RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The revision knee complexity classification (RKCC) stratifies knee revision operations depending on their level of complexity from simple revisions (R1) to highly complex cases (R3). Current financial codes used for calculation of reimbursement for knee revision services provided at the Trust, rely on patients' comorbidities. However, previous research has demonstrated that this approach may not yield an accurate financial account of knee revision arthroplasty cost. This is a single centre study from a secondary and tertiary revision unit, with work previously presented by the authors demonstrating that the majority of complex revision knee replacement within the region, take place in this unit. The aims of this study were to illustrate the current cost profile and renumeration service currently in place for revision knee and show the differences in cost based on complexity of the operation. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 90 cases who underwent revision knee operations in 2019 were analysed. Data was obtained from a tertiary referral centre where the episodes had occurred. Mean cost, tariff, and subsequent deficit were calculated for the R1, R2 and R3 episodes. RESULTS: R2 and R3 episodes were significantly more expensive than R1 episodes. The increase in cost between R3 and R2 episodes was not significant. The total cost of the revision operations was £1,162,343. Tariffs received for R2 and R3 revision operations were significantly more expensive than R1 operations. However, the increase in tariffs received for R3 operations was not significant in relation to R2 operations. The total amount of tariffs received by the Trust was £ 770,996 generating a net deficit of - £ 391,347. CONCLUSION: Current financial coding for revision knee does not accurately predict costs associated with revision knee surgery. Net deficit varies depending on the RKCC grade of the knee revision episode with more complex operations resulting in a higher mean net deficit. Implementation of the RKCC could prove to be a useful tool in generating an accurate prediction of the cost associated with knee revision surgery.
Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Humanos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reoperação , Custos HospitalaresRESUMO
BACKGROUND: It can be challenging to diagnose the cause of a patient's dizziness. Patients face significant delays before receiving a correct diagnosis as they will undergo many diagnostic tests under several different medical specialities. As well as prolonging the suffering of patients, these problems place a significant financial burden on health services worldwide. We have developed a wearable medical device which has the potential to diagnose the cause of a patient's dizziness using vestibular telemetry captured over a thirty-day period. We sought to quantify the potential direct cost savings of an alternative diagnostic pathway using our diagnostic device. METHODS: In this work, we identified the existing diagnostic pathways followed by patients reporting dizziness to their General Practitioner, and modelled the best and worst-case direct costs of providing a patient with a correct diagnosis. We estimated the potential cost of our alternative pathway, and calculated the cost savings this could provide to the NHS. RESULTS: The results show that our alternative diagnostic pathway could reduce the time and direct cost associated with providing a correct diagnosis. We present a potential indicative cost-saving of between £631 and £1305, per patient. CONCLUSION: Our alternative diagnostic pathway would reduce the time taken to correctly diagnose patients with vertigo. This in turn would facilitate faster access to targeted treatments, reduce unnecessary interventions, and reduce the suffering of patients. These improvements would also lead to other savings, such as reducing the amount of sick leave taken by patients to attend appointments, and freeing up of NHS time to see other patients.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We previously reported improved neurodevelopment at 2 and 4 years among preterm infants treated with erythropoietin or darbepoetin, known as erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). We now characterize longitudinal outcomes through 6 years. METHODS: Children randomized to ESAs or placebo were evaluated at 6 years. Healthy-term children served as controls. Tests of cognition and executive function (EF) were performed. RESULTS: Cognitive/EF scores remained similar between 4 and 6 years within each group (ESA: 43 children; placebo: 17 children; term: 21 children). ESA recipients scored higher than placebo on Full-Scale IQ (94.2 ± 18.6 vs. 81.6 ± 16.7, p = 0.022), and Performance IQ (97.3 ± 16.2 vs. 81.7 ± 15.2, = 0.005). Aggregate EF trended better for the ESA group. Term controls scored better than placebo on all measures. ESA and term controls scored similarly on cognitive and EF tests. CONCLUSION: ESA recipients had better outcomes than placebo recipients, and were similar to term children. ESAs may improve long-term cognition and executive function in preterm infants.
