Assessment of carotid calcifications on panoramic radiographs in relation to other used methods and relationship to periodontitis and stroke: a literature review.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the literature on carotid calcifications defined from panoramic radiographs (PMX) and concurrent diagnosis of stroke and periodontitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search screening for publications using search terms such as PMX and carotid calcification, stroke and periodontitis was performed in November 2012. RESULTS: A total of 189 articles were retrieved, among which 30 were included in the review. The sensitivity for PMX findings of carotid calcifications (CC) compared to a diagnosis by Doppler sonography varied between 31.1-100%. The specificity for PMX findings of carotid calcifications compared to a diagnosis by Doppler sonography varied between 21.4-87.5%. Individuals with CC findings from PMX have more periodontitis and risk for stroke. CONCLUSIONS: There is a shortage of well-designed studies in older dentate individuals assessing the associations between periodontitis and radiographic evidence of CC and in relation to stroke or other cardiovascular diseases. STATEMENT OF CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Carotid calcifications are prevalent in patients with periodontitis and such individuals may have an increased risk for stroke. The absence of signs of carotid calcification on panoramic radiographs is indicative of no calcification of carotid arteries.

Predictors of oral health quality of life in older adults.

There is limited information regarding oral health status and other predictors of oral health-related quality of life. An association between oral health status and perceived oral health-related quality of life (OHQOL) might help clinicians motivate patients to prevent oral diseases and improve the outcome of some dental public health programs. This study evaluated the relationship between older persons' OHQOL and their functional dentition, caries, periodontal status, chronic diseases, and some demographic characteristics. A group of 733 low-income elders (mean age 72.7 [SD = 4.71, 55.6% women, 55.1% members of ethnic minority groups in the U.S. and Canada) enrolled in the TEETH clinical trial were interviewed and examined as part of their fifth annual visit for the trial. OHQOL was measured by the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI); oral health and occlusal status by clinical exams and the Eichner Index; and demographics via interviews. Elders who completed the four-year assessment had an average of 21.5 teeth (SD = 6.9), with 8.5 occluding pairs (SD = 4.6), and 32% with occlusal contacts in all four occluding zones. Stepwise multiple regressions were conducted to predict total GOHAI and its subscores (Physical, Social, and Worry). Functional dentition was a less significant predictor than ethnicity and being foreign-born. These variables, together with gender, years since immigrating, number of carious roots, and periodontal status, could predict 32% of the variance in total GOHAI, 24% in Physical, 27% in Social, and 21% in the Worry subscales. These findings suggest that functional dentition and caries influence older adults' OHQOL, but that ethnicity and immigrant status play a larger role.

Comparison between panoramic and intra-oral radiographs for the assessment of alveolar bone levels in a periodontal maintenance population.

BACKGROUND: Information about the agreement between intra-oral (I-O) and panoramic (OPG) radiographs is limited. AIMS: : (1) To assess the agreement between I-Os and OPGs for direct measurements of the distance between the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and the alveolar bone level (BL) as well as the proportional values in relation to the root length (CEJ-BL/root length), and (2) to explore the symmetry between the left- and right-side measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS: I-Os and OPGs were studied in 292 periodontal maintenance subjects (mean age 55.5 years, SD+/-12.6) with on average 22.4 teeth (SD+/-4.1 range: 6-28). The images were measured using a PC software program. Site-based I-O and OPG values for CEJ-BL as well as CEJ-BL/root length were compared. OPG values of CEJ-BL/root length values between the left and right sides were also studied. RESULTS: A total of 11,395 linear distances (CEJ-BL plus CEJ-apex) from the I-Os and 21,462 linear distances from the OPGs were measured. The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) between sets of readings of CEJ-BL varied between 0.80 and 0.89 (p<0.001), with the best agreement for tooth 22 (ICC: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.83-0.92). The ICCs for CEJ-BL/root length varied between 0.54 and 0.92. Mean differences between I-O and OPG values were in the 0.00-0.04 mm range for the CEJ-BL/root length comparisons. The maxillary anterior sextant demonstrated a 1.4 x enlargement by OPG for the CEJ-BL/root length comparisons. No distortions were observed for mandibular sextants. Left- and right-side symmetry of periodontal bone loss was demonstrated. ICC varied between 0.79 (95.00% CI: 0.71-0.84, p<0.01) and 0.53 (95.00% CI: 0.36-0.65, p< 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: I-O and OPG radiograph readings are in great agreement. Alveolar bone loss appeared to have a symmetrical distribution pattern. Hence for periodontal assessments, OPG radiographic readings may, at least in part, substitute for full-mouth periapical radiographic evaluation.

Assessing periodontal disease risk: a comparison of clinicians' assessment versus a computerized tool.

BACKGROUND: The authors conducted a study to compare risk scores assigned by subjective expert clinician opinion with quantitative scores generated for the same subjects using the Periodontal Risk Calculator, or PRC. METHODS: The authors assembled a group of 107 subjects and performed standard periodontal examinations. The authors entered the resulting information into the PRC and calculated risk scores for two and four years, assuming no treatment would be performed. Using the same subject records, three groups of expert clinicians assigned risk scores for years 2 and 4. The authors analyzed the data to reveal the extent of interevaluator variation and the level of agreement between expert clinician scores and PRC scores. RESULTS: The extent of variation among scores assigned by individual expert clinicians was greater than the authors had expected. Expert clinicians consistently assigned more subjects to PRC risk group 2 and fewer to risk group 5 than did the PRC. The authors observed very high heterogeneity in the risk scores expert clinicians assigned to patients in each of the PRC-assigned groups. Thus, expert clinicians varied greatly in evaluating risk and, relative to the PRC, they appeared to underestimate periodontitis risk, especially for high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The authors' observations suggest that use of risk scores generated for individual patients by subjective expert clinician opinion about risk in periodontal clinical decision making could result in the misapplication of treatment for some patients and support the use of an objective tool such as the PRC. Use of the PRC over time may be expected to result in more uniform and accurate periodontal clinical decision making, improved oral health, reduction in the need for complex therapy and reduction in health care costs.

Influence of interleukin-1 gene polymorphism on the outcome of supportive periodontal therapy explored by a multi-factorial periodontal risk assessment model (PRA).

BACKGROUND: Multi-factorial risk models have been proposed to enhance the ability to predict risk for the progression of treated chronic periodontitis. AIMS: to study if the outcomes of supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) based on a multi-factorial periodontal risk assessment are influenced by IL-1 gene polymorphism (IP) status. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Information about the IP and smoking status, clinical periodontal conditions and age related bone level measurements were used to calculate a peridontal risk assessment model (PRA). The surface area of this diagram was calculated for 224 subjects who had participated in an SPT program over four years. Baseline and 4-year follow-up data were studied in relation to the IP status. RESULTS: Positive IP tests were obtained for 80/224 (35.7%) of the subjects. At baseline the mean PRA for the IP positive group was 79.9 units, which at year four had increased to 81.3 units (mean diff: 1.4 units, S.D.+/-16.5, p<0.45, 95% CI: 2.3 to 5.1). At baseline and year four the mean PRA for the IP negative group was 44.2 and 38.6 units, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (mean diff: 5.6, S.D.+/-16.1, p<0.001, 95% CI: 3.0 to 8.3). Independent t-tests confirmed that the IP status was significantly associated with a less favorable change in PRA over the four-year period (PRA difference: 7.04, t=3.01, p<0.003, 95% CI: 2.4 to 11.65). Bleeding on probing, and probing depth values alone did not differ between positive and negative IP status. Regression analysis demonstrated that the best-fit model for change in PRA included bleeding on probing at baseline, IP status, proportional alveolar bone loss in relation to the age, and gender. CONCLUSION: The PRA allowed the assessment of the outcomes of SPT therapy. Subjects with positive IP did not respond to individualized SPT as favorably as did IP negative subjects.

Periodontal conditions and service utilization behaviors in a low income adult population.

PURPOSE: Dental services utilization varies and access to periodontal therapy is not uniform. The objectives were to study an adult population of Medicaid eligible subjects in the Kitsap County, State of Washington, USA: (1) to assess their oral health status, specifically periodontal conditions, and (2) to assess their use of dental services and behavioral beliefs in relation to dental diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1500 randomly selected eligible households were invited to a cost-free dental examination. The Periodontal Screening and Recording (PSR) index and six bitewing x-ray films were obtained. Subjects responded to a service utilization questionnaire. A telephone interview was performed with 100 randomly selected eligible subjects to assess their behavioral beliefs about dentistry. RESULTS: 132 (8.8%) of the contacted subjects responded while only 4.5% came to the clinical examination. The mean age of the subjects was 35.0 years (S.D. +/- 13.6, range 18 to 78 years) and 73.4% were women. Bleeding on probing was found in 82.8%, and 7.8% of the subjects had teeth with suppurating gingival conditions. Supra, or sub-gingival calculus could be identified in 95.3% of the subjects. Probing depths > 5.5 mm (not accounting for surfaces of third molars) were found in 11.3%, and radiographic evidence of vertical defects > or = 3 mm in 47% of the subjects. Tooth decay in need of urgent dental care was found in 75% of the subjects. Cost (63.2%) and lack of dental insurance (51.3%) were primary factors for not seeking care but 48.7% had no desire to enroll in a "no cost" dental therapy program. Dental fear was an obstacle to care in only 2.6% of the subjects. CONCLUSION: Primary barriers to the utilization of dental services in low income, uninsured populations were: (1) a pre-occupation with other daily issues, financial being the greatest, (2) an attitude of waiting for a problem to occur before seeking dental care, (3) that tooth extraction is the solution or only available treatment option.

Response to direct and indirect recruitment for a randomised dental clinical trial in a multicultural population of elders.

OBJECTIVES: Recruitment for randomised clinical trials and community-based studies has received little attention in the dental literature. The goal of this study was to report on our experiences with direct and indirect recruitment methods for a trial to prevent tooth loss in elders. METHODS: A direct approach, consisting of an introductory lecture with the help of a local contact person in each of the nine community centres, resulted in 208 recruits mostly from minority non-English speaking communities (52%), whereas the other 192 recruits who responded to newspaper announcements (48%) were, in large part, from the English-speaking community. RESULTS: The response suggests that a more direct and culturally specific approach is more productive when recruiting elders from ethnic minority groups, whereas elders from the dominant culture can be recruited indirectly and for about half the financial cost through newspaper announcements. CONCLUSION: We conclude, therefore, that both direct and indirect methods are needed to recruit a multiethnic sample of subjects for a trial.

Ethnicity and oral health in community-dwelling older adults.

Epidemiological studies consistently have found differences in oral health status between white and non-white elders. This has been attributed primarily to lack of access to dental care, especially preventive services. The study reported here examined psychosocial factors in an attempt to explain these differences.