RESUMO
PURPOSE: To examine the outcome of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for drug-resistant epilepsy using data from a National Health Service VNS clinic. METHODS: Clinical records of patients implanted with VNS for epilepsy between1995 and 2010 were examined. Patients were selected for study who had at least one year of therapeutic stimulation (minimum 1 mA stimulator current) and follow-up by our service with analysable electronic records, providing continuous assessment of seizure control during available follow-up. Seizure status at each attendance was assessed and graded 1-4 (1=seizure free or <5 seizures/year; 2 =≥50%reduction in seizure frequency; 3=<50% reduction; 4=no improvement compared to baseline). Responders were those whose grades improved consistently (Grades 1,2 and 3). RESULTS: Of 464 patients, 171 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were divided into three groups: a) Responders (n = 81); b) non-responders (n = 80) and c) others (n = 10), the latter showing a late step-wise change (six improved; four deteriorated). After initial ramping up of current, groups were very stable over subsequent periods varying from one to 12 years (median 3.8 years). Sixteen patients died, 10 of non-epilepsy causes with 6 epilepsy-related deaths. There was a significant relation between epilepsy-related deaths and response (p < 0.00001). Patients with longer time as non-responders had more likelihood of suffering an epilepsy death than responders, though numbers were small. CONCLUSION: This study shows that meaningful data can be obtained retrospectively from routine clinic records. In this cohort about half of patients treated with VNS responded and the response generally remaining stable over time.
Assuntos
Epilepsia , Estimulação do Nervo Vago , Epilepsia/terapia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medicina Estatal , Resultado do Tratamento , Nervo VagoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the localising and lateralising value of delayed rhythmic ictal transformation (DRIT) on the scalp EEG during presurgical assessment for temporal lobe epilepsy. METHODS: Two hundred and eighty eight seizures recorded simultaneously with scalp and foramen ovale (FO) electrodes were studied retrospectively in 110 patients. DRIT was defined as sustained regular rhythmic waveforms seen on scalp recordings after scalp seizure onset. The incidence and laterality of scalp DRIT was evaluated by comparison to FO electrodes. RESULTS: Scalp DRIT was seen in 192 seizures, 65% of which showed focal mesial temporal onset (FMTO) recorded by FO electrodes. FMTO onset was seen in 73% of the 122 seizures showing unilateral scalp DRIT, in 32% of the 62 seizures showing bilateral asymmetrical scalp DRIT, and in 14% of the seven seizures showing bilateral symmetrical DRIT on the scalp. Among the 89 seizures showing unilateral scalp DRIT and FMTO, both were ipsilateral in 70 seizures (79%). Among the 38 seizures showing bilateral asymmetrical DRIT and FMTO, the largest amplitude of scalp DRIT was ipsilateral to the FO onset in 27 seizures (71%). CONCLUSION: Two thirds of seizures showed unilateral scalp DRIT, which had a lateralising value of up to 79%. SIGNIFICANCE: Scalp DRIT is a reliable marker to lateralise seizure focus in patients without a focal seizure onset on the scalp EEG.
Assuntos
Eletroencefalografia/métodos , Epilepsia do Lobo Temporal/fisiopatologia , Forame Oval/fisiologia , Lateralidade Funcional/fisiologia , Periodicidade , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Couro Cabeludo/fisiologia , Biomarcadores , Eletrodos , Humanos , Incidência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after implantation of electrodes in the subthalamic nuclei is currently performed at a number of sites, but a recent adverse incident and changes in MRI technology may heighten safety concerns. In this report, it is demonstrated that given whole-head image data, registration of postimplantation computed tomography to preimplantation MRI can enable verification of the position of electrodes to an accuracy of 2 mm. This registration technique can remove the need for potentially risky postoperative MRI.
Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/instrumentação , Eletrodos Implantados , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Núcleo Subtalâmico/cirurgia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Feminino , Temperatura Alta/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , SegurançaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To estimate the value of neuropsychological measurements in determining the side of seizure onset for presurgical assessment in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. The lateralising value of neuropsychological protocols was evaluated for all patients and in subpopulations depending on surgical outcome with regard to seizure control, speech dominance, neuropathology, and need for intracranial EEG recordings. METHODS: A battery of neuropsychological procedures was carried out preoperatively in 125 patients who underwent left (n = 66) or right (n = 59) temporal lobectomies. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to find sets of variables that allowed the best prediction of the side of seizure onset (assumed to be the operated-on side). RESULTS: Combinations of noninvasive neuropsychological tests and Wada subscores showed the highest lateralising values: 80.8% for all patients, 79.4% in seizure-free patients, 86.0% in patients not rendered seizure free, 85.7% in left speech patients, 77.8% in non-left speech patients, 89.3% in patients with mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS), 78.1% in non-MTS patients, 80.3% in patients who underwent intracranial EEG recordings, and 77.3% in those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: The lateralising value (80-90%) of neuropsychological protocols appears similar to that of other tests widely accepted for lateralisation (ictal and interictal scalp EEG and neuroimaging). Attention should be paid to neuropsychological results, particularly from the Wada test, during presurgical assessment of temporal lobe epilepsy, as they can provide strong support for findings from other lateralising tests, particularly in patients with presumed MTS or in left-speech patients.