Assuntos
Hematínicos , Lactente , Criança , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Hematínicos/uso terapêutico , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Darbepoetina alfa/uso terapêutico , Cognição , EritropoeseRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess how two disease-related factors, hearing disability and ear discharge, affect health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) in patients with chronic otitis media (COM). STUDY DESIGN: Multinational prospective cohort study. SETTING: Nine otology referral centers in eight countries. PATIENTS: Adult patients suffering from COM. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hearing disability and ear discharge were assessed by audiometry (Department of Health and Social Security formula) and otoscopy, respectively. Participants completed a native version of the Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12 (COMQ-12). We determined how the two disease-related factors affect HRQoL by performing two separate analyses: (1) using a 6-item score combining responses to COMQ-12 items independent of hearing loss and ear discharge and (2) using item 12 alone as a proxy for global HRQoL. RESULTS: This study included 478 participants suffering from COM. There was a significant association between HRQoL and hearing disability in the adjusted analysis. For every unit increase in the Department of Health and Social Security average hearing threshold (1) there was an increase of 0.06 (95% CI [0.007, 0.121], pâ=â0.0282) in the 6-item score and (2) the adjusted odds of having a higher item 12 score was 1.03 (95% CI [1.01, 1.04], pâ=â0.0004). There was no association between the presence of ear discharge and HRQoL in both COMQ-12 score analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of disease-related factors that influence HRQoL will aid interpretation of patient-reported measures for COM. Patients with a greater degree of hearing impairment appear to have poorer HRQoL, which is not exacerbated by the presence of ear discharge. The magnitude of postoperative hearing improvement rather than the attainment of a dry ear may be a better indicator of surgical success from the patient's perspective.
Assuntos
Otite Média , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Doença Crônica , Audição , Humanos , Otite Média/complicações , Otite Média/cirurgia , Alta do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To review medical malpractice trends and to identify the most common claims filed against medical providers for the management of patients with priapism. METHODS: Using the Westlaw legal database, a search was done for the keyword "priapism" between July 1, 1980 and July 1, 2020. Cases were evaluated for plaintiff demographics, reasons for filing claims, management outcomes, legal verdicts and awards and further categorized based upon the timing of the alleged malpractice. RESULTS: Alleged negligence during the pre-management period was cited in 30 cases. Administration of psychotropic medications was the most common reasons for filing pre-management claims 22/56 (39.3%). Delay in care accounted for 18/56 (32.1%) and complications of surgery were 5/56 (8.9%) of claims. The majority of the completed cases were in favor of the defendants (39/47; 83.0%). There was no association between type of health care provider or timing of alleged malpractice and ultimate verdict. CONCLUSIONS: Prescribing psychoactive medications without warning of the adverse effect profile is the most common reason for claims filed against providers with trazodone as the leading medication. Medical providers should ensure that patients are well informed of this adverse effect prior to prescription. Regardless, the majority of medical malpractice cases carry a verdict in favor of the defendant.
Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil , Imperícia , Priapismo , Psicotrópicos , Disfunção Erétil/epidemiologia , Disfunção Erétil/terapia , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Masculino , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/tendências , Priapismo/epidemiologia , Priapismo/terapia , Psicotrópicos/administração & dosagem , Psicotrópicos/efeitos adversos , Trazodona/administração & dosagem , Trazodona/efeitos adversos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The COVID-19 pandemic has been mitigated primarily using social and behavioral intervention strategies, and these strategies have social and economic impacts, as well as potential downstream health impacts that require further study. Digital and community-based interventions are being increasingly relied upon to address these health impacts and bridge the gap in health care access despite insufficient research of these interventions as a replacement for, not an adjunct to, in-person clinical care. As SARS-CoV-2 testing expands, research on encouraging uptake and appropriate interpretation of these test results is needed. All of these issues are disproportionately impacting underserved, vulnerable, and health disparities populations. This commentary describes the various initiatives of the National Institutes of Health to address these social, behavioral, economic, and health disparities impacts of the pandemic, the findings from which can improve our response to the current pandemic and prepare us better for future infectious disease outbreaks.
Assuntos
Pesquisa Comportamental , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Infecções por Coronavirus , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral , Saúde Pública/tendências , Ciências Sociais , Telemedicina , Controle Comportamental/métodos , Pesquisa Comportamental/métodos , Pesquisa Comportamental/tendências , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/economia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/organização & administração , Infecções por Coronavirus/economia , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Coronavirus/psicologia , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Pandemias/economia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/economia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/psicologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Ciências Sociais/métodos , Ciências Sociais/tendências , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/tendências , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
von Economo neurons (VENs) are bipolar, spindle-shaped neurons restricted to layer 5 of human frontoinsula and anterior cingulate cortex that appear to be selectively vulnerable to neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases, although little is known about other VEN cellular phenotypes. Single nucleus RNA-sequencing of frontoinsula layer 5 identifies a transcriptomically-defined cell cluster that contained VENs, but also fork cells and a subset of pyramidal neurons. Cross-species alignment of this cell cluster with a well-annotated mouse classification shows strong homology to extratelencephalic (ET) excitatory neurons that project to subcerebral targets. This cluster also shows strong homology to a putative ET cluster in human temporal cortex, but with a strikingly specific regional signature. Together these results suggest that VENs are a regionally distinctive type of ET neuron. Additionally, we describe the first patch clamp recordings of VENs from neurosurgically-resected tissue that show distinctive intrinsic membrane properties relative to neighboring pyramidal neurons.
Assuntos
Neurônios/fisiologia , Lobo Temporal/citologia , Transcriptoma , Animais , Encéfalo/citologia , Encéfalo/fisiologia , Eletrofisiologia/métodos , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Hibridização in Situ Fluorescente , Camundongos , Neurônios/citologia , Células Piramidais/fisiologia , Telencéfalo/citologia , Lobo Temporal/fisiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite growing evidence of diagnostic yield and clinical utility of whole exome sequencing (WES) in patients with undiagnosed diseases, there remain significant cost and reimbursement barriers limiting access to such testing. The diagnostic yield and resulting clinical actions of WES for patients who previously faced insurance coverage barriers have not yet been explored. METHODS: We performed a retrospective descriptive analysis of clinical WES outcomes for patients facing insurance coverage barriers prior to clinical WES and who subsequently enrolled in the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN). Clinical WES was completed as a result of participation in the UDN. Payer type, molecular diagnostic yield, and resulting clinical actions were evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients in the UDN faced insurance coverage barriers to WES at the time of enrollment (67% public payer, 26% private payer). Forty-two of 66 (64%) received insurance denial for clinician-ordered WES, 19/66 (29%) had health insurance through a payer known not to cover WES, and 5/66 (8%) had previous payer denial of other genetic tests. Clinical WES results yielded a molecular diagnosis in 23 of 66 patients (35% [78% pediatric, 65% neurologic indication]). Molecular diagnosis resulted in clinical actions in 14 of 23 patients (61%). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that a substantial proportion of patients who encountered insurance coverage barriers to WES had a clinically actionable molecular diagnosis, supporting the notion that WES has value as a covered benefit for patients who remain undiagnosed despite objective clinical findings.
Assuntos
Sequenciamento do Exoma , Cobertura do Seguro , Doenças não Diagnosticadas/genética , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Dizziness is a common condition that is responsible for a significant degree of material morbidity and burden on health services. It is usually episodic and short-lived, so when a patient presents to their clinician, examination is normal. The CAVA (Continuous Ambulatory Vestibular Assessment) device has been developed to provide continuous monitoring of eye-movements, allowing insight into the physiological parameters present during a dizziness attack. This article describes the first clinical investigation into the medical and technical aspects of this new diagnostic system. Seventeen healthy subjects wore the device near continuously for up to thirty days, artificially inducing nystagmus on eight occasions. 405 days' worth of data was captured, comprising around four billion data points. A computer algorithm developed to detect nystagmus demonstrated a sensitivity of 99.1% (95% CI: 95.13% to 99.98%) and a specificity of 98.6% (95% CI: 96.54% to 99.63%). Eighty-two percent of participants wore the device for a minimum of eighty percent of each day. Adverse events were self-limiting and mostly the consequence of skin stripping from the daily replacement of the electrodes. The device was shown to operate effectively as an ambulatory monitor, allowing the reliable detection of artificially induced nystagmus.
