Effectiveness of Nationwide COPD Pay-for-Performance Program on COPD Exacerbations in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It has also imposed a substantial economic and social burden on the health care system. In Taiwan, a nationwide COPD pay-for-performance (P4P) program was designed to improve the quality of COPD-related care by introducing financial incentives for health care providers and employing a multidisciplinary team to deliver guideline-based, integrated care for patients with COPD, reducing adverse outcomes, especially COPD exacerbation. However, the results of a survey of the effectiveness of the pay-for-performance program in COPD management were inconclusive. To address this knowledge gap, this study evaluated the effectiveness of the COPD P4P program in Taiwan. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance claims database and nationwide COPD P4P enrollment program records from June 2016 to December 2018. Patients with COPD were classified into P4P and non-P4P groups. Patients in the P4P group were matched at a ratio of 1:1 based on age, gender, region, accreditation level, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and inhaled medication prescription type to create the non-P4P group. A difference-in-difference analysis was used to evaluate the influence of the P4P program on the likelihood of COPD exacerbation, namely COPD-related emergency department (ED) visit, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, or hospitalization. RESULTS: The final sample of 14,288 patients comprised 7144 in each of the P4P and non-P4P groups. The prevalence of COPD-related ED visits, ICU admissions, and hospitalizations was higher in the P4P group than in the non-P4P group 1 year before enrollment. After enrollment, the P4P group exhibited a greater decrease in the prevalence of COPD-related ED visits and hospitalizations than the non-P4P group (ED visit: -2.98%, p<0.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.277 to -0.086; hospitalization: -1.62%, p<0.05, 95% CI: -0.232 to -0.020), whereas no significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of the changes in the prevalence of COPD-related ICU admissions. CONCLUSION: The COPD P4P program exerted a positive net effect on reducing the likelihood of COPD exacerbation, namely COPD-related ED visits and hospitalizations. Future studies should examine the long-term cost-effectiveness of the COPD P4P program.

Challenges faced in managing adult asthma: A perspective from Asian countries.

Asthma imposes a significant burden on the health system and patients' quality of life. Within Asia, there is large variability in several cultural, social and economic factors ultimately influencing the management of asthma. Differences in risk factors and asthma management practices across Asia make asthma a truly 'mixed-bag' phenomenon. With the advent of biological agents and the consequent emphasis on asthma phenotyping and endotyping, it is more important than ever to understand the diverse nature of asthma as a disease. This is a collaborative review within Asia to highlight the differences in management of adult asthma, and the local modifications that are made to international guidelines. This review paves the way for a future Asian collaborative network in asthma epidemiological research.

Long-acting muscarinic antagonist versus long-acting ß2 agonist/corticosteroid for moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: Exacerbation risk assessment.

BACKGROUND: Whether the beneficial effects of long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) are better than those of long-acting ß2 agonist/corticosteroids (LABA/ICS) in preventing exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the risk of exacerbations in moderate to severe COPD patients receiving LAMA versus LABA/ICS. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with COPD (2008-2010). The inclusion criteria were age ≥ 40 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) 30% to 80% of predicted value and at least three prescriptions for COPD medication, including LAMA or LABA/ICS. RESULTS: Of the 557 COPD patients screened, 90 patients were enrolled in the analysis. The demographic characteristics of patients receiving LABA/ICS or LAMA were similar. The all exacerbation rates was significantly higher in patients with global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease stage II COPD treated with LABA/ICS than in those treated with LAMA (p = 0.001), regardless of previous exacerbation history. Patients with previous exacerbation history showed an independent increase in the risk of moderate or severe exacerbation compared with those without exacerbation history (hazard ratio 3.86, 95% CI 1.75-8.53, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In comparison with LABA/ICS, LAMA is beneficial in reducing exacerbation risk for moderate COPD. Previous exacerbation history independently predicts the future risk of exacerbation regardless of treatment.

Comparison between COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scores for evaluation of clinical symptoms, comorbidities and medical resources utilization in COPD patients.

BACKGROUND: The 2011 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) proposed a new severity assessment system for emphasizing clinical symptom evaluation by COPD Assessment Test (CAT) or modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scores. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two scoring systems in evaluating COPD patients. METHODS: A population based cross-sectional study employing computer-assisted telephone interviewing system (CATI) for surveying the epidemiology of COPD in Taiwan. Among 6600 subjects recruited (age > 40), 404 subjects (6.1%) were diagnosed as COPD. The comorbidities, COPD-related symptoms, health care resources utilization were compared between CAT and mMRC. RESULTS: There were significant differences in all co-morbidities, symptom severity in favor of CAT as compared to mMRC. When comparing health care resources utilization, CAT and mMRC have equal effectiveness in evaluating patients with regular medical treatment. There were significant differences in emergency room visit and hospitalization in favor of mMRC. However, CAT was more effective in evaluating patients with ICU admission (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Compared with CAT and mMRC, there are individual benefits in the evaluation of clinical symptoms, co-morbidities and medical resources utilization for ER, hospitalization and ICU admission in COPD patients.

Comorbidities and risk of mortality in patients with sleep apnea.

