Efficacy Assessment of Radiofrequency Ablation as a Palliative Pain Treatment in Patients with Painful Metastatic Spinal Lesions: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic spinal lesions are difficult-to-treat entities that are most commonly associated with pain and severely reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Within the last 5 to 10 years, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as an option in the palliative treatment of vertebral metastases. OBJECTIVES: Our review aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of RFA, mostly in combination with vertebroplasty, in patients with painful vertebral metastases. STUDY DESIGN: The design of this study is a systematic review. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search and a manual search of 5 databases in December 2016. The review applied a methodological framework based on the HTA Core Model®. Data on each selected outcome category were synthesized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) scheme. Risk of bias was assessed using the Institute of Health Economics (IHE) Risk of Bias checklist for case series. RESULTS: We identified 299 citations. After applying the inclusion criteria, a total of 9 studies (4 prospective and 5 retrospective studies) were determined to be eligible. These studies included a total of 583 patients with vertebral metastases who were treated with RFA and, in most cases, received an additional vertebroplasty treatment (n = 437). The studies were categorized as having a moderate to high risk of bias. The strength of evidence was found to be "very low" for safety outcomes and could not be assessed for efficacy outcomes. Current evidence suggests that RFA leads to significant pain reduction. Furthermore, no major complications occurred when using RFA. LIMITATIONS: A major concern is the low number of included patients and heterogeneity of study characteristics in most of the studies. The low number of patients also impeded comparison of the effectiveness of RFA alone to RFA in combination with vertebroplasty. CONCLUSION: According to the available evidence, RFA may be safe and effective, especially for patients with painful vertebral metastases who show contraindications or unresponsiveness to conventional therapies (e.g., radiation) or for those who are at risk of tumor progression. KEY WORDS: Radiofrequency ablation, vertebral metastases, metastatic spinal lesions, pain, clinical effectiveness, safety, palliative pain treatment.

[Practical experience with overviews of reviews--valuable decision aid or academic exercise?]. / Praxiserfahrungen mit Overviews of Reviews--wertvolle Entscheidungsunterstützung oder wissenschaftliche Fingerübung?

The "overview of reviews" has evolved as a method to aggregate information from systematic reviews. Based on research projects conducted by two Austrian institutions, this article aims to point out methods and perceived strengths and limitations of overviews of reviews and to discuss their application and constraints for different healthcare settings. The six analysed projects differed in their objectives as well as in the corresponding methodology. We identified the following strengths of the overviews of reviews performed: the overview of the evidence base on an issue, the rapid detection of the results of numerous reviews, the demonstration of evidence gaps and potential savings in time and resources. At the same time, the methodology could lead to a loss of information, limited relevance and to uncertainties regarding the robustness of the overall results. However, the heterogeneity of the methods used shows that the development of methods for overviews of reviews is still ongoing. Whether overviews of reviews provide valuable decision support depends on the research question and realistic expectations towards the method.

Affordability of programmes to prevent spontaneous preterm birth in Austria: a budget impact analysis.

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is a rising health problem in Europe generally, and in Austria specifically. Decision makers require objective information on the effects and costs of measures to prevent preterm birth. METHODS: We undertook a budget impact analysis from a public payer perspective and for a 1-year and 5-year time horizon for five prevention approaches to reduce preterm birth. These were cervix screening + progesterone application, progesterone injection, smoking cessation, fish oil supplementation and infection screening. We analysed affordability in terms of programme costs and potential cost savings. RESULTS: Programme costs range from below €50 000 (cervix screening in high-risk pregnancy) to €500 000 (universal infection screening). The lowest health effects have been shown for smoking cessation programmes (-10 preterm births per year), whereas infection screening demonstrated the largest effect (-230 preterm births per year). In the base-case analysis, all programmes are potentially cost saving (-€500 000 to -€13 million per year). In the sensitivity analyses, preterm birth costs, target group size and (partly) unit costs of programme components have an influence on potential cost savings. However, except for two programmes, the results are robust concerning an overall economic net benefit of the programmes analysed compared with no programme. The study is mainly limited by the quality of some cost data and choice of the reference scenario. CONCLUSION: When considering potential cost savings, the five prevention programmes analysed seem affordable, with cervix screening and infection screening likely being the most promising in Austria.

[Types of medical registries - definitions, methodological aspects and quality of the scientific work with registries]. / Formen medizinischer Register - Definitionen, ausgewählte methodische Aspekte und Qualität der Forschung mit Registern.

This work presents a comprehensive list of registry definitions including broader and narrower definitions. Compared to each other different methodological issues can be identified. Some of these issues are common for all registry types; some can be assigned more easily to a specific registry type. Instruments for evaluating the quality of registers reflect many of the mentioned aspects. Generally, and especially at registers with a descriptive or exploratory research dimension it is important to consider their intended purpose and in about it was achieved. This includes, for instance, whether the purpose and the methodology are coordinated. From the start of registration an initiator should be - based on the purpose - aware of the methodological dimension of the registry. This helps to apply the correct type of the registry, the appropriate guidance and, ultimately, the arguments for the effort (cost-benefit ratio).