Evaluation of reproducible and transparent research practices in pulmonology.

BACKGROUND: Study reproducibility is valuable for validating or refuting results. Provision of reproducibility indicators, such as materials, protocols, and raw data in a study improve its potential for reproduction. Efforts to reproduce noteworthy studies in the biomedical sciences have resulted in an overwhelming majority of them being found to be unreplicable, causing concern for the integrity of research in other fields, including medical specialties. Here, we analyzed the reproducibility of studies in the field of pulmonology. METHODS: 500 pulmonology articles were randomly selected from an initial PubMed search for data extraction. Two authors scoured these articles for reproducibility indicators including materials, protocols, raw data, analysis scripts, inclusion in systematic reviews, and citations by replication studies as well as other factors of research transparency including open accessibility, funding source and competing interest disclosures, and study preregistration. FINDINGS: Few publications included statements regarding materials (10%), protocols (1%), data (15%), and analysis script (0%) availability. Less than 10% indicated preregistration. More than half of the publications analyzed failed to provide a funding statement. Conversely, 63% of the publications were open access and 73% included a conflict of interest statement. INTERPRETATION: Overall, our study indicates pulmonology research is currently lacking in efforts to increase replicability. Future studies should focus on providing sufficient information regarding materials, protocols, raw data, and analysis scripts, among other indicators, for the sake of clinical decisions that depend on replicable or refutable results from the primary literature.

Speech intelligibility assessment in a helium environment. II. The speech intelligibility index.

The Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) was measured for Navy divers participating in two saturation deep dives and for a group of nondivers to test different communication systems and their components. These SIIs were validated using the Speech Perception in Noise (SPIN) test and the Griffiths version of the Modified Rhyme Test (GMRT). Our goal was to determine if either of these assessments was sensitive enough to provide an objective measure of speech intelligibility when speech was processed through different helmets and helium speech unscramblers (HSUs). Results indicated that SII values and percent intelligibility decreased incrementally as background noise level increased. SIIs were very reliable across the different groups of subjects indicating that the SII was a strong measurement for predicting speech intelligibility to compare linear system components such as helmets. The SII was not useful in measuring intelligibility through nonlinear devices such as HSUs. The speech intelligibility scores on the GMRT and SPIN tests were useful when the system component being compared had a large measurable difference, such as in helmet type. However, when the differences were more subtle, such as differences in HSUs, neither the SPIN nor the GMRT appeared sensitive enough to make such distinctions. These results have theoretical as well as practical value for measuring the quality and intelligibility of helium speech enhancement systems.

Epidural narcotic analgesia after thoracotomy.

The benefits of epidural narcotic analgesia (ENA) have been documented in mixed surgical populations. To assess the safety and utility of ENA after thoracic surgery and to assess potential interactions with intraoperative intravenous narcotics (IIN), we retrospectively examined the records of 130 consecutive patients having thoracotomy. The 116 patients who received ENA required a mean of 0.19 mg/kg of intravenous morphine sulfate (MS) within the first 48 postoperative hours, as opposed to 0.44 mg/kg for patients who did not receive ENA. The place in which nonepidural patients were extubated most frequently was the operating room (71%), followed by the intensive care unit (21%) and the recovery room (7%). Percentages were similar for epidural patients: 71% were extubated in the operating room, 20% in the intensive care unit, and 9% in the recovery room. Nonepidural patients had an immediate mean postoperative PCO2 of 39.2 mm Hg, epidural patients a mean of 40.1 mm Hg. There were no technical complications due to epidural catheter placement, and no reintubation was required within the first 72 postoperative hours. The concomitant administration of IIN did not produce a significant difference in postextubation PCO2 in either group of patients, although increasing doses resulted in a lower percentage of patients extubated in the operating room or recovery room. We conclude that ENA may be safely administered to patients having thoracotomy, and it diminishes the need for postoperative intravenous narcotics.