Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35179519

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Intra-articular joint injections have been used with the goal of providing patients with symptomatic relief. Recently, however, the efficacy of corticosteroid (CS) and hyaluronic acid (HA) injections in the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA) is questionable. In this analysis, we investigated the costs associated with injections by assessing overall use, conversion and average time to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and reimbursement. METHODS: Patients aged 50 to 70 years with a knee-related diagnosis of pain, effusion, or OA were identified in the Humana insurance national data set. Patients who received intra-articular injections were stratified by the type and number of injection(s) received. The subsequent rates of TKA were compared with Kaplan-Meier curves for patients who underwent CS injections, HA injections, and a benchmarking cohort of patients with OA and no history of knee injections in the medical record. Average time to TKA was determined from index diagnosis, and total cost was compared using Wilcoxon rank sum analyses. RESULTS: A total of 778,686 patients were identified. Of these, 637,112 had no knee injection history, while 124,129 received CS and 17,445 received HA injections. The 10-year conversion to TKA was highest in HA cohort (31.6%), followed by the CS cohort (24.0%) and the noninjection cohort (7.3%) (P < 0.001). Time to TKA increased with number of injections for both injection types. For patients who underwent TKA, median cost was greater in HA ($16,687) and CS ($15,563) cohorts relative to noninjection cohort ($14,733) (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Compared with the noninjection cohort, both HA and CS cohorts experienced increased costs and increased time to TKA. However, while the cost incurred in HA cohort was greater than that in CS cohort, no appreciable benefit was demonstrated for conversion or time to TKA. Therefore, if intra-articular knee injections are indicated for the nonsurgical management of knee OA, the results of this study support CS over HA.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Osteoartrite do Joelho , Idoso , Humanos , Ácido Hialurônico/uso terapêutico , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoartrite do Joelho/complicações , Osteoartrite do Joelho/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoartrite do Joelho/cirurgia
2.
Clin Spine Surg ; 33(8): E401-E406, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32134746

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study using a national insurance claims database. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between chronic preoperative opioids and the outcomes of revision surgery and nonunion after single-level lumbar fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Opioids are widely utilized for pain management before spine procedures. Studies have associated opioids with unfavorable postoperative outcomes, and animal models have also linked opioid administration with unstable bone healing. METHODS: Single-level lumbar fusion patients were identified. Patients with any fracture history within 1 year before surgery were excluded. A chronic preoperative opioid cohort was defined by opioids prescriptions within 3 months prior and within 4-6 months before surgery. The rates of revision surgery within 6 months and nonunion within 6-24 months after surgery were assessed. Univariate analyses of chronic preoperative opioid prescriptions and various comorbidities for revision and nonunion were conducted followed by multivariate analyses controlling for these factors. Individual analyses were run for each of the 3 single-level lumbar fusion procedures. RESULTS: A total of 8494 single-level lumbar fusion patients were identified. Of the 3929 (46.3%) patients filled criteria for the chronic preoperative opioid cohort, while 3250 (38.3%) patients had no opioid prescriptions within 6 months before surgery. The opioid cohort experienced significantly higher rates of both revisions (3.92% vs. 2.71%, P=0.005) and nonunion (3.84% vs. 2.89%, P=0.027) relative to the opioid-naive cohort. In the multivariate analyses, chronic preoperative opioids were identified as an independent risk factor for revision (odds ratio: 1.453, P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: We report that chronic opioid prescriptions before lumbar fusion may increase the risk of revision. Although these prescriptions were also associated with increased nonunion, the comparisons did not achieve statistical significance in the multivariate model. Chronic preoperative opioid use may be considered a potential risk factor in arthrodesis populations.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Dor Lombar/prevenção & controle , Vértebras Lombares , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Reoperação , Fusão Vertebral , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória , Período Pré-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA