Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Nephrol ; 35(7): 1885-1893, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35838909

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The clinical trajectory of post-operative acute kidney injury (AKI) following lung transplantation for cystic fibrosis is unknown. METHODS: Incidence and risk factors for post-operative AKI, acute kidney disease (AKD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) were retrospectively analyzed in cystic fibrosis patients undergoing lung transplantation. Logistic regressions, Chi-square, Cuzick rank tests, and Cox-proportional hazard models were used. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were included. Creatinine peaked 3[2-4] days after transplantation, with 15(18%), 15(18%), and 20(24%) patients having post-operative AKI stages 1, 2, and 3, while 15(18%), 19(23%) and 10(12%) developed AKD stage 1, stage 2 and 3, respectively. Higher AKI stage was associated with worsening AKD (p = 0.009) and CKD (p = 0.015) stages. Of the 50 patients with AKI, 32(66%) transitioned to AKD stage > 0, and then 27 (56%) to CKD stage > 1. Female sex, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support as a bridge to lung transplant and at the end of the surgery, the use of intraoperative blood components, and cold-ischemia time were associated with increased risk of post-operative AKI and AKD. Higher AKI stage prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation (p = 0.0001), ICU stay (p = 0.0001), and hospital stay (p = 0.0001), and increased the incidence of primary graft dysfunction (p = 0.035). Both AKI and AKD stages > 2 worsened long-term survival with risk ratios of 3.71 (1.34-10.2), p = 0.0131 and 2.65(1.02-6.87), p = 0.0443, respectively. DISCUSSION: AKI is frequent in cystic fibrosis patients undergoing lung transplantation, it often evolves to AKD and to chronic kidney disease, thereby worsening short- and long-term outcomes.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Fibrose Cística , Falência Renal Crônica , Transplante de Pulmão , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Doença Aguda , Injúria Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Fibrose Cística/complicações , Fibrose Cística/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Rim/fisiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Transplante de Pulmão/efeitos adversos , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
2.
Minerva Anestesiol ; 86(10): 1057-1064, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32449339

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prone position (PP) improves acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) survival by reducing the risk of ventilation-induced lung injury. However, inter-individual variability is a hallmark of ARDS and lung protection by PP might not be optimal in all patients. In the present study, we dynamically assessed physiologic effects of PP by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and identified predictors of improved lung protection by PP in ARDS patients. METHODS: Prospective physiologic study on 16 intubated, sedated and paralyzed patients with ARDS undergoing PP as per clinical decision. EIT data were recorded during two consecutive steps: 1) baseline supine position before and after a recruitment maneuver (RM); 2) prone position before and after a RM. "Improved lung protection" by PP was defined in the presence of simultaneous improvement of ventilation homogeneity (Hom), alveolar overdistension and collapse (ODCL) and amount of recruitable lung volume by RM in comparison to supine. RESULTS: PP versus supine increased the tidal volume distending the dependent regions (Vtdep), resulting in improved Hom (1.1±0.9 vs. 1.7±0.9, P=0.021). PP also reduced ODCL (19±9% vs. 28±8%, P=0.005) and increased the recruitable lung volume (80 [71-157] vs. 59 [1-110] mL, P=0.025). "Improved lung protection" by PP was predicted by lower Vtdep, higher Vtndep and poorer Hom measured during baseline supine position (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: EIT enables dynamic bedside assessment of the physiologic effects of PP and might support early recognition of ARDS patients more likely to benefit from PP.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório , Impedância Elétrica , Humanos , Respiração com Pressão Positiva , Decúbito Ventral , Estudos Prospectivos , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Volume de Ventilação Pulmonar , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
3.
Ann Intensive Care ; 9(1): 83, 2019 Jul 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31332551

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive monitoring of maximal inspiratory and expiratory flows (MIF and MEF, respectively) by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) might enable early recognition of changes in the mechanical properties of the respiratory system due to new conditions or in response to treatments. We aimed to validate EIT-based measures of MIF and MEF against spirometry in intubated hypoxemic patients during controlled ventilation and spontaneous breathing. Moreover, regional distribution of maximal airflows might interact with lung pathology and increase the risk of additional ventilation injury. Thus, we also aimed to describe the effects of mechanical ventilation settings on regional MIF and MEF. METHODS: We performed a new analysis of data from two prospective, randomized, crossover studies. We included intubated patients admitted to the intensive care unit with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) undergoing pressure support ventilation (PSV, n = 10) and volume-controlled ventilation (VCV, n = 20). We measured MIF and MEF by spirometry and EIT during six different combinations of ventilation settings: higher vs. lower support during PSV and higher vs. lower positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during both PSV and VCV. Regional airflows were assessed by EIT in dependent and non-dependent lung regions, too. RESULTS: MIF and MEF measured by EIT were tightly correlated with those measured by spirometry during all conditions (range of R2 0.629-0.776 and R2 0.606-0.772, respectively, p < 0.05 for all), with clinically acceptable limits of agreement. Higher PEEP significantly improved homogeneity in the regional distribution of MIF and MEF during volume-controlled ventilation, by increasing airflows in the dependent lung regions and lowering them in the non-dependent ones. CONCLUSIONS: EIT provides accurate noninvasive monitoring of MIF and MEF. The present study also generates the hypothesis that EIT could guide PSV and PEEP settings aimed to increase homogeneity of distending and deflating regional airflows.

6.
Lancet Respir Med ; 5(8): 627-638, 2017 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28624388

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little information is available about the geo-economic variations in demographics, management, and outcomes of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to characterise the effect of these geo-economic variations in patients enrolled in the Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure (LUNG SAFE). METHODS: LUNG SAFE was done during 4 consecutive weeks in winter, 2014, in a convenience sample of 459 intensive-care units in 50 countries across six continents. Inclusion criteria were admission to a participating intensive-care unit (including transfers) within the enrolment window and receipt of invasive or non-invasive ventilation. One of the trial's secondary aims was to characterise variations in the demographics, management, and outcome of patients with ARDS. We used the 2016 World Bank countries classification to define three major geo-economic groupings, namely European high-income countries (Europe-High), high-income countries in the rest of the world (rWORLD-High), and middle-income countries (Middle). We compared patient outcomes across these three groupings. LUNG SAFE is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02010073. FINDINGS: Of the 2813 patients enrolled in LUNG SAFE who fulfilled ARDS criteria on day 1 or 2, 1521 (54%) were recruited from Europe-High, 746 (27%) from rWORLD-High, and 546 (19%) from Middle countries. We noted significant geographical variations in demographics, risk factors for ARDS, and comorbid diseases. The proportion of patients with severe ARDS or with ratios of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) to the fractional concentration of oxygen in inspired air (FiO2) less than 150 was significantly lower in rWORLD-High countries than in the two other regions. Use of prone positioning and neuromuscular blockade was significantly more common in Europe-High countries than in the other two regions. Adjusted duration of invasive mechanical ventilation and length of stay in the intensive-care unit were significantly shorter in patients in rWORLD-High countries than in Europe-High or Middle countries. High gross national income per person was associated with increased survival in ARDS; hospital survival was significantly lower in Middle countries than in Europe-High or rWORLD-High countries. INTERPRETATION: Important geo-economic differences exist in the severity, clinician recognition, and management of ARDS, and in patients' outcomes. Income per person and outcomes in ARDS are independently associated. FUNDING: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, University of Milan-Bicocca.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Países Desenvolvidos/estatística & dados numéricos , Países em Desenvolvimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/epidemiologia , Idoso , Comorbidade , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Geografia Médica , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/economia , Fatores de Risco
7.
Intensive Care Med ; 42(10): 1576-1587, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27518321

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Higher positive end-expiratory pressure might induce lung inflation and recruitment, yielding enhanced regional lung protection. We measured positive end-expiratory pressure-related lung volume changes by electrical impedance tomography and by the helium dilution technique. We also used electrical impedance tomography to assess the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on regional determinants of ventilator-induced lung injury. METHODS: A prospective randomized crossover study was performed on 20 intubated adult patients: 12 with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and 8 with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Each patient underwent protective controlled ventilation at lower (7 [7, 8] cmH2O) and higher (12 [12, 13] cmH2O) positive end-expiratory pressures. At the end of each phase, we collected ventilation, helium dilution, and electrical impedance tomography data. RESULTS: Positive end-expiratory pressure-induced changes in lung inflation and recruitment measured by electrical impedance tomography and helium dilution showed close correlations (R (2) = 0.78, p < 0.001 and R (2) = 0.68, p < 0.001, respectively) but with relatively variable limits of agreement. At higher positive end-expiratory pressure, recruitment was evident in all lung regions (p < 0.01) and heterogeneity of tidal ventilation distribution was reduced by increased tidal volume distending the dependent lung (p < 0.001); in the non-dependent lung, on the other hand, compliance decreased (p < 0.001) and tidal hyperinflation significantly increased (p < 0.001). In the subgroup of ARDS patients (but not in the whole study population) tidal hyperinflation in the dependent lung regions decreased at higher positive end-expiratory pressure (p = 0.05), probably indicating higher potential for recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: Close correlations exist between bedside assessment of positive end-expiratory pressure-induced changes in lung inflation and recruitment by the helium dilution and electrical impedance tomography techniques. Higher positive end-expiratory pressure exerts mixed effects on the regional determinants of ventilator-induced lung injury; these merit close monitoring.


Assuntos
Impedância Elétrica/uso terapêutico , Hélio/uso terapêutico , Testes Imediatos , Respiração com Pressão Positiva/métodos , Tomografia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Humanos , Medidas de Volume Pulmonar/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Volume de Ventilação Pulmonar , Lesão Pulmonar Induzida por Ventilação Mecânica/etiologia
8.
Respir Care ; 61(4): 495-501, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26884446

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We previously described an index, defined as the ratio between the inspiratory muscle pressure (Pmus) and the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EA(di)) (Pmus/EA(di) index). In the present work, we describe the trend of Pmus/EA(di) index over time, investigating whether it could be an indicator of muscular efficiency associated with risk factors for diaphragmatic injury and/or clinical outcomes. METHODS: This work is a retrospective analysis of subjects with measurements of Pmus/EA(di) index obtained, on different days, during assisted ventilation. Effects of Pmus/EA(di) index absolute value on clinical outcomes were investigated dividing subjects into those with Pmus/EA(di) index higher or lower than the median. Effects of Pmus/EA(di) index trend over time were analyzed, distinguishing between subjects with Pmus/EA(di) index increasing or decreasing. RESULTS: Mean Pmus/EA(di) index was 1.04 ± 0.67, and the median (interquartile range) was 1.00 (0.59-1.34), without a systematic trend over the days. Demographic, ventilator, or outcome data did not significantly differ between subjects with Pmus/EA(di) index higher or lower than the median. Similarly, we did not find relevant differences in subjects with Pmus/EA(di) index increasing or decreasing over time. CONCLUSIONS: The Pmus/EA(di) index value remained constant in each subject over time, although the inter-individual variability was high. Neither the Pmus/EA(di) index nor its trends appeared to be associated with ventilatory variables or clinical outcome.


Assuntos
Diafragma/fisiopatologia , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Pressões Respiratórias Máximas/estatística & dados numéricos , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Eletromiografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Músculos Respiratórios/fisiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Anesthesiology ; 121(3): 563-71, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25050572

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Auto-positive end-expiratory pressure (auto-PEEP) may substantially increase the inspiratory effort during assisted mechanical ventilation. Purpose of this study was to assess whether the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) signal can be reliably used to estimate auto-PEEP in patients undergoing pressure support ventilation and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) and whether NAVA was beneficial in comparison with pressure support ventilation in patients affected by auto-PEEP. METHODS: In 10 patients with a clinical suspicion of auto-PEEP, the authors simultaneously recorded EAdi, airway, esophageal pressure, and flow during pressure support and NAVA, whereas external PEEP was increased from 2 to 14 cm H2O. Tracings were analyzed to measure apparent "dynamic" auto-PEEP (decrease in esophageal pressure to generate inspiratory flow), auto-EAdi (EAdi value at the onset of inspiratory flow), and IDEAdi (inspiratory delay between the onset of EAdi and the inspiratory flow). RESULTS: The pressure necessary to overcome auto-PEEP, auto-EAdi, and IDEAdi was significantly lower in NAVA as compared with pressure support ventilation, decreased with increase in external PEEP, although the effect of external PEEP was less pronounced in NAVA. Both auto-EAdi and IDEAdi were tightly correlated with auto-PEEP (r = 0.94 and r = 0.75, respectively). In the presence of auto-PEEP at lower external PEEP levels, NAVA was characterized by a characteristic shape of the airway pressure. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with auto-PEEP, NAVA, compared with pressure support ventilation, led to a decrease in the pressure necessary to overcome auto-PEEP, which could be reliably monitored by the electrical activity of the diaphragm before inspiratory flow onset (auto-EAdi).


Assuntos
Diafragma/fisiologia , Suporte Ventilatório Interativo/métodos , Respiração com Pressão Positiva/métodos , Idoso , Fenômenos Eletrofisiológicos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos
10.
Intensive Care Med ; 38(7): 1224-32, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22584798

RESUMO

PURPOSE: During neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA), it is difficult to quantify the relative contribution of the patient versus the ventilator to the inspiratory tidal volume (Vt(insp)). To solve this problem, we developed an index, the "patient-ventilator breath contribution" (PVBC), using the inspiratory deflection of the diaphragmatic electrical activity (∆EAdi) and Vt(insp) during assisted and non-assisted breaths. This study evaluated the PVBC index in an experimental setup. METHOD: Nine intubated and sedated rabbits were studied during repeated ramp increases of the NAVA level. One breath was non-assisted at each NAVA level. The PVBC index was evaluated during resistive loading and after acute lung injury. PVBC was calculated by relating Vt(insp)/∆EAdi of a non-assisted breath to that of the preceding assisted breath. The PVBC was compared to the relative contribution of esophageal pressure (∆Pes) to transpulmonary pressure deflections (∆P (L,dyn)). RESULTS: The relationship between PVBC and ∆Pes/∆P (L,dyn) was slightly curvilinear with an intercept different from zero (y = -1x (2 )+ 1.64x + 0.21) and a determination coefficient (R (2)) of 0.95. Squaring the PVBC values resulted in a near perfect linear relationship (y = 1.02x + 0.05) between PVBC(2) and ∆Pes/∆P (L,dyn) with an R (2) of 0.97. CONCLUSION: This study shows that Vt(insp) and EAdi can be used to predict the contribution of the inspiratory muscles versus that of the ventilator during NAVA. If clinically applicable, this could serve to quantify and standardize the adjustment of the level of assist, and hence reduce the risks of excessive ventilatory assist. Further studies are required to evaluate if this method is clinically applicable.


Assuntos
Lesão Pulmonar Aguda/terapia , Suporte Ventilatório Interativo/métodos , Músculos Respiratórios/fisiologia , Volume de Ventilação Pulmonar/fisiologia , Animais , Masculino , Modelos Animais , Respiração com Pressão Positiva/métodos , Coelhos
11.
Crit Care Med ; 40(1): 119-24, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21926595

