What Are "Social Prescriptions" and How Should They Be Integrated Into Care Plans?

Health consequences of social isolation and loneliness include worsened morbidity and mortality. Despite wide recognition of this fact, little is understood about how to intervene successfully. "Social prescribing" is one approach by which clinicians can intervene on social determinants of health, which include social isolation and loneliness. This commentary on a case defines social prescribing and suggests how to integrate it into practice.

End-of-life health care use among socially isolated and cognitively impaired older adults.

BACKGROUND: Social isolation is common in the last years of life, especially among individuals with cognitive impairment (CI), but it is unknown if social isolation is related to end-of-life health care use. METHODS: We used nationally-representative 2006-2018 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) data linked to Medicare claims, including adults age ≥65 interviewed in the last 4 years of life (N = 2380). We used a validated social isolation scale and three social isolation subscales: (1) household contacts (marital status, household size, nearby children), (2) social network interaction (with children, family, and friends), and (3) community engagement. End-of-life health outcomes included 2+ emergency department (ED) visits in the last month of life, hospitalizations or ICU stays in the last 6 months of life, and any hospice use. CI was defined using the validated Langa-Weir methodology. We used logistic regression to test the association of each social isolation measure with each end-of-life outcome, adjusted for sociodemographic covariates, and tested for interaction terms with CI (p < 0.2). RESULTS: The mean age of our sample of decedents was 81.2 (SD = 9.9), 53% were female, 8% Black, and 4% Hispanic. Overall, social isolation and the community engagement subscale were not associated with end-of-life health care use. Fewer household contacts were associated with lower hospice use (aOR = 0.74, p = 0.005). There were significant interaction terms between the social network interaction subscale and CI for ED use (p = 0.009) and hospitalizations (p = 0.04), and a trend for ICU stays (p = 0.15); individuals with both low social network interaction and CI had lower health care use across all three outcomes compared to other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with fewer household contacts had lower hospice use, and cognitively impaired individuals with low social network interaction had fewer end-of-life ED visits, hospitalizations, and ICU stays. Clinicians should consider mobilizing external support services to ensure access to goal-concordant care for older adults with limited end-of-life social contact when needed.

Consensus statement: loneliness in older adults, the 21st century social determinant of health?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this consensus statement is to determine the state of the field of loneliness among older people, highlighting key issues for researchers, policymakers and those designing services and interventions. METHODS: In December 2018, an international meeting on loneliness was held in Belfast with leaders from across the USA and Europe. A summary of the conclusions reached at this event is presented following a consensus-building exercise conducted both during this event after each presentation as well as after the event through the drafting, reviewing and agreement of this statement by all authors for over 6 months. RESULTS: This meeting resulted in an agreement to produce a consensus statement on key issues including definitions of loneliness, measurement, antecedents, consequences and interventions. DISCUSSION: There has been an exponential growth in research on loneliness among older adults. However, differing measurements and definitions of loneliness mean the incidence and prevalence, associated risk factors and health consequences are often conflicting or confusing especially for those developing policy and services.

Brain health INnovation Diplomacy: a model binding diverse disciplines to manage the promise and perils of technological innovation.

BACKGROUND: Brain health diplomacy aims to influence the global policy environment for brain health (i.e. dementia, depression, and other mind/brain disorders) and bridges the disciplines of global brain health, international affairs, management, law, and economics. Determinants of brain health include educational attainment, diet, access to health care, physical activity, social support, and environmental exposures, as well as chronic brain disorders and treatment. Global challenges associated with these determinants include large-scale conflicts and consequent mass migration, chemical contaminants, air quality, socioeconomic status, climate change, and global population aging. Given the rapidly advancing technological innovations impacting brain health, it is paramount to optimize the benefits and mitigate the drawbacks of such technologies. OBJECTIVE: We propose a working model of Brain health INnovation Diplomacy (BIND). METHODS: We prepared a selective review using literature searches of studies pertaining to brain health technological innovation and diplomacy. RESULTS: BIND aims to improve global brain health outcomes by leveraging technological innovation, entrepreneurship, and innovation diplomacy. It acknowledges the key role that technology, entrepreneurship, and digitization play and will increasingly play in the future of brain health for individuals and societies alike. It strengthens the positive role of novel solutions, recognizes and works to manage both real and potential risks of digital platforms. It is recognition of the political, ethical, cultural, and economic influences that brain health technological innovation and entrepreneurship can have. CONCLUSIONS: By creating a framework for BIND, we can use this to ensure a systematic model for the use of technology to optimize brain health.

A Practical Approach to Assessing and Mitigating Loneliness and Isolation in Older Adults.

Loneliness and social isolation are strongly associated with several adverse health outcomes in older persons including death and functional impairments. The strength of these associations has been compared with smoking. Accordingly, loneliness and isolation have significant public health implications. Despite the adverse impacts of loneliness and social isolation on quality of life, and their strong association with health outcomes, the evaluation of loneliness and isolation have not been integrated into medical care. The risks for loneliness may be of particular concern to persons with serious illness as patients and caregivers cope with the experience of loss, loss of independence, and increasing care needs. To date, there has been no uniform way of evaluating and documenting loneliness and social isolation as a part of a review of a patient's social determinants of health. This article provides a framework for healthcare systems, providers, and community members working with older adults to (1) understand loneliness, isolation, and its counterpart social connection; (2) describe the different ways loneliness affects health; and (3) create a framework for asking about and documenting these experiences. Finally, because the lack of studies assessing whether targeting loneliness can improve health outcomes is a major gap, we provide guidance on the future of interventions. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:657-662, 2019.

"I Feel Trapped": The Tension Between Personal and Structural Factors of Social Isolation and the Desire for Social Integration Among Older Residents of a High-Crime Neighborhood.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the factors contributing to the social isolation of older residents of a high-crime neighborhood through the in-depth examination of their lived experiences. A deeper understanding of factors contributing to social isolation can allow policymakers and health care providers to create policies and programs to alleviate the social isolation of these vulnerable and understudied individuals. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants were recruited through the support of the Housing Authority and Police and Fire Departments of Richmond, California, a town with a high-crime rate. Fifty-nine ethnographic interviews were conducted with 20 individuals of 58-95 years of age. Transcripts and fieldnotes were analyzed with a focus on the specific factors contributing the social isolation of participants. RESULTS: An overarching theme of tension between personal and structural factors of social isolation and desire for social integration emerged from qualitative content analysis. A tension emerged between a longing to participate in society and the immersion in a reality so dense with obstacles that made participation in society difficult to attain. Four specific themes also emerged. Three themes demonstrated underlying factors of social isolation stemming from the personal sphere and the physical and social environment. The fourth theme illustrated participants' desire for social integration. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Findings demonstrate the salience of interventions and programs to make neighborhoods safe and accessible to older residents. Findings also suggest a need to reframe the conceptual framework for social isolation to better measure and alleviate this public health problem.