Preoperative frailty assessment in patients undergoing gynecologic oncology surgery: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present article was to discuss currently available evidence on the impact of frailty assessment on adverse postoperative outcomes and survival in patients undergoing surgery for gynecological cancer. METHODS: Systematic search of Medline (PubMed) and Embase databases until September 30, 2020. Key inclusion criteria were: (1) randomized or observational studies; (2) patients undergoing non-emergent surgery for gynecological malignancies; (3) preoperative frailty assessment. RESULTS: Through the process of evidence acquisition, twelve studies including 85,672 patients were selected and six tools were evaluable: 30-item frailty index, 40-item frailty index, modified frailty index (mFI), John Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups index, Fried frailty criteria, Driver's tool. The prevalence of frailty varied roughly from 6.1% to 60% across different series included. The mFI was the most adopted and predictive instrument. Pooled results underlined that frail patients were more likely to develop 30-day postoperative complications (OR:4.16; 95%CI 1.49-11.65; p:0.007), non-home discharge (OR:4.41; 95%CI: 4.09-4.76; p < 0.001), ICU admission (OR:3.99;3.76-4.24; p < 0.001) than the non-frail counterpart. Additionally, frail patients experienced worse oncologic outcomes (disease-free and overall survivals) than non-frail patients. CONCLUSION: The present systematic review demonstrated that preoperative frailty assessment among gynecologic oncology patients is essential to predict adverse outcomes and tailor a personalized treatment. The mFI appeared as the most used and feasible tool in daily practice, suggesting that tailored therapeutic strategies should be considered for patients with 3 or more frailty-defining items.

Management of morbidity associated with pancreatic resection during cytoreductive surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: In ovarian cancer (OC), survival benefit in case of complete cytoreduction with absence of residual tumor has been clearly demonstrated; however, it often requires extensive surgery. Particularly, pancreatic resection during cytoreduction, may severely impact perioperative morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate complication rates and related optimal management of ovarian cancer patients undergoing pancreatic resection as part of cytoreductive surgery. METHODS: Literature was searched for relevant records reporting distal pancreatectomy for advanced ovarian cancer. All cohorts were rated for quality. We focused our analysis on complications related to pancreatic surgical procedures evaluating the following outcomes: pancreatic fistula (PF), abdominal abscess, pancreatitis, iatrogenic diabetes, hemorrhage from splenic vessels and pancreatic-surgery-related mortality. RESULTS: The most frequent complication reported was PF. Similar rates of PF were reported after hand-sewn (20%) or stapled closure (24%). Continued drainage is the standard treatment, and often, the leak can be managed conservatively and does not require re-intervention. Abdominal abscess is the second most frequent complication and generally follows a non-adequately drained PF and often required re-laparotomy. Pancreatitis is a rare event that could be treated conservatively; however, death can occur in case of necrotic evolution. Cases of post-operative hemorrhage due to splenic vessel bleeding have been described and represent an emergency. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of pancreatic surgery and management of possible complications ought to be present in the oncologic-gynecologic armamentarium. All patients should be referred to specialized, dedicated, tertiary centers in order to reduce, promptly recognize and optimally manage complications.

Assessment of Quality of Life and Urinary and Sexual Function After Radical Hysterectomy in Long-Term Cervical Cancer Survivors.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term quality of life and urinary and sexual function in long-term cervical cancer survivors previously treated with radical hysterectomy (RH) type C2/type III. METHODS: All patients who presented at Campus Bio-Medico of Rome for RH type C2/type III for cervical cancer were considered eligible for this retrospective study protocol. We included exclusively patients with complete response to primary treatment with at least 36 months of follow up. Included subjects were interviewed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-CX24 Questionnaire, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30, and an Incontinence Impact Questionnaire 7. RESULTS: From January 2004 to June 2014, 251 patients affected by locally advanced cervical cancer were treated at Campus Bio-Medico of Rome treated with type C2/type III RH. At time point of March 2017, 90 patients were included with a mean age of 55.6 ± 8.5 years. The questionnaires were administered after a median follow-up of 49 months after the end of therapy. The symptoms of fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, pain, insomnia, and dyspnea, as well as a negative financial impact, were reported as not frequent and rarely disabling. On the contrary, patients frequently reported gastrointestinal complaints. Diarrhea was present in 6% of patients and was referred as mild; constipation was present in 75% of women and was reported as mild in 30% of cases, moderate in 30%, and severe in 15%. Concerning sexual activity, data indicated a good level of sexual enjoyment with a slight worsening of sexual activity. Incontinence was reported in 28% of cases and appeared to be mild and rarely disabling (all mean values <2). CONCLUSIONS: Waiting for ongoing randomized controlled trials, this study confirmed that RH may be considered as a useful treatment plan, according to its negligible long-term impact on quality of life, urinary dysfunction, and sexual function.

Economic Impact Among Family Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The life of a family caregiver changes in many ways when cancer is diagnosed. Changes regard also financial costs. To the authors' knowledge, little work has been done to estimate the costs associated with caregiving for cancer patients. The aim of the present study is to evaluate for the first time in literature the economic changes among family caregivers of advanced ovarian cancer during the first-line treatment in an Italian survey. METHODS: Between January 2009 and June 2014, the primary family caregivers of patients with advanced ovarian cancer (N = 172) were recruited from to the Division of Gynecologic Oncology of the University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome within 4 weeks of the patient's new diagnosis. Caregivers reported demographic, medical information, and economic cost, such as traveling to and from medical appointments, waiting with patients for appointments, missing work, and attending to patients who are hospitalized. RESULTS: Between January 2009 and June 2014, 172 primary family caregivers of patients with advanced ovarian cancer were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the study cohort was 54.01 years. They reported 3% of missing workdays. The mean cost for all caregivers was &OV0556;1,888,732 per year. Therefore, the mean cost for each caregiver was &OV0556;10,981 annually. CONCLUSIONS: This economic analysis of caregiving in patients with advanced ovarian cancer reports the significant burden that cancer treatment places on both families and society. These findings underscore the importance, when appropriate, of including valid estimates of the cost of informal caregiving when evaluating the cost-effectiveness of cancer treatments.