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: : We evaluated a new device designed to clean the endotracheal tube in mechanically ventilated patients, the Mucus Shaver. DESIGN: : Prospective, randomized trial. SETTING: : University hospital intensive care unit. PATIENTS: : We enrolled 24 patients expected to remain ventilated for >72 hrs. INTERVENTIONS: : The Mucus Shaver is a concentric inflatable catheter for the removal of mucus and secretions from the interior surface of the endotracheal tube. The Mucus Shaver is advanced to the distal endotracheal tube tip, inflated, and subsequently withdrawn over a period of 3-5 secs. Patients were prospectively randomized within 2 hrs of intubation to receive standard endotracheal tube suctioning treatment or standard suctioning plus Mucus Shaver use until extubation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: : During the study period, demographic data, recent medical history, adverse events, and staff evaluation of the Mucus Shaver were recorded. At extubation, each endotracheal tube was removed, cultured, and analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. Twelve patients were assigned to the study group and 12 were assigned to the control group. No adverse events related to the use of the Mucus Shaver were observed. At extubation, only one endotracheal tube from the Mucus Shaver group was colonized, whereas in the control group ten endotracheal tubes were colonized (8% vs. 83%; p < .001). Scanning electron microscopy showed little secretions on the endotracheal tubes from the study group, whereas thick bacterial deposits were present on all the endotracheal tubes from the control group (p < .001 by Fisher exact test, using a maximum biofilm thickness of 30 µm as cut-off). The nursing staff was satisfied by the overall safety, feasibility, and efficacy of the Mucus Shaver. CONCLUSIONS: : The Mucus Shaver is a safe, feasible, and efficient device for endotracheal tube cleaning in the clinical setting. The Mucus Shaver is helpful in preventing endotracheal tube colonization by potentially harmful microorganisms.


Assuntos
Intubação Intratraqueal/instrumentação , Muco/metabolismo , Respiração Artificial/instrumentação , Biofilmes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
12.
Crit Care ; 15(1): R56, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21306645

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Intensive care is generally regarded as expensive, and as a result beds are limited. This has raised serious questions about rationing when there are insufficient beds for all those referred. However, the evidence for the cost effectiveness of intensive care is weak and the work that does exist usually assumes that those who are not admitted do not survive, which is not always the case. Randomised studies of the effectiveness of intensive care are difficult to justify on ethical grounds; therefore, this observational study examined the cost effectiveness of ICU admission by comparing patients who were accepted into ICU after ICU triage to those who were not accepted, while attempting to adjust such comparison for confounding factors. METHODS: This multi-centre observational cohort study involved 11 hospitals in 7 EU countries and was designed to assess the cost effectiveness of admission to intensive care after ICU triage. A total of 7,659 consecutive patients referred to the intensive care unit (ICU) were divided into those accepted for admission and those not accepted. The two groups were compared in terms of cost and mortality using multilevel regression models to account for differences across centres, and after adjusting for age, Karnofsky score and indication for ICU admission. The analyses were also stratified by categories of Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II predicted mortality (< 5%, 5% to 40% and >40%). Cost effectiveness was evaluated as cost per life saved and cost per life-year saved. RESULTS: Admission to ICU produced a relative reduction in mortality risk, expressed as odds ratio, of 0.70 (0.52 to 0.94) at 28 days. When stratified by predicted mortality, the odds ratio was 1.49 (0.79 to 2.81), 0.7 (0.51 to 0.97) and 0.55 (0.37 to 0.83) for <5%, 5% to 40% and >40% predicted mortality, respectively. Average cost per life saved for all patients was $103,771 (€82,358) and cost per life-year saved was $7,065 (€5,607). These figures decreased substantially for patients with predicted mortality higher than 40%, $60,046 (€47,656) and $4,088 (€3,244), respectively. Results were very similar when considering three-month mortality. Sensitivity analyses performed to assess the robustness of the results provided findings similar to the main analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Not only does ICU appear to produce an improvement in survival, but the cost per life saved falls for patients with greater severity of illness. This suggests that intensive care is similarly cost effective to other therapies that are generally regarded as essential.


Assuntos
Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Quartos de Pacientes/economia , Triagem , Adulto , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Quartos de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Respir Care ; 56(5): 596-603, 2011 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21276316

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Standard indications for endotracheal suctioning are often based on clinical judgment on the deterioration of the patient's condition, and/or routine suctioning. TBA Care is a secretion detector that analyses airway sounds and indicates the need for suctioning. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of TBA Care in detecting retained secretions, compared to standard indications. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized trial with 72 general intensive care unit patients randomized at intubation into 2 groups, differing only in suctioning indications. The control group indications were at least 3 scheduled suctionings per day or were clinically driven. The secretion-detector group indications were device signal or clinically driven. At each suctioning session we recorded the indication for suctioning and the amount of secretions removed. Patients were followed until intensive care unit discharge or extubation. Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia was confirmed via microbiological analysis of suctioned secretions. RESULTS: We analyzed 1,705 suctionings in the control group and 1,354 in the secretion-detector group. The secretion-detector group had fewer suctionings per day (3.9 ± 2.3 vs 4.8 ± 1.2, P = .002) and a lower rate of unnecessary suctionings (4% vs 12%, P < .001). In the secretion-detector group, 97% of the suctionings were performed following the signal from the TBA Care device. In the control group, clinical deterioration (65%) was the most frequent indication for suctioning. The incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia was similar in the groups. CONCLUSIONS: TBA Care seems to give valid and timely indications for suctioning, anticipating clinical deterioration due to secretion retention and reducing unnecessary suctionings. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT00932776.).


Assuntos
Muco/metabolismo , Transtornos Respiratórios/terapia , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Sucção/métodos , Traqueia/metabolismo , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/etiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controle , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Transtornos Respiratórios/metabolismo
14.
Trials ; 10: 19, 2009 Apr 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19348675

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many studies have attempted to determine the "best" anaesthetic technique for neurosurgical procedures in patients without intracranial hypertension. So far, no study comparing intravenous (IA) with volatile-based neuroanaesthesia (VA) has been able to demonstrate major outcome differences nor a superiority of one of the two strategies in patients undergoing elective supratentorial neurosurgery. Therefore, current practice varies and includes the use of either volatile or intravenous anaesthetics in addition to narcotics. Actually the choice of the anaesthesiological strategy depends only on the anaesthetists' preferences or institutional policies. This trial, named NeuroMorfeo, aims to assess the equivalence between volatile and intravenous anaesthetics for neurosurgical procedures. METHODS/DESIGN: NeuroMorfeo is a multicenter, randomized, open label, controlled trial, based on an equivalence design. Patients aged between 18 and 75 years, scheduled for elective craniotomy for supratentorial lesion without signs of intracranial hypertension, in good physical state (ASA I-III) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) equal to 15, are randomly assigned to one of three anaesthesiological strategies (two VA arms, sevoflurane + fentanyl or sevoflurane + remifentanil, and one IA, propofol + remifentanil). The equivalence between intravenous and volatile-based neuroanaesthesia will be evaluated by comparing the intervals required to reach, after anaesthesia discontinuation, a modified Aldrete score > or = 9 (primary end-point). Two statistical comparisons have been planned: 1) sevoflurane + fentanyl vs. propofol + remifentanil; 2) sevoflurane + remifentanil vs. propofol + remifentanil. Secondary end-points include: an assessment of neurovegetative stress based on (a) measurement of urinary catecholamines and plasma and urinary cortisol and (b) estimate of sympathetic/parasympathetic balance by power spectrum analyses of electrocardiographic tracings recorded during anaesthesia; intraoperative adverse events; evaluation of surgical field; postoperative adverse events; patient's satisfaction and analysis of costs. 411 patients will be recruited in 14 Italian centers during an 18-month period. DISCUSSION: We presented the development phase of this anaesthesiological on-going trial. The recruitment started December 4th, 2007 and up to 4th, December 2008, 314 patients have been enrolled.


Assuntos
Anestesia/métodos , Anestésicos Inalatórios , Anestésicos Intravenosos , Craniotomia , Éteres Metílicos , Propofol , Adjuvantes Anestésicos , Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Anestesia/economia , Anestésicos Inalatórios/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Inalatórios/economia , Anestésicos Intravenosos/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Intravenosos/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Medicamentos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Fentanila , Humanos , Itália , Éteres Metílicos/efeitos adversos , Éteres Metílicos/economia , Satisfação do Paciente , Piperidinas , Propofol/efeitos adversos , Propofol/economia , Remifentanil , Projetos de Pesquisa , Sevoflurano , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA