Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Doc Ophthalmol ; 145(3): 197-209, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36287318

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Neurotoxicity, including optic nerve injury, is one of the most common adverse effects of tacrolimus, the principal calcineurin inhibitor used after kidney transplantation (KTx). The electrophysiologic measurements of both pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEP) and flash visual evoked potentials (FVEP) are valuable when drug-induced optic neuropathy is suspected. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether VEP measurement is a sensitive and repeatable method for monitoring tacrolimus neurotoxicity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study focused on 35 patients (20 M, 15F, 69 eyes, mean age 43 ± 11 years) who were at a median of 3.0 (IQR, 2.2-3.7) months after KTx at the time of the initial VEP evaluation and were treated with tacrolimus since KTx. The follow-up VEP examination was done after a median of 24 (22-27) months (both VEP measurements followed the ISCEV standards). The P100 wave latency and amplitude for the 1° and 15' PVEP simulations, and the P2 wave latency and amplitude for the FVEP were analyzed. RESULTS: For the 1° checks, the P100 wave latency and amplitude values were significantly worse in the follow-up examination compared to the early post-transplant time-point. Independent associations between FVEP parameters and the tacrolimus blood trough level were observed in the follow-up examination but not at the early post-transplant period. The P2 wave latency correlated with the tacrolimus trough level only in patients treated with the twice-daily, but not the once-daily, tacrolimus formulation. The brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) level correlated with the P100 (15') latency (R = 0.499; p = 0.005) and the P2 latency (R = 0.409; p = 0.025) only in patients treated with the once-daily, but not the twice-daily, tacrolimus formulation. CONCLUSION: The observations in this study may support the rationale for the use of VEP measurements as non-invasive monitoring of subclinical tacrolimus neurotoxicity.


Assuntos
Potenciais Evocados Visuais , Transplante de Rim , Humanos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Tacrolimo/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Eletrorretinografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA