Cost and efficacy comparison of five prostate biopsy modalities: a platform for integrating cost into novel-platform comparative research.

BACKGROUND: The cornerstone of prostate cancer diagnosis remains the transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-BX), which most frequently occurs in the office setting under local anesthesia. However, there are now other techniques of prostate biopsy aimed at improving outcomes such as patient comfort, significant cancer detection, and infectious complications. The purpose of the present study is to compare the cost and efficacy outcomes of five different approaches. METHODS: We compared the comprehensive costs of a random sample size of 20-30 cases from each of the following: (1) local anesthesia TRUS-BX (reference), (2) sedation TRUS-BX, (3) general anesthesia transperineal template biopsy (TP), (4) sedation MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy (FB), and (5) sedation in-bore MRI biopsy (IB-MRI). Cost categories included pre-procedure, anesthesia pharmacy and recovery, and the technical/professional costs from urology, radiology, and pathology services. For procedure outcomes, we compared the larger cohorts of TRUS-BX, TP, and FB in terms of indication, cancer yield, and downstream decision impact. RESULTS: Compared with standard TRUS-BX, the total costs of sedation TRUS-BX, TP, FB, and IB-MRI increased significantly ×1.9 (90%), ×2.5 (153%), ×2.5 (150%), and ×2.2 (125%), respectively (p < 0.001). Although there was no statistical difference between the total costs of TP, FB, and IB-MRI, these costs were significantly higher than those of TRUS-BX under either local anesthesia or sedation (p < 0.05). The cost of TRUS-BX under sedation was significantly higher than that of TRUS-BX under local anesthesia (p < 0.001). Compared to TRUS-BX, more significant cancers were detected in FB (16% vs. 36%) and TP (16% vs. 34%) groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with standard TRUS-BX, the additions of imaging, sedation anesthesia, and transperineal template increase costs significantly, and can be considered along with known improvements in accuracy and side effects. Ongoing efforts to combine imaging and transperineal biopsy, especially in an outpatient/local anesthesia setting may lead to a higher cost/benefit.

Comprehensive assessment of quality of life and psychosocial adjustment in patients with renal tumors undergoing open, laparoscopic and nephron sparing surgery.

PURPOSE: We prospectively evaluated the general and cancer specific quality of life, and psychosocial adjustment of patients with a renal mass treated with radical vs partial nephrectomy via a laparoscopic or an open approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 172 patients with renal tumors completed questionnaires before surgery, and 3 weeks, and 2, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. We assessed general quality of life using SF-36™ and cancer specific quality of life using the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System-Short Form, in addition to intrusive thoughts, avoidance behaviors and fear of recurrence. We used mixed model regression analysis to compare these measures across surgery types during the study course, adjusted for tumor size, histology, stage and renal function. RESULTS: The SF-36 physical component score differed significantly by surgery type with time (p = 0.04). Patients treated with laparoscopy improved by month 2 while those treated with open surgery had poorer quality of life until month 3. Better cancer specific quality of life was reported in patients who underwent radical vs partial nephrectomy. Age also had a significant effect on outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We report one of the most comprehensive patient reported prospective quality of life studies in patients with renal cell carcinoma. There were significant differences in quality of life and psychosocial adjustment outcomes during 1 year among patients treated with 1 of 4 commonly accepted surgical renal procedures. These outcomes must be evaluated in the context of tumor characteristics, cancer specific outcomes and renal function. These quality of life issues may be important to consider when choosing surgical procedures for patients with renal tumors.

A simplified protocol for evaluating and monitoring urethral stricture patients minimizes cost without compromising patient outcome.

Uroflowmetry, urethrocystoscopy and urethrography are either not readily available or the cost is prohibitive for many patients in low-resource countries. This paper examines the use of clinical history in post-urethroplasty follow-up. We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 54 post-urethroplasty patients. Preoperative diagnostic work-up included simple blood tests and a retrograde urethrography, and postoperatively we did not perform any immediate diagnostic work-up. Follow-up of these patients was done through mobile phone calls and personal contacts. Eighty-nine per cent of our patients reported acceptable voiding over a mean follow-up period of 48.4 months - 79.6% were followed using mobile phone contact. In the majority of the urethral strictures cases, diagnostic work up can be kept to a minimum, thereby reducing cost. Follow-up can be done via phone calls and personal contact in many African countries where compliance is frequently less than encouraging. The spread of mobile phone networks across the continent has been remarkable.

Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of a convective therapy delivery paradigm in a canine prostate model.

PURPOSE: To quantitatively investigate the feasibility of MRI as a tool for assessing the spatial distribution of a convectively delivered agent using a canine prostate model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Canine prostates (ex vivo, n = 3; in vivo, n = 12) were injected under several injection paradigms with a solution of gadolinium-DTPA for MR contrast and methylene blue as a grossly visible surrogate drug marker. Ex vivo and in vivo distributions were assessed at 1.5T and quantitatively compared. RESULTS: Measured distributions using MRI and methylene blue pathology photographs were analyzed using a Bland-Altman method. The fractional percentage volume covered (V frac) compared the measurements grossly: Pearson's correlation coefficients were R = 0.99 for ex vivo and R = 0.77 for in vivo (P < 0.05). The fractional percentage of area covered (A frac) demonstrated the high degree of spatial correlation between individual slices: R = 0.93 for ex vivo and R = 0.98 for in vivo (P < 0.05). There was no statistically observable bias in scale or offset between the measurements. CONCLUSION: Measured distributions using MRI and pathology were highly correlated and unbiased, indicating the potential of MRI as a tool for quantitative assessment of interstitial delivery of injected therapies in vivo.

An assessment of quality of life following radical prostatectomy, high dose external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy iodine implantation as monotherapies for localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Monotherapy with radical prostatectomy, high dose external beam radiotherapy or a (125)I implant is reported to produce equivalent outcomes. We assessed the health related quality of life associated with these 3 treatment approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Extended Prostate Index Composite surveys were mailed to all 960 patients treated with a (125)I implant, high dose external beam radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy with or without hormonal therapy at our institution from 1998 to 2000. A total of 625 patients (65%) completed the surveys. Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy was performed when appropriate. The (125)I implant consisted of 145 Gy and high dose external beam radiotherapy consisted of 78 Gy. For urinary, rectal and sexual domains mean scores were calculated, compared by treatment modality and compared to normative values. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients with radical prostatectomy, 135 with external beam radiotherapy and 74 with a (125)I implant were treated with a monotherapy approach. Median age was 61 years in the radical prostatectomy group, 68 years in the high dose external beam radiotherapy group and 64 years in the (125)I implant group (p <0.001). Of the patients 97% [corrected] had cT1-2 disease and Gleason score 7 or less [corrected] Median time from treatment was 4.0 years for radical prostatectomy, 4.7 years for high dose external beam radiotherapy and 3.5 years for (125)I implantation. Radiation caused significantly worse bowel bother and bowel function than radical prostatectomy (p < or =0.018). Patients with high dose external beam radiotherapy had significantly better urinary function than patients with radical prostatectomy (p <0.001). While patients with radical prostatectomy had significantly worse urinary incontinence than those with a (125)I implant or high dose external beam radiotherapy (p <0.0001), patients with a (125)I implant had more urinary irritation than those with high dose external beam radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy (p <0.01 and <0.0001, respectively). Patients with a (125)I implant had significantly better sexual function than those with high dose external beam radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy (p = 0.01 and 0.0003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Of patients with prostate cancer treated with a monotherapy approach we noted better urinary continence in those who underwent radiation based therapies, and better bowel function and less urinary irritation in those who underwent surgery. Sexual function was impaired across all monotherapies but higher scores were seen in men who selected brachytherapy.

Impact of fellowship training on pathologic outcomes and complication rates of radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to assess the results of radical prostatectomy (RP) performed by fellowship-trained surgeons in the first year of independent practice. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of 66 men who underwent RP performed by 2 recently graduated fellowship-trained surgeons (C.J.R., n = 27; A.M.K., n = 39) in their first year of independent practice was undertaken. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were collected and analyzed. Median follow-up of the cohort is 12.5 months. RESULTS: The median patient age was 61.2 +/- 6.9 years (range, 44-74 years), the median prostate-specific antigen level was 5 ng/mL (range, 1.2-39.4 ng/mL), and the median prostate biopsy-determined Gleason score was 7. Of the 66 men, 25 (38%) underwent a bilateral nerve-sparing RP, 20 (30%) underwent a unilateral nerve-sparing RP, and 21 (32%) underwent a nonnerve-sparing procedure. Forty-two men (63%) underwent a pelvic lymph node dissection. The median operative time was 201 minutes. Median estimated blood loss was 734 mL (range, 300-1600 mL). There were 4 major complications--a pulmonary embolism in 3 patients and an intraoperative rectal injury in 1. Pathologic classification was as follows: pT2, 74%; pT3a, 23%; pT3b, 2%; and pN+, 2%. The positive margin rate was 14% overall and only 2% in men with pT2 disease. CONCLUSIONS: Results of RP performed by fellowship-trained surgeons in their first year of practice compare favorably with results of RP in a large series reported by more experienced surgeons. Being trained in an environment where an experienced surgeon serves as first assistant to the trainee appears to abbreviate the learning curve associated with this procedure.