Preclinical patient-derived modeling of castration-resistant prostate cancer facilitates individualized assessment of homologous recombination repair deficient disease.

The use of mutation analysis of homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes to estimate PARP-inhibition response may miss a larger proportion of responding patients. Here, we provide preclinical models for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) that can be used to functionally predict HRR defects. In vitro, CRPC LNCaP sublines revealed an HRR defect and enhanced sensitivity to olaparib and cisplatin due to impaired RAD51 expression and recruitment. Ex vivo-induced castration-resistant tumor slice cultures or tumor slice cultures derived directly from CRPC patients showed increased olaparib- or cisplatin-associated enhancement of residual radiation-induced γH2AX/53BP1 foci. We established patient-derived tumor organoids (PDOs) from CRPC patients. These PDOs are morphologically similar to their primary tumors and genetically clustered with prostate cancer but not with normal prostate or other tumor entities. Using these PDOs, we functionally confirmed the enhanced sensitivity of CRPC patients to olaparib and cisplatin. Moreover, olaparib but not cisplatin significantly decreased the migration rate in CRPC cells. Collectively, we present robust patient-derived preclinical models for CRPC that recapitulate the features of their primary tumors and enable individualized drug screening, allowing translation of treatment sensitivities into tailored clinical therapy recommendations.

Risk management patterns in radiation oncology-results of a national survey within the framework of the Patient Safety in German Radiation Oncology (PaSaGeRO) project.

PURPOSE: Risk management (RM) is a key component of patient safety in radiation oncology (RO). We investigated current approaches on RM in German RO within the framework of the Patient Safety in German Radiation Oncology (PaSaGeRO) project. Aim was not only to evaluate a status quo of RM purposes but furthermore to discover challenges for sustainable RM that should be addressed in future research and recommendations. METHODS: An online survey was conducted from June to August 2021, consisting of 18 items on prospective and reactive RM, protagonists of RM, and self-assessment concerning RM. The survey was designed using LimeSurvey and invitations were sent by e­mail. Answers were requested once per institution. RESULTS: In all, 48 completed questionnaires from university hospitals, general and non-academic hospitals, and private practices were received and considered for evaluation. Prospective and reactive RM was commonly conducted within interprofessional teams; 88% of all institutions performed prospective risk analyses. Most institutions (71%) reported incidents or near-events using multiple reporting systems. Results were presented to the team in 71% for prospective analyses and 85% for analyses of incidents. Risk conferences take place in 46% of institutions. 42% nominated a manager/committee for RM. Knowledge concerning RM was mostly rated "satisfying" (44%). However, 65% of all institutions require more information about RM by professional societies. CONCLUSION: Our results revealed heterogeneous patterns of RM in RO departments, although most departments adhered to common recommendations. Identified mismatches between recommendations and implementation of RM provide baseline data for future research and support definition of teaching content.

Implications of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Crisis on Clinical Cancer Care: Report of the University Cancer Center Hamburg.

With the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemia, routine clinical work was immediately, deeply, and sustainably impacted in Germany and worldwide. The infrastructure of almost all hospitals is currently redirected to provide a maximum of intensive care resources, including the necessary staff. In parallel, routine as well as emergency clinical care for all patients in need has to be secured. This challenge becomes particularly evident in cancer care. In order to maintain adequate oncological care at all levels of provision and to conduct especially curative and intensive treatments with a maximum of safety, continuous adaption of the oncology care system has to be ensured. Intensive communication with colleagues and patients is needed as is consequent expert networking and continuous reflection of the own developed strategies. In parallel, it is of high importance to actively avoid cessation of innovation in order not to endanger the continuous improvement in prognosis of cancer patients. This includes sustained conduction of clinical trials as well as ongoing translational research. Here, we describe measures taken at the University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH) - a recognized comprehensive oncology center of excellence - during the COVID-19 crisis. We aim to provide support and potential perspectives to generate a discussion basis on how to maintain high-end cancer care during such a crisis and how to conduct patients safely into the future.