Patient and Provider Risk in Managing ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Decision Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy for treating ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is unclear given the potential risk of occupational exposure during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). We quantified the impact of different STEMI treatment strategies on patient outcomes and provider risk in context of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Using a decision-analytic framework, we evaluated the effect of PPCI versus the pharmaco-invasive strategy for managing STEMI on 30-day patient mortality and individual provider infection risk based on presence of cardiogenic shock, suspected coronary territory, and presence of known or presumptive COVID-19 infection. RESULTS: For patients with low suspicion for COVID-19, PPCI had mortality benefit over the pharmaco-invasive strategy, and the risk of cardiac catheterization laboratory provider infection remained very low (<0.25%) across all subgroups. For patients with presumptive COVID-19 with cardiogenic shock, PPCI offered substantial mortality benefit to patients relative to the pharmaco-invasive strategy (7.9% absolute decrease in 30-day mortality), but also greater risk of provider infection (2.3% absolute increase in risk of provider infection). For patients with presumptive COVID-19 with nonanterior STEMI without cardiogenic shock, PPCI offered a 0.4% absolute mortality benefit over the pharmaco-invasive strategy with a 0.2% greater absolute risk of provider infection, and the tradeoff between patient and provider risk with PPCI became more apparent in sensitivity analysis with more severe COVID-19 infections. CONCLUSIONS: Usual care with PPCI remains the appropriate treatment strategy in the majority of cases presenting with STEMI in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, utilization of a pharmaco-invasive strategy in selected patients with STEMI with presumptive COVID-19 and low likelihood of mortality from STEMI and use of preventive strategies such as preprocedural intubation in high risk patients when PPCI is the preferred strategy may be reasonable to reduce provider risk of COVID-19 infection.

Reporting trends and outcomes in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction national hospital quality assessment programs.

BACKGROUND: For patients who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, the door-to-balloon time is an important performance measure reported to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and tied to hospital quality assessment and reimbursement. We sought to assess the use and impact of exclusion criteria associated with the CMS measure of door-to-balloon time in primary PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: All primary PCI-eligible patients at 3 Massachusetts hospitals (Brigham and Women's, Massachusetts General, and North Shore Medical Center) were evaluated for CMS reporting status. Rates of CMS reporting exclusion were the primary end points of interest. Key secondary end points were between-group differences in patient characteristics, door-to-balloon times, and 1-year mortality rates. From 2005 to 2011, 26% (408) of the 1548 primary PCI cases were excluded from CMS reporting. This percentage increased over the study period from 13.9% in 2005 to 36.7% in the first 3 quarters of 2011 (P<0.001). The most frequent cause of exclusion was for a diagnostic dilemma such as a nondiagnostic initial ECG, accounting for 31.2% of excluded patients. Although 95% of CMS-reported cases met door-to-balloon time goals in 2011, this was true of only 61% of CMS-excluded cases and consequently 82.6% of all primary PCI cases performed that year. The 1-year mortality for CMS-excluded patients was double that of CMS-included patients (13.5% versus 6.6%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: More than a quarter of patients who underwent primary PCI were excluded from hospital quality reports collected by CMS, and this percentage has grown substantially over time. These findings may have significant implications for our understanding of process improvement in primary PCI and mechanisms for reimbursement through Medicare.

Assessment of nonstenotic coronary lesions by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography in comparison to intravascular ultrasound: evaluation of nonculprit coronary lesions.

BACKGROUND: Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has recently emerged as a potential noninvasive alternative for high-resolution imaging of coronary arteries. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we evaluated 64-slice MDCT for detection, quantification, and characterization of atherosclerotic plaque burden in nonculprit lesions. METHODS: Data from 11 patients who underwent both MDCT and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for suspected coronary artery disease were collected, and a total of 17 coronary segments and 122 cross-sectional slices were analyzed by MDCT and IVUS. Coronary segments on MDCT were coregistered to IVUS, and each obtained slice was scored by 2 blinded observers for presence and type of plaque. Quantitative measurements included cross-sectional vessel area, lumen area, wall area, plaque volume, and plaque burden. Mean and standard deviation of Hounsfield units (HUs) were recorded for plaque when present. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity for plaque detection was 95.0%, and specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value were 88.7%, 89.1%, and 94.8%, respectively. Spearman's correlation coefficients were 0.85, 0.75, 0.70, 0.89, and 0.54 for cross-sectional vessel area, lumen area, wall area, plaque volume, and plaque burden, respectively. The interobserver variability for plaque burden and plaque volume measurements between readers on 64-MDCT was high at 32.7% and 30.4%, respectively. Combined noncalcified plaque had a mean MDCT density significantly different from that of calcified plaque. Soft and fibrous plaques were not able to be distinguished based on their HU values. CONCLUSION: Sixty-four-slice MDCT had good correlation with IVUS but with high interobserver variability. Plaque characterization remains a challenge with present MDCT technology.