Assuntos
Acelerometria/instrumentação , Algoritmos , Tontura/diagnóstico , Movimentos Oculares/fisiologia , Nistagmo Patológico/diagnóstico , Vertigem/diagnóstico , Testes de Função Vestibular/instrumentação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Segurança , Método Simples-Cego , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Introduction and Objectives: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a complex multistep surgery that has shown a steady increase in use for the past decade in the United States. We sought to evaluate the trends and factors associated with PCNL usage across New York State (NYS). Our goal was to characterize patient demographics and socioeconomic factors across high-, medium-, and low-volume institutions. Materials and Methods: We searched the NYS, Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database from 2006 to 2014 using ICD-9 Procedure Codes 55.04 (percutaneous nephrostomy with fragmentation) for all hospital discharges. Patient demographics including age, gender, race, insurance status, and length of hospital stay were obtained. We characterized each hospital as a low-, medium-, or high-volume center by year. Patient and hospital demographics were compared and reported using chi-square analysis and Student's t-test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively, with statistical significance as a p-value of <0.05. Results: We identified a total of 4576 procedures performed from 2006 to 2014 at a total of 77 hospitals in NYS (Table 1). Total PCNL volume performed across all NYS hospitals increased in the past decade, with the greatest number of procedures performed in 2012 to 2013. Low-volume institutions were more likely to provide care to minority populations (21.4% vs 17.3%, p < 0.001) and those with Medicaid (25.5% vs 21.5%, p < 0.001). High-volume institutions provided care to patients with private insurance (42.1% vs 34.0%, p < 0.001) and had a shorter length of stay (3.3 days vs 4.1 days, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our data provide insight into the patient demographics of those treated at high-, medium-, and low-volume hospitals for PCNL across NYS. Significant differences in race, insurance status, and length of stay were noted between low- and high-volume institutions, indicating that racial and socioeconomic factors play a role in access to care at high-volume centers.
Assuntos
Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Nefrolitotomia Percutânea/estatística & dados numéricos , Nefrolitotomia Percutânea/tendências , Nefrostomia Percutânea/estatística & dados numéricos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/tendências , Coleta de Dados , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Nefrolitotomia Percutânea/economia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/economia , New York , Alta do Paciente , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
PURPOSE: In syndromic craniosynostosis, the Le Fort III osteotomy is used to correct dental/skeletal imbalance, improve exorbitism, and increase the airway. The purpose of this study is to perform a cost comparison between the standard technique of single-stage rigid internal fixation and distraction osteogenesis (DO) in the Le Fort III osteotomy in this patient population. METHOD: Hospital cost accounting databases were queried for patients undergoing single-stage advancement (SS) or DO from 2007 to 2016. Nominal cost data were adjusted using the Bank of Canada Consumer Price Index. Reported costs represented the full length of stay for all utilization per patient. Demographic information and cost data for single-stage osteotomy and DO were compared. RESULTS: Total costs for single-stage (n = 8) were higher than distraction (n = 6; mean $CAD57 825 vs $38 268, P < .05). Intensive care unit (ICU) costs for single-stage were significantly higher than distraction (mean, $17 746 vs $5585, P < .005). Distraction cases had higher operating room (OR) costs than single stage, but the difference was not significant (mean, $12 540 vs $9696). Length of stay was significantly longer for SS patients (mean, 11 days vs 7 days, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This single-institution retrospective cost analysis indicates standard SS rigid internal fixation Le Fort III is more costly than DO. Despite higher OR costs, prolonged ICU and hospital stay was the primary reason behind this difference. This information may be of benefit when advocating for new technology perceived as high cost.
