Anaemia to predict outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Owing to the heterogeneous population of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), risk stratification with tools such as the GRACE risk score is recommended to guide therapeutic management and improve outcome. AIM: To evaluate whether anaemia refines the value of the GRACE risk model to predict midterm outcome after an ACS. METHODS: A prospective registry of 1064 ACS patients (63 ± 14 years; 73% men; 57% ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [MI]) was studied. Anaemia was defined as haemoglobin less than 13 mg/dL in men or less than 12 mg/dL in women. The primary endpoint was 6-month death or rehospitalization for MI. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was reached in 132 patients, including 68 deaths. Anaemia was associated with adverse clinical outcomes (hazard ratio 3.008, 95% confidence interval 2.137-4.234; P<0.0001) in univariate analysis and remained independently associated with outcome after adjustment for the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score (hazard ratio 2.870, 95% confidence interval 1.815-4.538; P<0.0001). Anaemia provided additional prognostic information to the GRACE score as demonstrated by a systematic improvement in global model fit and discrimination (c-statistic increasing from 0.633 [0.571;0.696] to 0.697 [0.638;0.755]). Subsequently, adding anaemia to the GRACE score led to reclassification of 595 patients into different risk categories; 16.5% patients at low risk (≤ 5% risk of death or rehospitalization for MI) were upgraded to intermediate (>5-10%) or high risk (>10%); 79.5% patients at intermediate risk were reclassified as low (55%) or high risk (24%); and 45.5% patients at high risk were downgraded to intermediate risk. Overall, 174 patients were reclassified into a higher risk category (17.3%) and 421 into a lower risk category (41.9%). CONCLUSION: Anaemia provides independent additional prognostic information to the GRACE score. Combining anaemia with the GRACE score refines its predictive value, which often overestimates the risk.

Reoperation after the Ross procedure: incidence, management, and survival.

BACKGROUND: The risk of reoperation on the autograft and homograft is the major long-term drawback of the Ross procedure. The incidence and clinical implications of reoperations after the Ross procedure are reported. METHODS: Between March 1992 and February 2010, 336 consecutive patients had a Ross procedure (mean follow-up, 6.2±4.9 years). Autograft implant technique was freestanding root replacement in 269 patients, subcoronary implantation in 52 patients and a modified root replacement with the autograft included in a Valsalva tube graft in 15. RESULTS: Subsequently, 38 patients (11.3%) underwent reoperations, for autograft dilatation in 23 and a significant autograft insufficiency in 9, at 9.6±3.7 years and 2.6±3.9 years, respectively. Aortic and pulmonary infective endocarditis occurred in 3 patients. Three patients underwent a non valve-related cardiac reoperation. Three patients received a transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation after 12.2±1.7 years. At 15 years, freedoms for autograft and homograft explantation (with 95% confidence interval) were 83.3% (77.4%- to 9.2%) and 92.8% (87.6% to 97.9%), respectively. Native aortic valve regurgitation, indexed aortic annulus diameter exceeding 1.35 cm/m2 and autograft diameter were risk factors for dilated autograft reoperation (hazard ratio, 3.23 [95% confidence interval, 1.19 to 8.81], p=0.02; 3.83 [0.9 to 16.33], p=0.07 and 1.2 per mm [1.01 to 1.41], p=0.03), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Autograft dilatation was the leading cause of reoperation in patients who underwent root replacement. Long-term follow-up is mandatory to determine whether modifications of the operative technique could limit autograft dilatation.