Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Africa: a hidden danger.

There is a dearth of data on the burden and spectrum of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in African populations. The limited available information suggests that the prevalence of NAFLD in the general population is lowest for the Africa region. However, this is likely to be an underestimate and also does not take into consideration the long-term impact of rising rates of obesity, type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and high human immunodeficiency virus infection burden in Africa. A racial disparity in the prevalence of NAFLD has been observed in some studies but remains unexplained. There is an absence of data from population-based studies in Africa and this highlights the need for such studies, to reliably define the health service needs for this region. Screening for NAFLD at a population-based level using ultrasound is perhaps the ideal method for resource-poor settings because of its relative cost-effectiveness. What is required as a priority from Africa, are well-designed epidemiologic studies that screen for NAFLD in the general population as well as high-risk groups such as patients with T2DM or obesity.

Burden of Diabetes and First Evidence for the Utility of HbA1c for Diagnosis and Detection of Diabetes in Urban Black South Africans: The Durban Diabetes Study.

OBJECTIVE: Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) is recommended as an additional tool to glucose-based measures (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] and 2-hour plasma glucose [2PG] during oral glucose tolerance test [OGTT]) for the diagnosis of diabetes; however, its use in sub-Saharan African populations is not established. We assessed prevalence estimates and the diagnosis and detection of diabetes based on OGTT, FPG, and HbA1c in an urban black South African population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional survey using multistage cluster sampling of adults aged ≥18 years in Durban (eThekwini municipality), KwaZulu-Natal. All participants had a 75-g OGTT and HbA1c measurements. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the overall diagnostic accuracy of HbA1c, using OGTT as the reference, and to determine optimal HbA1c cut-offs. RESULTS: Among 1190 participants (851 women, 92.6% response rate), the age-standardised prevalence of diabetes was 12.9% based on OGTT, 11.9% based on FPG, and 13.1% based on HbA1c. In participants without a previous history of diabetes (n = 1077), using OGTT as the reference, an HbA1c ≥48 mmol/mol (6.5%) detected diabetes with 70.3% sensitivity (95%CI 52.7-87.8) and 98.7% specificity (95%CI 97.9-99.4) (AUC 0.94 [95%CI 0.89-1.00]). Additional analyses suggested the optimal HbA1c cut-off for detection of diabetes in this population was 42 mmol/mol (6.0%) (sensitivity 89.2% [95%CI 78.6-99.8], specificity 92.0% [95%CI: 90.3-93.7]). CONCLUSIONS: In an urban black South African population, we found a high prevalence of diabetes and provide the first evidence for the utility of HbA1c for the diagnosis and detection of diabetes in black Africans in sub-Saharan Africa.

Cost-effective management of diabetes mellitus.

Diabetes is one of the most common noncommunicable diseases (NCD) globally and a leading cause of death in many countries; the global epidemic of type 2 diabetes will most affect the developing world. The burden of diabetes is related to its chronic complications, both the specific microvascular and the nonspecific macrovascular (atherosclerosis), making diabetes one of the leading causes of death in some countries and an enormous financial burden. The costs of diabetes care, both direct and indirect, are high. Single and multiple risk-factor intervention studies have provided evidence that targeting hyperglycemia and other nonglycemic risk factors reduces the risk of chronic complications; most national guidelines recommend intensified, multitargeted intervention of known modifiable risk factors. The aim in management is optimal control, both glycemic and non-glycemic (blood pressure, lipid and weight control). Management strategies for hyperglycemia include standard methods and individualized options. Given the complexities of the therapeutic choices (classes/agents) and regimens and on the basis of proven benefit, long familiarity, known side-effects, and reduced cost of sulfonylureas, biguanides, and insulin, one should start with standard methods. Despite the evidence for benefit of glycemic control, wide therapeutic choices and regimens and clearer targets for control, glycemic control is far from ideal. The cost-effectiveness of interventions to reduce the burden of diabetes-related complications compares favorably with that of other accepted uses of healthcare resources and provides convincing economic rationale for improving standards of care for patients with type 2 diabetes.