OBJECTIFS: En cas de craniosynostose syndromique, l'ostéotomie de Le Fort III permet de corriger un déséquilibre dentaire et squelettique, d'améliorer l'exophtalmie et de mieux ouvrir les voies respiratoires. La présente étude vise à comparer les coûts de la technique standard de fixation interne rigide en une étape à la distraction osseuse (DO) au sein de la population de patients en cas d'ostéotomie de Le Fort III. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Les chercheurs ont fouillé les bases de données comptables des coûts hospitaliers pour les patients qui avaient subi un avancement en une étape (AUÉ) ou une DO entre 2007 et 2016. Ils ont rajusté les données sur les coûts nominaux à l'aide de l'indice des prix à la consommation de la Banque du Canada. Les coûts déclarés représentaient la durée totale de tous les séjours hospitaliers par patient. Ils ont comparé l'information démographique et les données sur les coûts de l'ostéotomie en une étape à la DO. RÉSULTATS: Les coûts totaux de l'AUÉ (n = 8) étaient plus élevés que ceux de la DO (n = 6) (moyenne de 57 825 $ CA par rapport à 38 268 $, P < 0,05). Les coûts de l'unité de soins intensifs (USI) pour les AUÉ étaient considérablement plus élevés que la ceux de la DO (moyenne de 17 746 $ par rapport à 5 585 $, P < 0,005). Les cas de DO s'associent à un rapport de cotes des coûts plus élevé que l'AUÉ, mais la différence n'était pas significative (moyenne de 12 540 $ par rapport à 9 696 $). Le séjour hospitalier était considérablement plus long pour les patients subissant un AUÉ (moyenne de 11 jours par rapport à sept jours, P < 0,05). CONCLUSIONS: D'après la présente analyse rétrospective des coûts dans un seul établissement, la fixation interne rigide de l'AUÉ standard de Le Fort III est plus coûteuse que la DO. Malgré des coûts plus élevés en salle opératoire, un séjour prolongé à l'USI et à l'hôpital est la principale raison de cette différence. Cette information peut être utile pour défendre les nouvelles technologies qui sont perçues comme coûteuses.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Many patients remain without a diagnosis despite extensive medical evaluation. The Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN) was established to apply a multidisciplinary model in the evaluation of the most challenging cases and to identify the biologic characteristics of newly discovered diseases. The UDN, which is funded by the National Institutes of Health, was formed in 2014 as a network of seven clinical sites, two sequencing cores, and a coordinating center. Later, a central biorepository, a metabolomics core, and a model organisms screening center were added. METHODS: We evaluated patients who were referred to the UDN over a period of 20 months. The patients were required to have an undiagnosed condition despite thorough evaluation by a health care provider. We determined the rate of diagnosis among patients who subsequently had a complete evaluation, and we observed the effect of diagnosis on medical care. RESULTS: A total of 1519 patients (53% female) were referred to the UDN, of whom 601 (40%) were accepted for evaluation. Of the accepted patients, 192 (32%) had previously undergone exome sequencing. Symptoms were neurologic in 40% of the applicants, musculoskeletal in 10%, immunologic in 7%, gastrointestinal in 7%, and rheumatologic in 6%. Of the 382 patients who had a complete evaluation, 132 received a diagnosis, yielding a rate of diagnosis of 35%. A total of 15 diagnoses (11%) were made by clinical review alone, and 98 (74%) were made by exome or genome sequencing. Of the diagnoses, 21% led to recommendations regarding changes in therapy, 37% led to changes in diagnostic testing, and 36% led to variant-specific genetic counseling. We defined 31 new syndromes. CONCLUSIONS: The UDN established a diagnosis in 132 of the 382 patients who had a complete evaluation, yielding a rate of diagnosis of 35%. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health Common Fund.).
Assuntos
Testes Genéticos , Doenças Raras/genética , Análise de Sequência de DNA , Adulto , Animais , Criança , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Drosophila , Exoma , Feminino , Testes Genéticos/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Animais , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Doenças Raras/diagnóstico , Síndrome , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) administered during initial hospitalization and family demographic factors on behavior at 3.5-4 years of age. STUDY DESIGN: Children were enrolled who had previously participated in a randomized study of ESAs (n = 35) or placebo (n = 14) in infants born preterm with birth weights of 500-1250 g. A term healthy control group (n = 22) also was recruited. Behavior was evaluated by parent report with the Behavioral Assessment System of Children-2. Principal component analyses identified 2 demographic factors, a Socioeconomic Composite (SEC) and a Family Stress Composite. A multivariate general linear model evaluated the impact of study group and sex on the 4 composite scales of the Behavioral Assessment System of Children-2. Demographic factors were treated as covariates and interactions with study group (ESA, placebo, and term) were examined. RESULTS: The ESA group had significantly better scores than the placebo group on behavioral symptoms (P = .04) and externalizing scales (P = .04). An interaction was observed between study group and SEC (P = .001). A beneficial effect of ESAs was maximal in the children with lower SEC scores. CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effects of ESAs on childhood behavior were maximal in children with lower SEC scores. ESAs seemed to ameliorate the adverse impact of lower SEC on behavioral domains seen in the placebo group. This effect was independent of the beneficial effect of ESAs on global cognition we reported previously. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01207778 and NCT00334737.
