Before full implementation of the Affordable Care Act, privacy and cost were barriers to using health insurance for STD services. PUBLIC HEALTH IMPLICATIONS: Barriers to using health insurance for STD services could be reduced through addressing issues of stigma associated with STD care and considering alternative payment sources for STD services.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Financiamento Pessoal , Humanos , Masculino , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Estigma Social , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
17.
Am J Public Health ; 105 Suppl 5: S690-5, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26447908

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the characteristics of sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic patients, their reasons for seeking health services in STD clinics, and their access to health care in other venues. METHODS: In 2013, we surveyed persons who used publicly funded STD clinics in 21 US cities with the highest STD morbidity. RESULTS: Of the 4364 STD clinic patients we surveyed, 58.5% were younger than 30 years, 72.5% were non-White, and 49.9% were uninsured. They visited the clinic for STD symptoms (18.9%), STD screening (33.8%), and HIV testing (13.6%). Patients chose STD clinics because of walk-in, same-day appointments (49.5%), low cost (23.9%), and expert care (8.3%). Among STD clinic patients, 60.4% had access to another type of venue for sick care, and 58.5% had access to another type of venue for preventive care. Most insured patients (51.6%) were willing to use insurance to pay for care at the STD clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Despite access to other health care settings, patients chose STD clinics for sexual health care because of convenient, low-cost, and expert care. Policy Implication. STD clinics play an important role in STD prevention by offering walk-in care to uninsured patients.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/estatística & dados numéricos , Provedores de Redes de Segurança/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
18.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 70(3): 269-74, 2015 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26039931

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Presence of a sexually transmitted infection (STI) can increase the likelihood of HIV transmission, and current treatment guidelines indicate that HIV-positive persons should be screened yearly for STIs. Therefore, we examined recent insurance claims data to determine whether private insurance beneficiaries who are HIV-positive were receiving recommended STI testing. METHODS: We used data from the 2011 and 2012 MarketScan data sets, a longitudinal population-based database that collects claims from commercially insured persons in private insurance and is conducted by Truven Health Analytics. Over a 13-month period, we calculated rates of testing for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis among an HIV-positive population and determined the factors that contributed to differences in testing rates. RESULTS: Overall testing rates were 22.2% for chlamydia, 21.9% for gonorrhea, and 51.1% for syphilis. Significant predictors of STI testing were sex, age, type of health plan, engagement with the health care system, and geographic location. Most notably, persons receiving viral load testing were more likely to receive testing for chlamydia [odds ratio (OR): 1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.63 to 1.81], gonorrhea (OR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.64 to 1.81), and syphilis (OR: 3.38; 95% CI: 3.25 to 3.53) compared with persons not receiving viral load testing. DISCUSSION: Not all commercially insured HIV-positive patients are receiving recommended testing for STIs. Presence of STIs could affect the transmission of HIV and has deleterious effects on health outcomes of the patients. Targeted efforts based on demographics, health plan type, and other quality-of-care measures could help identify populations for whom testing rates for STIs among HIV-positive persons could be improved.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/complicações , Seguro Saúde/organização & administração , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/complicações , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Carga Viral , Adulto Jovem
19.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 11: E108, 2014 Jun 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24967830

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of childhood asthma in the United States increased from 8.7% in 2001 to 9.5% in 2011. This increased prevalence adds to the costs incurred by state Medicaid programs. We provide state-based cost estimates of pediatric asthma emergency department (ED) visits and highlight an opportunity for states to reduce these costs through a recently changed Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) regulation. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional design across multiple data sets to produce state-based cost estimates for asthma-related ED visits among children younger than 18, where Medicaid/CHIP (Children's Health Insurance Program) was the primary payer. RESULTS: There were approximately 629,000 ED visits for pediatric asthma for Medicaid/CHIP enrollees, which cost $272 million in 2010. The average cost per visit was $433. Costs ranged from $282,000 in Alaska to more than $25 million in California. CONCLUSIONS: Costs to states for pediatric asthma ED visits vary widely. Effective January 1, 2014, the CMS rule expanded which type of providers can be reimbursed for providing preventive services to Medicaid/CHIP beneficiaries. This rule change, in combination with existing flexibility for states to define practice setting, allows state Medicaid programs to reimburse for asthma interventions that use nontraditional providers (such as community health workers or certified asthma educators) in a nonclinical setting, as long as the service was initially recommended by a physician or other licensed practitioner. The rule change may help states reduce Medicaid costs of asthma treatment and the severity of pediatric asthma.


Assuntos
Asma/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Governo Estadual , Adolescente , Asma/terapia , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Criança , Serviços de Saúde da Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pediatria/economia , Estados Unidos
20.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 10: E135, 2013 Aug 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23948336

RESUMO

We examined the characteristics of adults providing regular care or assistance to friends or family members who have health problems, long-term illnesses, or disabilities (ie, caregivers). We used data from the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) to examine caregiver characteristics, by age and caregiving status, and compare these characteristics with those of noncaregivers. Approximately 24.7% (95% confidence interval, 24.4%-25.0%) of respondents were caregivers. Compared with younger caregivers, older caregivers reported more fair or poor health and physical distress but more satisfaction with life and lower mental distress. Understanding the characteristics of caregivers can help enhance strategies that support their role in providing long-term care.


Assuntos
Cuidadores , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Nível de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , Cuidadores/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação Pessoal , Estresse Psicológico , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA