Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions for Musculoskeletal Foot and Ankle Conditions: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Musculoskeletal conditions of the foot and ankle are common, yet the cost-effectiveness of the variety of treatments available is not well defined. The aim of this systematic review was therefore to identify, appraise, and synthesize the literature pertaining to the cost-effectiveness of interventions for musculoskeletal foot and ankle conditions. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for studies presenting economic evaluations of nonsurgical and surgical treatments for acute or chronic musculoskeletal conditions of the foot and ankle. Data on cost, incremental cost-effectiveness, and quality-adjusted life years for each intervention and comparison were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Drummond checklist for economic studies (range 0-35). RESULTS: Thirty-six studies were identified reporting nonsurgical interventions (n = 10), nonsurgical versus surgical interventions (n = 14), and surgical interventions (n = 12). The most common conditions were osteoarthritis, ankle fracture, and Achilles tendon rupture. The strongest economic evaluations were for interventions managing end-stage ankle osteoarthritis, ankle sprain, ankle fracture, calcaneal fracture, and Achilles tendon rupture. Total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis, in particular, have been demonstrated through high-quality studies to be cost-effective compared to the nonsurgical alternative. CONCLUSION: Selected interventions for musculoskeletal foot and ankle conditions dominate comparators, whereas others require thoughtful consideration as they provide better clinical improvements, but at an increased cost. Researchers should consider measuring and reporting costs alongside clinical outcome to provide context when determining the appropriateness of interventions for other foot and ankle symptoms to best inform future clinical practice guidelines.

Improving the Consent Process in Foot and Ankle Surgery With the Use of Personalized Patient Literature.

A patient-specific letter was introduced to the consent process to observe the effect, if any, on information recall and satisfaction for patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery. The patients attending the clinic were written a personalized letter-this was a simple personalized letter that outlined their treatment options, the proposed management plan, likely treatment course, and the benefits, risks, and likely period required for recovery. The personalized letter system was compared with the 2 existing methods of consent process: signing for consent at their outpatient encounter at which they were scheduled for surgery and a separate consent clinic without the personalized letter. A total of 111 patients (87 females, 24 males) undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery were assessed on the day of surgery for recall of the procedure, risks, postoperative course, and satisfaction with the consent process. Patients receiving a personalized letter recalled more than those who had attended a routine preoperative consent clinic visit and significantly more than those who had provided consent at their last clinic visit. Patient satisfaction with the consent process was also greater in the personalized group. Our results suggest that the consent process is improved using routine preoperative consent clinics and, most notably, with patient-specific information to improve patient recall and satisfaction.