Assessment of tricuspid annulus: anatomic and echocardiographic correlation.

Tricuspid regurgitation is associated with a poor outcome and its quantification remains a challenge. Tricuspid annulus dilatation is one of the parameters that influences clinical decision-making. The aim of this study was to compare the use of 2D transoesophageal echocardiography with surgical assessment for the measurement of the tricuspid annulus. Sixty-one cardiac patients (median age 64 years) were included in the study. Echocardiographic tricuspid annulus measurements were obtained from four chamber and transgastric short axis views and compared with the surgical measurements of this valve. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our institution. The tricuspid annulus measurements were obtained from the four chamber and the short axis views in 57 and 49 patients, respectively, while surgical measurement was performed in all 61 patients. Bland-Altman analysis of 49 tricuspid annulus-matched dimensions of the short axis view and surgical values showed a mean bias of 0.223 mm/m2, with limits of agreement of -5.86 to 6.31 mm/m2. Echocardiographic measurements of the tricuspid annulus dimension were accurate (90% sensitivity and 90% specificity for a four chamber view cut-off value ≥ 24.5 mm/m2, and 89% sensitivity and 97% specificity for a short axis view cut-off value ≥ 37.6 mm/m2, P < 0.0001; both cases) for detecting directly assessed annular dilatation by the surgeon in the operative field. Echocardiographic values of tricuspid annulus dimension have a good predictive value to detect surgically assessed annular dilatation and may help identify patients who require surgical tricuspid intervention.

Elective or emergency heart transplantation: Cost comparison in a single center.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Heart transplantation (HT) is the treatment of choice for selected cases of advanced heart failure. There is an increasing rate of emergency HT in our country. The aim of this study was to determine the cost of HT in our hospital according to emergent vs. elective transplantation status. METHODS: The costs of all consecutive HTs performed in our center between January 2010 and May 2015 were analyzed. The cost of elective and emergent HT was compared. RESULTS: HT mean cost at our institution was €62 203 ± 47 976. Elective HT mean cost was €47 540 ± 25 140, whereas emergent HT cost was €102 733 ± 68 050 (emergency status 1, as regional priority, was €66 077 ± 28 067 and emergency status 0, as the highest national priority, was €136 056 ± 77 080; P < 0.001). Increased emergent HT cost was mainly related to a longer admission (32 ± 24 days vs. 69 ± 53 days; P = 0.006; accounting for a cost of €14 517 ± 12 475 vs. €37 846 ± 31 702; P < 0.001) and increased drug-related expenses (€6622 ± 7465 vs. €15,171 ± 15,758; P < 0.02). Elective HT survival rate was 96%, compared to 68% for emergent HT; P = 0.002. CONCLUSIONS: Elective HT showed a high survival rate with a relatively low and less variable cost, leading to a favorable economic balance in today's public health reimbursement system. In contrast, emergent HT showed a higher cost and a lower survival rate. New treatment strategies should be identified for heart failure patients at risk of requiring emergency HT.