Standardized assessment of vascular reconstruction kernels in photon-counting CT angiographies of the leg using a continuous extracorporeal perfusion model.

This study evaluated the influence of different vascular reconstruction kernels on the image quality of CT angiographies of the lower extremity runoff using a 1st-generation photon-counting-detector CT (PCD-CT) compared with dose-matched examinations on a 3rd-generation energy-integrating-detector CT (EID-CT). Inducing continuous extracorporeal perfusion in a human cadaveric model, we performed CT angiographies of eight upper leg arterial runoffs with radiation dose-equivalent 120 kVp acquisition protocols (CTDIvol 5 mGy). Reconstructions were executed with different vascular kernels, matching the individual modulation transfer functions between scanners. Signal-to-noise-ratios (SNR) and contrast-to-noise-ratios (CNR) were computed to assess objective image quality. Six radiologists evaluated image quality subjectively using a forced-choice pairwise comparison tool. Interrater agreement was determined by calculating Kendall's concordance coefficient (W). The intraluminal attenuation of PCD-CT images was significantly higher than of EID-CT (414.7 ± 27.3 HU vs. 329.3 ± 24.5 HU; p < 0.001). Using comparable kernels, image noise with PCD-CT was significantly lower than with EID-CT (p ≤ 0.044). Correspondingly, SNR and CNR were approximately twofold higher for PCD-CT (p < 0.001). Increasing the spatial frequency for PCD-CT reconstructions by one level resulted in similar metrics compared to EID-CT (CNRfat; EID-CT Bv49: 21.7 ± 3.7 versus PCD-CT Bv60: 21.4 ± 3.5). Overall image quality of PCD-CTA achieved ratings superior to EID-CTA irrespective of the used reconstruction kernels (best: PCD-CT Bv60; worst: EID-CT Bv40; p < 0.001). Interrater agreement was good (W = 0.78). Concluding, PCD-CT offers superior intraluminal attenuation, SNR, and CNR compared to EID-CT in angiographies of the upper leg arterial runoff. Combined with improved subjective image quality, PCD-CT facilitates the use of sharper convolution kernels and ultimately bears the potential of improved vascular structure assessability.

Image Quality Assessment for Clinical Cadmium Telluride-Based Photon-Counting Computed Tomography Detector in Cadaveric Wrist Imaging.

OBJECTIVES: Detailed visualization of bone microarchitecture is essential for assessment of wrist fractures in computed tomography (CT). This study aims to evaluate the imaging performance of a CT system with clinical cadmium telluride-based photon-counting detector (PCD-CT) compared with a third-generation dual-source CT scanner with energy-integrating detector technology (EID-CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both CT systems were used for the examination of 8 cadaveric wrists with radiation dose equivalent scan protocols (low-/standard-/full-dose imaging: CTDIvol = 1.50/5.80/8.67 mGy). All wrists were scanned with 2 different operating modes of the photon-counting CT (standard-resolution and ultra-high-resolution). After reformatting with comparable reconstruction parameters and convolution kernels, subjective evaluation of image quality was performed by 3 radiologists on a 7-point scale. For estimation of interrater reliability, we report the intraclass correlation coefficient (absolute agreement, 2-way random-effects model). Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were calculated to provide semiquantitative assessment of image quality. RESULTS: Subjective image quality of standard-dose PCD-CT examinations in ultra-high-resolution mode was superior compared with full-dose PCD-CT in standard-resolution mode (P = 0.016) and full-dose EID-CT (P = 0.040). No difference was ascertained between low-dose PCD-CT in ultra-high-resolution mode and standard-dose scans with either PCD-CT in standard-resolution mode (P = 0.108) or EID-CT (P = 0.470). Observer evaluation of standard-resolution PCD-CT and EID-CT delivered similar results in full- and standard-dose scans (P = 0.248/0.509). Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.876 (95% confidence interval, 0.744-0.925; P < 0.001), indicating good reliability. Between dose equivalent studies, signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were substantially higher in photon-counting CT examinations (all P's < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Superior visualization of fine anatomy is feasible with the clinical photon-counting CT system in cadaveric wrist scans. The ultra-high-resolution scan mode suggests potential for considerable dose reduction over energy-integrating dual-source CT.

Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography phantom study: intravenous iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast agents may cause false-negative results in assessment of vesicoureteral reflux in children.

BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ce-VUS) is commonly requested simultaneously to other diagnostic imaging necessitating intravenous contrast agents. To date there is limited knowldedge about intravesical interactions between different types of contrast agents. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of excreted intravenous iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast agents on the intravesical distribution of ultrasound contrast within contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Iodinated (iomeprol, iopamidol) and gadolinium-based (gadoterate meglumine) contrast agents were diluted to bladder concentration and injected into balloons filled with saline solution. CT scans were performed to assess the contrast distribution in these phantoms. Regions of interest were placed at the top and bottom side of each balloon and Hounsfield units (HU) were measured. Three other balloons were filled with saline solution and contrast media likewise. The ultrasound contrast agent sulphur hexafluoride was added and its distribution was assessed using sonography. RESULTS: MDCT scans showed a separation of two liquid layers in all bladder phantoms with the contrast layers located at the bottom and the saline solution at the top. Significant differences of the HU measurements at the top and bottom side were observed (P < 0.001-0.007). Following injection of ultrasound contrast agent, US showed its distribution exclusively among the saline solution. CONCLUSIONS: False-negative results of contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography may occur if it is performed shortly after imaging procedures requiring intravenous contrast.