BACKGROUND: A variety of disorders, most notably cardiovascular diseases, was linked to sleep apnea (SA), but their impact on mortality of SA patients had not been systematically investigated. We aimed to develop a composite index based on the comorbidity burden to predict mortality risk. METHODS: Using Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, 9853 adult SA patients were enrolled and their comorbidity profile at baseline was recorded. The subjects were followed from 1995 till death or the end of 2011. A Cox regression model was used for multivariable adjustment to identify independent predictors for mortality. RESULTS: During an average follow-up period of 5.3 ± 3.1 years, 311 (3.2%) subjects died. SA patients with any comorbidity had a higher risk for death compared to those without comorbidity (HR: 11.01, 95% CI 4.00-30.33, p < 0.001). Age and 10 comorbidities related to increased overall mortality were identified, from which the CoSA (Comorbidities of Sleep Apnea) index was devised. The corresponding hazard ratios for patients with CoSA index scores of 0, 1-3, 4-6, and >6 were 1 (reference), 3.29 (95% CI, 2.04-5.28, p < 0.001), 13.56 (95% CI, 8.63-21.33, p < 0.001), and 38.47 (95% CI, 24.92-59.38, p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the comorbidity burden, we developed an easy-to-use tool to evaluate mortality risk in SA. Key messages: Sleep apnea (SA) is linked to a variety of disorders, particularly cardiovascular diseases. SA patients with any comorbidity may experience a higher risk of death in comparison to those without comorbidity. Comorbidities related to increased mortality are identified and converted into a simple risk indicator, the CoSA (Comorbidities of Sleep Apnea) index scores, which may help to stratify risk of death in daily practice.

Asthma in Asia: Physician perspectives on control, inhaler use and patient communications.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the physician perspectives on asthma management in Asia. METHODS: An online/face-to-face, questionnaire-based survey of respiratory specialists and primary care physicians from eight Asian countries/region was carried out. The survey explored asthma control, inhaler selection, technique and use; physician-patient communications and asthma education. Inclusion criteria were >50% of practice time spent on direct patient care; and treated >30 patients with asthma per month, of which >60% were aged >12 years. RESULTS: REALISE Asia (Phase 2) involved 375 physicians with average 15.9(±6.8) years of clinical experience. 89.1% of physicians reporting use of guidelines estimated that 53.2% of their patients have well-controlled (GINA-defined) asthma. Top consideration for inhaler choice was asthma severity (82.4%) and lowest, socio-economic status (32.5%). Then 54.7% of physicians checked their patients' inhaler techniques during consultations but 28.2(±19.1)% of patients were using their inhalers incorrectly; 21.1-57.9% of physicians could spot improper inhaler techniques in video demonstrations. And 79.6% of physicians believed combination inhalers could increase adherence because of convenience (53.7%), efficacy (52.7%) and usability (18.9%). Initial and follow-up consultations took 16.8(±8.4) and 9.2(±5.3) minutes, respectively. Most (85.1%) physicians used verbal conversations and least (24.5%), video demonstrations of inhaler use; 56.8% agreed that patient attitudes influenced their treatment approach. CONCLUSION: Physicians and patients have different views of 'well-controlled' asthma. Although physicians informed patients about asthma and inhaler usage, they overestimated actual usage and patients' knowledge was sub-optimal. Physician-patient interactions can be augmented with understanding of patient attitudes, visual aids and ancillary support to perform physical demonstrations to improve treatment outcomes.

COPD in Taiwan: a National Epidemiology Survey.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of COPD in Taiwan and to document the disease characteristics and associated risk factors. METHODS: We conducted a random cross-sectional national survey of adults older than 40 years in Taiwan. Respiratory health screening questions identified subjects with diagnosed COPD or whose reported symptoms also fulfilled an epidemiological case definition; these were eligible to complete the survey, which also included indices of symptom severity and disability and questions on comorbidities, medical treatments, smoking habits, and occupations potentially harmful to respiratory health. Subjects with diagnosed COPD were subdivided by smoking status. Subjects who fulfilled the case definition of COPD and smoked were designated as "possible COPD". Participants who did not fit the case definition of COPD were asked only about their personal circumstances and smoking habits. Data from these groups were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Of the 6,600 participants who completed the survey, 404 (6.1%) fulfilled the epidemiological case definition of COPD: 137 with diagnosed COPD and 267 possible COPD. The most common comorbidities of COPD were hypertension or cardiovascular diseases (36.1%). Subjects with definite COPD had significantly higher COPD Assessment Test scores than the possible COPD group (14.6±8.32 vs 12.6±6.49, P=0.01) and significantly more comorbid illnesses (P=0.01). The main risk factors contributing to health care utilization in each COPD cohort were higher COPD Assessment Test scores (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.26), higher modified Medical Research Council Breathlessness Scale scores (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.11-3.51), and having more than one comorbidity (OR 5.19, 95% CI 1.05-25.61). CONCLUSION: With estimated prevalence of 6.1% in the general population, COPD in Taiwan has been underdiagnosed. Symptoms and comorbidities were independent risk factors for health care utilization in subjects with definite or possible COPD. There is an urgent need to raise awareness of the importance of early evaluation and prompt treatment for subjects with chronic airway symptoms.