Reorientation of the Rural Adversity Mental Health Program: the value of a program logic model.

CONTEXT: The Rural Adversity Mental Health Program (RAMHP) was founded in 2007 with the specific focus of responding to drought-related mental health needs among farmers in rural and remote New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Successive re-funding enabled the program to evolve strategically and increase its reach. Over a decade, the program's focus has expanded to include all people in rural and remote NSW in need of mental health assistance, and not just in times of adversity such as drought. ISSUE: The program's longest re-funding period, 2016-2020, provided the opportunity for a comprehensive review and longer term planning. Several priorities influencing program renewal were evident at this time: the need to improve data collection and evaluation methods, a reassessment of the program's primary focus and the need to align with significant government mental health reforms. A program logic model (PLM) was developed, in collaboration with frontline RAMHP coordinators, to steer reorientation, clarify objectives, activities and outcomes, and improve data collection. A PLM is a graphic depiction of a program, showing the rationale of how inputs and activities lead to outcomes. LESSONS LEARNED: Four key lessons were identified. (1) The development of the PLM in collaboration with the RAMHP coordinators (frontline staff) was found to be an important vehicle for ensuring their acceptance and adoption of strategic changes. (2) The collaborative development process also provided the opportunity to decide upon consistent terminology to describe the program, facilitating communication of the value of RAMHP to external stakeholders. (3) The PLM enabled a clear but flexible program structure that aligned with changes in the mental health system to be described. (4) The PLM provided the foundation for the development of an evaluation framework, including a mobile app, to aid data collection to underpin accountability. Investing in the development of a PLM early in program reorientation provided many benefits for RAMHP, including improved role clarity and communication, staff commitment to program changes and a foundation for comprehensive program evaluation that integrates with program planning. The PLM proved a key foundational tool to reorient RAMHP by producing a clear program structure that was agreed upon by all staff.

Shared care in mental illness: A rapid review to inform implementation.

BACKGROUND: While integrated primary healthcare for the management of depression has been well researched, appropriate models of primary care for people with severe and persistent psychotic disorders are poorly understood. In 2010 the NSW (Australia) Health Department commissioned a review of the evidence on "shared care" models of ambulatory mental health services. This focussed on critical factors in the implementation of these models in clinical practice, with a view to providing policy direction. The review excluded evidence about dementia, substance use and personality disorders. METHODS: A rapid review involving a search for systematic reviews on The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE). This was followed by a search for papers published since these systematic reviews on Medline and supplemented by limited iterative searching from reference lists. RESULTS: Shared care trials report improved mental and physical health outcomes in some clinical settings with improved social function, self management skills, service acceptability and reduced hospitalisation. Other benefits include improved access to specialist care, better engagement with and acceptability of mental health services. Limited economic evaluation shows significant set up costs, reduced patient costs and service savings often realised by other providers. Nevertheless these findings are not evident across all clinical groups. Gains require substantial cross-organisational commitment, carefully designed and consistently delivered interventions, with attention to staff selection, training and supervision. Effective models incorporated linkages across various service levels, clinical monitoring within agreed treatment protocols, improved continuity and comprehensiveness of services. CONCLUSIONS: "Shared Care" models of mental health service delivery require attention to multiple levels (from organisational to individual clinicians), and complex service re-design. Re-evaluation of the roles of specialist mental health staff is a critical requirement. As expected, no one model of "shared" care fits diverse clinical groups. On the basis of the available evidence, we recommended a local trial that examined the process of implementation of core principles of shared care within primary care and specialist mental health clinical services.

Far West Area Health Service mental health integration project: model for rural Australia?

OBJECTIVE: To see if a new model of service delivery ensures that individuals with a mental illness in rural and remote settings could be assessed, treated and cared for in a more appropriate way. DESIGN: Community mental health teams (CMHTs), general practitioners (GP) and other agencies were provided with clinical and broader support services by consultant psychiatrists from public and private sectors. The occasions of service were logged, audited and relevant provider groups were interviewed. Ethics approval was provided by Human Research Ethics Community of University of New South Wales. SETTING: Far West Area Health Service (FWAHS), remote New South Wales. PARTICIPANTS: An enhanced service was provided for residents, specialist mental health and other healthcare providers. RESULTS: Regular access to psychiatrists for primary and secondary care was achieved in remote communities in FWAHS. 3908 new patients were seen by CMHTs between July 2002 and December 2003 and 380 by visiting psychiatrists between January 2002 and July 2003. Secondary consultation, mentoring and education opportunities were made available by tele-conference and face-to-face for CMHTs and others in FWAHS. GPs and CMHTs in remote settings were satisfied with improved access to psychiatrist care. CONCLUSIONS: This model appears to be sustainable with reasonable levels of funding in FWAHS and may be applicable to other remote contexts.