Assuntos
Comportamento Infantil/efeitos dos fármacos , Darbepoetina alfa/farmacologia , Eritropoetina/farmacologia , Hematínicos/farmacologia , Pré-Escolar , Emoções/efeitos dos fármacos , Características da Família , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Masculino , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We previously reported improved neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years among infants treated with the erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) darbepoetin alfa (darbepoetin) or erythropoietin. Here we characterize 4-year outcomes. METHODS: Former preterm infants randomly assigned to receive darbepoetin (10 µg/kg, once per week), erythropoietin (400 U/kg, 3 times/week), or placebo through 35 weeks' postconceptual age were evaluated at 3.5 to 4 years of age. For comparison, healthy children formerly delivered full term (term controls [TCs]) were also recruited. All participants were assessed by using measures of full-scale IQ (FSIQ) and general language from the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, Third Edition, and an overall measure of executive function, on the basis of tests evaluating inhibitory control and spatial working memory. Rates of neurodevelopmental impairment were compared across groups. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of variance compared children randomly assigned to ESAs (n = 39), placebo (n =14), and TCs (n = 24). FSIQ and performance IQ were significantly higher in the ESA group than in the placebo group (FSIQ: 91.1 ± 17.5 vs 79.2 ± 18.5, P = .036; performance IQ: 93.0 ± 17.0 vs 79.5 ± 19.5, P = .018). Follow-up analyses revealed that the children receiving ESAs performed better than those who received placebo on executive function tasks. The ESA group's performance was below that of TCs, but the results did not reach significance on executive function. The incidence of neurodevelopmental impairment was greater in the placebo group than in the ESA group. CONCLUSIONS: ESA-treated infants had better cognitive outcomes and less developmental impairment at 3.5 to 4 years of age compared with placebo-treated infants. ESAs show promise in improving long-term cognitive outcomes of infants born prematurely.
Assuntos
Desenvolvimento Infantil/efeitos dos fármacos , Cognição/efeitos dos fármacos , Darbepoetina alfa/administração & dosagem , Eritropoetina/administração & dosagem , Doenças do Prematuro/tratamento farmacológico , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Transtornos do Neurodesenvolvimento/tratamento farmacológico , Pré-Escolar , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hematínicos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Injeções Subcutâneas , Masculino , Transtornos do Neurodesenvolvimento/etiologia , Transtornos do Neurodesenvolvimento/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Physician-scientists and scientists in all the health professions are vital members of the U.S. biomedical workforce, but their numbers at academic health centers are declining. Mentorship has been identified as a key component in retention of faculty members at academic health centers. Effective mentoring may promote the retention of clinician-scientists in the biomedical workforce. The authors describe a holistic institutional mentoring program to support junior faculty members engaged in clinical and translational science at the University of Utah. The clinical and translational scholars (CATS) program leverages the resources of the institution, including the Center for Clinical and Translational Science, to augment departmental resources to support junior faculty investigators and uses a multilevel mentoring matrix that includes self, senior, scientific, peer, and staff mentorship. Begun in the Department of Pediatrics, the program was expanded in 2013 to include all departments in the school of medicine and the health sciences. During the two-year program, scholars learn management essentials and have leadership training designed to develop principal investigators. Of the 86 program participants since fiscal year 2008, 92% have received extramural awards, 99% remain in academic medicine, and 95% remain at the University of Utah. The CATS program has also been associated with increased inclusion of women and underrepresented minorities in the institutional research enterprise. The CATS program manifests institutional collaboration and coordination of resources, which have benefited faculty members and the institution. The model can be applied to other academic health centers to support and sustain the biomedical workforce.
Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Docentes de Medicina , Mentores , Pesquisadores , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica , Pesquisa Biomédica , Feminino , Humanos , Liderança , Masculino , Grupos Minoritários , Reorganização de Recursos Humanos , Médicas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto , Desenvolvimento de Pessoal , Universidades , UtahAssuntos
Tomada de Decisões/ética , Julgamento , Competência Mental , Autonomia Pessoal , Procurador , Valor da Vida , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is more prevalent with advancing age. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: High-resolution computed-tomographic temporal bone scans were identified for patients of all ages and analyzed by two independent assessors. Multiplanar reconstruction was applied, and the thinnest area of temporal bone overlying each superior semicircular canal (SSC) was measured. RESULTS: A sample of 121 patients was analyzed that contained an almost identical number of male and female patients. In total, 242 temporal bone images were reviewed. Patients' ages ranged between 6 and 86 years. Age was shown to have a significant linear relationship (P < 0.001) such that for every unit increase in age the predicted thickness was reduced by 0.0047 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The thickness of the SSC decreases with advancing age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Assuntos
Doenças do Labirinto/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada Multidetectores/métodos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Canais Semicirculares/diagnóstico por imagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Doenças do Labirinto/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Osso Temporal/diagnóstico por imagem , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Estimates of the burden of disease assess the mortality and morbidity that affect a population by producing summary measures of health such as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). These measures typically do not include stillbirths (fetal deaths occurring during the later stages of pregnancy or during labor) among the negative health outcomes they count. Priority-setting decisions that rely on these measures are therefore likely to place little value on preventing the more than three million stillbirths that occur annually worldwide. In contrast, neonatal deaths, which occur in comparable numbers, have a substantial impact on burden of disease estimates and are commonly seen as a pressing health concern. In this article we argue in favor of incorporating unintended fetal deaths that occur late in pregnancy into estimates of the burden of disease. Our argument is based on the similarity between late-term fetuses and newborn infants and the assumption that protecting newborns is important. We respond to four objections to counting stillbirths: (1) that fetuses are not yet part of the population and so their deaths should not be included in measures of population health; (2) that valuing the prevention of stillbirths will undermine women's reproductive rights; (3) that including stillbirths implies that miscarriages (fetal deaths early in pregnancy) should also be included; and (4) that birth itself is in fact ethically significant. We conclude that our proposal is ethically preferable to current practice and, if adopted, is likely to lead to improved decisions about health spending.
Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Aborto Espontâneo , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Morte Fetal/prevenção & controle , Saúde Global , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Natimorto , Feminino , Mortalidade Fetal , Saúde Global/normas , Humanos , Lactente , Mortalidade Infantil , Recém-Nascido , Parto , Gravidez , Natimorto/epidemiologiaRESUMO
A primary goal of clinical practice is to respect patient autonomy. To promote this goal for patients who have lost the ability to make their own decisions, commentators recommend that surrogates make their treatment decisions based on the substituted judgment standard. This standard is commonly interpreted as directing surrogates to make the decision the patient would have made in the circumstances, if the patient were competent. However, recent commentators have argued that this approach--attempting to make the decision the patient would have made if competent--is theoretically problematic, practically infeasible, and ignores the interests of the patient's family and loved ones. These commentators conclude that the substituted judgment standard should be revised significantly, or abandoned altogether. While this response would avoid the cited problems, it also would require substantial changes to clinical practice and would raise significant problems of its own. The present paper thus considers the possibility that the criticisms do not point to problems with the substituted judgment standard itself; instead, they point to problems with the way it is most commonly interpreted. This analysis suggests that the substituted judgment standard need not be dramatically revised or abandoned. Instead, it should be interpreted in a way that effectively promotes respect for the autonomy of incompetent patients. The 'endorsed life' interpretation described here helps clinicians and surrogates to achieve this important goal. To clarify this approach, we explain how it differs from three other recently proposed alternatives to the standard interpretation of the substituted judgment standard.