Mitigating the risk of COVID-19 exposure by transitioning from clinic-based to home-based immune globulin infusion.

PURPOSE: Intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) therapy is used in patients with hypogammaglobulinemia to lower the risk of infections. IVIG and subcutaneous IVIG (SCIG) therapy have been to shown to be safe and effective when administered as clinic-based infusions. Concern from both patients and providers for increased transmission of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus to immunosuppressed patients with scheduled medical visits and procedures made it necessary for us to reassess our process of how we manage patient care in general and chronic clinic infusions in particular. Here we describe our experience of transitioning patients from clinic-based to home based IVIG and/or SCIG infusions to decrease the risk of COVID-19 exposure. METHODS: Criteria were developed to identify high-risk immunosuppressed patients who would be appropriate candidates for potential conversion to home based IVIG infusions. Data were collected via chart review, and cost analysis was performed using Medicare Part B reimbursement data. A patient outcome questionnaire was developed for administration through follow-up phone calls. RESULTS: From March to May 2020, 45 patients met criteria for home-based infusion, with 27 patients (60%) agreeing to home-based infusion. Posttransition patient outcomes assessment, conducted in 26 patients (96%), demonstrated good patient understanding of the home-based infusion process. No infusion-related complications were reported, and 24 patients (92%) had no concerns about receiving future IVIG and/or SCIG doses at home. No patient tested positive for COVID-19 during the study period. Clinic infusion visits decreased by 26.6 visits per month, resulting in a total of 106 hours of additional available infusion chair time per month and associated cost savings of $12,877. CONCLUSION: Transition of clinic based to home based IVIG/SCIG infusion can be successfully done to decrease potential exposure during a pandemic in a high-risk immunosuppressed population, with no impact on patient satisfaction, adherence, or efficacy. The home-based infusion initiative was associated with a reduction in costs to patients and an increase in available chair time in the infusion clinic.

Healthcare expenses for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.

Introduction: The cost of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment is substantial and increasing. Inpatient treatment costs for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and intensive chemotherapy are the main cost drivers in AML, however this pattern may change as new, expensive oral therapies enter the market. Areas covered: The authors provide an overview of the healthcare costs in patients with AML treated with various modalities (intensive chemotherapy, allogeneic HSCT, low-intensity treatment and supportive care only). The authors review both the impact of the recently approved novel AML agents and an increasingly personalized treatment approach on healthcare resources. Finally, the authors discuss whether these treatments are cost-effective from a societal perspective and how the increase in AML-associated costs can potentially be slowed. Expert opinion: The direct healthcare costs of AML are substantial and vary depending on the treatment approach, the country studied, and in the United States, a patient's insurance status. Treatment costs have increased out of proportion to general inflation and this trend is likely going to continue or even accelerate. Societal consensus on cost-effectiveness is essential. It remains to be seen how advances in diagnostic techniques and the incorporation of novel agents will impact medical outcomes, costs and influence health policy.

The impact of a multimodal approach to vancomycin discontinuation in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (HSCT) with febrile neutropenia (FN).

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend adding vancomycin to empiric treatment of FN in patients who meet specific criteria. After 48 hours, the guidelines recommend discontinuing vancomycin if resistant Gram-positive organisms are not identified. Based on these recommendations, a vancomycin stewardship team defined criteria for discontinuation of vancomycin at 48 hours and increased surveillance of vancomycin usage through a multimodal approach. The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to assess the impact of this multimodal approach on the discontinuation of empiric vancomycin at 48 hours in FN. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included a pre- and post-intervention cohort of 200 HSCT recipients with FN from 2015 to 2018. Criteria for continued vancomycin use beyond 48 hours included culture-documented resistant Gram-positive infection, positive Methicillin-Resistant S aureus (MRSA) nasal swab with evidence of pneumonia, or hemodynamic instability with concern for sepsis. The following patient characteristics were collected: previous MRSA infection, MRSA nasal swab collection and results, culture results, duration of vancomycin use, rationale for continuation of vancomycin beyond 48 hours, and re-initiation of vancomycin. RESULTS: In the post-intervention cohort, vancomycin discontinuation at 48 hours increased from 31% (95% CI 21.94-40.05) to 70% (95% CI 61.02-78.97; P < 0.0001). An additional 23% of vancomycin orders were discontinued at 72 hours. Off criteria vancomycin use decreased from 33% in pre to 1% in the post-implementation cohort. CONCLUSION: Establishing define criteria for vancomycin use in FN patients with a multimodal approach of physicians from hematology and infectious diseases, clinical pharmacists and the antibiotic stewardship team significantly improved vancomycin discontinuation.

Romiplostim: a novel thrombopoiesis-stimulating agent.

PURPOSE: The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, dosage and administration, efficacy, safety, effects on quality of life, and place in therapy of romiplostim are reviewed. SUMMARY: Romiplostim is a second- generation thrombopoietic agent that stimulates the thrombopoietin receptor and platelet production without inducing production of autoantibodies. Romiplostim, a peptibody, bears no structural resemblance to endogenous thrombopoietin, thus minimizing the risk for development of thrombopoietin autoantibodies. Clinical trials have shown that romiplostim increases platelet counts compared with placebo in both splenectomized and non-splenectomized adult patients with chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Clinical trials with romiplostim are ongoing for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and those receiving chemotherapy for treatment of malignancies. Romiplostim may confer an increased risk of bone marrow reticulin formation or fibrosis, malignancy, thrombosis, and thrombocytopenia that is more severe than the level present before initiation of romiplostim. While all patients receiving romiplostim in clinical trials experienced at least one adverse event, most were mild to moderate in severity. The most frequent adverse effects were ecchymosis, headache, and petechiae. Romiplostim is initiated at a dosage of 1 microg/kg subcutaneously once weekly and titrated to achieve platelet counts between 50 and 200 x 10(9) platelets/L, with a maximum dose of 10 microg/kg. Romiplostim is only available through the manufacturer's risk-management program. The current wholesale price of romiplostim is $1,062.50 for a single-use vial of 250 microg or $2,125 for a single-use vial of 500 microg. The extrapolated drug cost for weekly dosing for one year is approximately $55,250. CONCLUSION: Romiplostim is a novel thrombopoietic-stimulating agent for use in patients with chronic ITP who have not responded to other therapies.