Accuracy of 16-slice multi-detector CT to quantify the degree of coronary artery stenosis: assessment of cross-sectional and longitudinal vessel reconstructions.

BACKGROUND: Sixteen-slice multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) permits reliable noninvasive detection of significant coronary stenosis based on qualitative visual assessment. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of MDCT to quantify the degree of coronary stenosis as compared to quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) using two different reconstruction methods. METHODS: We studied 69 coronary artery lesions from 38 consecutive patients that underwent 16-slice MDCT as a part of research study, which enrolled consecutive subjects scheduled for clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography. Nine coronary artery lesions with motion artifacts, heavily calcified plaques or stents were excluded from the analysis. The degree of stenosis was calculated by two independent readers non-blinded to the location of the stenosis, but blinded to the results of the QCA. MDCT luminal diameters were measured in cross-sectional multi-planar reformatted (CS-MPR) images created perpendicular to the centerline of the vessel and in 5 mm thin-slab maximum intensity projections (MIP) parallel to the long axis of the vessel. Both MDCT methods were compared against QCA. RESULTS: The mean degree of stenosis as measured by MDCT was closely correlated to QCA for both methods (CS-MPR versus QCA: 61 +/- 23% versus 64 +/- 29%; r2 = 0.83, p < 0.001 and MIP versus QCA: 64 +/- 22% versus 64 +/- 29%; r2 = 0.84, p < 0.001 for MIP. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a negative bias of the degree of stenosis of -2.8 +/- 12% using CS-MPR and a minimally positive bias of 0.6 +/- 12% for MIP. In stratified analysis for lesion severity (mild, 0-40%; moderate, 41-70% or severe, > 70%) the agreement between both CS-MPR and MIP was high when compared to QCA (kappa = 0.74 and 0.71, respectively). CONCLUSION: Multi-detector spiral CT permits accurate quantitative assessment of the degree of coronary stenosis in selected data sets of sufficient quality using both cross-sectional and longitudinal vessel reconstructions.

Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to investigate whether contrast-enhanced multidetector spiral CT (MDCT) permits assessment of remodeling in coronary atherosclerotic lesions. BACKGROUND: With sufficient image quality, MDCT permits noninvasive visualization of the coronary arteries, but its ability to assess remodeling has not been evaluated. METHODS: Out of 102 patients in whom MDCT (16-slice scanner, intravenous contrast, 0.75-mm collimation, 420 ms rotation) was performed before invasive coronary angiography, 44 patients with high-quality MDCT data sets showing atherosclerotic plaque in a proximal coronary artery segment were chosen for evaluation. In multiplanar reconstructions orthogonal to the coronary artery, the cross-sectional vessel area was measured for the respective lesion and for a reference segment proximal to the lesion. The "Remodeling Index" was calculated by dividing the vessel area in the lesion by the reference segment. Results were correlated to the presence of stenosis (>50% diameter reduction) in invasive angiography. In a subset of 13 patients, MDCT measurements were verified by IVUS. RESULTS: Reference vessel area was not significantly different between nonstenotic versus stenotic lesions (20 +/- 8 mm(2), n = 23 vs. 22 +/- 8 mm(2), n = 21). The mean Remodeling Index was significantly higher in nonstenotic than in stenotic lesions (1.3 +/- 0.2 vs. 1.0 +/- 0.2, p < 0.001). In five stenotic lesions, "negative remodeling" (Remodeling Index < or = 0.95) was observed. Cross-sectional vessel areas and Remodeling Indices measured by MDCT correlated closely to IVUS (r(2) = 0.77 and r(2) = 0.82, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Multidetector spiral CT may permit assessment of remodeling of coronary atherosclerotic lesions in selected data sets of sufficient quality.